| Literature DB >> 36079730 |
Anca Corina Fărcaș1, Sonia Ancuța Socaci1, Silvia Amalia Nemeș2, Oana Lelia Pop1, Teodora Emilia Coldea3, Melinda Fogarasi3, Elena Suzana Biriș-Dorhoi1.
Abstract
Cereal processing generates around 12.9% of all food waste globally. Wheat bran, wheat germ, rice bran, rice germ, corn germ, corn bran, barley bran, and brewery spent grain are just a few examples of wastes that may be exploited to recover bioactive compounds. As a result, a long-term strategy for developing novel food products and ingredients is encouraged. High-value compounds like proteins, essential amino acids, essential fatty acids, ferulic acid, and other phenols, tocopherols, or β-glucans are found in cereal by-products. This review aims to provide a critical and comprehensive overview of current knowledge regarding the bioactive compounds recovered from cereal by-products, emphasizing their functional values and potential human health benefits.Entities:
Keywords: bioactive compounds; bioavailability; cereal by-products; health benefits; waste
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 36079730 PMCID: PMC9460243 DOI: 10.3390/nu14173470
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nutrients ISSN: 2072-6643 Impact factor: 6.706
Figure 1Reintegration of cereal by-products in human consumption.
The main carbohydrates composition of different grain by-products and their potential application.
| Compounds | By-Product | Concentration | Industrial Applications | Health Benefits | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Residual undigested starch | BSG | 1.3–10% | Production of fungal biomass and ethanol; | Positive effects on metabolism regulate the fermentative processes in the colon and increase the levels of glucagon-like peptide-1, known for its anti-diabetic and anti-obesogenic features | [ |
| Beta-glucans | Oat bran | 5.5% dry matter | Using supercritical carbon dioxide to remove the oat bran lipids can increase by more than 40% the beta-glucan level; | Antioxidant and antiproliferative activities, regulate the glycemic index and blood sugar and reduce LDL cholesterol. | [ |
| BSG | 0.36% dry matter | ||||
| Arabinoxylans | Different cereals bran | 10.9–26.0% of the bran dry matter | Food-thickening and stabilizing agents | Prebiotic effect, reduce the risk of metabolic disorders such as obesity, | [ |
| Cellulose | Rye bran | 5.5–6.5% | Feed supplement | It facilitates the shortening of the intestinal transit time and also the elimination of possible carcinogens, which contributes to reducing the risk of developing colon cancer. | [ |
| Wheat bran | 9.3–12.1% | ||||
| BSG | 15.1–25% | ||||
| Lignin | BSG | 7–28% | Food industry (dispersing, binding, and emulsifying agent), food supplement, animal feed and medicine, construction industry, cosmetic products, crop protection (lignin-based pesticides), printing ink | Anticarcinogenic, antimicrobial, and antioxidant properties, increase fecal bulk and stimulates intestinal transit, can undergo fermentation when exposed to colon microbiota, anti-hyperlipidemia and anti-obesogenic agent, protective activity against oxidative stress and inhibition of LDL oxidation | [ |
| Wheat bran | 3.3–4.9% | ||||
| Corn bran | 10 g/kg |
BSG—brewers’ spent grain.
Bioactive proteins and amino acids recovered from cereal by-products and waste.
