| Literature DB >> 36090374 |
Clarisse de Azambuja Farias1,2, Taiane de Azevedo Cardoso2,3, Marielle Moro da Silva4, Francesca D'Angelo3, Thaise Campos Mondin2, Luciano Dias de Mattos Souza2, Ricardo Azevedo da Silva2, Flavio Kapczinski1,3,4, Karen Jansen2, Pedro V S Magalhães1.
Abstract
In this report, we aim to assess the interaction of bipolar disorder and major depressive disorder with the evolution of social roles, economic classification, and substance misuse in emerging adults. This is a longitudinal population-based study (n = 231 at baseline), in which participants were reassessed at a mean of 5 years after baseline. A structured clinical interview was used to diagnose the participants with bipolar disorder and major depression; a control group without mood disorders was included. Men with mood disorders were less likely to be married in the beginning of the study and less likely to work in the follow-up. Women with major depression were less likely to study and more likely to be in a lower economic class at the beginning of the study. In comparison, women with bipolar disorder were less likely to live with their parents and more likely to live with their children in the first wave of the study. Substance misuse was more likely in people with mood disorders, especially in men, and women with bipolar disorder had the highest likelihood in the follow-up. Albeit longitudinal analyses were limited by a possibly insufficient sample size and mediating mechanisms for change, such as stigma, were not explored, the study suggests sex-related specificities regarding the change in social roles and substance use in people with mood disorders. Emerging adults, especially those with mood disorders, are in a period of change and instability and at a greater risk for substance use and abuse.Entities:
Keywords: economic status; emerging adults; longitudinal studies; mood disorder; social roles; substance use disorder
Year: 2022 PMID: 36090374 PMCID: PMC9448898 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.932484
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Psychiatry ISSN: 1664-0640 Impact factor: 5.435
Sample characteristics according to baseline diagnosis.
| Variables | Bipolar disorder | Major depression | Control |
|
| |||
| Male | 14 (25.5) | 19 (22.9) | 40 (43.0) |
| Female | 41 (74.5) | 64 (77.1) | 53 (57.0) |
|
| |||
| White | 36 (65.5) | 52 (62.7) | 65 (69.9) |
| Non-white | 19 (34.5) | 31 (37.3) | 28 (30.1) |
|
| 21.82 ± 2.26 | 21.78 ± 2.00 | 22.40 ± 2.26 |
|
| |||
| Upper (A + B) | 14 (25.5) | 24 (28.9) | 35 (37.6) |
| Middle (C) | 33 (60.0) | 40 (48.2) | 46 (49.5) |
| Lower (D + E) | 8 (14.5) | 19 (22.9) | 12 (12.9) |
|
| 8.82 ± 3.56 | 8.91 ± 2.75 | 9.69 ± 3.18 |
|
| |||
| No | 29 (52.7) | 55 (67.1) | 67 (72.0) |
| Yes | 26 (47.3) | 27 (32.9) | 26 (28.0) |
|
| |||
| Tobacco | 25 (45.5) | 32 (38.6) | 22 (23.7) |
| Alcohol | 21 (38.2) | 32 (38.6) | 24 (25.8) |
| Any illicit drug | 9 (16.4) | 19 (22.9) | 9 (9.7) |
ABEP, Associação Brasileira de Empresas de Pesquisa; ASSIST, Alcohol, Smoking and Substance Involvement Screening Test.
aAbsolute and relative frequencies (%), Chi-square test.
bMean and standard deviation, ANOVA test.
cMissing (n = 31).
dMissing (n = 1).
*p = 0.009; **p = 0.015.
FIGURE 1Changes in socioeconomic variables and substance abuse/dependence according sex at baseline and 5-year follow-up in emerging adults with and without mood disorders. Double bars indicate significant within-group changes (p < 0.05) and asterisks indicate significant between-group changes (p < 0.05).
Effects of diagnosis, sex, and study wave on socioeconomic variables and substance abuse/dependence in the final model (n = 231).
| Low economic class | Lives with parents | Lives with partner | Lives with children | Studying | Working | Alcohol abuse/ | Tobacco abuse/ | Any illicit drug abuse/ | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||
| RR | 95%CI | RR | 95%CI | RR | 95%CI | RR | 95%CI | RR | 95%CI | RR | 95%CI | RR | 95%CI | RR | 95%CI | RR | 95%CI | |
| Major depression |
|
| 0.86 | 0.62–1.18 | 0.56 | 0.30–1.07 |
|
|
|
|
|
| 1.01 | 0.43–2.40 | 0.51 | 0.23–1.14 | 0.69 | 0.41–1.17 |
| Major depression*wave | − | − | 0.94 | 0.62–1.42 | 0.97 | 0.56–1.67 | 0.56 | 0.29–1.07 | 0.89 | 0.54–1.47 | 1.87 | 0.52–6.81 | 0.61 | 0.35–1.06 | 1.13 | 0.59–2.19 | 1.05 | 0.69–1.60 |
| Major depression*sex | − | − | 1.22 | 0.81–1.85 |
|
| 0.75 | 0.36–1.56 | 0.86 | 0.37–2.04 | 1.08 | 0.29–4.01 | 1.66 | 0.69–4.00 | 1.24 | 0.52–2.93 | 1.40 | 0.88–2.22 |
| Bipolar disorder | 1.91 | 0.91–4.00 | 0.96 | 0.69–1.34 | 0.57 | 0.27–1.19 | 1.76 | 0.99–3.15 |
|
| 1.99 | 0.69–5.75 | 0.68 | 0.25–1.83 | 0.92 | 0.47–1.82 | 0.87 | 0.51–1.49 |
| Bipolar disorder*wave | − | − | 1.05 | 0.64–1.71 | 0.87 | 0.52–1.46 | 0.88 | 0.46–1.71 | 1.11 | 0.70–1.76 | 2.85 | 0.77–10.47 | 0.68 | 0.40–1.15 | 1.21 | 0.66–2.23 | 0.79 | 0.51–1.21 |
| Bipolar disorder*sex | − | − | 0.72 | 0.43–1.18 |
|
| 0.89 | 0.42–1.88 | 0.99 | 0.41–2.42 | 1.05 | 0.24–4.56 |
|
| 0.86 | 0.39–1.87 | 1.29 | 0.78–2.14 |
| Study wave |
|
|
|
|
|
| 01.03 | 0.65–1.65 | 0.93 | 0.65–1.33 | 0.49 | 0.15–1.57 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Sex | 0.71 | 0.41–1.22 | 0.87 | 0.66–1.15 | 0.89 | 0.56–1.42 | 0.58 | 0.33–1.04 | 0.74 | 0.36–1.55 | 0.37 | 0.11–1.23 | 1.34 | 0.76–2.37 | 1.20 | 0.79–1.82 | 0.79 | 0.61–1.03 |
Bold values represent p ≤ 0.05.
RR, risk ratio; CI, confidence intervals.