| Literature DB >> 36080337 |
Jinfeng Chen1, Yimou Yang1, Yujie Zhou1, Yang Wei1, Rui Zhu1, Shaojun Zheng1.
Abstract
To search for efficient agricultural antifungal lead compounds, 39 Chimonanthus praecox derivatives were designed, synthesized, and evaluated for their antifungal activities. The structures of target compounds were fully characterized by 1H NMR, 13C NMR, and MS spectra. The preliminary bioassays revealed that some compounds exhibited excellent antifungal activities in vitro. For example, the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of compound b15 against Phytophthora infestans was 1.95 µg mL-1, and the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of compound b17 against Sclerotinia sclerotiorum was 1.95 µg mL-1. Therefore, compounds b15 and b17 were identified as the most promising candidates for further study.Entities:
Keywords: Chimonanthus praecox derivative; antifungal activity; structure–activity relationship; synthesis
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 36080337 PMCID: PMC9457717 DOI: 10.3390/molecules27175570
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.927
Figure 1Chimonanthus praecox alkaloids.
Figure 2Representative Chimonanthus praecox compounds found by our research group.
Scheme 1Synthesis of Chimonanthus praecox derivatives.
MIC of Chimonanthus praecox derivatives against 6 plant pathogens.
| Compd. | MIC (µg mL−1) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| 62.5 | - | 125 | 32.3 | - | 31.3 |
|
| 31.2 | - | 31.25 | 15.61 | 32.25 | 125 |
|
| 62.5 | - | 31.25 | 15.61 | 31.25 | 31.25 |
|
| 62.5 | 250 | 62.5 | 250 | 125 | 125 |
|
| 31.25 | 62.5 | 125 | 250 | 250 | 125 |
|
| 31.3 | 15.61 | 62.5 | 62.5 | 62.5 | 31.3 |
|
| 250 | - | 250 | 250 | 125 | 250 |
|
| 125 | 250 | 62.5 | 125 | - | 250 |
|
| 62.5 | 250 | 250 | 250 | - | 250 |
|
| 62.5 | 62.5 | 31.25 | 15.16 | - | 31.25 |
|
| 31.25 | - | 62.5 | 250 | - | 125 |
|
| 62.5 | 31.3 | 62.5 | 250 | 125 | 125 |
|
| 62.5 | - | 62.5 | 125 | 31.25 | 125 |
|
| - | - | 250 | 250 | - | 250 |
|
| 31.25 | - | 31.25 | 62.5 | 15.61 | 31.25 |
|
| 15.63 | 125 | 31.25 | 62.5 | 31.25 | 125 |
|
| 125 | 250 | 62.5 | 250 | 250 | 125 |
|
| 62.5 | 250 | 125 | 62.5 | 250 | 125 |
|
| 7.8 | 31.25 | 31.25 | 62.5 | - | 62.5 |
|
| 31.25 | 125 | 62.5 | 31.25 | 62.5 | - |
|
| 125 | 62.5 | 31.3 | 250 | 62.5 | 62.5 |
|
| 62.5 | - | - | - | 125 | 125 |
|
| 62.5 | 62.5 | - | - | 125 | 62.5 |
|
| 31.3 | 31.3 | 62.5 | 62.5 | 31.25 | 62.5 |
|
| 62.5 | 125 | 125 | - | - | 31.3 |
|
| 31.3 | 62.5 | - | 31.3 | 125 | 62.5 |
|
| 62.5 | 62.5 | - | 125 | 31.3 | 62.5 |
|
| 31.3 | 15.61 | 125 | 62.5 | 62.5 | 62.5 |
|
| 31.3 | 62.5 | - | 62.5 | 125 | 62.5 |
|
| 31.3 | 15.61 | 62.5 | 31.3 | 15.61 | 31.3 |
|
| 15.61 | 31.3 | 15.61 | 62.5 | 125 | - |
|
| 7.81 | 3.91 | 125 | 31.3 | 31.3 | 31.3 |
|
| 62.5 | 62.5 | - | 31.3 | 125 | 250 |
|
| 62.5 | 125 | 125 | - | 31.3 | 31.3 |
|
| 7.81 | 1.95 | 125 | 31.3 | - | 15.61 |
|
| 3.91 | 3.91 | 125 | 15.61 | - | 15.61 |
|
| 1.95 | 3.91 | 62.5 | 15.61 | 31.3 | 15.61 |
|
| 15.61 | 31.3 | - | 62.5 | 62.5 | 125 |
|
| 31.25 | 15.63 | 125 | 62.5 | 125 | 15.61 |
|
| 7.8 | 62.5 | 15.16 | 62.5 | 31.3 | 125 |
|
| 3.9 | 15.16 | 62.5 | 31.3 | 125 | 62.5 |
Note: The Carbendazim and Amphotericin B were used as the positive controls; “-” means no inhibition effect. MIC: Minimal Inhibitory Concentration; S. s.: Sclerotinia sclerotiorum; A. s.: Altenaria solani; V. d.: Verticillium dahliae; C. o.: Colletotrichum orbiculare; C. j.: Cytospora juglandis; C. l.: Curvularia lunata; C: Carbendazim; A: Amphotericin B.
Figure 3Substituent R3.