Literature DB >> 36081579

Visualization system based on hierarchical targeting for diagnosis and treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma.

Shasha Shi1,2,3, Huipu Li4, Xi Zheng5, Lin Lv1, Shengtao Liao1, Peng Lu6, Maoxia Liu7, Hongyun Zhao1,2, Zhechuan Mei1.   

Abstract

The accuracy and enrichment rate of targeted drugs largely determine the clinical diagnosis and treatment effect. Therefore, the accuracy and enrichment rate of targeted drugs should be improved. We designed a visual diagnosis and treatment system based on hierarchical targeting. It consists of multifunctional magnetic nanoparticles and a bio magnetic material. Bio-magnet mediated primary targeting can effectively improve the drug enrichment rate in the target tissue. SNF peptide/epithelial cell adhesion molecule antibody mediated targeting liver cancer stem cells (LCSCs) (secondary target) can improve the accuracy of the treatment and its outcomes. Low intensity focused ultrasound irradiation can explode nanoparticles around LCSCs, which can cause physical damage to cells. The combination of released interferon gamma and its receptor (tertiary target) can be used to initiate chemotherapy and immunotherapy. Using the optical properties of Fe3O4 and the phase transformation ability of perfluoropentane, the system can enhance photoacoustic and ultrasonic molecular imaging enabling diagnosis and treatment visualization. Targeting LCSCs can accurately provide physical, chemical, and immune treatment of Hepatocellular carcinoma, making the therapeutic effect more effective and thorough. This system may provide a new method for a more accurate visual diagnosis and treatment of tumors.
© 2022 The Authors.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Hepatocellular carcinoma; Hierarchical targeting; Magnet; Visual system

Year:  2022        PMID: 36081579      PMCID: PMC9445383          DOI: 10.1016/j.mtbio.2022.100398

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mater Today Bio        ISSN: 2590-0064


Introduction

Various diagnostic and treatment strategies have been developed for tumors in recent years [[1], [2], [3]]. However, the enrichment rate of drugs or contrast agents in the target region is poor owing to the complex environment of the human body [4], which makes it impossible to diagnose and treat tumors efficiently at the molecular level. The low drug enrichment rate and high drug resistance of tumor cells, especially the high drug resistance of cancer stem cells (CSCs), also decrease the efficiency of the clinical drug treatment [5,6]. Recently, targeted drug delivery has gained attention as an effective strategy for precision therapy [[7], [8], [9]]. New technologies such as salivary protein detection of tumors [10], as well as the application of various new biomaterials in diseases [11], have provided new directions for diagnosing and treating diseases. However, even if nanoparticles enter the body to escape capture by the macrophage system in circulation, the high interstitial pressure in the tumor region greatly hinders the aggregation and diffusion of nanoparticles, preventing them from entering deeper into the tumor tissue and limiting their application against tumors [12,13]. To solve the above problems, previous strategies to modify nanoparticles mainly focused on their direct and specific recognition of target cells [13,14]; however, the results were unsatisfactory because nanoparticles should be highly enriched in the target tissue first and then reach the target cells and target receptors in large quantities, i.e., they should be accurately graded and targeted to tissues (primary target), cells (secondary target), and receptors (tertiary target) (see Scheme 1, Scheme 2).
Scheme 1

Illustration to demonstrate the visualized diagnosis and treatment system based on hierarchical precision targeting and its therapeutic function involving multiple ways. Mice are magnetized after in a situ injection of Nd2Fe14B/Fe3O4-PLGA into the tumor. The magnetic field can attract a large number of magnetic nanoparticles into the deep tumor (primary target). After demagnetized, nanoparticles are released to targeting cells (secondary target). When nanoparticles are enriched around the target cells, they are irradiated by low intensity focused ultrasound. Gamma interferon is released from exploded nanoparticles and target receptors (tertiary target). This process produces chemotherapy, immunotherapy, and physical damage to the tumor.

Scheme 2

Schematic illustration of synthesis of MNDs/mMNDs.

Illustration to demonstrate the visualized diagnosis and treatment system based on hierarchical precision targeting and its therapeutic function involving multiple ways. Mice are magnetized after in a situ injection of Nd2Fe14B/Fe3O4-PLGA into the tumor. The magnetic field can attract a large number of magnetic nanoparticles into the deep tumor (primary target). After demagnetized, nanoparticles are released to targeting cells (secondary target). When nanoparticles are enriched around the target cells, they are irradiated by low intensity focused ultrasound. Gamma interferon is released from exploded nanoparticles and target receptors (tertiary target). This process produces chemotherapy, immunotherapy, and physical damage to the tumor. Schematic illustration of synthesis of MNDs/mMNDs. Some scholars have carried out magnetic targeting tests to improve the enrichment of nanoparticles in target tissues (primary targeting). They set a magnetic field in vitro to attract the circulating iron oxide to the tumor area [[15], [16], [17]]. However, with increasing depth, the strength of the magnetic field at the body surface decreases, causing more accumulation of nanoparticles at the skin tissue rather than deeper in the tumor tissue [18,19]. It has been shown that an injectable liquid-solid phase-transformation material in vivo may overcome these challenges [20]. We establish an in vivo magnetic field. Based on the property that the magnet can be magnetized and demagnetized [21], it is applied to improve the primary targeting ability of nanoparticles in the target tissue. When the nanoparticles in the bloodstream reach deep tumor locations following magnetic attraction, we demagnetize the magnetic force, which improves the nanoparticle enrichment rate in the tumor and does not affect the secondary and tertiary targeting of the nanoparticles. This facilitates uniform distribution of nanoparticles within the tumor, which in turn leads to a comprehensive and accurate visualization of the tumor for diagnosis and treatment. The Fe3O4 magnetic nanoparticles have an excellent light effect, which can enhance the photoacoustic imaging function. Simultaneously, liquid fluorocarbon phase change can enhance the ultrasound imaging function. These two are combined to achieve dual-modality imaging using ultrasound and photoacoustics [[22], [23], [24]]. While improving the enrichment rate of primary targeting, selecting important secondary molecular targets is crucial for therapeutic benefits. Most current targeted therapies only target typical tumor cells and ignore CSCs involved in tumorigenesis, progression, metastasis, and recurrence. CSCs are key factors contributing to the high rates of tumor recurrence, metastasis, and drug resistance [25,26]. Using CSCs with low differentiation, rapid proliferation, and strong self-renewal abilities as secondary targets for drug delivery and treatment can help in eradicating tumors [27,28]. To improve the tumor cure rate and to reduce the recurrence and metastasis rates, the therapeutic strategy of targeting CSCs is needed further study. Epithelial cell adhesion molecule (EpCAM) is a membrane protein that is expressed in abnormally high quantities in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). It is also involved in the differentiation, proliferation, and migration of HCC cells. Furthermore, it is considered as a marker protein for liver cancer stem cells (LCSCs) [29]. Therefore, drug delivery programs targeting EpCAM are expected to eradicate the hotspots of HCC. As a classical clinical drug, interferon gamma has targeting properties and can specifically bind to receptors on the surface of cell membranes to achieve final tertiary targeting [30]. Interferon gamma activates relevant pathways after binding to receptors on the membrane surface and enhances the expression of major histocompatibility complex (MHC) proteins while promoting apoptosis of tumor cells [[31], [32], [33], [34]]. This is a combination of chemotherapy and immunotherapy. However, interferon gamma has a short half-life in vivo and toxic side effects. The use of nanoparticles as delivery carriers is a proven strategy for the safe and effective use of classical drugs [35,36]. In this study, we designed a visual diagnosis and treatment system based on hierarchical precise targeting. The system comprised of Fe3O4-γ–IFN–PFP-NPs:SNF (MNDs)/Fe3O4-γ-IFNm-PFP-NPs:EpC (mMNDs) and a bio-magnet. Magnetic nanoparticles combined with the optical properties of Fe3O4 and the liquid-gas phase transition ability of perfluoropentane can enhance the photoacoustic and ultrasonic molecular imaging functions. The bio-magnet-mediated nanoparticles were efficiently enriched in the primary target. The SNF peptide/EpCAM antibody screens target cells by binding to the secondary target EpCAM, and low intensity focused ultrasound irradiation causes physical damage to HCC cells by the phase change bursting of nanoparticles. It also upregulates the expression of MHC proteins while promoting apoptosis in HCC cells. Targeted LCSCs can precisely administer physical, chemical, and immune therapies (trinity treatment strategy) to LCSCs, making the therapeutic effect against HCC more effective and complete. Simultaneously, we conducted a more comprehensive and reliable validation in two different species of human-derived liver cancer models and murine liver cancer models. This system could be used as a new strategy for tumor visualization, diagnosis, and treatment; it improves the drug enrichment rate in target tissues and organs through primary targeting, increasing the accuracy of tumor visualization, diagnosis, and treatment through secondary and tertiary targeting.

