| Literature DB >> 36079924 |
Nattaporn Pattarachotanant1,2, Nilubon Sornkaew1,2, Watis Warayanon1,2, Panthakarn Rangsinth3, Chanin Sillapachaiyaporn1,4, Wudtipong Vongthip1,4, Siriporn Chuchawankul3, Anchalee Prasansuklab1,5, Tewin Tencomnao1,2.
Abstract
Hyperglycemia is one of the important causes of neurodegenerative disorders and aging. Aquilaria crassna Pierre ex Lec (AC) has been widely used to relieve various health ailments. However, the neuroprotective and anti-aging effects against high glucose induction have not been investigated. This study aimed to investigate the effects of hexane extract of AC leaves (ACH) in vitro using human neuroblastoma SH-SY5Y cells and in vivo using nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. SH-SY5Y cells and C. elegans were pre-exposed with high glucose, followed by ACH treatment. To investigate neuroprotective activities, neurite outgrowth and cell cycle progression were determined in SH-SY5Y cells. In addition, C. elegans was used to determine ACH effects on antioxidant activity, longevity, and healthspan. In addition, ACH phytochemicals were analyzed and the possible active compounds were identified using a molecular docking study. ACH exerted neuroprotective effects by inducing neurite outgrowth via upregulating growth-associated protein 43 and teneurin-4 expression and normalizing cell cycle progression through the regulation of cyclin D1 and SIRT1 expression. Furthermore, ACH prolonged lifespan, improved body size, body length, and brood size, and reduced intracellular ROS accumulation in high glucose-induced C. elegans via the activation of gene expression in the DAF-16/FoxO pathway. Finally, phytochemicals of ACH were analyzed and revealed that β-sitosterol and stigmasterol were the possible active constituents in inhibiting insulin-like growth factor 1 receptor (IGFR). The results of this study establish ACH as an alternative medicine to defend against high glucose effects on neurotoxicity and aging.Entities:
Keywords: Cyclin D1; GAP-43; SIRT1; Teneurin-4; aqp-1; daf-16; neurite outgrowth
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 36079924 PMCID: PMC9460374 DOI: 10.3390/nu14173668
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nutrients ISSN: 2072-6643 Impact factor: 6.706
The sequence of RNA primers.
| Primer | Forward 5′-3′ | Reverse 5′-3′ |
|---|---|---|
|
| TTTCCGTCCCCGAACTCAA | ATTCGCCAACCCATGATGG |
|
| TTCGAAAGGGAATCTAAAAGAAG | GCCAAGTTGGTCCAGAAGATAG |
|
| TTTTGGCAAGGAACCTCATC | GCTGTTGCCATAACTGCAAA |
|
| AGACAATGGATCCGGAATGT | CATCCCAGTTGGTGACGATA |
Figure 1The effect of different concentrations of ACH on SH-SY5Y cell viability (A). MTT assay was used to clarify cell viability. The effect of ACH extracts on high glucose-induced intracellular ROS accumulation was performed using H2DCFDA assay, and the relative intracellular ROS accumulation level is shown in (B). MTT assay showed cell viability in cells pre-exposed with high glucose and followed by ACH treatment (C). Data are presented as the means ± SEM, * p < 0.05 vs. control and # p < 0.05 vs. 50 mM glucose.
Figure 2The neuroprotective effect of ACH on neuronal differentiation. The neurite outgrowth process was observed under a differential interference contrast (DIC) microscope at 10× magnification (black lines represented the measurement of neurite outgrowth) (A). The number of bearing cells and neurite length are shown in (B,C), respectively. GAP-43 and Teneurin-4 expression is shown in a representative Western blot (D). Normalized values of both GAP-43 and Teneurin-4 against β-actin (E,F). All data are presented as the mean ± SEM, * p < 0.05 vs. control; + p < 0.05 vs. 10 μM RA; # p < 0.05 vs. 50 mM glucose; ns = not significant.
Figure 3The neuroprotection of ACH on high glucose-induced cell cycle delay. Quantitative determination based on propidium iodide (PI) staining was carried out using a flow cytometer. Cell histogram (A) and the percentage of cell numbers (B) are shown. Cyclin D1 and sirtuin 1 (SIRT1) are as shown in a representative Western blot (C). Normalized values of both cyclin D1 and SIRT1 against β-actin (D). The mean ± SEM values of normalized cyclin D1 and SIRT1 expression were obtained from three independent experiments, * p < 0.05 vs. control; # p < 0.05 vs. 50 mM glucose.
Figure 4ACH extracts attenuated the high glucose-induced reduction of body length and size and brood size. Bright-field microscope images of C. elegans were taken using a 10x objective, and representative images are shown (A). The body size and length were measured from at least 20 adult day 1 worms. The number of eggs hatching were counted. The mean ± SEM values of body size (B), body length (C) and brood size (D) are shown, * p < 0.05 vs. control; # p < 0.05 vs. 50 mM glucose-fed worms.
