Literature DB >> 27702512

Relationships between protein content, starch molecular structure and grain size in barley.

Wenwen Yu1, Xinle Tan2, Wei Zou3, Zhenxia Hu4, Glen P Fox3, Michael J Gidley3, Robert G Gilbert5.   

Abstract

Correlations among barley protein, starch molecular structure and grain size were determined using 30 barley samples with variable protein contents. Starch molecular structure was characterized by fluorophore-assisted carbohydrate electrophoresis and by size-exclusion chromatography (SEC, also termed GPC). The chain-length distributions of amylopectin were fitted using a mathematical model reflecting the relative activities of starch branching enzymes and starch synthase enzymes. Increased protein content significantly and negatively correlated with higher amounts of amylose with longer chains (degree of polymerization, DP 1600-40000) while barley grain sizes positively associated with starch contents. Protein content also positively correlated with the proportion of longer chains of amylopectin (DP 34-100). These results showed that the enzyme activities of starch synthases change with protein content, leading to altered starch contents, structures and grain sizes. From this perspective, selecting for large grain size (or low protein content) does not necessarily relate to starch structure, although may suggest long chains of amylopectin. Measuring starch structure could give a good indication of process performance in human food, animal feed and brewing, as all these structural features contribute to significant functional properties.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Barley; Biosynthesis; GPC; Molecular structure; Protein; Starch

Year:  2016        PMID: 27702512     DOI: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2016.08.078

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Carbohydr Polym        ISSN: 0144-8617            Impact factor:   9.381


  7 in total

1.  Rheological behaviors, structural properties and freeze-thaw stability of normal and waxy genotypes of barley starch: a comparative study with mung bean, potato, and corn starches.

Authors:  Shenchi Zhao; Xin Li; Gongshe Hu; Xi Liang; Chengguo Liu; Qian Liu
Journal:  Food Sci Biotechnol       Date:  2021-08-26       Impact factor: 3.231

Review 2.  Capillary Electrophoresis Separations of Glycans.

Authors:  Grace Lu; Cassandra L Crihfield; Srikanth Gattu; Lindsay M Veltri; Lisa A Holland
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2018-03-12       Impact factor: 60.622

3.  Novel insights into the effect of drought stress on the development of root and caryopsis in barley.

Authors:  Fali Li; Xinyu Chen; Xurun Yu; Mingxin Chen; Wenyi Lu; Yunfei Wu; Fei Xiong
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2020-01-31       Impact factor: 2.984

4.  Identification of QTL for barley grain size.

Authors:  Junmei Wang; Xiaojian Wu; Wenhao Yue; Chenchen Zhao; Jianming Yang; Meixue Zhou
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2021-04-29       Impact factor: 2.984

5.  Preparation of Natural Food-Grade Core-Shell Starch/Zein Microparticles by Antisolvent Exchange and Transglutaminase Crosslinking for Reduced Digestion of Starch.

Authors:  Chaofan Wang; Kaili Qin; Qingjie Sun; Xuguang Qiao
Journal:  Front Nutr       Date:  2022-04-15

6.  Dimension Reduction of Digital Image Descriptors in Neural Identification of Damaged Malting Barley Grains.

Authors:  Piotr Boniecki; Agnieszka Sujak; Agnieszka A Pilarska; Hanna Piekarska-Boniecka; Agnieszka Wawrzyniak; Barbara Raba
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-08-31       Impact factor: 3.847

7.  Effect of Genotype and Environment on Food-Related Traits of Organic Winter Naked Barleys.

Authors:  Jordyn S Bunting; Andrew S Ross; Brigid M Meints; Patrick M Hayes; Karl Kunze; Mark E Sorrells
Journal:  Foods       Date:  2022-08-31
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.