Materials and methods

Materials and cells

Dipalmitoyl-phosphatidylcholine and cholesterol were purchased from Avanti (USA). The SNF peptides (sequence: SNFYMPLGGGSK) were synthesized by ChinaPeptides (Shanghai, China). DSPE-PEG2000-Mal was obtained from Xian Ruixi Biotechnology (Xi’ an, China). Interferon gamma (human and mouse origin; purity: 95.0%) was purchased from T&L Biological Technology (Beijing, China). Fe3O4 was purchased from Ocean Technology Co., Ltd. (Springdale, AR, USA) and perfluoropentane (PFP) was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). The Tris (2-carboxyethyl) phosphine hydrochloride (TCEP) was purchased from Beyotime Biotechnology (Shanghai, China). Polylactic-co-glycolic acid (PLGA, Mw: 40000 ​Da, 50:50) was purchased from Jinan Daigang Bioengineering Co. Ltd. (Jinan, China). N-methyl pyrrolidone was obtained from Sigma-Aldrich (AL, USA). Neodymium iron boron (Nd2Fe14B) particles (diameter: 30 ​μm) were obtained from Guangzhou Xinnuode Rotatable Part (Guangzhou, China). The Dioctadecyl-3,3,3′,3′-tetramethylindocarbocyanine (DiI) was obtained from Beyotime Biotechnology (Shanghai, China). 1,1′-dioctadecyl-3,3,3′,3′- tetramethylindotricarbocyanine iodide (DiR), calcein green-AM/propidium iodide PI and diamidino-phenylindole (DAPI) were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium and fetal bovine serum were purchased from Gibco (Carlsbad, USA). Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) kits were purchased from Meimian Industrial Co. Ltd. (Jiangsu, China). A Cell Counting Kit 8 (CCK-8) was provided by Dojindo Technology (Tokyo, Japan). N-methyl pyrrolidone (NMP) solvent were purchased from Sigma (Darmstadt, Germany). All the cell lines were purchased from Procell Life Science&Technology Co., Ltd. (Wuhan, China).

Synthesis of MNDs/mMNDs

To thoroughly validate the system's functionality, experiments were performed on two kinds of liver cancer models, human-derived and murine-derived. Thus, we designed Fe3O4-γ–IFN–PFP-NPs:SNF (MNDs) and Fe3O4-γ-IFNm-PFP-NPs:EpC (mMNDs) nanoparticles that corresponded to the different species. The MNDs were loaded with human-derived gamma interferon (γ-IFN) and SNF peptides [37], which were used to target human-derived EpCAM. The mMNDs were loaded with murine-derived gamma interferon (γ-IFNm) and murine-derived EpCAM antibodies. Nanocarriers were synthesized following the previously reported thin-film hydration method and phacoemulsification method [38]. First, DPPC 5 ​mg, DSPE-PEG2000-Mal 2 ​mg, cholesterol 1 ​mg, and 20 ​μL Fe3O4 were added to a round-bottom flask and dissolved in 5 ​mL trichloromethane. The round-bottom flask was connected to a rotary evaporator and evaporated for 1 ​h at 52 ​°C. After dissolving 1 ​μg of γ-IFN/γ-IFNm in water, 200 ​μL PFP was added, which was first emulsified with an ultrasonic sonicator at 100 ​W (5 ​s on, 5 ​s off) for 3 ​min, and then all products were emulsified at the same power for 8 ​min. Then Fe3O4-γ–IFN–PFP-NPs/Fe3O4-γ-IFNm-PFP-NPs were prepared. SNF peptide/EpCAM antibody solution activated for 2 ​h with TCEP was then added. Next, the solution was placed in the refrigerator at 4°C overnight. Finally, MNDs/mMNDs were purified by centrifugation at 5000 ​rpm for 5 ​min at 4 ​°C. The supernatant was discarded and resuspended thrice in 3 ​mL of phosphate-buffered saline solution. Other nanocarrier solutions (Fe3O4-PFP-NPs:SNF, Fe3O4-γ–IFN–PFP-NPs, Fe3O4-PFP-NPs:EpC, and Fe3O4-γ-IFNm-PFP-NPs) were also fabricated using a similar method; except that γ-IFN/γ-IFNm, SNF peptides/EpCAM antibodies were added during the process. Fluorescently labeled MNDs/mMNDs were prepared by adding the corresponding markers (DiI and DiR) in the first step.

Synthesis of liquid Nd2Fe14B/Fe3O4-PLGA

PLGA (1.1 ​g) and NMP (2 ​mL) were placed into a bottle as past exploration [39]. To generate a homogenous PLGA liquid bio-injection, the PLGA was completely dissolved in NMP overnight at 37 ​°C, 120 r/min. Certain amount of Nd2Fe14B and Fe3O4 particles were dispersed into PLGA liquid gel, and there are 0.38 ​g of Nd2Fe14B and 0.15 ​g of Fe3O4 per ml of gel.

Characterization of MNDs/mMNDs

The MNDs/mMNDs were observed using transmission electron microscopy (Hitachi H-7600; Japan) and laser confocal microscopy (CLSM) (Nikon A1, Japan). A dynamic light scattering (DLS) detector (ZEN3600; Malvern Instruments, U.K.) was used to determine the diameter and zeta potential of MNDs/mMNDs. Notably, the mean sizes of MNDs/mMNDs were recorded at different time points (1, 2, 3, 7, and 14 days). Inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometry (ICP-OES; PerkinElmer 8300; USA) was used to measure the content of Fe3O4 loaded into the MNDs/mMNDs. The method for measuring the encapsulation rate and drug loading of the prepared MNDs/mMNDs was consistent with those used in previous reports; however, the method for testing drug concentration was replaced with the use of an ELISA kit. The shell was labeled with DiI and the SNF polypeptide/EpCAM antibody was labeled with FITC. The dilution concentration of MNDs/mMNDs was adjusted to 50 ​mg/mL. The connection rate between the liposome shell and the SNF peptide/EpCAM antibody in MNDs/mMNDs was observed using CLSM and detected using flow cytometry (FC) (BD Biosciences, USA). To study the acoustic phase transition, low intensity focused ultrasound (LIFU) (LMSC051ACA; Institute of Ultrasound Imaging, Chongqing Medical Sciences, Chongqing, China) was turned on, and the parameters were adjusted to pulse mode (2 ​s: on, 2 ​s: off). The MNDs/mMNDs were loaded into a 5 ​mL ​EP tube, placed at the center of the LIFU probe, irradiated with a focal length of 1.5 ​cm with different powers (1, 2, 3, 4 ​W/cm2), and the MNDs/mMNDs were aspirated and dropped on a glass slide after 5 ​min of irradiation and placed under a light microscope for observation. LIFU drug release experiments were performed as described above using an original concentration of MNDs/mMNDs, and the drug concentration was calculated using an ELISA kit. Nanoscale liposomes enhance the ultrasound (US) imaging capability when transformed to micron-scale or even larger sizes [40]. We used the parameters of the LIFU release drug experiment for the experiment of US imaging capability, and the MNDs/mMNDs after different treatments were observed using ultrasound diagnostic system (Mylab 90, Esaote, Italy); the image grayscale was analyzed using DFY software (Chongqing Medical University, China).

Safety of MND/mMND

All the animal experiments were approved by the Animal Ethics Committee of Chongqing Medical University and Institutional Animal Care. The CCK-8 assay was used to detect the cytotoxicity of MNDs to Huh7 and mMNDs to Hepa1-6. The specific method was the same as the previous study [38]. To evaluate the in vivo biosafety of these mMNDs, healthy C57 mice were intravenously administered an mMNDs suspension (3 ​mg/mL, 200 ​μL per mouse). The shell was labeled with DiI and the EpCAM antibody was labeled with FITC. Mouse urine was smeared before injection and 2 ​h, 6 ​h, 24 ​h, and 48 ​h after injection (n ​= ​3); it was observed under a fluorescence microscope (Olympus, Japan). Mice were sacrificed before and 1, 2, and 7 days after the injection (n ​= ​3), and blood samples were collected for serum iron, serum ferritin, hematology, and serum biochemical tests, respectively. The major organs (heart, liver, spleen, lung, and kidney) were subjected to autofluorescence detection, Prussian blue (PB), and Hematoxylin-eosin (H&E) staining on day 2.

Characterization of Nd2Fe14B/Fe3O4-PLGA

To study the liquid-solid phase change properties of Nd2Fe14B/Fe3O4-PLGA, the Nd2Fe14B/Fe3O4-PLGA liquid injection was loaded into a standard 1 ​mL syringe and injected into saline. The liquid Nd2Fe14B/Fe3O4-PLGA transformed into a solid form after contact with water. The prepared liquid Nd2Fe14B/Fe3O4-PLGA injection was injected into the skin of healthy C57 mice (n ​= ​3). The phase-transformation procedure was dynamically guided by an US diagnostic system that captured US images every 30 ​s. The Nd2Fe14B/Fe3O4-PLGA was charged using a magnetizing apparatus provided by the Chongqing University of Science and Technology, and turn into the bio-magnet. The magnetizer (MT-4060) had an 8-T center field strength, a peak charging voltage of DC 2000 V, and a peak electric field of 10,000 A. Before magnetization, after magnetization, and after demagnetization, the cured Nd2Fe14B/Fe3O4-PLGA was placed in Fe3O4 powder to investigate the magnetic absorption range and magnetic lines of force of the bio-magnet. A tesla meter was used to measure the magnetic force of the bio-magnet.

