J Goletzke1, R-D Kocalevent2, G Hansen3, M Rose4, H Becher5, K Hecher3, P C Arck3, A Diemert3. 1. Department of Obstetrics and Fetal Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg Eppendorf, 20246 Hamburg, Germany. Electronic address: j.goletzke@uke.de. 2. Department of Medical Psychology, University Medical Center Hamburg Eppendorf, 20246 Hamburg, Germany; Department of Primary Care, University Medical Center Hamburg Eppendorf, 20246 Hamburg, Germany. 3. Department of Obstetrics and Fetal Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg Eppendorf, 20246 Hamburg, Germany. 4. Center for Internal Medicine and Dermatology, Department of Psychosomatic Medicine, Charite-Universitaetsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany. 5. Institute of Medical Biometry and Epidemiology, University Medical Center Hamburg Eppendorf, 20246 Hamburg, Germany.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Prenatal distress has been linked to pregnancy complications and poor offspring's health, despite the fact that longitudinal assessments of various stress dimensions are still lacking. Hence, we aimed to assess perceived stress over the course of pregnancy. Moreover, we examined whether social support and coping styles are linked to prenatal stress trajectories. METHODS: Data from 543 women participating in the PRINCE (Prenatal Identification of Children Health) study, a prospective population-based cohort study, was used for the present analyses. Once per trimester the women completed questionnaires regarding different psychometric measures, including the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS). Linear mixed regression models were used to examine perceived stress development longitudinally and to relate social support and coping styles to stress trajectories during pregnancy. RESULTS: A significant decrease of perceived stress was observed over the course of pregnancy. Stratifying the study sample according to parity, women delivering their first child had continuously lower perceived stress scores compared to women having already one or more children, and a significant decrease during pregnancy was exclusively observed in primiparous women. Both, positive coping strategies and higher perceived and received social support were independently associated with lower perceived stress, while evasive coping strategies were associated with higher levels of perceived stress. CONCLUSION: Our study reveals stress perception trajectories during pregnancies in primi- and multiparous women. Our findings underscore the need for intervention strategies aiming to improve social support and positive coping strategies especially in multiparous women in order to reduce the risks for adverse pregnancy outcomes.
OBJECTIVE: Prenatal distress has been linked to pregnancy complications and poor offspring's health, despite the fact that longitudinal assessments of various stress dimensions are still lacking. Hence, we aimed to assess perceived stress over the course of pregnancy. Moreover, we examined whether social support and coping styles are linked to prenatal stress trajectories. METHODS: Data from 543 women participating in the PRINCE (Prenatal Identification of Children Health) study, a prospective population-based cohort study, was used for the present analyses. Once per trimester the women completed questionnaires regarding different psychometric measures, including the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS). Linear mixed regression models were used to examine perceived stress development longitudinally and to relate social support and coping styles to stress trajectories during pregnancy. RESULTS: A significant decrease of perceived stress was observed over the course of pregnancy. Stratifying the study sample according to parity, women delivering their first child had continuously lower perceived stress scores compared to women having already one or more children, and a significant decrease during pregnancy was exclusively observed in primiparous women. Both, positive coping strategies and higher perceived and received social support were independently associated with lower perceived stress, while evasive coping strategies were associated with higher levels of perceived stress. CONCLUSION: Our study reveals stress perception trajectories during pregnancies in primi- and multiparous women. Our findings underscore the need for intervention strategies aiming to improve social support and positive coping strategies especially in multiparous women in order to reduce the risks for adverse pregnancy outcomes.
Authors: Nicholas V Alen; Camelia E Hostinar; Nicole E Mahrer; Stephen R Martin; Christine Guardino; Madeleine U Shalowitz; Sharon L Ramey; Christine Dunkel Schetter Journal: Psychoneuroendocrinology Date: 2020-05-17 Impact factor: 4.905
Authors: Caroline-Aleksi Olsson Mägi; Anders Bjerg Bäcklund; Karin Lødrup Carlsen; Catarina Almqvist; Kai-Håkon Carlsen; Berit Granum; Guttorm Haugen; Katarina Hilde; Oda C Lødrup Carlsen; Christine Monceyron Jonassen; Eva Maria Rehbinder; Katrine D Sjøborg; Håvard Skjerven; Anne Cathrine Staff; Riyas Vettukattil; Cilla Söderhäll; Björn Nordlund Journal: ERJ Open Res Date: 2020-10-13
Authors: Shannon L Gillespie; Amanda M Mitchell; Jennifer M Kowalsky; Lisa M Christian Journal: Psychoneuroendocrinology Date: 2018-07-05 Impact factor: 4.905
Authors: Denise M Werchan; Cassandra L Hendrix; Jennifer C Ablow; Ananda B Amstadter; Autumn C Austin; Vanessa Babineau; G Anne Bogat; Leigh-Anne Cioffredi; Elisabeth Conradt; Sheila E Crowell; Dani Dumitriu; William Fifer; Morgan R Firestein; Wei Gao; Ian H Gotlib; Alice M Graham; Kimberly D Gregory; Hanna C Gustafsson; Kathryn L Havens; Brittany R Howell; Kathryn L Humphreys; Lucy S King; Patricia A Kinser; Elizabeth E Krans; Carly Lenniger; Alytia A Levendosky; Joseph S Lonstein; Rachel Marcus; Catherine Monk; Sara Moyer; Maria Muzik; Amy K Nuttall; Alexandra S Potter; Amy Salisbury; Lauren C Shuffrey; Beth A Smith; Lynne Smith; Elinor L Sullivan; Judy Zhou; Moriah E Thomason; Natalie H Brito Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2022-01-24 Impact factor: 4.996
Authors: Liqing Wei; Xiaohong Ying; Mengxi Zhai; Jiayu Li; Dan Liu; Xin Liu; Bin Yu; Hong Yan Journal: Front Immunol Date: 2022-08-25 Impact factor: 8.786
Authors: Maheshwari Andhavarapu; James Orwa; Marleen Temmerman; Joseph Wangira Musana Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-06-25 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Fatemeh Sarhaddi; Iman Azimi; Sina Labbaf; Hannakaisa Niela-Vilén; Nikil Dutt; Anna Axelin; Pasi Liljeberg; Amir M Rahmani Journal: Sensors (Basel) Date: 2021-03-24 Impact factor: 3.576
Authors: Barbara S E Verstraeten; Guillaume Elgbeili; Ashley Hyde; Suzanne King; David M Olson Journal: Can J Psychiatry Date: 2020-11-11 Impact factor: 4.356