| Literature DB >> 36080069 |
Zhiwei Liang1,2, Min Chen3, Yuanyuan Yan1,2, Dongmei Chen1,2,3, Shuyu Xie1,2.
Abstract
Albendazole (ABZ), an effective benzimidazole antiparasitic drug is limited by its poor solubility and oral bioavailability. In order to overcome its disadvantages, ABZ nanocrystals were prepared using a novel bottom-up method based on acid-base neutralization recrystallization with high-speed mixing and dispersing. The cosolvent, stabilizer and preparation temperature were optimized using single factor tests. The physicochemical properties, solubility and pharmacokinetics of the optimal ABZ nanocrystals were evaluated. The high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC), differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) and X-ray powder diffraction (XRD) showed that ABZ had no structural and crystal phase change after nanocrystallization. The saturated solubility of ABZ nanocrystals in different solvents was increased by 2.2-118 fold. The oral bioavailability of the total active ingredients (ABZ and its metabolites of albendazole sulfoxide (ABZSO) and albendazole sulfone (ABZSO2)) of the nanocrystals in rats was enhanced by 1.40 times compared to the native ABZ. These results suggest that nanocrystals might be a promising way to enhance the solubility and oral bioavailability of ABZ and other insoluble drugs.Entities:
Keywords: albendazole; bioavailability; insolubility; nanocrystals; oral absorption
Year: 2022 PMID: 36080069 PMCID: PMC9457984 DOI: 10.3390/nano12173032
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nanomaterials (Basel) ISSN: 2079-4991 Impact factor: 5.719
Figure 1Albendazole metabolic pathway.
Figure 2The schematic representation of ABZ nanocrystals preparation.
Figure 3The chromatogram of ABZ, ABZSO and ABZSO2.
Figure 4The chromatogram of ABZ (A) and ABZ (B) under high temperature of 90 °C.
Figure 5The appearance of the nanosuspension prepared by different stabilizers. (A): PVP, (B): PVA, (C): Tween 80; (D): HEL-40 as stabilizers.
Optimization formulation condition and properties of ABZ nanocrystal.
| ABZ | PVA | Malic Acid | Temperature | Speed | Size (nm) | ZP (mv) | PDI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3 g | 0.25 g | 15.0 g | 80 °C | 2000 rpm/5 min | 508 ± 11.9 | 2.30 ± 0.44 | 0.28 ± 0.01 |
Figure 6SEM photomicrograph of albendazole nanoparticles (×100,000).
Figure 7DSC of bulk drug and albendazole nanocrystals.
Figure 8XRD pattern (B) of bulk drug and albendazole nanocrystals.
Solubility of native ABZ and ABZ nanocrystal in various solvents (25 °C, standard atmospheric pressure).
| Solvents | Solubility (µg/mL, Mean ± S.D.) | Enhanced Folds | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Native ABZ | ABZ Nanocrystal | ||
| Water | 3.35 ± 0.10 | 3967 ± 0.05 b | 1189 |
| Ethanol | 11.7 ± 0.00 | 226 ± 0.08 b | 19.4 |
| Acetonitrile | 31.9 ± 0.30 | 282 ± 0.24 b | 8.80 |
| DMF | 7308 ± 0.34 | 16,078 ± 0.42 b | 2.20 |
b Statistical significances compared to ABZ power are p < 0.01.
Figure 9In vitro dissolution curves of native albendazole and albendazole. Nanocrystals in (A) pH = 2.0 PBS and (B) pH = 8.0 PBS (Mean ± SD, n = 6).
Figure 10The concentration vs. time curves of ABZ (A), ABZSO (B), ABZSO2 (C) and total active ingredient (D) in SD rats after oral administration of nanocrystals and native ABZ at a dose of 100 mg/kg body weight.
