| Literature DB >> 36090675 |
Mecca E Burris1, Esperanza Caceres2, Emily M Chester1,3, Kathryn A Hicks4, Thomas W McDade5, Lynn Sikkink6, Hilde Spielvogel2, Jonathan Thornburg7, Virginia J Vitzthum1,3.
Abstract
Background/Entities:
Keywords: adolescent growth; children's growth references; double burden of malnutrition; health disparities; high-altitude adaptation; secular trend
Year: 2022 PMID: 36090675 PMCID: PMC9454678 DOI: 10.1093/emph/eoac033
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Evol Med Public Health ISSN: 2050-6201
Parental occupations
|
| % | |
|---|---|---|
| Mother’s occupation | ||
| Office | 3 | 3.0 |
| Construction | 1 | 1.0 |
| Education | 6 | 5.9 |
| Retail/vendor | 19 | 18.8 |
| Food | 23 | 22.8 |
| Service job | 3 | 3.0 |
| Arts/crafts/musician | 2 | 2.0 |
| Housewife | 44 | 43.6 |
| Father’s occupation | ||
| Office | 10 | 10.6 |
| Construction | 22 | 23.4 |
| Education | 5 | 5.3 |
| Transport | 26 | 27.7 |
| Retail/vendor | 13 | 13.8 |
| Food | 5 | 5.3 |
| Civil service | 8 | 8.5 |
| Service job | 3 | 3.2 |
| Arts/crafts/musician | 2 | 3.1 |
| No information/deceased | 7 |
Number and percent of either mothers or fathers engaged in each occupational sector. Income within each sector varies depending upon the specific job, and whether employment is part or full time and/or short or long term.
Anthropometrics and biomarkers of El Alto adolescents
| Females | Males | |
|---|---|---|
| ( | ( | |
| x̄ ± SD | x̄ ± SD | |
| Age | 13.1 ± 0.7 | 13.5 ± 0.7 |
| Height (cm) | 149.2 ± 5.8 | 151.6 ± 9.5 |
| Weight (kg) | 44.7 ± 7.4 | 42.7 ± 8.0 |
| BMI (km/m2) | 20.0 ± 2.4 | 18.5 ± 2.3 |
| MAC (mid-arm circumference, cm) | 23.1 ± 2.5 | 21.7 ± 2.5 |
| Biceps skinfold (mm) | 6.7 ± 2.6 | 4.6 ± 2.1 |
| Triceps skinfold (mm) | 15.1 ± 3.9 | 9.7 ± 3.7 |
| Subscapular skinfold (mm) | 12.0 ± 5.0 | 7.5 ± 3.8 |
| Suprailiac skinfold (mm) | 11.9 ± 5.5 | 7.3 ± 5.2 |
| Sum of skinfolds (mm) | 45.8 ± 15.4 | 29.1 ± 14.0 |
| Body temperature (degrees Celsius) | 36.9 ± 0.3 | 36.9 ± 0.3 |
| Systolic blood pressure (mmHg) | 106.4 ± 7.4 | 107.1 ± 7.2 |
| Diastolic blood pressure (mmHg) | 70.3 ± 7 | 70.9 ± 4.5 |
| Pulse | 78.1 ± 8.2 | 74.9 ± 11.6 |
Age significantly differed between females and males; two-sided t-test, P = 0.005.
Mean sex-age-community-specific z-scores for the El Alto sample relative to three high-altitude community-based samples
| Ancoraimes 1977 | La Paz 1983 | Marquiri 1998 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Females | |||
| z-Height | 2.1 | 0.8 | 0.9 |
| z-Weight | 1.9 | 1.2 | 0.8 |
| z-MAC | 2.0 | 1.4 | |
| z-Triceps | 1.2 | ||
| Males | |||
| z-Height | 2.0 | 0.9 | 1.2 |
| z-Weight | 1.7 | 1.3 | 1.0 |
| z-MAC | 1.9 | 1.3 | — |
| z-Triceps | 1.2 |
Year of data collection.
Significant associations of adolescent girls' anthropometrics and socioeconomic indicators
| Household income index | Maternal spoken language | Paternal spoken language | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Spearman rho | p | t | p | t | p | |
| z-scoreA for Alteño girls' | 0.322 | 0.007 | 2.94 | 0.002 | 2.37 | 0.01 |
| z-scoreW for Alteño girls' | 0.312 | 0.009 | 2.48 | 0.008 | 2.27 | 0.014 |
| z-scoreA for Alteño girls' | 2.68 | 0.005 | 1.88 | 0.033 | ||
| z-scoreW for Alteño girls' | 2.76 | 0.004 | 2.29 | 0.013 | ||
| z-scoreA for Alteño girls' | 2.52 | 0.007 | 1.85 | 0.035 | ||
| z-scoreW for Alteño girls' | 1.89 | 0.032 | ||||
z-scoreA: anthropometric standardized to Ancoraimes sample.
z-scoreW: anthropometric standardized to WHO growth reference.
tests were one-sided; blank grey cells indicate that the hypothesized associations were not significant at alpha = 0.05.