Safety of Nd2Fe14B/Fe3O4-PLGA

The CCK-8 assay was used to detect the cytotoxicity of Nd2Fe14B/Fe3O4-PLGA. The specific method was the same as the previous study [38]. The prepared liquid Nd2Fe14B/Fe3O4-PLGA bio injection was directly injected into the skin of healthy C57 mice. After curing, the size of the material was measured and recorded immediately after injection and at 1 and 2 months along with the weight of the loaded mice (n ​= ​3). Mice were sacrificed before and 3, 7, 30, and 60 days after the injection (n ​= ​3). Blood samples were collected for serum iron, serum ferritin, hematology, and biochemical tests. After degradation of the material, the remaining mice were euthanized. The major organs (heart, liver, spleen, lung, and kidney) were subjected to PB and H&E staining.

Cell culture and establishment of an animal xenograft model

Cells were adherently cultured with DMEM complete medium (10% fetal bovine serum). The cells were all cultured in a cell incubator at 37 ​°C, 5% CO2, and 95% humidity and passaged or frozen when the cells were in the logarithmic phase. C57 mice (male, 4–5 weeks) were purchased from the Animal Experiment Center of Chongqing Medical University, housed in SPF-grade cages. Hepa1-6 ​cells were cultured until the logarithmic growth phase, the cell concentration was adjusted to 5–6 ​× ​106/mL, and 200 ​μL of cells was subcutaneously injected into the root of the leg of each mouse. After approximately 15 days, the subcutaneous tumor was around 100 ​mm3 in size. Due to its high fl uidity, the as-formed liquid Nd2Fe14B/Fe3O4-PLGA (25μL) can be immediately in-situ injected into tumors under ultrasound guidance. The NMP can swiftly diffuse into the surrounding aquatic environment after contacting the aqueous environment of tumor tissues. After placing the mice in the magnetizer for magnetization, the animal xenograft models with bio-magnets were prepared.

Cell line screening and EpCAM expression assay

Western blot (WB) was used to verify the expression of EpCAM in human and murine-derived cell lines, and the expression rate of EpCAM in selected cell lines was quantified using FC.

Secondary and tertiary targeting efficiency of MNDs/mMNDs in vitro

The method used to examine the efficacy of secondary targeting in vitro was same as that used in our previous reports [38]. We chose Huh7 and L02 ​cells to simulate human-derived tests and Hepa 1–6 and AML12 to simulate murine-derived tests. The FC detection method was the same as that reported previously. To understand the secondary and tertiary targeting properties of the nanoparticles, we used the same approach as described above for the experiments. But after 1 ​h of nanoparticle addition to the culture dish, the LIFU was switched on. The parameter was adjusted as per the pulse mode (2 ​s: on, 2 ​s: off), and the power was 4 ​W/cm2. The dish was placed at the center of the LIFU probe, irradiated with a focal length of 1.5 ​cm for 5 ​min, and placed in a cell incubator again for 1 ​h.

The therapeutic capability of MNDs in vitro

The concentration of Huh7 cells was adjusted to 5 ​× ​106/mL; they were placed in a cell incubator until they completely adhered to the walls of the dish. The cells were divided into the following groups: 1, control; 2, LIFU; 3, Fe3O4-γ–IFN–PFP-NPs ​+ ​LIFU; 4, MNDs ​+ ​LIFU; 5, Fe3O4-PFP-NPs:SNF; 6, Fe3O4-PFP-NPs:SNF ​+ ​LIFU; 7, Fe3O4-γ–IFN–PFP-NPs; 8, MNDs. Nanoparticles prepared in a serum-free medium were added and placed in an incubator (the control group contained only serum-free medium). The LIFU-treated group was irradiated at 4 ​W/cm2 for 5 ​min after 1 ​h of nanoparticles addition. Following 24 ​h of incubation, the liquid in the dish was removed and the cells were washed thrice with PBS. The expression of HLA-I was verified using WB and FC analyses. The killing ability of the nanoparticles was detected using double staining with calcein green-AM/propidium iodide and FC. The specific method used was the same as that in our previous report [38].

Visualization and accurate targeting of mMNDs ​+ ​Bio-magnet in vivo

To validate the primary targeting ability of the mMNDs ​+ ​Bio-magnet system in vivo, tumor-bearing C57 mice were prepared. The fluorescent probe DIR was used to label the mMNDs. The mice were divided into mMNDs and mMNDs ​+ ​Bio-magnet groups (n ​= ​3), after they were subjected to gas anesthesia. First, the pre-images were collected using a NIRF imaging system (Xenogen IVIS Spectrum, PerkinElmer, U.K.); the mMNDs were injected from the tail vein (200 ​μL per mouse). Mice were placed in a fluorescence operating console, and fluorescence images were collected at 3, 12, and 24 ​h. After the mice were sacrificed, their viscera and tumors were separated and fluorescence images were collected. Finally, the corresponding fluorescence intensities were analyzed using Living Image Software (PerkinElmer). Photoacoustic (PA) imaging of the mMNDs was first performed using full-band scanning with a wavelength of 680–970 ​nm, and the wavelength with the strongest PA signal (705 ​nm) was selected as the experimental wavelength. The mMNDs were diluted to different concentrations and injected into gel model holes. The intensities of the acquired PA images were measured using a PA imager. To perform mMNDs ​+ ​bio-magnet system primary targeting ability in vivo using PA imaging, subcutaneous xenografts were constructed. Tumor-bearing C57 mice were divided into mMNDs and mMNDs ​+ ​Bio-magnet groups (n ​= ​3), after they were subjected to gas anesthesia. Pre-images without mMNDs were collected; the mMNDs were injected into the mice from the tail vein (200 ​μL per mouse). The PA images of the two groups were collected and analyzed for PA intensity at 1, 3, 12, and 24 ​h after the injection using Vevo LAZR software (VisualSonics Inc., Toronto, Canada). The tumor-bearing C57 mice were divided into mMNDs and mMNDs ​+ ​bio-magnet groups (n ​= ​3). The two groups were subjected to different irradiation time using LIFU (pulse mode, 2 ​s: on, 2 ​s: off, 4 ​W/cm2). The US images were obtained using the US diagnostic system in B-mode and contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS), and the intensities were recorded via the DFY-texture (Chongqing Medical University, China). For more objective evaluation, the time-point of the highest mMNDs enrichment in each group for LIFU irradiation was selected based on the results of in vivo fluorescence and PA imaging experiments. The time-point of the mMNDs group was 12 ​h post-injection and that of the mMNDs ​+ ​Bio-magnet group was 3 ​h post-injection. In the above experiments, the mMNDs ​+ ​bio-magnet group was subjected to demagnetization treatment 3 ​h following the mMNDs injection. To study secondary and tertiary targeting from a microscopic perspective, tumor-bearing C57 mice were divided into mMNDs and mMNDs ​+ ​bio-magnet groups (n ​= ​3). DiI-labeled mMNDs loaded with FITC-labeled γ-IFNm were injected into the tail vein (200 ​μL per mouse). The time-point of the mMNDs group was 12 ​h post-injection and that of the mMNDs ​+ ​Bio-magnet group was 3 ​h post-injection. The two groups were subjected to different irradiation time using LIFU (pulse mode, 2 ​s: on, 2 ​s: off, 4 ​W/cm2, 15 ​min). Mice were sacrificed after irradiation. The tumor tissues were removed for sectioning, DAPI-stained nuclei were stained, and CLSM was used to observe the aggregation trend and the secondary and tertiary targeting performance of the mMNDs. When the tissues were sectioned, the central part of the tumor tissue was selected for the mMNDs group. The tissues around the bio-magnet were selected for the mMNDs ​+ ​bio-magnet group.

