| Literature DB >> 29667744 |
Adrian Gaspar1,2, Sandra Maestri1, Joaquin Silva2, Hugo Brandi1, Daniel Luque1, Neža Koron3, Zdenko Vižintin3.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Genitourinary syndrome of menopause (GSM) combines the conditions of vulvovaginal atrophy (VVA) and urinary tract dysfunction, which is a result of urethral atrophy. There are several treatment methods available for the management of vulvovaginal symptoms of GSM, whereas urinary tract dysfunction often remains overlooked and undertreated. The objective of this pilot study was to assess the safety and efficacy of intraurethral Er:YAG laser treatment of urinary symptoms of GSM. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with diagnosed GSM, having less than 5% of vaginal superficial cells in the cytology, vaginal pH higher than 5, with urinary symptoms of GSM (dysuria, frequency, urgency) and impaired continence due to urethral atrophy, received two sessions of intraurethral Er:YAG laser with a 3-week interval in-between the sessions. Laser energy was delivered in non-ablative way using Erbium SMOOTH™ mode technology and a 4-mm thick cannula. Therapeutic efficacy was determined using ICIQ-SF, the 1-hour pad test and VAS scores. Occurrence of adverse effects was followed at every visit. Follow ups (FU) were at 3 and 6 months.Entities:
Keywords: Erbium SMOOTH™ laser; genitourinary syndrome of menopause; impaired continence; intraurethral; urethral atrophy
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29667744 PMCID: PMC6175161 DOI: 10.1002/lsm.22826
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Lasers Surg Med ISSN: 0196-8092 Impact factor: 4.025
Effect of Intraurethral Laser Treatment During the Course of the Study
| Baseline (B)a | 3‐month FUb | 6‐month FUc |
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dysuria (VAS 0‐100) | 66 (21) | 8.3 (7.6) | 20 (11) | <0.0005 | a vs. b, c <0.0005 |
| Urgency (VAS 0‐100) | 58 (28) | 13 (12) | 28 (15) | <0.0005 | a vs. b, c <0.001 |
| Frequency (VAS 0‐100) | 49 (20) | 11 (8.4) | 21 (8.8) | <0.0005 | a vs. b, c <0.0005 |
| ICIQ‐UI | 13 (4.1) | 5.2 (3.6) | 8.1 (4.8) | <0.0005 | a vs. b, c <0.0005 |
| 1‐h pad test (g) | 42 (17) | 16 (5.2) | 23 (10) | <0.0005 | a vs. b, c <0.0005 |
Results are presented as mean (SD).
Friedman test (related samples Friedman's two‐way analysis of variance by ranks). Significance level is set to 0.05.
Post‐hoc multiple comparison with a Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons.
a‐cTime points of the study.
Figure 1Effect of intraurethral laser treatment on three urinary symptoms of GSM: dysuria (a), urgency (b), and frequency (c). The horizontal line within the box indicates a median, boundaries of the box indicate the 1st and 3rd quartile, and whiskers indicate the minimum and maximum values. Empty circles indicate outliers with values 1.5 × IQR above and below the marked quartiles (Q1 and Q3) and asterisks indicate outliers with values 3 × IQR above and below the Q1 and Q3.
Figure 2Effect of intraurethral laser treatment on UI, determined by ICIQ‐UI SF (a) and 1‐hour pad test (b). The horizontal line within the box indicates a median, boundaries of the box indicate the 1st and 3rd quartile, and whiskers indicate the minimum and maximum values. Empty circles indicate outliers with values 1.5 × IQR above and below the marked quartiles (Q1 and Q3) and asterisks indicate outliers with values 3 × IQR above and below the Q1 and Q3.
Improvement in Outcome Measures
| Outcome measure | Dysuria | Urgency | Frequency | ICIQ‐UI SF | 1‐h pad test |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3‐month FU | |||||
| Improved | 100 ( | 93 ( | 97 ( | 79 ( | 90 ( |
| Not improved | 0 | 7 ( | 3 ( | 21 ( | 10 ( |
| Worse | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 6‐month FU | |||||
| Improved | 76 ( | 66 ( | 62 ( | 45 ( | 38 ( |
| Not improved | 24 ( | 31 ( | 38 ( | 48 ( | 59 ( |
| Worse | 0 | 3 ( | 0 | 7 ( | 3 ( |
Data is presented as a percentage of patients with corresponding improvement rate, which was calculated as ratio between values at FU and baseline values (n = absolute number of patients).
If improvement was ≥50%.
If improvement was <50%.
If improvement was negative (relative to baseline).
Average Improvement Rates (%) from Baseline Values
| 3‐month FU | 6‐month FU | |
|---|---|---|
| Dysuria | 87 (12) | 64 (25) |
| Urgency | 79 (18) | 44 (35) |
| Frequency | 77 (18) | 52 (23) |
| ICIQ‐UI | 64 (25) | 40 (31) |
| 1‐h pad test (g) | 59 (13) | 42 (20) |
Results are presented as mean (SD).