Pharmacokinetic parameters of native ABZ and nanocrystals in SD rats after an oral dose of 100 mg/kg (mean ± standard deviation, n = 6).
| Parameters | Units | ABZ | ABZSO | ABZSO2 | Total | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Native | Nanosuspension | Native | Nanosuspension | Native | Nanosuspension | Native | Nanosuspension | ||
| Tmax | h | 0.60 ± 0.22 | 0.50 | 5.00 ± 1.15 | 4.67 ± 1.03 b | 8.00 | 7.33 ± 1.03 a | 5.60 ± 1.67 | 5.67 ± 1.51 b |
| Cmax | μg/mL | 0.61 ± 0.06 | 0.66 ± 0.19 | 1.18 ± 0.16 | 2.08 ± 0.38 a | 1.03 ± 0.11 | 1.71 ± 0.30 a | 2.08 ± 0.35 | 3.37 ± 0.82 b |
| AUC0→∞ | h*μg/mL | 14.7 ± 4.04 | 16.4 ± 1.81 a | 31.6 ± 7.49 | 46.1 ± 11.1 a | 30.7 ± 2.25 | 35.9 ± 3.59 a | 725 ± 6.18 | 102 ± 20.8 b |
| VZ | mL/kg | 341 ± 85.5 | 340 ± 77.9 b | 143 ± 14.2 | 104 ± 16.9 b | 125 ± 10.2 | 113 ± 21.6 b | 89,468 ± 34,099 | 41,904 ± 13,965 b |
| CL | mL/h/kg | 5.70 ± 1.81 | 3.42 ± 1.39 a | 3.62 ± 0.22 | 2.22 ± 0.76 a | 2.82 ± 0.52 | 2.35 ± 0.52 a | 1101 ± 521 | 926 ± 223 b |
| MRTlast | h | 35.2 ± 3.37 | 43.2 ± 4.15 a | 30.9 ± 4.4 | 34.3 ± 2.10 b | 30.6 ± 2.59 | 31.3 ± 5.11 a | 32.0 ± 3.00 | 33.0 ± 3.33 a |
| Ke | 1/h | 0.01 ± 0.001 | 0.01 ± 0.002 a | 0.010 ± 0.001 | 0.010 ± 0.003 b | 0.01 ± 0.002 | 0.008 ± 0.002 b | 0.009 ± 0.001 | 0.009 ± 0.002 a |
| T1/2 | h | 62.4 ± 7.88 | 66.8 ± 10.8 b | 67.3 ± 8.24 | 75.79 ± 21.68 a | 87.82 ± 21.55 | 90.5 ± 26.4 b | 79.9 ± 12.7 | 83.7 ± 23.0 b |
| F | % | 114.7 | 172 | 113 | 140 | ||||
Tmax, time to reach maximum concentration; Cmax, maximum concentration of drug; AUC0→∞, area under plasma concentration–time curve; VZ, volume of distribution; CL, clearance rate; MRTlast, mean resident time; Ke, elimination rate; T1/2, elimination half-life; F, bioavailability. a Statistical significances compared to native ABZ are p < 0.05. b Statistical significances compared to native ABZ are p < 0.01.
The reported preparation methods of ABZ nanocrystal.
| Method | Solvent and Stabilizer | Performance | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|
| High-pressure homogenization combined with spray drying | Water, PVPk30 | Enhanced the chemoprophylactic and clinical efficacy | 19 |
| High-pressure homogenization combined with drying processes | Water, ABZ and P188 (1:1) | AUC values of nano-sized ABZO was enhanced by threefold | 21 |
| High-pressure homogenization combined with spray-drying processes | Water, P188 | AUC of ABZSO was almost twice than that of the control | 22 |
| Spray drying | Dichloromethane, P188 | Approximately 4.2-fold higher AUC of ABZSO in Beagle dogs | 23 |
| Antisolvent precipitation technique combined with drying | Dimethyl sulfoxide | Improved the dissolution | 24 |
| High pressure homogenization combined with and spray-drying | Water | The dissolution rate noticeably increased | 25 |