Therapeutic efficacy of mMNDs in vivo

Tumor-bearing C57 mice were divided into the following groups (n ​= ​6): 1, control; 2, saline ​+ ​LIFU; 3, mMNDs; 4, mMNDs ​+ ​LIFU; 5, mMNDs ​+ ​Bio-magnet; 6, mMNDs ​+ ​Bio-magnet ​+ ​LIFU; 7, Fe3O4-PFP-NPs:EpC ​+ ​Bio-magnet ​+ ​LIFU; 8, Fe3O4-γ-IFNm-PFP-NPs ​+ ​Bio-magnet ​+ ​LIFU. They were administered 200 ​μL of the corresponding nanoparticle solution through tail vein injection, and the control group was administered saline injection. LIFU irradiation (pulse mode, 2 ​s: on, 2 ​s: off, 4 ​W/cm2, 15 ​min) was started 4 ​h after the injection once a day for 3 days. Changes in the body weight and tumor volume were recorded for 16 days. The bio magnetic precursor Nd2Fe14B/Fe3O4-PLGA was injected into the left tumor only, and the LIFU irradiated the same tumor. Groups with Nd2Fe14B/Fe3O4-PLGA, magnetization was given before tail vein injection and demagnetization was given 3 ​h after injection. On day 3 after the end of treatment, the left tumors were harvested for immunofluorescence staining to study the expression of H-2 in tumor tissues. Additionally, the harvested left tumor was used to produce a single-cell suspension. The prepared cells were stained with H-2-FITC (BioLegend, USA) antibodies and analyzed using FC. After understanding the effects of mMNDs on the immune microenvironment, we validated the tumor-killing ability of mMNDs. Tumor-bearing C57 mice were divided into the same treatment groups (n ​= ​6), as described above. On day 3 after the end of treatment, the left tumor was harvested for TUNEL staining and a single-cell suspension was prepared for detecting apoptosis using FC. During the treatment period, we recorded the left tumor size and weight of the tumor-bearing mice.

Statistical analysis

All results were presented as mean ​± ​standard (mean ​± ​SD). Statistical analyses were completed with Prism GraphPad. Unpaired Student's t-test (for two groups), one-way or two-way ANOVA (for multiple groups) were used followed by the Tukey-Kramer test (∗p ​< ​0.05 was considered statistically significant, ∗∗p ​< ​0.01, ∗∗∗p ​< ​0.001, ∗∗∗∗p ​< ​0.0001).

Results and discussion

Preparation and characterization of MNDs and mMNDs

General characterization of MNDs and mMNDs

Low-magnification TEM and CLSM images revealed the successful synthesis of MNDs and mMNDs, both of which exhibited relatively uniform particle sizes and spherical states and good dispersion (Fig. 1A and E). High-magnification TEM showed that Fe3O4 in MNDs and mMNDs was well encapsulated in the core-shell and exhibited small black particles (Fig. 1A). DLS detected the average hydrodynamic diameters of MNDs and mMNDs as 321.91 ​± ​2.80 ​nm and 353.57 ​± ​7.43 ​nm (Fig. 1B). The zata potentials were −40.59 ​± ​1.56 ​mV and −40.55 ​± ​1.51 ​mV, respectively (Fig. 1I). After monitoring the 14-day particle size variation of MNDs and mMNDs (Fig. 1F), the results showed that the maximum particle sizes of the adopted core shells were 336.93 ​± ​3.55 ​nm and 384.50 ​± ​10.38 ​nm, respectively, demonstrating good stability of the nanoparticles. The inductively coupled plasma spectrometer detection of Fe loading revealed that the loading of Fe3O4 increased with increasing Fe3O4 addition, while the encapsulation rate decreased (Fig. 1C). The ELISA test suggested that the loading of γ-IFN and γ-IFNm similarly increased with drug addition. However, the encapsulation rate decreased gradually (Fig. 1D). Combining the loading and encapsulation rate analyses, the final selection of the nanoparticles was 20 ​μL of Fe3O4 and 1 ​μg of γ-IFNm. Our shell nuclei contain maleimide, which is often coupled with sulfhydryl groups on proteins to achieve selective modification. The Michael addition reaction is selective and rapid. The required reaction conditions is mild and simple. Several FDA-approved antibody-drug adducts have been clinically obtained using such reactions [41,42]. Therefore, the Michael addition reaction is used in this study to attach the SNF peptide/EpCAM antibody to the corresponding nanoparticle shell and observed using CLSM. The DiI-labeled shells overlapped with the SNF peptides/EpCAM antibodies labeled with FITC and were orange in color. Quantitative analysis of the nanoparticle Michael addition reaction using FC showed that the attachment rate of nanoparticles to peptides was 89% and that to antibodies was 95.7% (Fig. 1H). SNF peptides/EpCAM antibodies are important components of secondary targeting in this system, and their efficient attachment to nanoparticles provides a good basis for secondary active targeting.
Fig. 1

Characterization of MNDs and mMNDs. A Low and high magnification TEM images of MNDs and mMNDs. B Diameters of MNDs and mMNDs. C Concentrations and encapsulation efficiency of Fe3O4 from ICP-OES. D Concentrations and encapsulation efficiency of drug from ELISA. E CLSM images of MNDs and mMNDs. F Stability of MNDs and mMNDs based on DLS. G Phase transition of MNDs and mMNDs after LIFU irradiation with different power. H&J CLSM and FC to evaluate binding of SNF peptides/EpCAM antibodies and the shell of nanoparticles I Zeta potentials of MNDs and mMNDs. K US images of MNDs and mMNDs after LIFU irradiation with different power. L Dug release curves from MNDs and mMNDs after LIFU irradiation with different power. M Average echo intensity values of US images, (B) means echo intensity values of B-mode and (C) means echo intensity values of CEUS-mode.

Characterization of MNDs and mMNDs. A Low and high magnification TEM images of MNDs and mMNDs. B Diameters of MNDs and mMNDs. C Concentrations and encapsulation efficiency of Fe3O4 from ICP-OES. D Concentrations and encapsulation efficiency of drug from ELISA. E CLSM images of MNDs and mMNDs. F Stability of MNDs and mMNDs based on DLS. G Phase transition of MNDs and mMNDs after LIFU irradiation with different power. H&J CLSM and FC to evaluate binding of SNF peptides/EpCAM antibodies and the shell of nanoparticles I Zeta potentials of MNDs and mMNDs. K US images of MNDs and mMNDs after LIFU irradiation with different power. L Dug release curves from MNDs and mMNDs after LIFU irradiation with different power. M Average echo intensity values of US images, (B) means echo intensity values of B-mode and (C) means echo intensity values of CEUS-mode.

Phase transition and drug release of MNDs and mMNDs

The controlled release of the drug is significant for its therapeutic efficacy and biosafety, and the controlled phase changeability of PFP under LIFU irradiation has also been verified in a large number of experiments [40,43]. The phase changeability of the nanoparticles showed significant energy dependence under the same LIFU irradiation time (Fig. 1G). The same energy dependence of drug release was observed, up to 50.67% (MNDs) and 52.28% (MNDs) at 4 ​W/cm2 (Fig. 1L). The same pattern of nanoparticle phase transition induced by LIFU irradiation was confirmed using in vitro US imaging (Fig. 1K). The average sound intensity peaked at 3 ​W/cm2 and decreased as the nanoparticles broke down owing to the high energy (Fig. 1M). Thus, PFP responds efficiently to LIFU irradiation and can be used for precise and controlled drug release. Therefore, efficient and straightforward synthesis of MNDs and mMNDs is crucial for future clinical conversion. Moreover, the results show that MNDs and mMNDs successfully encapsulate Fe3O4 and Gamma interferon; considering their nanoscale particle size and good liquid-gas phase transition properties, MNDs and mMNDs have the potential to guide visual grading and precision therapy.

Metabolism and biosafety of mMNDs

Metabolic pathways and biosafety are crucial for the clinical translation of novel drugs and biomaterials [44,45]. In vitro cytotoxicity test, there was no significant difference in cell survival rate between the experimental group and the control group, which preliminarily showed that MNDs/mMNDs had the good safety (Fig. 2B). In vivo experiments were mainly performed with mMNDs; thus, we focused on examining various effects of mMNDs on living organisms. The mMND shells were labeled with DiI, the EpCAM antibodies were labeled with FITC, and the urine was observed under fluorescence microscopy before, and 2 ​h, 6 ​h, 24 ​h, and 48 ​h after injecting mMNDs. A scattered dotted red-green light was observed at 2 ​h; it significantly increased at 6 ​h, decreased at 24 ​h, and diminished completely at 48 ​h (Fig. 2A). Thus, mMNDs can be excreted through the urine in 48 ​h.
Fig. 2

Metabolism and biosafety of mMNDs. A Fluorescence microscopy images of mMNDs in mice urine. The scale bar is 50 ​μm. B Cytotoxicity test by a CCK-8 assay. C Images of autofluorescence, PB and HE staining 48 ​h following mMNDs injection. The scale bar of PB and HE staining is 50 ​μm, and the scale bar of fluorescence image is 100 ​μm. D Blood tests at different times.

