Literature DB >> 28992901

Prenatal stress perception and coping strategies: Insights from a longitudinal prospective pregnancy cohort.

J Goletzke1, R-D Kocalevent2, G Hansen3, M Rose4, H Becher5, K Hecher3, P C Arck3, A Diemert3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Prenatal distress has been linked to pregnancy complications and poor offspring's health, despite the fact that longitudinal assessments of various stress dimensions are still lacking. Hence, we aimed to assess perceived stress over the course of pregnancy. Moreover, we examined whether social support and coping styles are linked to prenatal stress trajectories.
METHODS: Data from 543 women participating in the PRINCE (Prenatal Identification of Children Health) study, a prospective population-based cohort study, was used for the present analyses. Once per trimester the women completed questionnaires regarding different psychometric measures, including the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS). Linear mixed regression models were used to examine perceived stress development longitudinally and to relate social support and coping styles to stress trajectories during pregnancy.
RESULTS: A significant decrease of perceived stress was observed over the course of pregnancy. Stratifying the study sample according to parity, women delivering their first child had continuously lower perceived stress scores compared to women having already one or more children, and a significant decrease during pregnancy was exclusively observed in primiparous women. Both, positive coping strategies and higher perceived and received social support were independently associated with lower perceived stress, while evasive coping strategies were associated with higher levels of perceived stress.
CONCLUSION: Our study reveals stress perception trajectories during pregnancies in primi- and multiparous women. Our findings underscore the need for intervention strategies aiming to improve social support and positive coping strategies especially in multiparous women in order to reduce the risks for adverse pregnancy outcomes.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Coping strategies; Parity; Perceived stress; Pregnancy; Social support

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28992901     DOI: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2017.09.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Psychosom Res        ISSN: 0022-3999            Impact factor:   3.006


  10 in total

1.  Prenatal maternal stress and child hair cortisol four years later: Evidence from a low-income sample.

Authors:  Nicholas V Alen; Camelia E Hostinar; Nicole E Mahrer; Stephen R Martin; Christine Guardino; Madeleine U Shalowitz; Sharon L Ramey; Christine Dunkel Schetter
Journal:  Psychoneuroendocrinology       Date:  2020-05-17       Impact factor: 4.905

2.  Allergic disease and risk of stress in pregnant women: a PreventADALL study.

Authors:  Caroline-Aleksi Olsson Mägi; Anders Bjerg Bäcklund; Karin Lødrup Carlsen; Catarina Almqvist; Kai-Håkon Carlsen; Berit Granum; Guttorm Haugen; Katarina Hilde; Oda C Lødrup Carlsen; Christine Monceyron Jonassen; Eva Maria Rehbinder; Katrine D Sjøborg; Håvard Skjerven; Anne Cathrine Staff; Riyas Vettukattil; Cilla Söderhäll; Björn Nordlund
Journal:  ERJ Open Res       Date:  2020-10-13

3.  Maternal parity and perinatal cortisol adaptation: The role of pregnancy-specific distress and implications for postpartum mood.

Authors:  Shannon L Gillespie; Amanda M Mitchell; Jennifer M Kowalsky; Lisa M Christian
Journal:  Psychoneuroendocrinology       Date:  2018-07-05       Impact factor: 4.905

4.  Perceived Psychological Traumatic Childbirth in Iranian Mothers: Diagnostic Value of Coping Strategies.

Authors:  Sedigheh Abdollahpour; Seyed Abbas Mousavi; Habibollah Esmaily; Ahmad Khosrav
Journal:  Osong Public Health Res Perspect       Date:  2019-04

5.  Behavioral coping phenotypes and associated psychosocial outcomes of pregnant and postpartum women during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Authors:  Denise M Werchan; Cassandra L Hendrix; Jennifer C Ablow; Ananda B Amstadter; Autumn C Austin; Vanessa Babineau; G Anne Bogat; Leigh-Anne Cioffredi; Elisabeth Conradt; Sheila E Crowell; Dani Dumitriu; William Fifer; Morgan R Firestein; Wei Gao; Ian H Gotlib; Alice M Graham; Kimberly D Gregory; Hanna C Gustafsson; Kathryn L Havens; Brittany R Howell; Kathryn L Humphreys; Lucy S King; Patricia A Kinser; Elizabeth E Krans; Carly Lenniger; Alytia A Levendosky; Joseph S Lonstein; Rachel Marcus; Catherine Monk; Sara Moyer; Maria Muzik; Amy K Nuttall; Alexandra S Potter; Amy Salisbury; Lauren C Shuffrey; Beth A Smith; Lynne Smith; Elinor L Sullivan; Judy Zhou; Moriah E Thomason; Natalie H Brito
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-01-24       Impact factor: 4.996

6.  A comparison of COVID-19 vaccination status among pregnant Israeli Jewish and Arab women and psychological distress among the Arab women.

Authors:  Orit Taubman-Ben-Ari; Efrat Weiss; Salam Abu-Sharkia; Enas Khalaf
Journal:  Nurs Health Sci       Date:  2022-02-24       Impact factor: 2.214

7.  The association between peritraumatic distress, perceived stress, depression in pregnancy, and NR3C1 DNA methylation among Chinese pregnant women who experienced COVID-19 lockdown.

Authors:  Liqing Wei; Xiaohong Ying; Mengxi Zhai; Jiayu Li; Dan Liu; Xin Liu; Bin Yu; Hong Yan
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2022-08-25       Impact factor: 8.786

8.  Maternal Sociodemographic Factors and Antenatal Stress.

Authors:  Maheshwari Andhavarapu; James Orwa; Marleen Temmerman; Joseph Wangira Musana
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-06-25       Impact factor: 3.390

9.  Long-Term IoT-Based Maternal Monitoring: System Design and Evaluation.

Authors:  Fatemeh Sarhaddi; Iman Azimi; Sina Labbaf; Hannakaisa Niela-Vilén; Nikil Dutt; Anna Axelin; Pasi Liljeberg; Amir M Rahmani
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2021-03-24       Impact factor: 3.576

10.  Maternal Mental Health after a Wildfire: Effects of Social Support in the Fort McMurray Wood Buffalo Study.

Authors:  Barbara S E Verstraeten; Guillaume Elgbeili; Ashley Hyde; Suzanne King; David M Olson
Journal:  Can J Psychiatry       Date:  2020-11-11       Impact factor: 4.356

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.