Literature DB >> 17921384

Calcium requirements: new estimations for men and women by cross-sectional statistical analyses of calcium balance data from metabolic studies.

Curtiss D Hunt1, Luann K Johnson.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Low intakes of calcium are associated with an increased risk of both osteoporosis and cardiovascular disease.
OBJECTIVE: To provide new estimates of the average calcium requirement for men and women, we determined the dietary calcium intake required to maintain neutral calcium balance.
DESIGN: Calcium balance data [calcium intake -(fecal calcium + urinary calcium)] were collected from 155 subjects [women: n = 73; weight: 77.1 +/- 18.5 kg; age: 47.0 +/- 18.5 y (range: 20-75 y); men: n = 82; weight: 76.6 +/- 12.5 kg; age: 28.2 +/- 7.7 y (range: 19-64 y)] who participated in 19 feeding studies conducted in a metabolic unit. Balance data from the final 6-12 d of each dietary period (minimum length:18 d) of each study (1-9 observations per subject) were analyzed. Data were excluded if individual intakes of magnesium, copper, iron, phosphorus, or zinc fell below the estimated average requirements or exceeded the 99 th percentile of usual intakes from the 1994 Continuing Survey of Food Intakes by Individuals (for iron, above the upper limit). Daily intakes of calcium ranged between 415 and 1740 mg. The relation between intake and output was examined by fitting random coefficient models. Coefficients were included to test for sex and age differences.
RESULTS: The models predicted a neutral calcium balance [defined as calcium output (Y) equal to calcium intake (C)] at intakes of 741 mg/d [95% prediction interval (PI): 507, 1035; Y = 148.29 + 0.80C], 9.4 mg kg body wt(-1) d(-1) [95% PI: 6.4, 12.9; Y = 1.44 + 0.85C], or 0.28 mg kcal(-1) d(-1) [95% PI: 0.19, 0.38; Y = 0.051 + 0.816C]. Neither age nor sex affected the estimates when calcium intakes were expressed as mg/d or as mg kg body wt(-1) d(-1).
CONCLUSION: The findings suggest that the calcium requirement for men and women is lower than previously estimated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17921384     DOI: 10.1093/ajcn/86.4.1054

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr        ISSN: 0002-9165            Impact factor:   7.045


  22 in total

1.  Calcium intake and bone mineral density as an example of non-linearity and threshold analysis.

Authors:  L P Breitling
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2015-01-31       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 2.  Calcium citrate: from biochemistry and physiology to clinical applications.

Authors:  Andrea Palermo; Anda Mihaela Naciu; Gaia Tabacco; Silvia Manfrini; Pierpaolo Trimboli; Fabio Vescini; Alberto Falchetti
Journal:  Rev Endocr Metab Disord       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 6.514

3.  Effect of calcium treatment on blood parameters, gonadal development and the structure of bone in immature female rats.

Authors:  Natalia El-Merhie; Ismail Sabry; Mahmoud Balbaa
Journal:  J Physiol Biochem       Date:  2011-12-03       Impact factor: 4.158

Review 4.  Pitfalls in interpreting interventional studies for osteoporosis.

Authors:  Mohammad Shafi Kuchay; Beena Bansal; Ambrish Mithal
Journal:  Clin Cases Miner Bone Metab       Date:  2017-12-27

5.  Calcium revisited: part I.

Authors:  Peter Burckhardt
Journal:  Bonekey Rep       Date:  2013-10-16

Review 6.  Calcium and vitamin D supplementation and loss of bone mineral density in women undergoing breast cancer therapy.

Authors:  Mridul Datta; Gary G Schwartz
Journal:  Crit Rev Oncol Hematol       Date:  2013-08-07       Impact factor: 6.312

Review 7.  Maternal and fetal vitamin D and their roles in mineral homeostasis and fetal bone development.

Authors:  B A Ryan; C S Kovacs
Journal:  J Endocrinol Invest       Date:  2020-08-09       Impact factor: 4.256

Review 8.  Clinical practice. Calcium supplements and fracture prevention.

Authors:  Douglas C Bauer
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2013-10-17       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Genetic hypercalciuric stone-forming rats have a primary decrease in BMD and strength.

Authors:  Marc Grynpas; Stephen Waldman; Douglas Holmyard; David A Bushinsky
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 6.741

10.  Beneficial effects of a Paleolithic diet on cardiovascular risk factors in type 2 diabetes: a randomized cross-over pilot study.

Authors:  Tommy Jönsson; Yvonne Granfeldt; Bo Ahrén; Ulla-Carin Branell; Gunvor Pålsson; Anita Hansson; Margareta Söderström; Staffan Lindeberg
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diabetol       Date:  2009-07-16       Impact factor: 9.951

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.