Metabolism and biosafety of mMNDs. A Fluorescence microscopy images of mMNDs in mice urine. The scale bar is 50 ​μm. B Cytotoxicity test by a CCK-8 assay. C Images of autofluorescence, PB and HE staining 48 ​h following mMNDs injection. The scale bar of PB and HE staining is 50 ​μm, and the scale bar of fluorescence image is 100 ​μm. D Blood tests at different times. The hearts, livers, spleens, lungs, and kidneys were stained with PB and HE staining 48 ​h following mMNDs injection. Only a small amount of PB staining was observed in the liver and spleen, and no evident autofluorescence was observed in the organ tissues (Fig. 2C). Thus, mMNDs were metabolized by the liver and spleen. No residues were found in the essential organs. HE staining of the organ tissues showed no significant abnormalities in the cellular morphology of the organ tissues. The iron environment in mice was observed, routine blood and biochemical tests were obtained before and 1, 2, and 7 days after the injection of mMNDs. The results showed that all indicators were within normal levels during the follow-up period, both in the acute and relatively long term (Fig. 2D). The results of above experiments indicate that mMNDs have good metabolism, biosafety, and reasonable clinical translation.

Nd2Fe14B/Fe3O4-PLGA performance testing

Phase transition and magnetic properties of Nd2Fe14B/Fe3O4-PLGA

Minimally invasive implantable bio-magnets are vital components of this project. The prepared bio-magnet precursor Nd2Fe14B/Fe3O4-PLGA has a dark gray liquid phase with good fluidity and can be inhaled into a 1 ​mL empty needle. The liquid-phase bio-magnetic precursor was injected smoothly into the cup with saline. The liquid-solid phase change occurred through solvent exchange to form a stable solid (Fig. 3A). As per macroscopic observation, the phase change time was 3 ​min. The ultrasonic detection of the in vivo phase change pattern of the bio-magnet precursor showed that the liquid-phase bio-magnet precursor was injected with a gray-black low-echo state; it gradually underwent solvent exchange and became solid after complete curing; it showed an echogenic solid-state (Fig. 3B). This indicates that the bio-magnet precursor can be fully cured in vivo. This feature firmly confines the implant within the tumor to avoid leakage and has a reliable safety profile. The cured bio-magnet precursor is magnetized further into a bio-magnet. The bio-magnet could attract Fe3O4; it shown specific magnetic susceptibility lines and magnetic poles. After demagnetization, the magnetism was significantly weakened; the bio-magnet no longer attracted Fe3O4 (Fig. 3C). The magnetic properties of the bio-magnet increased to 1.21 ​± ​0.11 ​mT after magnetization and weakened to 0.25 ​± ​0.07 ​mT after demagnetization (Fig. 3D), as measured by the Tesla magnetometer. Thus, the bio-magnet has good injectability and is a reliable precursor for minimally in vivo invasive implantation. This also demonstrates that the magnetic properties of the bio-magnet was adjustable as needed. The enhanced magnetic properties can effectively improve the primary targeting ability and increase the enrichment rate of MNDs/mMNDs in deep tumor tissues. The weakening of magnetic properties can cause MNDs/mMNDs to eliminate magnetic attraction and effectively implement secondary and tertiary targeting (autonomous selection of target cells and target receptors).
Fig. 3

Characterization and biosafety of Nd2Fe14B/Fe3O4-PLGA. A Photograph images of injectable Nd2Fe14B/Fe3O4-PLGA, before (a), in progress (b), after contacting with water (c), and eventually solid phase (d). BIn vivo US imaging before (a) and after (b) the subcutaneous injection of Nd2Fe14B/Fe3O4-PLGA, and (c) eventually solid phase. C Photograph images of before magnetization (a), after magnetization (b), and after degaussing (c). D Magnetic properties of before magnetization, after magnetization and after degaussing. E Photograph images of Nd2Fe14B/Fe3O4-PLGA absorption in vivo, before (a) and after (b). F The body weight changes of mice. G Cytotoxicity test by a CCK-8 assay, 1 means control group, 2 means Nd2Fe14B/Fe3O4-PLGA group. I Blood tests of iron environment at different times. H Images of PB and HE staining after complete absorption of Nd2Fe14B/Fe3O4-PLGA. The scale bar is 50 ​μm. J Blood tests at different times.

Characterization and biosafety of Nd2Fe14B/Fe3O4-PLGA. A Photograph images of injectable Nd2Fe14B/Fe3O4-PLGA, before (a), in progress (b), after contacting with water (c), and eventually solid phase (d). BIn vivo US imaging before (a) and after (b) the subcutaneous injection of Nd2Fe14B/Fe3O4-PLGA, and (c) eventually solid phase. C Photograph images of before magnetization (a), after magnetization (b), and after degaussing (c). D Magnetic properties of before magnetization, after magnetization and after degaussing. E Photograph images of Nd2Fe14B/Fe3O4-PLGA absorption in vivo, before (a) and after (b). F The body weight changes of mice. G Cytotoxicity test by a CCK-8 assay, 1 means control group, 2 means Nd2Fe14B/Fe3O4-PLGA group. I Blood tests of iron environment at different times. H Images of PB and HE staining after complete absorption of Nd2Fe14B/Fe3O4-PLGA. The scale bar is 50 ​μm. J Blood tests at different times.

Metabolism and biosafety of Nd2Fe14B/Fe3O4-PLGA

The cytotoxicity of Nd2Fe14B/Fe3O4-PLGA was tested in Huh7 and Hepa1-6, respectively. The results showed that there was no significant difference in cell survival between the experimental group and the control group (Fig. 3G). Liquid-phase Nd2Fe14B/Fe3O4-PLGA was injected subcutaneously and observed in mice. After 2 months, there was complete absorption of Nd2Fe14B/Fe3O4-PLGA without skin breakdown (Fig. 3E), and the body weight increased steadily over time (Fig. 3F). The blood of mice was collected at the designated time-point for serum iron, serum ferritin, routine blood, and biochemical tests, and all indicators were within normal levels during the follow-up period (Fig. 3I and J). PB staining was performed on the organs obtained after complete absorption of Nd2Fe14B/Fe3O4-PLGA. Only a small amount of blue tissue was visible in the liver and spleen (Fig. 3H), which initially indicated that the liver and spleen could metabolize Nd2Fe14B/Fe3O4-PLGA. Concurrent HE staining was performed and minor histomorphological or pathological changes were observed (Fig. 3H). These results confirm that Nd2Fe14B/Fe3O4-PLGA had no adverse effects in mice, either in the acute or relatively long-term phase; thus, Nd2Fe14B/Fe3O4-PLGA can be metabolized easily and exhibited biosafety. They can be completely absorbed and metabolized after injection into the body without the need for pre-surgical removal, which is favorable for in vivo use. Considering the safety verification results of mMNDs, the clinical translation of mMNDs ​+ ​bio-magnetic visualization and treatment systems is feasible.

Performance of MNDs and mMNDs in vitro

In the hierarchical targeting delivery strategy, each stage of targeting is critical to lay the necessary foundation for the final accurate drug delivery, just as a multi-stage rocket delivers a satellite to its target location, each stage provides the necessary power for the satellite to reach its final location (Fig. 4A).
Fig. 4

Targeting Performance of MNDs and mMNDs in vitro. A Simulation of hierarchical target delivery strategy with rocket-delivered satellites. B WB analysis of EpCAM expression on human-derived cell lines. C WB analysis of EpCAM expression on murine-derived cell lines. D FC analyses of EpCAM expression rate on Huh7 cells and Hepa 1–6 ​cells. E CLSM images of human-derived or murine-derived cell lines treated by different nanoparticles, and FC analysis of secondary targeting ability. The scale bar is 50 ​μm. F CLSM images of Huh7 and Hepa 1–6 ​cells treated by MNDs or mMNDs shown secondary and tertiary targeting ability. The scale bar is 50 ​μm ∗p ​< ​0.05, ∗∗p ​< ​0.01, ∗∗∗p ​< ​0.001, ∗∗∗∗p ​< ​0.0001.

Targeting Performance of MNDs and mMNDs in vitro. A Simulation of hierarchical target delivery strategy with rocket-delivered satellites. B WB analysis of EpCAM expression on human-derived cell lines. C WB analysis of EpCAM expression on murine-derived cell lines. D FC analyses of EpCAM expression rate on Huh7 cells and Hepa 1–6 ​cells. E CLSM images of human-derived or murine-derived cell lines treated by different nanoparticles, and FC analysis of secondary targeting ability. The scale bar is 50 ​μm. F CLSM images of Huh7 and Hepa 1–6 ​cells treated by MNDs or mMNDs shown secondary and tertiary targeting ability. The scale bar is 50 ​μm ∗p ​< ​0.05, ∗∗p ​< ​0.01, ∗∗∗p ​< ​0.001, ∗∗∗∗p ​< ​0.0001.

