| Literature DB >> 36090079 |
Zhang Jize1, Deqing Zhuoga2, Zhang Xiaoqing1, Ta Na1, Gesang Jiacuo2, Luosang Cuicheng2, Pingcuo Bandan2.
Abstract
Due to the harsh environment in the Tibetan Plateau, traditional grazing greatly limits the growth potential of local animals and causes severe ecosystem degradation. This is an urgent issue to be solved, which requires alternative strategies for grazing animals in the Tibetan alpine pastoral livestock systems. This study aimed to investigate the effects of different feeding strategies on growth performance and ruminal microbiota-host interactions in the local breed of sheep (Gangba sheep). Thirty 9-month old Gangba sheep (n = 10 per group) were assigned to natural grazing (G), semi-grazing with supplementation (T), and barn feeding (F) groups (supplementation of concentrate and oat hay) based on body weight. At the end of the experiment (75 d), all sheep were weighed, rumen fluid was obtained from six sheep per group, and ruminal epithelium was obtained from 3 sheep per group. The results showed that: (1) Compared with the G and T groups, the F group significantly increased dry matter intake, average daily gain, and feed conversion ratio of animals. Additionally, Gangba sheep in the F group had higher concentrations of ruminal short-chain volatile fatty acids (VFAs), especially propionate and butyrate (P <0.05) than sheep in the G and T groups. (2) The principal coordinates analysis indicated a significant difference in bacterial composition among different feed strategies. More specifically, the relative abundance of propionate (unidentified F082 and Succiniclasticum) and butyrate-producing (Eubacterium_coprostanoligenes_group) genera were also observed to be increased in the F group, in which unidentified F082 was identified as a differential biomarker among the three groups according to linear discriminant analysis effect size analysis. (3) The dynamics of the rumen epithelial transcriptome revealed that ECM-receptor interactions, focal adhesion, and PI3K-Akt signaling pathways, which are critical in mediating many aspects of cellular functions such as cell proliferation and motility, were upregulated in the F group. In conclusion, under harsh conditions in the Tibetan alpine meadow, barn feeding increased ruminal VFAs concentrations (especially propionate and butyrate), which stimulated gene expression related to cell proliferation in rumen epithelium, appearing to be superior to natural grazing and semi-grazing in gaining body weight of the local Gangba sheep.Entities:
Keywords: Gangba sheep; feeding strategies; growth performance; microbiome; transcriptome
Year: 2022 PMID: 36090079 PMCID: PMC9449551 DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.908326
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Microbiol ISSN: 1664-302X Impact factor: 6.064
Nutrient composition of the concentrate, oat hay, and natural pasture (% of dry matter).
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Dry matter (105°C) | 88.30 | 90.03 | 89.99 |
| Metabolizable energy, MJ/kg | 12.08 | 9.92 | – |
| Crude protein | 16.10 | 10.06 | 8.93 |
| Neutral detergent fiber | 8.68 | 52.89 | 59.82 |
| Acid detergent fiber | 6.01 | 28.72 | 48.01 |
| Calcium | 0.54 | 0.40 | 2.27 |
| Phosphorus | 0.38 | 0.27 | 0.12 |
The concentrate consisted of 55% chopped maize, 10% highland barley, 23.5% pea, 10% wheat bran, 1% limestone and 0.5% premix. The premix was formulated to provide (per kilogram of dry matter) vitamin A, 10,500 IU; vitamin D3, 2,110 IU; vitamin E, 43 mg; Mn, 40 mg; Fe, 32 mg; Zn, 95 mg; Cu, 16 mg.
Metabolizable energy was calculated value.
Effects of different feeding strategies on the growth performance of Gangba sheep.
|
|
|
|
| ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| |||
| Initial weight, kg | 13.88 | 14.17 | 14.21 | 0.185 | 0.795 |
| Final weight, kg | 22.02b | 24.69a | 26.41a | 0.616 | 0.005 |
| Average daily gain, g/day | 108.53c | 140.28b | 162.78a | 7.300 | 0.003 |
| Dry matter intake, kg/day | 1.26b | 1.45ab | 1.52a | 0.082 | 0.042 |
| Feed conversion ratio | 11.7a | 10.5b | 9.1c | 0.625 | 0.037 |
a, b, c Values in the same row with different superscript letters are statistically different at P <0.05.
