| Literature DB >> 36079722 |
Isabela Costa Fernandes1, Talita Adriana Pereira Santos1, Daiane Teixeira Oliveira2, Victor Fernandes Oliveira3, Graziele Galdino Sousa1, Luciene Santos Pereira1, Natália Rocha Barboza1, Elísio Alberto Evangelista1, Renata Guerra-Sá1.
Abstract
Noncoding microRNAs are involved in lipid and carbohydrate metabolism pathways and are powerful regulators of gene expression. The goals of this study were to evaluate the temporal expression profiles of miRNAs in rat adipose tissue and predict mRNA-microRNA interactions. Newly weaned Wistar rats were divided into groups fed a standard diet and high-sucrose diet (HSD). The HSD contains 66.86% carbohydrates (40.45% standard diet, 40.45% condensed milk, and 8.58% crystal sugar), and the HSD was provided for 4, 8 and 15-week periods to investigate the expression levels of miRNAs in visceral adipose tissue using RT-qPCR. Target selection, enriched pathways and networks were analyzed in silico. The factor consumption time significantly was associated to decreases (p < 0.05) in the expression levels of the following miRNAs: 124-5p, 125-5p, 126-5p, 200c-3p, and 212-3p in all experimental groups. The factor diet significantly influenced rno-miR-124-5p, 200c-3p, and 212-3p expression (p < 0.05). A significant reduction (p < 0.05) in rno-miR-27a-3p expression was observed. The biological processes involved key pathways regulating fat deposition. Our findings provide important insights into downregulated miRNA expression patterns in visceral adipose tissue, adiposity level, hyperinsulinemia and increased VLDL-c and triglyceride levels.Entities:
Keywords: adipose tissue; high sucrose diet; microRNAs; nutritional genomics; rats; sucrose; target prediction
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 36079722 PMCID: PMC9460050 DOI: 10.3390/nu14173465
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nutrients ISSN: 2072-6643 Impact factor: 6.706
Centesimal composition of diets.
| Centesimal Composition | ||
|---|---|---|
| STD | HSD | |
| Energy (kcal/g) | 3.08 | 2.86 |
| Nutrients (g/100g) | ||
| Carbohydrate | 44.08 | 47.86 |
| Protein | 21.67 | 12.81 |
| Lipid | 5.06 | 4.85 |
| Water | 10.89 | 25.77 |
| Fiber | 11.43 | 5.08 |
| Mineral | 6.87 | 3.63 |
| Total | 100 | 100 |
| Calorie Percentage (%) | ||
| as Carbohydrate | 57.16 | 66.86 |
| as Protein | 28.09 | 17.89 |
| as Lipid | 14.75 | 15.26 |
| Total | 100 | 100 |
The centesimal composition can be found in each diet.
Oligonucleotide sequences according miRDB.
| Noncoding RNA | Sequence |
|---|---|
| snoRNAU6 | AGTTGAGGTC ACACGCTGGT CGATGAACTC CTAAGTGTAG GTAGTGTGCT AAACGAGCGG CAAG |
| rno-miR-27a-3p | UUCACAGUGGCUAAGUUCCGC |
| rno-miR-124-5p | CGUGUUCACAGCGGACCUUGAU |
| rno-miR-125a-5p | UCCCUGAGACCCUUUAACCUGUGA |
| rno-miR-126a-3p | UCGUACCGUGAGUAAUAAUGCG |
| rno-miR-126a-5p | CAUUAUUACUUUUGGUACGCG |
| rno-miR-200c-3p | UAAUACUGCCGGGUAAUGAUG |
| rno-miR-212-3p | UAACAGUCUCCAGUCACGGCCA |
| rno-miR-221-3p | AGCUACAUUGUCUGCUGGGUUUC |
Figure 1Effect of a high-sucrose diet on the variations in body mass gain and adiposity index of Wistar rats. (A) Body mass gain and (B) adiposity index for both groups between the three periods of diet consumption. STD: standard diet; HSD: high-sucrose diet. Means were compared using two-way ANOVA with Bonferroni’s post hoc test. *: p ≤ 0.05; **: p ≤ 0.01; ***: p ≤ 0.001; ****: p ≤ 0.0001.