Selection of cell lines

The high drug resistance and high proliferation ability of LCSCs are crucial for the low efficiency of HCC treatment; therefore, therapeutic strategies targeting LCSCs can improve the cure rate of HCC [46,47]. EpCAM is considered a marker of LCSCs [47]; therefore, the MNDs and mMNDs prepared in this study used LCSCs with high expression of EpCAM as secondary targets. The expression of EpCAM in normal hepatocytes L02 and hepatoma cell lines Huh7, 97H, 97 ​L, and SK-Hep-1 was verified using WB, and the results showed that EpCAM was not expressed in normal hepatocytes L02; its expression was higher in the hepatoma cell line Huh7 than in other cell lines (Fig. 4B); therefore, Huh7 was selected as the experimental group for human-derived cells. WB was also used to verify the expression of EpCAM in murine-derived normal hepatocytes AML12 and murine-derived hepatocellular carcinoma cells Hepa1-6, and the results showed that EpCAM was not expressed in murine-derived normal hepatocytes AML12 and was highly expressed in murine hepatocellular carcinoma cells Hepa1-6 (Fig. 4C). After specifying the cell lines, the expression rate of EpCAM in various generic cell lines was determined using FC (Fig. 4D) to quantitatively evaluate the secondary targeting ability of MNDs and mMNDs at a later stage.

Secondary targeting

Secondary targeting enhances the enrichment of nanoparticles in target cells and provides the necessary conditions for precise drug delivery [48]. As observed in CLSM, after co-incubation with DiI-labeled MNDs and mMNDs with Huh7 and Hepa1-6 ​cells, respectively, red fluorescence was visible around the cytosolic membranes of most cells. Simultaneously, almost no red fluorescence was observed around L02 and AML12. No red fluorescence was observed around the cell membranes after co-incubation of nanoparticles without SNF peptides and EpCAM antibodies with Huh7 and Hepa1-6 (Fig. 4E). The quantitative FC analysis of the in vitro secondary targeting ability was almost consistent with the CLSM results (Fig. 4E). Thus, nanoparticles coupled with SNF peptides and EpCAM antibodies barely target normal liver cells but specifically target LCSCs, demonstrating the high precision of secondary targeting.

Tertiary targeting

As observed using CLSM, shells of MNDs/mMNDs loaded with FITC-labeled γ-IFN/γ-IFNm were labeled with DiI. After LIFU irradiation, the cells with red fluorescence around the cell membrane also had green fluorescence around them (Fig. 4F). The above results indicate that γ-IFN/γ-IFNm released by nanoparticle rupture can be efficiently targeted at the tertiary level based on the precise delivery of secondary targeting. The validation of secondary and tertiary targeting in vitro initially indicate that MNDs and mMNDs can deliver drugs accurately, enabling further validation of hierarchical targeting in vivo. The performance of in vitro primary targeting could not be discussed; thus, the study of primary targeting will be further elaborated in later in vivo experiments.

Treatment of MNDs in vitro

Gamma interferon can promote tumor cell apoptosis and increase the expressions of MHC proteins. It integrates chemotherapy and immunotherapy. MHC proteins are the basis of immunotherapy in this study. The low expression of MHC proteins can help tumor cells escape the recognition and killing of immune cells, and MHC proteins are usually in a low expression in tumor cells [49,50]. By increasing the expression of MHC proteins in tumor cells, it helps to improve antigen presentation and enhance the anti-tumor T cell response [49]. MHC proteins are different in human and mice, HLA-I proteins in Human, while H-2 proteins in mice. Because the experiment involved human and mouse HCC models, we verified these two proteins according to the experimental species. WB results showed that compared to the control group, an increase in HLA-I was observed in the MNDs, Fe3O4-γ–IFN–PFP-NPs, Fe3O4-γ–IFN–PFP-NPs ​+ ​LIFU and MNDs ​+ ​LIFU groups (Fig. 5A and E). The increase in HLA-I was the most apparent in the MNDs ​+ ​LIFU group, which confirmed the secondary targeted delivery. The binding rate of γ-IFN to receptors on the cell membrane surface was higher, and drug efficacy was most apparent. The results of the quantitative FC assay were consistent with the WB results, i.e., the HLA-I expression rate of the MNDs ​+ ​LIFU group reached 20.20%, which was 5.3 times higher than that of the control group at 3.81% (Fig. 5C and F). Calcein-AM/PI cell double staining was used to verify the effect of different treatment groups on the survival of Huh7 cells. In the CLSM images, living cells were stained green by calcein-AM and dead cells were stained red by PI. The results showed that almost all Huh7 cells in the control, MNDs, Fe3O4-γ–IFN–PFP-NPs, and Fe3O4-PFP-NPs:SNF groups were green-stained live cells; red-stained dead cells were occasionally observed. However, cells in the remaining groups were red-stained died cells to varying degrees. The Fe3O4-γ–IFN–PFP-NPs ​+ ​LIFU and MNDs ​+ ​LIFU groups were significantly red-stained, the MNDs ​+ ​LIFU group showed maximum number of red-stained cells (Fig. 5B). The results of quantitative FC for apoptosis were consistent with the above results (Fig. 5D and G). Thus, physical killing by LIFU irradiation and chemical killing by drugs produce different degrees of damage to Huh7 cells. MNDs exert a more significant therapeutic effect through secondary and tertiary targeting of LCSCs, especially in combination with physical and chemical injury.
Fig. 5

Treatment of MNDs in vitro. A&E WB analysis of HLA-I expression on Huh7 cells treated by different nanoparticles. C&F FC analysis of HLA-I expression on Huh7 cells treated by different nanoparticles. B The Calcian-AM/PI staining of Huh7 cells after different treatments. The green fluorescence shows living cells and the red fluorescence represents dead cells. The scale bar is 50 ​μm. D&G FC analysis of apoptosis after different treatments. ∗p ​< ​0.05, ∗∗p ​< ​0.01, ∗∗∗p ​< ​0.001, ∗∗∗∗p ​< ​0.0001.

Treatment of MNDs in vitro. A&E WB analysis of HLA-I expression on Huh7 cells treated by different nanoparticles. C&F FC analysis of HLA-I expression on Huh7 cells treated by different nanoparticles. B The Calcian-AM/PI staining of Huh7 cells after different treatments. The green fluorescence shows living cells and the red fluorescence represents dead cells. The scale bar is 50 ​μm. D&G FC analysis of apoptosis after different treatments. ∗p ​< ​0.05, ∗∗p ​< ​0.01, ∗∗∗p ​< ​0.001, ∗∗∗∗p ​< ​0.0001. In conclusion, MNDs and mMNDs perform well with secondary and tertiary targeting in vitro. The precise delivery of secondary targeting helps in tertiary targeting and optimizes the therapeutic effect of drugs. Further, in vitro treatment results showed that MNDs performed well in the direct killing of tumor cells (physiotherapy and chemotherapy) and enhancing antigen presentation (immunotherapy), laying the foundation for further in vivo treatment. The therapeutic effects of mMNDs are not discussed here, and the relevant part will be further elaborated in in vivo experiments.

Fluorescence reveals bio-magnet-mediated primary targeting

A large number of mMNDs in blood vessels are guided into the tumor and its deeper parts by an intra-tumoral magnetic field, which is the first efficient stage of graded targeting. In small-animal in vivo fluorescence imaging, the mMNDs ​+ ​Bio-magnet group exhibited a significant fluorescence signal 3 ​h after mMNDs injection compared with the mMNDs group, with a mean fluorescence intensity of (16.79 ​± ​1.04) ​× ​106 ​nW, which was 11.99 times higher than that of the mMNDs group (1.40 ​± ​0.33) ​× ​106 ​nW. The mMNDs group showed a significant fluorescence signal of (7.49 ​± ​1.33) ​× ​106 ​nW at 12 ​h, and the fluorescence intensity of the mMNDs ​+ ​Bio-magnet group at 3 ​h was 2.24 times higher than that of the mMNDs group. The bio-magnet demagnetization treatment performed at 3 ​h, and a significant fluorescence signal remained at 12 and 24 ​h (Fig. 6A and C). The mean fluorescence intensity of tumors in the mMNDs ​+ ​Bio-magnet group was also significantly stronger than that in the mMNDs group (Fig. 6B and D) when the tumors and organs were removed after 24 ​h, and fluorescence intensity was measured using IndiGo software. The above results indicate that bio-magnet-mediated primary targeting has superior targeting ability; it can significantly increase the drug enrichment rate in target tissues. Meanwhile, the fluorescence intensity of the liver and spleen was the most obvious among all organs in both groups (Fig. 6B and D), which also indicated that the mMNDs were metabolized through the liver and spleen.
Fig. 6

Visualization and accurate targeting of mMNDs ​+ ​Bio-magnet in vivo. AIn vivo imaging of mMNDs in C57 tumor-bearing mice. BEx vivo fluorescence imaging of main organs and tumors in different groups. C The statistical fluorescence intensity of tumors in different groups at different time. D The statistical fluorescence intensity of main organs and tumors in different groups after 24 ​h. E PA imaging and intensity of the mMNDs. F PA imaging of mMNDs in C57 tumor-bearing mice. G The statistical PA intensity of tumors in different groups at different time. H US imaging of mMNDs in C57 tumor-bearing mice. I The statistical CEUS echo intensity of tumors in different groups at different time. ∗p ​< ​0.05, ∗∗p ​< ​0.01, ∗∗∗p ​< ​0.001, ∗∗∗∗p ​< ​0.0001.

