| Literature DB >> 36081052 |
Piotr Boniecki1, Agnieszka Sujak1, Agnieszka A Pilarska2, Hanna Piekarska-Boniecka3, Agnieszka Wawrzyniak1, Barbara Raba1.
Abstract
The paper covers the problem of determination of defects and contamination in malting barley grains. The analysis of the problem indicated that although several attempts have been made, there are still no effective methods of identification of the quality of barley grains, such as the use of information technology, including intelligent sensors (currently, quality assessment of grain is performed manually). The aim of the study was the construction of a reduced set of the most important graphic descriptors from machine-collected digital images, important in the process of neural evaluation of the quality of BOJOS variety malting barley. Grains were sorted into three size fractions and seed images were collected. As a large number of graphic descriptors implied difficulties in the development and operation of neural classifiers, a PCA (Principal Component Analysis) statistical method of reducing empirical data contained in the analyzed set was applied. The grain quality expressed by an optimal set of transformed descriptors was modelled using artificial neural networks (ANN). The input layer consisted of eight neurons with a linear Postsynaptic Function (PSP) and a linear activation function. The one hidden layer was composed of sigmoid neurons having a linear PSP function and a logistic activation function. One sigmoid neuron was the output of the network. The results obtained show that neural identification of digital images with application of Principal Component Analysis (PCA) combined with neural classification is an effective tool supporting the process of rapid and reliable quality assessment of BOJOS malting barley grains.Entities:
Keywords: PCA (principal component analysis); classification of quality; compression of graphical data; digital image; graphic descriptors; malting barley
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 36081052 PMCID: PMC9459746 DOI: 10.3390/s22176578
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sensors (Basel) ISSN: 1424-8220 Impact factor: 3.847
Figure 1The scheme of the proposed procedures.
Figure 2Examples of the types of BOJOS cultivar grain damages.
Contaminant content in the examined size fractions of malting barley of BOJOS variety [%].
| Characteristics | Size Fraction | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 2.2 | 2.5 | 2.8 | |
| No pollution/Good quality grain | 40.27 | 48.04 | 57.09 |
| Mold-infected grain | 49.54 | 40.88 | 35.57 |
| Halves | 4.47 | 2.54 | 0.94 |
| Grain partially/completely dehulled | 1.83 | 6.35 | 3.84 |
| “Rainy weather” (with dark ends) | 3.31 | 1.27 | 2.28 |
| Grain with embryo killed | 0 | 0.69 | 0.25 |
| Sprouted grain | 0 | 0 | 0.03 |
| Grain affected by pests | 0.46 | 0 | 0 |
| Other grains/seeds | 0.12 | 0.23 | 0 |
Figure 3Acquisition and image processing of damaged malting barley grains using the original Hordeum v. 3.2 computer system created by B. Raba within MATLAB 2014b environment (MathWorks, Natick, MA, USA) using Image Processing Toolbox library.
Parameters extracted from malting barley seeds’ images using a Hordeum v.3.2 computer system (number of parameters).
| Geometric Parameters | Shape Factors | Values of Colour Space Models | Texture | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ‘Area’. | ‘C.Feret’. | ‘R Max’. | ‘H Max’. | ‘MGmean’. |
# parameter number.
Values of variances explained for 8 consecutive principal components.
| Size Fraction | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| 2.2 | 2.5 | 2.8 | |
| No. main component | Variance [%] | ||
| 1 | 22.03 | 21.59 | 22.97 |
| 2 | 18.54 | 18.10 | 17.20 |
| 3 | 15.88 | 15.34 | 13.59 |
| 4 | 8.69 | 8.30 | 8.26 |
| 5 | 6.80 | 6.85 | 7.40 |
| 6 | 4.35 | 4.94 | 5.95 |
| 7 | 3.63 | 4.10 | 3.77 |
| 8 | 3.32 | 3.08 | 3.06 |
Graphical descriptors for 3 fractions (2.2, 2.5, 2.8) of BOJOS variety samples (order by significance level of assignment to the first principal component).
| Fraction | Eight of the Most Important Primary Graphic Descriptors |
|---|---|
| 2.2 | Circumference, GLCMCorrelation, GLCM Homogeneity, R Median, MinorAxisLength, G Min, S Max, V Min |
| 2.5 | Circumference, GLCMContrast, S Mean, MinorAxisLength, S Max, S STD, G Min, V Min |
| 2.8 | Circumference, V Mean, Mgmean, S Median, MinorAxisLength, S STD, G Min, V Min |
RMS error for generated MLP: 8-14-1, MLP: 8-19-1 and MLP: 8-8-1 neural topologies.
| Model | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| RMS Error * | MLP: 8-14-1 | MLP: 8-19-1 | MLP: 8-8-1 |
| RMS (training file) | 0.017233 | 0.010752 | 0.010869 |
| RMS (testing file) | 0.012034 | 0.0105261 | 0.010416 |
| RMS (validation file) | 0.011213 | 0.0108675 | 0.010638 |
* dimensionless quantity.
Best neural network models for each fraction of the BOJOS variety samples.
| BOJOS | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sample | 2.2 | 2.5 | 2.8 | |
| ANN Quality | ||||
| Statistical v. 10 (StatSoft Polska, Cracov, Poland) | MLP: 8-14-1 | MLP: 8-19-1 | MLP: 8-8-1 | |
| ANN structure |
|
|
| |
| Quality of the training file [%] | 85.40 | 92.43 | 91.70 | |
| Quality of the testing file [%] | 83.13 | 94.74 | 95.87 | |
| Quality of the validation file [%] | 82.75 | 92.89 | 94.36 | |
| Learning algorithms used | BPCG—1600 epochs | BPCG—1600 epochs | BPCG—1600 epochs | |
Where: BP—back propagation method; CG—conjugate gradient method.