| Literature DB >> 36079852 |
Yi Cui1, Wei Si1,2, Chen Zhu1,2, Qiran Zhao1,2.
Abstract
Alcohol consumption has been associated with the risk of mild cognitive impairment (MCI) in observational studies. The result is inconsistent and whether the association is causal remains unknown. To examine the causal effect of alcohol consumption on MCI in rural China, this study used a cross-sectional dataset that included 1966 observations collected in rural China, of which 235 observations' genotyping were collected. All participants accepted the MCI evaluation using Mini-Cog and were asked about the participants' alcohol consumption behavior. The causal effect of alcohol consumption on MCI was investigated by Mendelian randomization (MR) of genetic variation in the aldehyde dehydrogenase 2 (ALDH2 rs671) gene. The risk of MCI in Chinese rural areas was 43%. Alcohol consumption was causally associated with a higher risk of MCI under MR design. Parameter estimates of drinking or not (b = 0.271, p = 0.007, 95% CI = 0.073 to 0.469), drinking frequency during the past 30 days (b = 0.016, p = 0.003, 95% CI = 0.005 to 0.027), and the weekly ethanol consumption (b = 0.132, p = 0.004, 95% CI = 0.042 to 0.223) were all positive and statistically significant at the 5% level. In conclusion, there was a high risk of MCI in rural China, and alcohol consumption was causally associated with a higher risk of MCI.Entities:
Keywords: Mendelian randomization; alcohol consumption; mild cognitive impairment; rural China
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 36079852 PMCID: PMC9460868 DOI: 10.3390/nu14173596
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nutrients ISSN: 2072-6643 Impact factor: 6.706
Figure 1Diagram of household sample selection procedure.
Figure 2Mini-Cog scoring algorithm.
Figure 3Design of Mendelian randomization in the current study.
Basic characteristics of genetic sample.
| Variable | Definition | Observation | Mean | S.D. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Socio-demographic characteristics: | ||||
| Male | dummy; 0 = female; 1 = male | 235 | 0.8 | 0.4 |
| Age | age measure by year | 235 | 49.7 | 11.3 |
| Ethnic minority | dummy; 0 = no; 1 = yes | 235 | 0.1 | 0.3 |
| Education | educational years | 235 | 8.6 | 3.1 |
| Income | household income is taking log | 235 | 1.0 | 2.2 |
| Parents drinker | the number of drinking parents | 235 | 0.4 | 0.6 |
| Drinking behaviors: | ||||
| Drinking or not | dummy; 0 = no; 1 = yes | 235 | 0.5 | 0.5 |
| Drinking frequency | drinking frequency during the past 30 days | 235 | 9.6 | 16.7 |
| Weekly ethanol consumption | 100 g/week | 235 | 1.2 | 2.4 |
| The risk of MCI: | ||||
| MCI | dummy; 0 = no; 1 = yes | 235 | 0.4 | 0.5 |
| Genetic variants: | ||||
| ALDH2 (rs671) | AA/AG | 81 | 34.5% | - |
| GG | 154 | 65.5% | - | |
Effects of alcohol consumption on MCI-OLS and 2SLS estimation results.
| Variable | Multivariable Linear Regressions | Mendelian Randomization |
|---|---|---|
| (1) Drinking or not | ||
| −0.045 (−0.333, 0.243) | 0.271 (0.073, 0.469) | |
|
| 0.689 | 0.007 |
| 34.88 (0.000) | ||
| (2) Drinking frequency during the past 30 days | ||
| −0.000 (−0.012, 0.011) | 0.016 (0.005, 0.027) | |
|
| 0.915 | 0.003 |
| 37.23 (0.004) | ||
| (3) Weekly ethanol consumption (100 g/week) | ||
| −0.006 (−0.054, 0.042) | 0.132 (0.042, 0.223) | |
|
| 0.751 | 0.004 |
| 31.89 (0.005) | ||
MCI was defined as Mini-Cog [36]. Abbreviations: 95% CI represents 95% confidence interval. All regressions were adjusted for age, gender, ethnic minority, years of education, logarithm of household income, and province-fixed effects. In particular, the MR model adjusted for the number of respondents’ parents who drink alcohol. The first-stage Cragg–Donald F statistics (with values of p) is test statistics of the weak instrument and overidentification tests.
Sensitivity analysis of alcohol consumption on MCI–2SLS estimation results.
| Variable | Drop Last Five Years of Abstinence Sample | Male Sample |
|---|---|---|
| Observations | 221 | 183 |
| (1) Drinking or not | ||
| 0.193 (0.024, 0.363) | 0.243 (0.017, 0.469) | |
|
| 0.026 | 0.035 |
| 78.08 (0.000) | 36.87 (0.003) | |
| (2) Drinking frequency during the past 30 days | ||
| 0.011 (0.001, 0.022) | 0.013 (0.001, 0.025) | |
|
| 0.035 | 0.037 |
| 45.26 (0.003) | 10.55 (0.011) | |
| (3) Weekly ethanol consumption (100 g/week) | ||
| 0.093 (0.014, 0.173) | 0.107 (0.000, 0.213) | |
|
| 0.022 | 0.049 |
| 31.60 (0.005) | 23.73 (0.008) | |
MCI was defined as Mini-Cog [36]. Abbreviations: 95% CI represents 95% confidence interval. All regressions were adjusted for age, gender, ethnic minority, years of education, logarithm of household income, and province fixed effects. In particular, the MR model adjusted for the number of respondents’ parents who drink alcohol. The first-stage Cragg–Donald F statistics (with values of p) is test statistics of the weak instrument and overidentification tests.