| Literature DB >> 36079651 |
Sara Monteiro1, Fernando H Reboredo1,2, Maria Manuela Lageiro2,3, Vanda M Lourenço1,4, João Dias2,5, Fernando Lidon1,2, Marta Abreu3,6, António P L Martins2,3, Nuno Alvarenga2,3.
Abstract
The baobab tree (Adansonia digitata L.) is found widely in the forests and savannas of sub-Saharan Africa. The baobab fruit has a sour and slightly sweet taste and is widely consumed by the natives, thus containing a high nutritional value and providing a source of income for rural people. This study aimed to compare the nutritional composition of baobab fruit pulp from different localities in the Namibe province (Angola). Twenty samples of baobab pulp were collected in markets of the four municipalities of Namibe. The results obtained showed that there is some geographic location dependence on nutritional and functional composition. The municipality of Camucuio showed samples with higher fibre content (56.62 g/100 g) and vitamin C (288.9 mg/100 g). Samples from the Virei municipality stood out for their antioxidant activity (1936 mmol TE/100 g), high K content (42.4 mg/g) and higher values of protein (2.42 g/100 g). The samples collected in the municipality of Bibala stood out for their high contents of carbohydrates (28.1 g/100 g), total phenolic compounds (972 mg GAE/100 g) and Ca (3.80 mg/g). Despite the differences in origin, the high nutritional value of baobab fruit has the potential to improve the diet of thousands of people in Africa qualitatively.Entities:
Keywords: Adansonia digitata L.; African food; antioxidant activity; baobab pulp; elemental minerals; nutritional composition; phenolic content; vitamin C
Year: 2022 PMID: 36079651 PMCID: PMC9460372 DOI: 10.3390/plants11172272
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Plants (Basel) ISSN: 2223-7747
Means and standard deviation (within brackets) of the different baobab’s constituents across the four Namibe municipalities and collected samples, and results from the pairwise tests on the equality of means of the constituents across the four municipalities (Equation (2)—Tukey, Dunnet-Tukey-Kramer and Dunn tests) for the constituents for which the existence of at least one pairwise significant difference was detected (Equation (1)—F-ANOVA, F-Welch-ANOVA and Kruskal–Wallis tests).
| Component/Municipality | BCI | CNI | MC | VSI |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 12.50 (0.76) b | 13.20 (0.32) ab | 13.81 (0.37) a | 12.91 (0.36) ab |
|
| 4.75 (0.23) | 5.01 (0.27) | 4.71 (0.09) | 5.18 (0.63) |
|
| 2.24 (0.04) | 2.10 (0.18) | 2.27 (0.03) | 2.42 (0.20) |
|
| 52.17 (2.86) a | 56.62 (1.84) a | 51.38 (1.80) a | 54.21 (4.88) a |
|
| 28.1 (2.5) | 22.9 (1.7) | 27.6 (1.8) | 25.1 (5.3) |
|
| 1 262 (21) a | 1 208 (15) b | 1 249 (16) ab | 1 230 (48) ab |
|
| 3 797 (862) | 3 696 (425) | 2 937 (352) | 3 409 (1 019) |
|
| 37 528 (3 642) | 41 834 (3 780) | 40 973 (3 400) | 42 368 (4 520) |
|
| 10 805 (768) | 10 010 (766) | 9 279 (1 791) | 11 355 (140) |
|
| 36 081 (2 858) | 33 999 (2 376) | 31 997 (5 284) | 38 273 (629) |
|
| 1 960 (176) a b | 1 864 (165) ab | 1 675 (324) b | 2 164 (180) a |
|
| 972.2 (427.2) a | 758.4 (168.6) ab | 460.5 (88.7) b | 872.8 (602.8) ab |
|
| 1 834 (1 360) a | 1 406 (338) a | 536.9 (161.3) b | 1 936 (1 599) ab |
|
| 284.6 (38.4) a | 288.9 (130.2) ab | 163.8 (12.8) b | 251.6 (116.7) ab |
Significant differences are marked with different letters in each line. The same letter means no differences in means were detected. Detailed results from these tests and the preceeding normality and variance homegeity tests can be found in the Supplementary Materials.
Principal component analysis.
| Component | PC1 | PC2 | PC3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C | −0.82 ** | 0.11 | −0.12 |
| TPC | −0.92 ** | 0.00 | 0.22 |
| Ca | −0.84 ** | −0.14 | 0.19 |
| K | −0.59 | −0.71 ** | −0.08 |
| P | −0.40 | 0.68 * | 0.31 |
| Moisture | 0.30 | −0.82 ** | 0.20 |
| Ash | −0.89 ** | −0.15 | −0.18 |
| TDF | −0.45 | 0.12 | −0.79 ** |
| AA | −0.95 ** | 0.00 | 0.25 |
| Eigenvalue | 4.72 | 1.70 | 0.96 |
| % Variance | 52.47 | 18.90 | 10.64 |
| % Cumulative variance | 52.47 | 71.37 | 82.01 |
* Marked values were considered moderately correlated with the PC; ** marked values were considered strongly correlated with the PC, following the classification used previously [27,28,29].
Figure 1Principal component analysis projection of the samples.
Figure 2(A) Map of the Namibe province in Angola [53] and (B) map of sampling locations in four Namibe communities [54].
GPS location of the baobab samples collected in Namibe of Angola.
| Municipality | Location in Namibe | Community | Sample Code | GPS Location |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bibala (BCI) | Center inland | Bibala | B1 | 14°45′42.8″ S 13°21′21.2″ E |
| B2 | ||||
| Caitou | B-Cai | 14°28′49.0″ S 13°04′52.9″ E | ||
| Capangombe | B-Cap | 14°56′31.4″ S 12°57′43.4″ E | ||
| Lola | B-L | 14°18′15.7″ S 13°36′16.8″ E | ||
| Camucuio (CNI) | Northern inland | Chingo | C-C | 14°13′00″ S 12°49′00″ E |
| Camucuio | C1 | 14°06′47.8″ S 13°14′35.9″ E | ||
| Mamué | C-M1 | 13°49′00″ S 13°08′00″ E | ||
| Moçâmedes (MC) | Coastline | Bentiaba | M-B1 | 14°15′33.1″ S 12°23′26.6″ E |
| Lucira | M-L | 13°52′05.4″ S 12°31′34.4″ E | ||
| Moçâmedes | M1 | 15°12′20.0″ S 12°08′51.7″ E | ||
| Virei (VSI) | Southern inland | Cahinde | V-C1 | 15°29′51.8″ S 13°22′11.7″ E |
| Virei | V1 | 15°43′33.4″ S 12°57′04.1″ E |