Dry matter intake = Concentrate dry matter intake + pasture dry matter intake + oat hay dry matter intake, and pasture dry matter intake was estimated for T and F groups using the n-alkane method in early of August, September and October.
1G, natural grazing; T, semi-grazing with supplementation; F, barn feeding.
Effects of different feeding strategies on ruminal fermentation in Gangba sheep.
|
|
|
|
| ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| |||
| NH3-N (mg/dl) | 8.57b | 21.48a | 23.48a | 2.37 | <0.001 |
| pH | 6.85a | 6.64ab | 6.47b | 0.068 | 0.025 |
| TVFA (mmol/L) | 38.4c | 46.7b | 55.7a | 3.5 | 0.012 |
| Acetate (mmol/L) | 28.79b | 35.17a | 39.61a | 2.32 | 0.027 |
| Propionate (mmol/L) | 6.33b | 6.67b | 10.06a | 0.75 | 0.049 |
| Acetate:propionate | 4.55a | 5.28a | 3.94b | 0.25 | 0.042 |
| Butyrate (mmol/L) | 1.85b | 2.00b | 2.36a | 0.09 | 0.014 |
| Isobutyrate (mmol/L) | 0.48c | 1.04b | 1.35a | 0.13 | <0.001 |
| Valerate (mmol/L) | 0.19b | 0.43b | 0.63a | 0.07 | 0.014 |
| Isovalerate (mmol/L) | 0.72b | 1.47a | 1.73a | 0.17 | 0.015 |
1G, natural grazing; T, semi-grazing with supplementation; F, barn feeding; SEM, standard error of means; TVFA, total volatile fatty acid.
a, b, cValues in the same row with different superscript letters are statistically different at P <0.05.
Figure 1Effects of feeding strategies on ruminal microbiota of Gangba sheep. (A) The richness and diversity indices of rumen microbiota in Gangba sheep under different feeding strategies. (B) Principal coordinates analysis (PCoA) of the overall rumen microbiota in Gangba sheep based on unweighted UniFrac distance. G, natural grazing; T, semi-grazing with supplementation; F, barn feeding.
Figure 2Comparisons of ruminal bacteria in Gangba sheep under different feeding strategies. (A) Relative abundances of bacterial communities at the phylum level. (B) Relative abundances of bacterial communities at the family level. (C) Relative abundances of bacterial communities at the genus level. G, natural grazing; T, semi-grazing with supplementation; F, barn feeding.
Figure 3LEFSe (Linear discriminant analysis Effect Size) cladogram comparing microbial communities among the three feeding strategies. Differences are represented by color, indicating the group where taxa are most abundant: red = taxa abundant in F group, green = taxa abundant in G group, blue = taxa abundant in T group. G, natural grazing; T, semi-grazing with supplementation; F, barn feeding.
Figure 4Correlation between the relative abundances of rumen bacteria and fermentation parameters. “*”, “**”, and “***” indicate the significance level at 0.05, 0.01 and 0.001, respectively.
Figure 5Overview of Gangba sheep ruminal epithelium transcriptome under different feeding strategies. (A) PCA plots of transcripts identified by RNA-Seq of Gangba sheep under natural grazing (G), semi-grazing with supplementation (T), and barn feeding (F) conditions. (B) Number of individual transcripts significantly up- or down-regulated under different feeding strategies. (C) KEGG pathway enrichment analysis of DEGs in the Gangba sheep transcriptome under different feeding strategies. X-axis depicts richness factor (Richness factor = DEGs enriched in the pathway/background genes in the pathway). Y-axis represents the KEGG pathway terms. The color of each circle represents q-value. The area of each circle represents the number of DEGs enriched in this pathway. (D) Venn diagram of common and unique pathways presented in the Gangba sheep transcriptome under different feeding strategies.
Figure 6The dynamics of the rumen epithelial transcriptomic analysis of significant DEGs in Profile 4 under different feeding strategies. The top 20 KEGG pathways for Profile 4 are listed on the right. X-axis depicts the richness factor (Richness factor = DEGs enriched in the pathway/background genes in the pathway). Y-axis represents the KEGG pathway terms. G, natural grazing; T, semi-grazing with supplementation; F, barn feeding.