| Literature DB >> 36080148 |
Imtiyaz Murtaza1, Omi Laila1, Iqra Drabu1, Ajaz Ahmad2, Wafa Charifi3, Simona M Popescu4, Sheikh Mansoor5.
Abstract
Taraxacum officinale (T. officinale), a wild vegetable with a number of health claims, has been mostly ignored and unexplored. The study aims to compare the nutritional, phytochemical as well as antidiabetic potential of fresh as well as shade-dried leaves of T. officinale, in order to recommend its best form as a dietary antidiabetic product. The results revealed that as compared to fresh leaves, the shade-dried leaves, in addition to possessing higher levels of carbohydrates, crude protein, crude fat, crude fiber, etc., also contain appreciable amounts of total phenols (5833.12 ± 4.222 mg/100), total flavonoids (188.84 ± 0.019 mg/100 g), ascorbic acid (34.70 ± 0.026 mg/100 g), β-carotene (3.88 ± 1.473 mg/100 g) and total chlorophyll (239.51 ± 0.015 mg/100 g) antioxidants. The study revealed the presence of medicinally important antidiabetic flavonoid quercetin present in T. officinale leaves. Among the three solvent systems used, the aqueous extract of shade-dried T. officinale leaves comparatively demonstrated potent antidiabetic activity under in vitro conditions in a dose-dependent manner via targeting α-amylase and α-glucosidase, the two potent enzymes of carbohydrate metabolism. Therefore, in addition to being a nutritious herb, the shade-dried leaves of T. officinale have great potential to suppress post-prandial glucose rise and can be better exploited through clinical trials to be used as a dietary intervention for better management of diabetes.Entities:
Keywords: T. officinale; antidiabetic; phytochemicals; quercetin; toxicity; α-amylase; α-glucosidase
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 36080148 PMCID: PMC9457557 DOI: 10.3390/molecules27175380
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.927
Comparative analysis of proximate composition of T. officinale leaves (fresh and shade-dried).
| Parameter | Fresh | Shade-Dried | Tcal |
|---|---|---|---|
| Moisture (%) | 81.94 ± 1.07 | 7.04 ± 0.07 | 103.05 ** |
| Ash (%) | 1.90 ± 0.006 | 12.28 ± 0.012 | 778.75 ** |
| Carbohydrates (%) | 8.33 ± 0.678 | 58.69 ± 0.015 | 74.26 ** |
| Crude protein (%) | 3.82 ± 0.016 | 16.01 ± 0.025 | 593.24 ** |
| Crude fat (%) | 0.84 ± 0.017 | 4.29 ± 0.017 | 202.78 ** |
| Crude fiber (%) | 3.11 ± 0.012 | 8.72 ± 0.023 | 297.33 ** |
| Total sugars (%) | 6.73 ± 0.052 | 9.08 ± 0.035 | 66.41 ** |
| Reducing sugars (%) | 2.49 ± 0.026 | 2.60 ± 0.017 | 5.15 ** |
| Non-reducing sugars (%) | 4.24 ± 0.047 | 6.50 ± 0.024 | 132.97 ** |
Results are expressed as mean ± SD and are the average of triplicates. ** indicates significance level at p < 0.01 and Tcal is the t-statistic for the data obtained.
Comparative analysis of mineral content of T. officinale leaves (mg/100 g).
| Parameter | Fresh | Dried | Tcal |
|---|---|---|---|
| Iron | 3.08 ± 0.021 | 6.01 ± 0.28 | 117.59 ** |
| Potassium | 392.76 ± 0.03 | 405.75 ± 0.025 | 607 ** |
| Calcium | 192.06 ± 0.05 | 204.68 ± 0.035 | 302.07 ** |
| Magnesium | 37.93 ± 0.034 | 45.76 ± 0.038 | 211.02 ** |
Results are expressed as mean ± SD and are the average of triplicates. ** indicates significance level of p < 0.01. Tcal is the t-statistic for the data obtained.
Comparative analysis of bioactive constituents of T. officinale leaves.
| Parameter | Fresh | Dried | Tcal |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total phenols (mg/100 g) | 1707 ± 3.819 | 5833.12 ± 4.222 | 724.68 ** |
| Total flavonoids (mg/100 g) | 179.44 ± 0.012 | 188.84 ± 0.019 | 424.83 ** |
| β-carotene (mg/100 g) | 5.85 ± 0.167 | 3.88 ± 1.473 | 3.0602 |
| Ascorbic acid (mg/100 g) | 39.95 ± 0.052 | 34.70 ± 0.026 | 141.34 ** |
| Chlorophyll-a (mg/100 g) | 24.53 ± 0.027 | 178.03 ± 0.035 | 3441.93 ** |
| Chlorophyll-b (mg/100 g) | 20.69 ± 0.018 | 61.49 ± 0.049 | 676.87 ** |
| Total chlorophyll (mg/100 g) | 45.25 ± 0.015 | 239.51 ± 0.015 | 8992.49 ** |
Results are expressed as mean ± SD and are the average of triplicates. ** indicates a significance level of p < 0.01. Tcal is the t-statistic for the data obtained.
Figure 1HPTLC chromatogram of T. officinale leaf extracts. S represents quercetin standard, F1 and F2 represent quercetin from fresh T. officinale leaf extracts, and D1 and D2 represent quercetin from shade-dried T. officinale leaf extracts.
Figure 2Inhibitory potential of T. officinale extracts against α-amylase.
Figure 3The IC50 value of aqueous extract of shade-dried T. officinale leaves against α-amylase.
Figure 4Percent α-glucosidase inhibitory potential of T. officinale extracts.
Figure 5The IC50 value of aqueous extract of shade-dried T. officinale leaves against α-glucosidase.
Correlation matrix between different variables and bioactive constituents (fresh T. officinale leaves).
| Variables | Total Phenols | Total Flavonoids | β-Carotene | Ascorbic Acid |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| α-amylase inhibitory potential | 0.96 | 0.94 | 0.90 | 0.91 |
| α-glucosidase inhibitory potential | 0.97 | 0.93 | 0.89 | 0.92 |
Correlation matrix between different variables and bioactive constituents (dried T. officinale leaves).
| Variables | Total Phenols | Total Flavonoids | β-Carotene | Ascorbic Acid |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| α-amylase inhibitory potential | 0.98 | 0.96 | 0.87 | 0.88 |
| α-glucosidase inhibitory potential | 0.99 | 0.95 | 0.86 | 0.89 |