Figure 5The protective effect of ACH extracts on high glucose-induced oxidative stress in C. elegans. Intracellular ROS accumulation was performed using H2DCFDA assay and imaged by a confocal microscope (A). Relative intracellular ROS accumulation level is shown in (B). Data are presented as the means ± SEM, * p < 0.05 vs. control; # p < 0.05 vs. high glucose-fed worms.
Figure 6The effect of high glucose and ACH crude extracts on C. elegans lifespan.
Results and statistical analyses of lifespan of C. elegans treated with high glucose and ACH.
| Groups | Mean Lifespan | Number of Worms | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Day ± SEM | % Increase (vs. 50 mM Glucose) | ||||
| 0.1% DMSO | 18.55 ± 0.42 | 31.00 | - | 0.0001 | 102 |
| 50 mM Glucose | 14.16 ± 0.40 | - | 0.0001 | - | 118 |
| 50 mM Glucose + 10 μg/mL ACH | 17.01 ± 0.47 | 20.13 | 0.0379 | 0.0001 | 93 |
| 50 mM Glucose + 50 μg/mL ACH | 19.93 ± 0.43 | 40.75 | 0.0192 | 0.0001 | 91 |
Figure 7The mRNA expression: (A) daf-16, (B) sod-3, and (C) aqp-1 genes of ACH treatment on high glucose-fed worms. All data were presented as the mean ± SEM), * p < 0.05 vs. control; # p < 0.05 vs. high glucose-fed worms.
Proposed phytochemical constituents in ACH extract compared with the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) database.
| Compound | RT | Area (%) | MF | MW |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| tetradecane | 22.867 | 0.15 | C14H30 | 198 |
| hexadecane | 30.730 | 0.12 | C16H34 | 226 |
| phytol | 39.231 | 0.3 | C20H40O | 296 |
| n-hexadecanoic acid | 43.3 | 0.9 | C16H32O2 | 256 |
| oleic acid | 48.638 | 0.57 | C18H34O2 | 282 |
| oleamide (9-Octadecenamide, (Z)-) | 54.799 | 0.97 | C18H35NO | 281 |
| squalene | 66.506 | 13.55 | C30H50 | 410 |
| nonacosane | 68.036 | 0.49 | C29H60 | 408 |
| 9,19-cyclolanost-24-en-3-ol, acetate, (3.β.) | 68.794 | 0.38 | C32H52O2 | 468 |
| 2,2,4-trimethyl-3-(3,8,12,16-tetramethyl-heptadeca-3,7,11,15-tetraenyl)-cyclohexanol | 69.037 | 0.4 | C30H52O | 428 |
| ϒ-tocopherol | 71.233 | 0.69 | C28H48O2 | 416 |
| hentriacontane | 72.371 | 2.68 | C31H64 | 436 |
| vitamin E | 73 | 8.94 | C29H50O2 | 430 |
| stigmasterol | 75.305 | 1.17 | C29H48O | 412 |
| D-friedoolean-14-en-3-one | 76.122 | 1.25 | C30H48O | 424 |
| tritriacontane | 76.463 | 9.38 | C33H68 | 464 |
| β-amyrin | 76.547 | 5.17 | C30H50O | 426 |
| olean-12-en-3-one | 77.411 | 2.23 | C30H48O | 424 |
| lupenone (lup-20(29)-en-3-one) | 77.498 | 3.31 | C30H48O | 424 |
| α-amyrin | 77.878 | 1.94 | C30H50O | 426 |
| lup-20(29)-en-3-ol, acetate, (3.β.) | 78.077 | 0.93 | C32H52O2 | 468 |
| D:A-friedooleanan-7-one, 3-hydroxy | 78.41 | 1.19 | C30H50O2 | 442 |
| ursa-9(11),12-dien-3-ol | 78.65 | 1.16 | C30H48O | 424 |
| 9,19-cyclolanostan-3-ol,24,24-epoxymethano, acetate | 78.796 | 3.74 | C33H54O3 | 498 |
| betulin | 79.05 | 1.00 | C31H52O | 440 |
| friedelan-3-one | 79.473 | 0.42 | C30H50O | 426 |
| D:A-friedooleanan-3-ol, (3.α.) | 80.004 | 10.21 | C30H52O | 428 |
| pentatriacontane | 80.197 | 1.42 | C35H72 | 492 |
| 24-methylenecycloartan-3-one | 80.474 | 14.17 | C31H50O | 438 |
RT: retention time; MF: molecular formula; MW: molecular weight.