Visualization and accurate targeting of mMNDs ​+ ​Bio-magnet in vivo. AIn vivo imaging of mMNDs in C57 tumor-bearing mice. BEx vivo fluorescence imaging of main organs and tumors in different groups. C The statistical fluorescence intensity of tumors in different groups at different time. D The statistical fluorescence intensity of main organs and tumors in different groups after 24 ​h. E PA imaging and intensity of the mMNDs. F PA imaging of mMNDs in C57 tumor-bearing mice. G The statistical PA intensity of tumors in different groups at different time. H US imaging of mMNDs in C57 tumor-bearing mice. I The statistical CEUS echo intensity of tumors in different groups at different time. ∗p ​< ​0.05, ∗∗p ​< ​0.01, ∗∗∗p ​< ​0.001, ∗∗∗∗p ​< ​0.0001.

Photoacoustic (PA) imaging showing bio-magnet-mediated primary targeting

mMNDs have enhanced PA visualization properties owing to their iron content, which allows the visualization and supervision of primary targeting. The small-animal PA imager showed that the visualization ability of mMNDs was positively correlated with their concentration (Fig. 6E). In mice, the mMNDs ​+ ​Bio-magnet group exhibited a significant PA signal 3 ​h after mMNDs injection compared to the pre-injection period. Simultaneously, the bio-magnet demagnetization treatment was administered and a significant PA signal was observed at 12 ​h, which was attenuated in 24 ​h because of the in vivo self-clearing effect (Fig. 6F). Quantitative analysis of the PA signal intensity of the two groups showed that the PA intensity of the mMNDs ​+ ​Bio-magnet group at 3 ​h was 4.74 times higher than that of the mMNDs group; it was 2.36 times higher than that of the mMNDs group at 12 ​h (Fig. 6G). These findings were consistent with those of small-animal in vivo fluorescence, indicating that primary targeting mediated by bio-magnet mediation can significantly improve the enrichment rate of mMNDs in tumors, initiating precise diagnosis and treatment. Additionally, PA imaging can be used to monitor primary targeting. Primary targeting can enhance PA imaging and help in the diagnosis and treatment of mutually optimized tumors.

US imaging shows LIFU irradiation-controlled drug release

The mMND-loaded PFP can undergo liquid-gas phase change under LIFU irradiation, which enhances US imaging. According to the results of in vivo fluorescence and PA imaging, the mMNDs group was subjected LIFU 3 ​W/cm2 irradiation for 5, 10, and 15 ​min after 12 ​h of mMNDs injection and 3 ​h of mMNDs injection in the mMNDs ​+ ​Bio-magnet group, and the results were detected using ultrasonic detection, which showed that both groups were visible after 5 ​min, but the mMNDs ​+ ​Bio-magnet group was more significant (Fig. 6I). After 10 ​min, both groups showed a substantial shadowing effect, but the mMNDs ​+ ​Bio-magnet group showed the most significant shadowing. After 15 ​min, both groups still showed shadowing. However, the shadowing effect was weaker than before owing to rupture of most of the liquid-gas phase change of the nanoparticles (Fig. 6H). Quantitative analysis of grayscale values (Fig. 6I) showed that both the mMNDs and mMNDs ​+ ​Bio-magnet groups showed differences at 10 ​min compared to the pre, indicating that LIFU irradiation could better stimulate the liquid-gas phase change of mMND-loaded PFP and thus, release the drug; this is consistent with in vitro phase change and drug release results (Fig. 1G and L). The ability of mMNDs to undergo liquid-gas phase changes under LIFU irradiation can enhance ultrasound imaging and release drugs at regular intervals, which also enables precise diagnosis and treatment. The mean grayscale values of the mMNDs ​+ ​Bio-magnet group were higher than those of the mMNDs group, demonstrating that primary targeting could significantly increase the enrichment rate of mMNDs in tumor tissues.

Observation of autofluorescence in tumor tissue sections

Tumor tissue sections were obtained from mMNDs and mMNDs ​+ ​Bio-magnet groups and observed under CLSM for autofluorescence. Deep tumor tissue was used for the mMNDs group, and the tissue near the Bio-magnet was used for the mMNDs ​+ ​Bio-magnet group. The shells of injected mMNDs were stained with DiI, and mMNDs were loaded with fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC)-labeled γ-IFNm. A small amount of red-green fluorescence was observed in the mMNDs group, whereas the mMNDs ​+ ​Bio-magnet group showed abundant red-green fluorescence with a centripetal enrichment trend centered around the bio-magnet (Fig. 7). The above results reconfirm that the mMNDs ​+ ​Bio-magnet system can enhance the primary targeting ability and increase the number of nanoparticles that can enter deep into the tumor. Nanoparticles can be more efficient for secondary targeting after demagnetization, and LIFU irradiation can release the drug and carry out tertiary targeting.
Fig. 7

CLSM images of autofluorescence in tumor tissue sections. The blue fluorescence shows nucleus, the red fluorescence is Dil-labeled EpCAM antibodies, and the red fluorescence is FITC-labeled γ-IFNm.

CLSM images of autofluorescence in tumor tissue sections. The blue fluorescence shows nucleus, the red fluorescence is Dil-labeled EpCAM antibodies, and the red fluorescence is FITC-labeled γ-IFNm. In summary, the use of primary targeting to enhance the enrichment of mMNDs at tumor sites is well demonstrated using in vivo fluorescence and photoacoustic imaging in the system. And compared with the traditional in situ injection treatment strategy, this system can visual monitoring of the disease treatment process. Visualized dual-modality imaging combining PA and US can effectively present the graded targeting situation; it also confirm the superior precision targeting ability of the mMNDs ​+ ​Bio-magnet system from a macroscopic visualization perspective. Simultaneously, the tissue sections further demonstrate the feasibility and efficiency of graded targeting at the microscopic level. Thus, precise targeting and visualization supervision complement each other.

In vivo treatment of mMNDs ​+ ​Bio-magnet system

A previous in vitro study confirmed that our designed treatment strategy could effectively promote apoptosis of tumor cell and expression of MHC proteins; to further confirm our idea, we conducted in vivo treatment experiments on bilaterally tumor-bearing C57 mice. The treatment effect was evaluated by monitoring the growth of the primary and distant tumors, and the results showed that the most significant reduction of bilateral tumors was observed in the mMNDs ​+ ​Bio-magnet ​+ ​LIFU group compared with the control, mMNDs ​+ ​LIFU and Fe3O4-γ-IFNm-PFP-NPs ​+ ​Bio-magnet ​+ ​LIFU groups (Fig. 8A and E). It demonstrated that the tumors on the left side of the mMNDs ​+ ​Bio-magnet ​+ ​LIFU group received more increased drug enrichment and accurate physical, chemical, and immunological treatments by hierarchical targeting. The tumors on the right side, which did not receive immediate treatment, were also suppressed, mainly due to the antitumor immune response generated by the treatment of the left tumor, which directly confirms that this system can produce practical immunotherapeutic effects.
Fig. 8

In vivo treatment of mMNDs ​+ ​Bio-magnet system. A Pictures of mice in different groups. B TUNEL staining in different tumor tissue sections, and FC analysis of tumor tissue apoptosis in different tumor tissues. The scale bar is 50 ​μm. C&H Immunofluorescence staining of H-2 (green) in different tumor tissue sections. The scale bar is 50 ​μm. D Time-body-weight curves of tumor-bearing mice in the different treatment groups. E Time-tumor-volume curves of the left tumor in the different treatment groups. F FC analysis of H-2 expression rate in different tumor tissues. G&I FC analysis of Tumor cells apoptosis. ∗p ​< ​0.05, ∗∗p ​< ​0.01, ∗∗∗p ​< ​0.001, ∗∗∗∗p ​< ​0.0001.

