| Literature DB >> 36079130 |
Lin Gao1, Wei Wen2, Yuanli Wang1, Zhaoyang Li1, Erle Dang1, Lei Yu3, Chenxi Zhou1, Meiheng Lu1, Gang Wang1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Vaginal laxity (VL) is characterized by the relaxing of the vaginal wall that affects the quality of life and sexual function of patients. The current management of VL such as Kegel exercises and topical or systemic hormonal replacement results in unsatisfactory outcomes; thus, novel modalities are needed to improve the efficacy. Vaginal fractional carbon dioxide (CO2) laser treatment has shown growing applications for the treatment of VL, but results show nonconformities due to the lack of objective evaluations. In this study, we aimed to validate the clinical efficacy and biophysical benefits of fractional CO2 laser treatment for VL patients with the incorporation of objective approaches.Entities:
Keywords: fractional carbon dioxide laser; sexual function; vaginal laxity; vaginal tactile imaging
Year: 2022 PMID: 36079130 PMCID: PMC9457362 DOI: 10.3390/jcm11175201
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Clin Med ISSN: 2077-0383 Impact factor: 4.964
Figure 1Fractional CO2 laser treatment improves vaginal tissue tightening in patients with VL. (A,B), Tactile images showing pressure gradients for VTI probe insertion for a 42 year old female subject pre-treatment and 12 months post-treatment. A pressure resistance curve (white) was generated during each measurement and displayed in the VIT image. (C) Quantitative analysis of total vaginal tissue pressure resistance of the anterior and posterior vaginal walls (kPa). The total area under the pressure curve was computed to determine the maximal pressure, e.g., total vaginal tissue pressure resistance, in both anterior and posterior vaginal walls. (D) The average vaginal tissue pressure resistance crossing anterior and posterior vaginal walls was determined by the ratio of total vaginal tissue pressure resistance to the length of the vaginal wall with detectable pressure in the curve (kPa/cm). Dotted lines connect VTI data points before and after treatment for the same subject; diamond boxes represent median (IQR), and whiskers represent SD. Statistical analysis was performed using a Wilcoxon signed-rank test (two-sided).
Demographic and Clinical Information of the Subjects.
| Patients, No. | 29 |
| Average age (years) (mean ± SD) | 37.2 ± 7.8 |
| Postmenopausal Women, No. | 3 |
| Nulliparous Women, No. | 9 |
| Natural labor/cesarean birth, No. | 14/6 |
Total and Domain-Specific Scores of FSFI and VHIS in patients Before and After Each Laser Treatment Session.
| Before Treatment | One-Month Post-Treatment | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| First Treatment | Second Treatment | ||
| FSFI ( | 24.3 ± 5.2 | 27.0 ± 5.5 ** | 26.6 ± 4.9 ** |
| Desire | 3.2 ± 1.1 | 3.5 ± 1.2 * | 3.6 ± 0.9 * |
| Arousal | 3.9 ± 1.1 | 4.3 ± 1.0 * | 4.2 ± 1.0 * |
| Lubrication | 4.6 ± 1.1 | 5.1 ± 0.7 ** | 5.3 ± 0.5 **,*** |
| Orgasm | 4.1 ± 1.3 | 4.4 ± 1.1 * | 4.2 ± 1.2 |
| Satisfaction | 4.0 ± 1.1 | 4.6 ± 0.9 * | 4.7 ± 1.6 * |
| Pain | 4.6 ± 1.2 | 5.1 ± 1.2 * | 4.8 ± 1.1 |
| VHIS ( | 17.4 ± 3.9 | 19.9 ± 3.6 * | 21.9 ± 3.5 *,*** |
| Vaginal elasticity | 3.7 ± 0.9 | 4.1 ± 0.7 * | 4.3 ± 0.6 *,*** |
| Vaginal secretions | 3.3 ± 1.2 | 3.9 ± 1.1 ** | 3.6 ± 1.0 * |
| pH | 2.5 ± 1.2 | 3.1 ± 1.3 ** | 2.7 ± 1.0 * |
| Vaginal mucosa | 4.3 ± 0.9 | 4.5 ± 0.7 * | 4.5 ± 0.9 * |
| Vaginal hydration | 3.7 ± 1.0 | 4.4 ± 0.7 ** | 4.6 ± 0.6 **,*** |
* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01 as compared scores after each treatment session with the baseline scores. *** p < 0.05 as compared scores after the second treatment session with the scores after the first treatment session. A Mann–Whitney U test was used to compare the differences between the two groups. Data are presented as mean ± SD.
Figure 2Laser treatment improves vaginal tissue physiological properties in patients with VL. H&E staining of vaginal biopsies taken from subject 1 (50 years old) before and one month after treatment. Scale bar: 250 µm.