| Cereal Waste | Protein/Amino Acids Quantity | Extraction Methods/Treatments | Extraction Efficiency/Yield | Properties/Applications/Other Observations | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Brewers’ Spent Grain | Protein: 23.10 g/100 g dw for pale BSG | Sequential aqueous and alkaline (110 mM NaOH) extraction, followed by isoelectric | Pale BSG: 59% protein extraction yield | Protein-enriched isolates can be used as bioactive ingredients for incorporation into conventional and functional foods. | [ |
| Protein: 23.4 g/100 g BSG dw | Enzymatic (Alcalase 2.4 L) and ultrasound-assisted enzymatic extraction (amplitude 40%, treatment time 10 min, pulse 5 s:3 s off) | 61.6% recovery for enzymatic treatments and 69.8% recovery for ultrasound enzymatic extraction | Ultrasound pretreatment increases the efficiency of protein separation, reduces enzyme loading, and decreases enzyme incubation time. | [ | |
| Protein: 22.63 g/100 g defatted BSG | Acid pretreatment (one-step dilute acid pretreatment with the acid solution (11,400 mg H2SO4/g BSG) autoclaved at 121 °C for 1 h) | Protein extraction efficiency 90% | Even though the acid treatment had a higher efficiency, a significant amount of carbohydrates and lignin was also solubilized together with protein; instead, the hydrothermal pretreatment had a better selectivity and is more | [ | |
| Protein: 22.9 g/100 g defatted BSG | Sodium hydroxide treatment | Protein separation | Enzymatic treatment proved to be the most effective and the resulting protein concentrate | [ | |
| Protein: 24.70 g/100 g dw | Sodium hydroxide (110 mM) and ultrasound treatment (power 250 W, duty cycle 60%, 20 min/25 °C) | Extraction yield of 86.16% and purity at 57.84% | Plant-based protein source to the food industry. | [ | |
| Amino acids: 43.62 mg/g−1 proteins | Subcritical water hydrolysis in a single reactor (120 min at 15 MPa, 5 mL water min, 80–180 °C, solid: fluid of 20 g−1 BSG) | The main amino acids of hydrolysate: tryptophan 215.55 µg mL−1, aspartic acid 123.35 µg mL−1, valine 64.35 µg mL−1, lysine 16.55 µg mL−1, and glycine 16.1 µg mL−1 | Applicability in the field of food and supplements production | [ | |
| Rice bran defatted (RBD) | Soluble proteins: 8.23 g/100 RBD | Alkaline extraction | 55.8% of the total soluble proteins, of which 6.1%albumin, 4.5% globulin, and 43.5% glutelin. | Applicability in the field of food and supplements and cosmetics production. | [ |
| Protein: 15.67 g/100 g RBD | Alkaline extraction | Protein content of concentrated product 75.32% and extraction yield 12.85% | Comparing the two methods, the microwave-assisted one proved to be more efficient and environmentally friendly. Also, the microwaves did not affect the extracted rice bran proteins. | [ | |
| Protein: 14.13% of concentrate product | Microwave-assisted extraction (1000 W of MW power, extraction time 90 s, solid to liquid ratio of 0.89 g rice bran/10 mL of distilled water) and response surface methodology | Protein content of concentrated product 71.27% and recovery yield 22.07% | Food industry—strong antioxidant activity. | [ | |
| Malted barley germs | Protein: 29.1% on a dry matter basis | Amino acid profile by LC/fluorescence | Total amino acid 214 mg/g of which 35–40% are essential (leucine | Valuable source of good quality nitrogen fraction. | [ |
| Brewing cake | Protein: 30.4% on a dry matter basis | Amino acid profile by LC/fluorescence | Total amino acid content | Valuable source of good quality nitrogen fraction. | [ |
| Wheat bran (WB) | Protein: 17.2 g/100 g WB dw | Alkaline extraction (pH 9.5, 2 h, followed by isoelectric precipitation, pH 4.2) | Wheat bran concentrate (WBPC) protein content: 61% | WBPC showed excellent functional properties in terms of high solubility, good water, and fat absorption capacity. | [ |
| Defatted Wheat Germ | Protein: 34.9% dw (albumin 34.5% | Alcaline extraction | Isolate protein content 88.5%, recovery yield in the range of 24.0–37.0% | Significant level of essential amino acids. | [ |
| Defatted corn germ (DCG) | Protein: 12.48% fresh weight basis | Alkaline extraction of corn germ partially defatted by supercritical fluid extraction | Protein content of DCG concentrate 48.5% dry base reported | Good foaming capacity and stability | [ |
| Defatted oat bran (DOB) | Protein: 17.6% | Enzyme-assisted extraction (Viscozyme L, pH 4.6, incubation time 2.8 h, and temperature 44 °C) | Extraction yield 56.2% | Applicability in the field of food and supplements production. | [ |
dw—dry weight basis; fw—fresh weight basis.
Fatty acid composition of cereal by-products and waste.
