| Literature DB >> 36079907 |
Magdalena Dettlaff-Dunowska1, Michał Brzeziński1, Agnieszka Zagierska1, Anna Borkowska1, Maciej Zagierski1, Agnieszka Szlagatys-Sidorkiewicz1.
Abstract
The problem of overweight and obesity is a growing phenomenon in the entire population. Obesity is associated with many different metabolic disorders and is directly associated with an increased risk of death. The aim of the study was to assess the changes in body composition and physical fitness in children participating in an integrated weight-loss programme and to analyse the possible relationship between changes in body composition and improvements in fitness. Participants of the study were recruited from the "6-10-14 for Health"-multidisciplinary intervention programme for children aged 6 to 15 years old. A total of 170 patients qualified for the study, and 152 patients were enrolled. Statistically significant changes in body composition were found after the end of the intervention program, as measured by both BIA (bioimpedance) and DXA (Dual Energy X-ray Absorptiometry). The differences in KPRT (Kasch Pulse Recovery Test) results at baseline and after intervention are positively correlated with the difference in fat mass between baseline and the after-intervention measure. Improving physical fitness is positively correlated with a decrease in FM (fat mass) and an increase in FFM (fat-free mass) measured in both absolute values and %. Both BIA and DXA methods proved to be equally useful for measuring body composition.Entities:
Keywords: body composition; obesity; weight–loss
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 36079907 PMCID: PMC9459952 DOI: 10.3390/nu14173647
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nutrients ISSN: 2072-6643 Impact factor: 6.706
Descriptive statistics for the whole studied group.
| No of Patients | Mean ± SD | (95% CI) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age v1 (years) | 149 | 10.93 ± 2.97 | 10.45–11.41 |
| Body mass v1 (kg) | 152 | 58.08 ± 20.58 | 54.78–61.38 |
| Body mass v4 (kg) | 109 | 60.88 ± 18.76 | 57.32–64.44 |
| Height v1 (cm) | 152 | 150.14 ± 17.37 | 147.36–152.92 |
| Height v4 (cm) | 109 | 155.50 ± 16.16 | 152.43–158.57 |
| BMI v1 | 152 | 24.78 ± 3.88 | 24.16–25.40 |
| BMI v4 | 109 | 24.50 ± 3.72 | 23.80–25.21 |
| Δ BMI v4–1 | 109 | −0.18 ± 1.83 | −0.53–0.16 |
| BMI centile v1 | 152 | 95.21 ± 3.29 | 94.68–95.73 |
| BMI centile v4 | 109 | 91.75 ± 8.55 | 90.13–93.37 |
| Δ BMI centile v4–1 | 109 | −3.43 ± 7.41 | −4.84–(−2.02) |
SD—standard deviation; CI—confidence interval; BMI—body mass index; v1—visit 1; v4—visit 4; Δ—delta–difference.
Analysis of changes in physical fitness in the studied groups after the end of the intervention program.
| No Patients | No Patients | Sum.Rank | Sum.Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KPRT_rank_v1 | 55 | 58 | 2,995,500 | 3,445,500 | 0.404121 |
| KPRT_rank_v4 | 19 | 23 | 381,000 | 522,000 | 0.479873 |
| Δ KPRT rank v4–v1 | 19 | 22 | 430,000 | 431,000 | 0.412217 |
* U Mann–Whitney test; KPRT_rank-test value; v1—visit 1; v4—visit 4; Δ—delta–difference.
BIA results.
| No | Mean ± SD | (95% CI) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| BI_FM (kg) visit 1 | 105 | 18.16 ± 7.66 | 16.83–19.35 |
| BI_FM (kg) visit 4 | 105 | 18.21 ± 7.61 | 16.76–19.66 |
| Δ BI_FM (kg) visit 4–1 | 105 | −0.05 ± 4.03 | −0.83–0.73 * |
| BI_FM (%) visit 1 | 105 | 31.19 ± 5.38 | 30.14–32.23 |
| BI_FM (%) visit 4 | 105 | 29.48 ± 6.46 | 28.23–30.73 |
| Δ BI_FM (%) visit 4–1 | 105 | −1.70 ± 4.28 | −2.53–(−0.87) # |
| BI_MM (kg) visit 1 | 106 | 37.53 ± 13.47 | 35.61–40.13 |
| BI_MM (kg) visit 4 | 106 | 40.41 ± 12.88 | 38.02–42.89 |
| Δ BI_MM (kg) visit 4–1 | 106 | 2.89 ± 2.69 | 2.36–3.39# |
| BI_MM (%) visit 1 | 106 | 65.37 ± 4.89 | 64.74–66.45 |
| BI_MM (%) visit 4 | 106 | 66.69 ± 6.10 | 65.57–67.87 |
| Δ BI_MM (%) visit 4–1 | 106 | 1.43 ± 3.87 | 0.70–2.19 # |
* Wilcoxon pair test p = 0.57; # Wilcoxon pair test p < 0.05; Sp—spine, BMD—bone mineral density, Δ—delta–difference, TBLH—total body less head, TFM—total fat mass, TLM—total lean mass.