Effects of a high-sucrose diet on biochemical parameters in male Wistar rats.
| Parameters | Unit | Time (Weeks) | STD | HSD | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| M ± SD | M ± SD | Time Effect | Diet Effect | Interaction | |||
| Total cholesterol | mg/dL | 0.0152 | <0.001 | 0.1462 | |||
| 4 | 109 ± 16 ab | 96 ± 13 b | |||||
| 8 | 109 ± 26 ab | 84 ± 17 b | |||||
| 15 | 130.80 ± 11.31 a | 95.60 ± 3.36 b | |||||
| LDL-c | mg/dL | 4 | 47 ± 15 ab | 31 ± 17 ab | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.5855 |
| 8 | 49 ± 18 ab | 26 ± 10 ab | |||||
| 15 | 51.87 ± 32.65 a | 21.05 ± 9.71 b | |||||
| HDL-c | mg/dL | 4 | 43 ± 6 a | 41 ± 4 a | 0.9377 | 0.0003 | 0.026 |
| 8 | 38 ± 8 a | 38 ± 5 a | |||||
| 15 | 52.05 ± 4.8 b | 42.02 ± 2.30 a | |||||
| VLDL-c | mg/dL | 4 | 17 ± 5.0 a | 24 ± 7.0 a | 0.0001 | <0.0001 | 0.0036 |
| 8 | 21 ± 5 a | 21 ± 5 a | |||||
| 15 | 21.61 ± 1.7 a | 34.32 ± 3.91 b | |||||
| Triglycerides | mg/dL | 4 | 86 ± 17 a | 119 ± 35 a | 0.0001 | <0.0001 | 0.0012 |
| 8 | 106 ± 23 a | 103 ± 28 a | |||||
| 15 | 105.6 ± 8.9 a | 169.7 ± 17.55b | |||||
| Triglyceride/HDL ratio | 4 | 1.82 ± 2.82 a | 3.02 ± 7.98 a | 0.94 | 0.90 | 0.79 | |
| 8 | 2.75 ± 2.8 a | 2.71 ± 5.3 a | |||||
| 15 | 4.11 ± 3.94 a | 2.28 ± 8.67 a | |||||
| Fasting glucose | mmol/L | 4 | 8.7 ± 1.7 a | 7.6 ± 2.20 ad | 0.0001 | 0.847 | 0.0643 |
| 8 | 6.5 ± 0.9 bd | 7 ± 0.20 ad | |||||
| 15 | 5.8 ± 0.2 cd | 6.60 ± 0.50 d | |||||
| Fasting insulin | ng/mL | 4 | 0.64 ± 0.60 a | 1.63 ± 1.42 ab | |||
| 8 | 1.08 ± 0.80 ab | 2.64 ± 2.46 b | 0.0937 | 0.0063 | 0.4738 | ||
| 15 | 0.7 ± 0.32 a | 1.2 ± 0.62 ab | |||||
|
| STD-4w ( | HSD-4w ( | |||||
| STD-8w ( | HSD-4w ( | ||||||
| STD-15w ( | HSD-15w ( | ||||||
Biochemical parameters were measured in both groups between the three periods of diet consumption. STD: standard diet; HSD: high-sucrose diet. Means (M) were compared using two-way ANOVA with Bonferroni’s post hoc test. Different letters indicate significant differences between the six groups (p < 0.05). The same letters indicate no significant difference (p > 0.05). a is different to b. SD indicates standard deviation. n indicates the sample size by group (time in weeks) and diet.
Figure 2Effects of the time of consumption of a high-sucrose diet on the expression of microRNAs in visceral white adipose tissue. Differences in the abundances of microRNAs in both groups between the three periods of diet consumption. (A) Relative rno-miR-27a-3p expression (2−ΔCT); (B) relative rno-miR-124-5p expression (2−ΔCT); (C) relative rno-miR-125-5p expression (2−ΔCT); (D) relative rno-miR-126-3p expression (2−ΔCT); (E) relative rno-miR-126-5p expression (2−ΔCT); (F) relative rno-miR-200c-3p expression (2−ΔCT); (G) relative rno-miR-212-3p expression (2−ΔCT); (H) relative rno-miR-221-3p expression (2−ΔCT). STD—standard diet; HSD—high-sucrose diet; rno—Rattus norvegicus; miR—microRNA. Means were compared using two-way ANOVA with Bonferroni’s post hoc test. *: p ≤ 0.05; **: p ≤ 0.01; ***: p ≤ 0.001; ****: p ≤ 0.0001.
Figure 3In silico prediction of microRNA targets and microRNA–mRNA interaction networks. The interactions between eight miRNAs and their predicted mRNA targets were rendered using Gephi.
Figure 4Biological processes related to mRNA targets. The enrichment scores of biological processes annotated and related to mRNA targets were evaluated using Funset.
Figure 5Molecular function network of the mRNA targets. The interaction network between the mRNA targets and their molecular functions was rendered using Network Analyst software.