| Cereal | Fatty Acid | Concentration | Extraction Methods | Functional Properties | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rice bran | Triacylglycerol | 60.12 | Solvent extraction (n-hexane) | Balanced fatty acid profile; | [ |
| Polyunsaturated fatty acids | 40.73 | ||||
| Linoleic acid | 38.84 | ||||
| Oleic acid | 34.31 | ||||
| Palmitic acid | 19.87 | ||||
| Free fatty acids | 29.69 | ||||
| Diacylglycerol | 9.98 | ||||
| Monoacylglycerol | 0.21 | ||||
| γ-oryzanol | 18.53 | ||||
| Phytosterol | 22.40 | ||||
| Wheat germ | Linoleic acid | 57 | Solvent extraction (hexane) | Food ingredients with potential health benefits. | [ |
| Palmitic acid | 17.5 | ||||
| Oleic acid | 15 | ||||
| Linolenic acid | 6 | ||||
| Total polyunsaturated fatty acids | 64.5–63.7 | ||||
| Brewer’s spent grain | Free fatty acids | 18 | Soxhlet acetone extraction; | Nutraceutical, pharmaceutical, and cosmetic properties. | [ |
| Triglycerides | 67 | ||||
| Monoglycerides | 1.7 | ||||
| Diglycerides | 7.7 | ||||
| Steroid compounds | 5 | ||||
| Oat bran | Oleic acid | 44.09–46.68 | Subcritical butane extraction | Preventive effects on cardiovascular disease and development of atherosclerosis; | [ |
| Linoleic acid | 32.54–32.88 | ||||
| Stearic acid | 1.71–1.89 | ||||
| Palmitic acid | 15.68–16.03 | ||||
| Corn germ | Palmitic acid | 11.57 | Pressing extraction | Commercial shortening replacement in food industries. | [ |
| Stearic acid | 2.89 | ||||
| Oleic acid | 29.45 | ||||
| Linoleic acid | 54.31 | ||||
| Rye bran | Linoleic acid | 61.09 | Supercritical carbon dioxide extraction using response surface methodology | Food grade ingredient. | [ |
| Palmitic acid | 13.74 | ||||
| Oleic acid | 13.65 | ||||
| Linolenic acid | 6.37 | ||||
| Corn waste | Palmitic acid | 23.0 | Solvent extraction analyzed by gas chromatography (Folch method) | Feed or pharmaceutical industry. | [ |
| Stearic acid | 3.4 | ||||
| Oleic acid | 11.7 | ||||
| Linoleic acid | 52.9 | ||||
| α-Linolenic acid | 5.3 |
Antioxidant compounds recovered from cereals wastes and by-products.
| Cereal Waste | Antioxidant Compounds | Extraction Methods/Biotechnology | Extraction/ | Antioxidant Activity | Application | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Corn silage | Polyphenols | Enzymatic treatment | 412.83 mg GAE/100 g | 2961.6 μM (ABTS) | - | [ |
| Brewers’ spent grain | Phenolic compounds | Supercritical carbon dioxide | 3 g mass of extract | 2% DPPH | [ | |
| Polyphenols | Acidifies solution (pH 2,5–3) | 1.14 mg GAE/g | 8–13% | - | [ | |
| Oat bran | Protein hydrolysates | Hydrolyzed with Flavourzyme (1), Papain (2), or Alcalase (3) | 89–93% | 627.17 (1); 682.90 (2); 652.67 (3) µM TE/g (ORAC) | - | [ |
| Rice bran | Free phenols | Ultrasound-assisted extraction (65% ethanolic solution) | 17–20% | 275.1 (DPPH) IC50 (μg/mL) | Cosmetic formulation | [ |
| Protein hydrolysates | Hydrolysate by Alcalase 2.4 L and Protease 500 G | 79.12% | 75–90% (DPPH) | - | [ | |
| Protein hydrolysates | Protein enzyme-assisted extraction/hydrolysis | - | 2.8 μmol TE/g (DPPH) | Food additive | [ | |
| Polyphenols | Glycerol extraction | 708.58 ± 12.36 mg GAE/100 g dw | 700.35 mg | - | [ | |
| Sesame bran | Phenols | Microwave-assisted enzymatic extraction | - | 1.94 µmol TE/g | Functional food ingredient | [ |
| Wheat bran | Free phenols | Ultrasound-assisted extraction (65% ethanolic solution) | 17–20% | 1194.8 (DPPH) IC50 (μg/mL) | Cosmetic formulation | [ |
| Peptides | HPLC purification | - | 3000–3300 μmol/L biological antioxidant potential (free radical analyzer system) | Antidiabetic compound | [ | |
| Wheat and rye waste (distillery stillage) | Polyphenols | Conventional solid-liquid extraction (1) | 52–99% | 10.84 (1); 16.67 (2); 26.73 (3) μmol TE/g (ABTS) | - | [ |
| Wheat waste | Astaxanthin | Solid state fermentation | 17–109% | 90–95% of the antioxidant (DPPH) activity of astaxanthin from plant | - | [ |
| Wheat and Oat Bran | Phenolic compounds | Ultrasound-assisted extraction | 25–50 mg GAE/100 g | 40–52% (DPPH) | - | [ |
“DPPH”—2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl; “IC50”—half maximal inhibitory concentration; “-“ not mentioned; “TE”/“GAE”—trolox/gallic acid equivalent; “ORAC”—oxygen radical absorbance capacity; “ABTS”—2,2′-azino-bis(3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonic acid); “FRAP”—ferric reducing antioxidant power assay.