In vivo treatment of mMNDs ​+ ​Bio-magnet system. A Pictures of mice in different groups. B TUNEL staining in different tumor tissue sections, and FC analysis of tumor tissue apoptosis in different tumor tissues. The scale bar is 50 ​μm. C&H Immunofluorescence staining of H-2 (green) in different tumor tissue sections. The scale bar is 50 ​μm. D Time-body-weight curves of tumor-bearing mice in the different treatment groups. E Time-tumor-volume curves of the left tumor in the different treatment groups. F FC analysis of H-2 expression rate in different tumor tissues. G&I FC analysis of Tumor cells apoptosis. ∗p ​< ​0.05, ∗∗p ​< ​0.01, ∗∗∗p ​< ​0.001, ∗∗∗∗p ​< ​0.0001. To further compare the treatment effects, the left tumors of each group were collected for immunofluorescence staining and TUNEL staining. The tumor tissue H-2 expression rate and apoptosis were quantified using FC. As shown in Fig. 8C, green fluorescence represents H-2 expression. Compared with the control group, increased H-2 was observed in the mMNDs ​+ ​LIFU, Fe3O4-γ-IFNm-PFP-NPs ​+ ​Bio-magnet ​+ ​LIFU, and mMNDs ​+ ​Bio-magnet ​+ ​LIFU groups, with the most significant increase in the mMNDs ​+ ​Bio-magnet ​+ ​LIFU group. In contrast, the increase in H-2 was not significant in the saline ​+ ​LIFU, mMNDs, mMNDs ​+ ​Bio-magnet, and Fe3O4-PFP-NPs:EpC ​+ ​Bio-magnet ​+ ​LIFU groups (Fig. 8C). In quantitative analysis using FC, the H-2 expression in the mMNDs ​+ ​Bio-magnet ​+ ​LIFU group was 7.11-fold, 2.08-fold, and 1.32-fold higher than that in the control, mMNDs ​+ ​LIFU, and Fe3O4-γ-IFNm-PFP-NPs ​+ ​Bio-magnet ​+ ​LIFU groups, respectively (Fig. 8F and H). Thus, using precise delivery of graded targeting combined with LIFU irradiation, the anti-tumor effect of mMNDs can be significantly enhanced. TUNEL staining showed that LIFU irradiation, chemotherapy, and immunotherapy under graded targeting conditions resulted in significant green fluorescence in the mMNDs ​+ ​Bio-magnet ​+ ​LIFU group, suggesting significantly greater tumor cell apoptosis in this group than in the remaining groups (Fig. 8B). The results of apoptosis detection using FC were consistent with the results of TUNEL staining, and the apoptosis rate in the mMNDs ​+ ​Bio-magnet ​+ ​LIFU group was as high as 74.78% (Fig. 8G and I). Meanwhile, there was no significant weight loss in the mMNDs ​+ ​Bio-magnet ​+ ​LIFU group compared to the control group (Fig. 8D), and no mouse mortality was observed throughout the treatment process. This observation, combined with the above experimental results, confirms the effectiveness of the system. As a traditional cancer treatment modality, chemotherapy alone can inhibit tumor growth to a certain extent [51]. However, most chemotherapeutic agents have suboptimal accumulation barriers [52]; these severely impede clinical treatment when combined with tumor resistance [5,51]. We designed a graded targeting multifunctional system that significantly improved drug enrichment in tumor tissues through primary targeting, solving the above-mentioned limitations effectively. Targeted LCSCs combined with the trinity treatment strategy can effectively address the adverse consequences of high drug resistance in HCC through physical, chemical, and immune killing, and optimize anti-tumor therapy. Moreover, the feasibility of this system was demonstrated in different species (human and murine) of HCC models. Studies on using reactive oxygen species (ROS) to treat tumors have emerged in recent years [53,54]. Most of them have discussed that Fe3O4 is the main component because the Fenton reaction involving Fe3O4 can produce ROS [55,56], and mitochondria are also the natural oxygen production plant in the body [54]. The combination of Fe3O4 and mitochondrial targeting is a feasible direction. ROS can also damage normal cells. For example, the activation of the renin angiotensin aldosterone system can increase ROS, which can lead to liver fibrosis and then lead to liver cancer [57]. The ability to accurately regulate Fe3O4 by using a magnetic field is also expected to regulate the aldosterone system accurately, so that it can change its role in the lesion site. It is also a direction to explore the combined use of nanoantioxidants when necessary to avoid the adverse reactions of the aldosterone system [58]. Moreover, the shell platform constructed by Fe3O4 combined with liposomes in this system has a strong assembly ability, and its application in other diseases can be explored in the future. Thus, this system is expected to improve the precision of targeted drugs and the drug enrichment rate through graded precision targeting; it can provide a new strategy for more accurate visual diagnosis and treatment of tumor.

Conclusion

The proposed visualization and treatment system based on hierarchical precision targeting is practical and feasible. The multifunctional magnetic nanoparticles loaded with Fe3O4 were precisely targeted to HCC tissue-LCSCs- Gamma interferon receptors at three levels, mediated by an in vivo bio-magnet, SNF peptide/EpCAM antibody, and γ-IFN/γ-IFNm hierarchy. Compared to other targeting strategies, in the primary targeting strategy, the magnetically responsive targeted delivery system can provide a solid force to attract magnetic nanoparticles to the tumor region, which counteracts the high interstitial pressure inside the tumor and increases targeted enrichment of nanoparticles. The high accumulation of nanoparticles at the tumor site could enhance photoacoustic and ultrasound molecular imaging for further diagnosis. After degaussing, the SNF peptide/EpCAM antibody mediates secondary targeting, and nanoparticles actively target LCSCs and deliver drugs around them. Under LIFU irradiation, the nanoparticle phase changes blast to kill some tumor cells, and the released γ-IFN/γ-IFNm are more enriched in LCSCs to finally achieve tertiary targeting. After binding to the receptor, γ-IFN/γ-IFNm can effectively promote tumor cell apoptosis, up-regulate MHC proteins expression, and finally “kill” the tumor in the crib through physical injury, chemotherapy, and immunotherapy. This series of measures is a powerful approach for making the treatment of HCC more efficient and thorough. Moreover, the feasibility of this system has been demonstrated in different species (human and murine) of HCC models. In conclusion, a visual diagnosis and treatment system based on hierarchical precision targeting has a promising potential.

Credit author statement

Shasha Shi: Conceptualization, Methodology, Formal analysis, Investigation, Writing-original draft, Visualization, Validation. Huipu Li: Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Investigation. Xi Zheng: Methodology, Validation. Lin Lv: Methodology, Validation. Shengtao Liao: Formal analysis, Writing – review. Peng Lu: Methodology, Investigation, Writing – review. Maoxia Liu: Methodology, Validation. Hongyun Zhao: Resources, Writing-review & editing, Supervision, Project administration, Funding acquisition. Zhechuan Mei: Resources, Writing-review & editing, Supervision, Project administration, Funding acquisition.

Declaration of competing interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
  57 in total

Review 1.  Bioassay of saliva proteins: The best alternative for conventional methods in non-invasive diagnosis of cancer.

Authors:  Aziz Eftekhari; Mohammad Hasanzadeh; Simin Sharifi; Solmaz Maleki Dizaj; Rovshan Khalilov; Elham Ahmadian
Journal:  Int J Biol Macromol       Date:  2018-12-01       Impact factor: 6.953

2.  A role of interferon-gamma (IFN-gamma) in tumor immunity: T cells with the capacity to reject tumor cells are generated but fail to migrate to tumor sites in IFN-gamma-deficient mice.

Authors:  C Nakajima; Y Uekusa; M Iwasaki; N Yamaguchi; T Mukai; P Gao; M Tomura; S Ono; T Tsujimura; H Fujiwara; T Hamaoka
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2001-04-15       Impact factor: 12.701

Review 3.  Biomolecules-derived biomaterials.

Authors:  Lakshmi Priya Datta; Shivaprasad Manchineella; Thimmaiah Govindaraju
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2019-11-15       Impact factor: 12.479

Review 4.  Delivering nanomedicine to solid tumors.

Authors:  Rakesh K Jain; Triantafyllos Stylianopoulos
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-09-14       Impact factor: 66.675

5.  Recent progress in mitochondria-targeting-based nanotechnology for cancer treatment.

Authors:  Jingbo Qin; Ningqiang Gong; Zhihuan Liao; Shouwen Zhang; Peter Timashev; Shuaidong Huo; Xing-Jie Liang
Journal:  Nanoscale       Date:  2021-04-12       Impact factor: 7.790

6.  Anti-Cancer Effects of Citalopram on Hepatocellular Carcinoma Cells Occur via Cytochrome C Release and the Activation of NF-kB.

Authors:  Elham Ahmadian; Aziz Eftekhari; Hossein Babaei; Alireza M Nayebi; Mohammad A Eghbal
Journal:  Anticancer Agents Med Chem       Date:  2017-11-24       Impact factor: 2.505

Review 7.  Strategies and challenges to improve the performance of tumor-associated active targeting.

Authors:  Yahui Zhang; Jing Cao; Zhi Yuan
Journal:  J Mater Chem B       Date:  2020-05-14       Impact factor: 6.331

Review 8.  Orally effective FDA-approved protein kinase targeted covalent inhibitors (TCIs).

Authors:  Robert Roskoski
Journal:  Pharmacol Res       Date:  2021-01-09       Impact factor: 7.658

9.  Meta-Analysis of Nanoparticle Delivery to Tumors Using a Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Modeling and Simulation Approach.

Authors:  Yi-Hsien Cheng; Chunla He; Jim E Riviere; Nancy A Monteiro-Riviere; Zhoumeng Lin
Journal:  ACS Nano       Date:  2020-03-04       Impact factor: 15.881

10.  BiVO4/Fe3O4@polydopamine superparticles for tumor multimodal imaging and synergistic therapy.

Authors:  Ze Wang; Guan Wang; Tingting Kang; Shuwei Liu; Lu Wang; Haoyang Zou; Yu Chong; Yi Liu
Journal:  J Nanobiotechnology       Date:  2021-03-29       Impact factor: 10.435

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.