Significant associations of adolescent girls' anthropometrics and Maternal Income Index (MII; stratified into Low, Medium, and High PII)
| Paternal Income Index = Low (0-2), n = 10 | Paternal Income Index = Middle (3-4), n = 33 | Paternal Income Index = High (5-6), n = 15 | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TJT | z | p | TJT | z | p | TJT | z | p | |
| z-scoreA for Alteño girls' | 29.0 | 2.317 | 0.01 | 68.0 | 2.581 | 0.005 | |||
| z-scoreW for Alteño girls' | 29.0 | 2.317 | 0.01 | 64.0 | 2.17 | 0.015 | |||
| z-scoreA for Alteño girls' | 25.0 | 1.544 | 0.06 | 61.5 | 1.912 | 0.028 | |||
| z-scoreW for Alteño girls' | 24.5 | 1.453 | 0.07 | 56.0 | 1.34 | 0.09 | |||
| z-scoreA for Alteño girls' | 57.5 | 1.5 | 0.067 | ||||||
| z-scoreW for Alteño girls' | |||||||||
z-scoreA: anthropometric standardized to Ancoraimes sample.
z-scoreW: anthropometric standardized to WHO growth reference.
Jonckheere-Terpstra test statistic.
Standardized test statistic.
Tests were one-sided; blank grey cells indicate that the hypothesized associations were not significant at alpha = 0.10.
Sex-, age- and reference-specific mean z-scores for the El Alto sample
| El Alto mean z-score with respect to growth reference | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| WHO | MESA 2005-2007 | Puno 2016 | |
| Females | |||
| z-Height | −1.1 | −0.2 | 0.6 |
| z-Weight | −0.4 | −0.2 | 0.6 |
| z-BMI | 0.3 | −0.1 | 0.3 |
| z-MAC | −0.1 | 1.2 | |
| Males | |||
| z-Height | −1.1 | −0.3 | 0.7 |
| z-Weight | −0.7 | −0.5 | 0.4 |
| z-BMI | −0.2 | −0.5 | 0.1 |
| z-MAC | −0.6 | 0.4 | |
N (%) of El Alto sample categorized as stunted, underweight, overweight or obese using WHO, MESA and Puno growth references
| El Alto height-for-age | El Alto BMI-for-age | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| < −2SD | < −2SD | > +1SD < +2SD | > +2SD | |
| stunted | underweight | overweight | obese | |
| Females | ||||
| WHO | 8 (13%) | 1 (2%) | 10 (17%) | 0 |
| MESA | 2 (3%) | 0 | 5 (8%) | 0 |
| Puno | 0 | 0 | 7 (12%) | 2 (3%) |
| Males | ||||
| WHO | 9 (22%) | 2 (5%) | 5 (12.5%) | 0 |
| MESA | 3 (7.5%) | 0 | 1 (2.5%) | 0 |
| Puno | 1 (2%) | 0 | 3 (7.5%) | 2 (5%) |
| Total sample | ||||
| WHO | 17 (17%)a | 3 (3%) | 15 (15%) | 0 |
| MESA | 5 (5%) | 0 | 6 (6%) | 0 |
| Puno | 1 (1%) | 0 | 10 (10%) | 4 (4%) |
One child is classified as severely stunted (<−3 SD).
Figure 1.Secular trends in height-for-age (HFA) z-scorew. z-scorew is calculated with respect to the WHO growth reference (see main text and Supplementary Data Section S7 for detailed explanation); mean HFA z-scorew is plotted for each of the seven samples examined in this article (symbol shape and size denote community type and altitude, respectively). Solid line depicts estimated urban HFA secular trend; dashed line indicates estimated rural HFA secular trend.
Determinations of secular trends and locality effects on adolescents’ height for age
| Secular trend | Height-for-age | |
|---|---|---|
| (z-scoreW/decade) | (z-scoreW) | |
| Ancoraimes-to-Marquiri | 0.340 | |
| La Paz-to-El Alto | 0.427 | |
| | 0.383 | |
| Urbanized Locality Effect (a): urban trend line value in 1977—Ancoraimes | 0.617 | |
| Urbanized Locality Effect (b): La Paz—rural trend line value in 1983 | 0.670 | |
| Urbanized Locality Effect (c): urban trend line value in 1998—Marquiri | 0.801 | |
| Urbanized Locality Effect (d): El Alto—Ancoraimes-to-Marquiri rural trend line in 2003 | 0.844 | |
| | 0.731 | |
| Total increase in mean height from Ancoraimes to El Alto | 1.727 | |
| | 0.996 (58% of total increase) | |
| | 0.731 (42% of total increase) | |
| Contribution of rural secular trend (=0.340*2.6 decades) | 0.883 (51% of total increase) | |
| Urbanized locality effect over and above rural secular trend (=1.727–0.883) | 0.844 (49% of total increase) | |
| Contribution of urban secular trend (=0.427*2.6 decades) | 1.110 (64% of total increase) | |
| Urbanized locality effect over and above urban secular trend (=1.727–1.110) | 0.617 (36% of total increase) | |
| MESA—La Paz-to-El Alto urban trend line | 0.069 |