Docking results of the compounds with IGFR.
| No. | Compound | MW | Binding Energy (kcal/mol) | Inhibition Constant | Amino Acid Interaction | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hydrogen Bond | Hydrophobic Bond | Electrostatic Bond | |||||
| EGCG (positive control) | 458.4 | −6.54 | 16.18 μM | ASP1086 | LEU1005 (2) | ||
| Resveratrol (positive control) | 228.24 | −6.57 | 15.39 μM | MET1082 | VAL1013 | ||
| 1 | 24-Methylenecycloartan-3-one | 438.7 | −5.13 | 172.22 μM | GLY1085 | LEU1005 | |
| 2 | Squalene | 410.7 | −6.37 | 21.57 μM | ARG1003 | ||
| 3 | D:A-Friedooleanan-3-ol, (3.alpha.)- | 428.7 | −5.90 | 47.43 μM | GLU1080 | VAL1013 | |
| 4 | Friedelan-3-one | 426.7 | −7.88 | 1.66 μM | VAL1013 (3) | ||
| 5 | Stigmasterol | 412.7 | −9.32 | 146.8 nM | ARG1003 | LEU1005 (3) | |
| 6 | Tritriacontane | 464.9 | −3.51 | 2.69 mM | LEU1005 (3) | ||
| 7 | Vitamin E | 430.7 | −7.92 | 1.56 μM | GLY1085 | VAL1013 (3) |
|
| 8 | D-Friedoolean-14-en-3-one | 424.7 | −8.88 | 355.27 nM | LEU1005 (4) | ||
| 9 | 9,19-Cyclolanostan-3-ol,24,24-epoxymethano-, acetate | 498.8 | −7.30 | 4.49 μM | SER1089 | LEU1005 | |
| 10 | D:A-Friedooleanan-7-one, 3-hydroxy- | 442.7 | −5.37 | 116.19 μM | GLU1080 | LEU1005 | |
| 11 | Beta-amyrin | 426.7 | −9.02 | 245.77 nM | THR1083 | LEU1005 | |
| 12 | Olean-12-en-3-one | 424.7 | −9.77 | 68.61 nM | LEU1005 | ||
| 13 | Lup-20(29)-en-3-ol, acetate, (3.beta.)- | 468.8 | −7.36 | 4.02 μM | LEU1005 | ||
| 14 | Lupenone (Lup-20(29)-en-3-one) | 424.7 | −9.56 | 97.57 nM | SER1089 | LEU1005 | |
| 15 | Gamma-Tocopherol | 416.7 | −7.75 | 2.08 μM | LEU1005 (3) | ||
| 16 | Hentriacontane | 436.8 | −3.39 | 3.25 mM | LEU1005 (2) | ||
| 17 | Oleamide (9-Octadecenamide, (Z)-) | 281.5 | −4.51 | 490.34 μM | GLU1080 | LEU1005 (2) | |
| 18 | Alpha-amyrin | 426.7 | −9.21 | 178.76 nM | LEU1005 | ||
| 19 | Pentatriacontane | 492.9 | −1.59 | 68.88 mM | LEU1005 (5) | ||
| 20 | Ursa-9(11),12-dien-3-ol | 424.7 | −8.53 | 554.63 nM | VAL1013 (2) | ||
| 21 | Betulin | 442.7 | −8.86 | 322.86 nM | LEU1005 (2) | ||
| 22 | n-Hexadecanoic acid | 256.42 | −3.76 | 1.75 mM | MET1082 | LEU1005 | |
| 23 | Oleic acid | 282.5 | −4.43 | 564.46 μM | SER1089 | VAL1013 (2) | |
| 24 | Nonacosane | 408.8 | −3.85 | 1.52 mM | LEU1005 | ||
| 25 | 2,2,4-Trimethyl-3-(3,8,12,16-tetramethyl-heptadeca-3,7,11,15-tetraenyl)-cyclohexanol | 428.7 | −6.75 | 11.23 μM | SER1089 | LEU1005 (2) | |
| 26 | 9,19-Cyclolanost-24-en-3-ol, acetate, (3.beta.)- | 468.8 | −5.29 | 132.45 μM | LEU1005 (3) | ||
| 27 | Phytol | 296.5 | −5.17 | 161.26 μM | ASP1086 | LEU1005 (2) | |
Figure 8The effect of fraction ACH3 on neurite outgrowth (A). MTT assay was performed to clarify the effect of fraction ACH3 on cell viability (B). GAP-43 and Teneurin4 expression shown in a representative Western blot (C). Normalized values of both GAP-43 and Teneurin-4 against β-actin (D). All data are presented as the mean ± SEM, * p < 0.05 vs. control; + p < 0.05 vs. 10 μM RA; # p < 0.05 vs. high glucose-treated cells.