DXA Results.
| No | Mean ± SD | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sp BMD visit 1 | 95 | 0.76 ± 0.18 | 0.72–0.78 | 0.000 |
| Sp BMD visit 4 | 94 | 0.81 ± 0.19 | 0.77–0.85 | |
| Δ in Sp BMD visit 4–1 | 94 | 0.05 ± 0.04 | 0.05–0.06 | |
| TBLH BMD visit 1 | 95 | 0.86 ± 0.14 | 0.84–0.89 | 0.000 |
| TBLH BMD visit 4 | 95 | 0.90 ± 0.14 | 0.87–0.93 | |
| \Δ in TBLH BMD visit 4–1 | 95 | 0.04 ± 0.03 | 0.04–0.05 | |
| TFM (kg) visit 1 | 95 | 24.4 ± 8.8 | 23.3–26.3 | 0.015 |
| TFM (kg) visit 4 | 95 | 25.1 ± 8.8 | 23.3–26.9 | |
| Δ in TFM visit 4–1 | 95 | 7.0 ± 4.7 | −2.6–1.7 | |
| TLM (kg) visit 1 | 95 | 31.6 ± 10.6 | 30.4–34.1 | 0.000 |
| TLM (kg) visit 4 | 95 | 34.4 ± 11.2 | 32.2–36.7 | |
| TFM (%) visit 1 | 95 | 43.38 ± 4.11 | 42.54–44.22 | 0.004 |
| TFM (%) visit 4 | 95 | 42.10 ± 5.37 | 41.01–43.20 | |
| Δ in TFM (%) visit 4–1 | 95 | −1.28 ±4.04 | −2.10–(−0.46) | |
| TLM (%) visit 1 | 95 | 56.62 ± 4.11 | 55.78–57.46 | 000.4 |
| TLM (%) visit 4 | 95 | 57.90 ± 5.37 | 56.80–58.99 | |
| Δ in TLM (%) visit 4–1 | 95 | 1.28 ± 4.04 | 0.46–2.10 |
* Wilcoxon pair test; Sp—spine, BMD—bone mineral density, Δ—delta–difference, TBLH—total body less head, TFM—total fat mass, TLM—total lean mass.
Analysis of the correlation between differences in body composition and change in physical fitness.
| Variable | KPRT | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| KPRT_1 | KPRT_4 | KPRT_4–1 | |
| Δ BI_FM (%) visit 4–1 | 0.173286 | −0.191248 | −0.542303 |
| Δ BI_MM (%) visit 4–1 | −0.170405 | 0.146202 | 0.488293 |
| Δ BI_NFM (%) visit 4–1 | −0.156313 | 0.149330 | 0.478494 |
| Δ Sp BMD visit 4–1 | −0.149281 | 0.171923 | 0.389636 |
| Δ Sub BMD visit 4–1 | 0.069039 | 0.072368 | −0.056962 |
| Δ TFM (%) visit 4–1 | 0.082971 | −0.279475 | 0.411392 |
| Δ TLM (%) visit 4–1 | −0.082971 | 0.279475 | 0.411392 |
| Δ BMI % visit 4–1 | −0.043510 | −0.106357 | −0.282023 |
Spearman rank correlation coefficient; bolded when p < 0.05; KPRT—Kasch Pulse Recovery Test; BI—bioimpedance; FM—fat mass; Δ—delta–difference; MM—muscle mass; BMD—bone mineral density; BMI—body mass index; NFM—non-fat mass; Sp—spine; Sub-subtotal; TFM—total fat mass; TLM—total lean mass.