| Literature DB >> 36079744 |
Catherine Norton1, Manjula Hettiarachchi1, Rachel Cooke1, Marta Kozior1, Hilkka Kontro1, Rosemary Daniel1, Philip Jakeman1.
Abstract
Dietary calcium intake is a modifiable, lifestyle factor that can affect bone health and the risk of fracture. The diurnal rhythm of bone remodelling suggests nocturnal dietary intervention to be most effective. This study investigated the effect of daily, bed-time ingestion of a calcium-fortified, milk-derived protein matrix (MBPM) or control (CON), for 24 weeks, on serum biomarkers of bone resorption (C-terminal telopeptide of type I collagen, CTX) and formation (serum pro-collagen type 1 N-terminal propeptide, P1NP), and site-specific aerial bone mineral density (BMD), trabecular bone score (TBS), in postmenopausal women with osteopenia. The MBPM supplement increased mean daily energy, protein, and calcium intake, by 11, 30, and 107%, respectively. 24-week supplementation with MBPM decreased CTX by 23%, from 0.547 (0.107) to 0.416 (0.087) ng/mL (p < 0.001) and P1NP by 17%, from 60.6 (9.1) to 49.7 (7.2) μg/L (p < 0.001). Compared to CON, MBPM induced a significantly greater reduction in serum CTX (mean (CI95%); -9 (8.6) vs. -23 (8.5)%, p = 0.025 but not P1NP -19 (8.8) vs. -17 (5.2)%, p = 0.802). No significant change in TBS, AP spine or dual femur aerial BMD was observed for CON or MBPM. This study demonstrates the potential benefit of bed-time ingestion of a calcium-fortified, milk-based protein matrix on homeostatic bone remodelling but no resultant treatment effect on site-specific BMD in postmenopausal women with osteopenia.Entities:
Keywords: bone health; bone remodelling; bone turnover markers; milk protein matrix; nutrient intervention; nutrient timing; osteopenia; postmenopausal women; randomized control trial
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 36079744 PMCID: PMC9460355 DOI: 10.3390/nu14173486
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nutrients ISSN: 2072-6643 Impact factor: 6.706
Figure 1CONSORT flow diagram of participant enrolment, allocation, follow-up, and analysis.
Subject population (n = 67).
| ALL ( | CON ( | MBPM ( | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Characteristic | Unit | Mean | SD | Range | Mean | SD | Range | Mean | SD | Range |
| Age | y | 62.8 | 6.0 | 51 to 74 | 63.6 | 6.3 | 51 to 75 | 61.9 | 5.8 | 51 to 74 |
| Height | cm | 161.0 | 5.2 | 148 to 175 | 160.7 | 4.2 | 151 to 171 | 161.3 | 6.1 | 148 to 175 |
| Weight | kg | 67.8 | 11.8 | 44 to 113 | 70.2 | 12.7 | 54 to 113 | 65.3 | 10.4 | 44 to 96 |
| BMI | kg∙m−2 | 26.2 | 4.3 | 18 to 41 | 27.2 | 4.7 | 20 to 41 | 25.1 | 3.6 | 18 to 34 |
| AP Spine (L1–L4) BMD | T-score | −1.5 | 0.4 | −2.4 to −1.0 | −2.3 | 0.4 | −2.3 to −1.0 | −1.5 | 0.4 | −2.4 to −1.0 |
| Trabecular Bone Score | T-Score | −1.7 | 0.9 | −3.7 to 0.1 | −1.5 | 0.8 | −3.1 to 0.1 | −2.0 | 0.9 | −3.7 to −0.5 |
Baseline 7-day averaged daily nutrient intake for the calcium-fortified, milk-derived protein matrix (MBPM) and maltodextrin (CON) groups (n = 55).
| Average Habitual Daily Intake in CON Group | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Energy (kcal·kg−1) | Protein (g·kg−1) | Carbohydrate (g·kg−1) | Fat (g·kg−1) | Protein (g) | Calcium (mg) | Vitamin D (ug) | |
| Mean | 22 | 1.0 | 2.4 | 0.8 | 73 | 951 | 13.3 |
| SD | 5 | 0.3 | 0.7 | 0.3 | 14 | 473 | 18.2 |
| Min | 10 | 0.5 | 1 | 0.3 | 43 | 384 | 1.0 |
| Max | 34 | 1.5 | 4.3 | 1.5 | 110 | 2032 | 80.0 |
|
| |||||||
| Mean | 25 | 1.2 | 2.8 | 0.9 | 75 | 957 | 11.6 |
| SD | 7 | 0.4 | 0.8 | 0.3 | 19 | 514 | 15.0 |
| Min | 12 | 0.7 | 1.4 | 0.3 | 53 | 505 | 1.0 |
| Max | 39 | 1.9 | 4.6 | 1.6 | 122 | 2805 | 62.0 |
Note. There were no statistically significant differences between groups (p > 0.05).
Figure 2Four-hour epoch distribution of habitual nutrient intake and supplements for CON (a–d) and MBPM (e–h). ** denotes significant difference between CON and MBPM, p < 0.05.
Figure 3Absolute and relative change, from 0 to 24 weeks, in the homeostatic level of a biomarker of bone resorption (CTX; (a,b)) and bone formation (P1NP: (c,d)) following 24-week ingestion of CON and MBPM. * Denotes significant difference between CON and MBPM, p < 0.05.
Absolute and relative percentage change in bone mineral density (BMD) and trabecular bone score (TBS) following 24-week intervention in CON and MBPM.
| AP Spine BMD (g∙cm−2) | Dual Femur BMD (g∙cm−2) | TBS (g∙cm−2) | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Week | ∆0–24 | Week | ∆0–24 | Week | ∆0–24 | ||||||||
| 0 | 24 | g∙cm−2 | % | 0 | 24 | g∙cm−2 | % | 0 | 24 | g∙cm−2 | % | ||
| CON | mean | 1.016 | 1.017 | 0.001 | 0.10 | 0.910 | 0.904 | −0.004 | −0.47 | 1.339 | 1.329 | −0.009 | −0.72 |
| CI95% | 0.024 | 0.027 | 0.010 | 0.97 | 0.029 | 0.030 | 0.004 | 0.43 | 0.028 | 0.033 | 0.013 | 0.99 | |
| MBPM | mean | 1.041 | 1.030 | −0.005 | −0.51 | 0.897 | 0.903 | 0.0002 | 0.01 | 1.308 | 1.304 | −0.004 | −0.31 |
| CI95% | 0.043 | 0.040 | 0.011 | 0.97 | 0.035 | 0.036 | 0.004 | 0.48 | 0.032 | 0.035 | 0.017 | 1.32 | |