| Literature DB >> 36088352 |
Haojie Xu1,2, Wuqian Guo1,2, Yu Ma1,2, Yi Liu1,2, Xinxin Hu1,2, Lina Hua1, Shiguo Han1,3, Xitao Liu1,3, Junhua Luo4,5,6, Zhihua Sun7,8,9.
Abstract
Metal-free antiferroelectric materials are holding a promise for energy storage application, owing to their unique merits of wearability, environmental friendliness, and structure tunability. Despite receiving great interests, metal-free antiferroelectrics are quite limited and it is a challenge to acquire new soft antiferroelectric candidates. Here, we have successfully exploited binary CMBrxI1-x and CMBrxCl1-x solid solution as single crystals (0 ≤ x ≤ 1, where CM is cyclohexylmethylammonium). A molecule-level modification can effectively enhance Curie temperature. Emphatically, the binary CM-chloride salt shows the highest antiferroelectric-to-paraelectric Curie temperature of ~453 K among the known molecular antiferroelectrics. Its characteristic double electrical hysteresis loops provide a large electric polarization up to ~11.4 μC/cm2, which endows notable energy storage behaviors. To our best knowledge, this work provides an effective solid-solution methodology to the targeted design of new metal-free antiferroelectric candidates toward biocompatible energy storage devices.Entities:
Year: 2022 PMID: 36088352 PMCID: PMC9464199 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-022-33039-9
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nat Commun ISSN: 2041-1723 Impact factor: 17.694
Fig. 1Diagram for the molecule-level design of metal-free molecular AFEs in a series of CMBrxI1− and CMBrxCl1− (0 ≤ x ≤ 1) solid solutions.
a Basic structures for solid solutions. b The relationship between Curie temperatures and D···A distances of hydrogen bonds, where donor (D) is N of organic CM+ cation and acceptor (A) is halogen (X). The D···A distances can be obtained from the crystal structures; the averaged electronegativity of the solid solution is estimated from the ratio x based on the known Cl/Br/I. c Tc for the solid solutions is dramatically enhanced through the gradual substitution, the background refers to Hirshfeld surface to quantify intermolecular interactions.
Fig. 2Crystal structures of binary solid solutions.
a, b Schematic diagram of CMBrI1− and CMBrCl1− binary solid solutions. The organic cations afford a driving force to trigger phase transitions. c Projection of AFE structure of CMC at LTP. d The cell edges of both the AFEP and PEP were drawn to show volume multiplication of AFE. e, f Structure packing of CMC at the paraelectric HTP P4/nmm, showing the complete disordering of organic CM cations.
Fig. 3CM content-induced phase transition in solid solutions.
a DSC curves of CMBrI1− and CMBrCl1− solid solutions. b Temperature variation of εʹ upon cooling. c Schematic diagram of temperature dependence versus cell lattice parameters obtained directly from the X-ray single-crystal diffraction, as depicted by the short dash lines. d Temperature dependence of εʹ and dielectric loss measured at different frequencies for CMC. e Phase diagram and the point groups of CMBrI1− and CMBrCl1− solid solutions. The dotted boundary is roughly estimated due to the difficulty of growing homogeneous crystals. f TG/DTA curves of CMC with heating rate 15 °C/min.
Fig. 4AFE properties of CMBrI1− and CMBrCl1− solid solutions.
a Variable-temperature domains of CMC. b, c Preparation of electrodes according to the relationship between optical axis and the direction of electric polarization. d J–E curves collected at different temperatures. e Variable-temperature double P–E hysteresis loops of CMC.
Fig. 5AFE and energy storage related characteristics.
a AFEP Curie temperature (Tc) of CMC compared with some reported molecule-based AFE compounds. The columnar with twill background present the temperature range for experimentally measuring the antiferroelectric properties (for details, see Table S9). b Schematic illustration of the calculation of Wre (green) and Wloss (yellow) from the double P–E hysteresis loop.