Literature DB >> 36078946

Higher Thyroid fT3-to-fT4 Ratio Is Associated with Gestational Diabetes Mellitus and Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes.

Lore Raets1, Caro Minschart1, Annick Van den Bruel2, Emmelien Van den Bogaert3, Paul Van Crombrugge4, Carolien Moyson1, Johan Verhaeghe5, Sofie Vandeginste6, Hilde Verlaenen6, Chris Vercammen7, Toon Maes7, Els Dufraimont8, Nele Roggen8, Christophe De Block9, Yves Jacquemyn10,11, Farah Mekahli12, Katrien De Clippel13, Anne Loccufier13, Annouschka Laenen14, Roland Devlieger5, Chantal Mathieu1, Brigitte Decallonne1, Katrien Benhalima1.   

Abstract

AIM: To determine the association between thyroid function and the risk of developing gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) and adverse pregnancy outcomes.
METHODS: This case-control study was a sub-analysis of the BEDIP-N study, in which 199 GDM women were matched for age and body mass index with 398 controls. Thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH), free thyroxine (fT4), free triiodothyronine (fT3), and thyroid peroxidase (TPO) antibodies were measured at 6-14 weeks and 26-28 weeks during pregnancy. TSH and fT4 were also measured in early postpartum in GDM women.
RESULTS: The fT3-to-fT4 ratio at 26-28 weeks was positively associated with GDM risk with an adjusted odds ratio (aOR for smoking, education, parity, ethnicity, gestational weight gain, and (family) history of diabetes or GDM) of 2.12 (95% CI 1.07; 4.23), comparing the highest with the lowest tertile. Higher fT3 levels and a higher fT3-to-fT4 ratio were associated with a less favorable metabolic profile with higher BMI and more insulin resistance during pregnancy and postpartum. Women in the upper fT3 tertile and the upper fT3-to-fT4 ratio had a higher rate of preeclampsia [4.6% (10) vs. 1.0% (2), p = 0.040, and 4.4% (9) vs. 0.5% (1), p = 0.020], gestational hypertension [8.3% (18) vs. 3.1% (6), p = 0.034 and 8.9% (18) vs. 2.0% (4), p = 0.003], and caesarean sections [29.4% (63) vs. 16.1% (31), p = 0.002 and 32.2% (65) vs. 12.7% (25), p < 0.001].
CONCLUSION: A higher fT3-to-fT4 ratio late into pregnancy was associated with GDM, adverse pregnancy outcomes, and an adverse metabolic profile in early postpartum.

Entities:  

Keywords:  fT3-to-fT4 ratio; free T3; gestational diabetes mellitus; pregnancy outcomes; thyroid function

Year:  2022        PMID: 36078946      PMCID: PMC9457218          DOI: 10.3390/jcm11175016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Med        ISSN: 2077-0383            Impact factor:   4.964


1. Introduction

Thyroid hormones (THs) are important for intrauterine fetal development, especially for the development of the fetal brain. During the early stages of pregnancy, the fetus largely depends on maternal THs [1]. Untreated overt maternal hypothyroidism during pregnancy leads to an increased risk of adverse pregnancy and child outcomes [2,3]. There has been a debate on the need for universal screening for thyroid dysfunction before or during pregnancy. The major negative impact of universal screening would be the identification of women with mild hypothyroidism, a population in whom the benefit of thyroid hormone supplementation is not well established [2]. THs play an important role in glucose metabolism. It has been suggested that thyroid dysfunction might be involved in the development of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) [4,5,6]. Sparse and conflicting data allude to the increased incidence of GDM in women with hypothyroidism [5,7,8,9]. Studies have shown that thyroid diseases in the first trimester are positively related to GDM [10,11]. Free T3 (fT3) levels may be an indicator of GDM risk starting early during pregnancy [5]. More data are needed to evaluate the association between thyroid function during pregnancy with GDM, adverse pregnancy outcomes, and risk of developing glucose intolerance in early postpartum. Moreover, there are currently only a few studies on the association between TH markers and GDM based on the 2013 WHO criteria [12,13]. We therefore aimed to determine the association between the fT3-to-fT4 ratio and related TH markers in early and late pregnancy and the risk of developing GDM, adverse pregnancy outcomes, and glucose intolerance in early postpartum.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Design and Setting

This case–control study was a sub-analysis of the Belgian Diabetes in Pregnancy study (BEDIP-N) (NCT02036619). We selected all women with GDM and matched them with women with normal glucose tolerance (two controls for every GDM case). Women with a history of thyroid disease were excluded. The controls were normal glucose tolerant (NGT) women matched for age and body mass index (BMI) in early pregnancy. Age matching was performed using a maximum range of 2 years and ages > 40 were rounded to 40 years. BMI matching was performed using a maximum range of 2 points and BMI > 35 was rounded to 35. BEDIP-N was a multicentric prospective cohort study that has previously been described in detail [14,15,16,17,18]. The study was approved by the Institutional Review Boards of all participating centers, and all investigations were carried out in accordance with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. Informed consent was obtained before inclusion in the study. Participants were enrolled between 6 and 14 weeks of pregnancy, when fasting plasma glucose (FPG) was measured. Women with impaired fasting glycaemia (IFG) or diabetes in early pregnancy according to the American Diabetes Association (ADA)-criteria were excluded [19]. Women without (pre)diabetes received universal screening for GDM between 24 and 28 weeks of pregnancy with a non-fasting 50 g glucose challenge test (GCT) followed by a 75 g 2 h OGTT. The 2013 WHO criteria were used for the diagnosis of GDM [14,15,20]. The ADA-recommended glycemic targets were used for the treatment of GDM [20]. Women with GDM received an invitation for a postpartum 75 g OGTT 6 to 16 weeks after delivery. The ADA criteria were used to define diabetes and glucose intolerance postpartum [IFG and/or impaired glucose tolerance (IGT)] [14,20].

2.2. Study Visits and Measurements

Baseline characteristics and obstetrical history were collected at first visit [14]. At first visit and at the time of the OGTT, anthropometric measurements were obtained, and several self-administered questionnaires were completed [14]. A BMI ≥ 25 kg/m2 was defined as overweight, and a BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2 was defined as obese based on the BMI at first prenatal visit. A fasting blood test was taken to measure FPG, insulin, lipid profiles (total cholesterol, HDL and LDL cholesterol, triglycerides), and HbA1c. The homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) and beta-cell function (HOMA-B) was carried out [21]. The results of glucose and insulin levels during the OGTT were used to calculate the Matsuda index, which is a measure of whole body insulin sensitivity [14,21,22,23,24,25].

2.3. Pregnancy and Delivery Outcome Data

The following pregnancy outcomes were collected: gestational age at delivery, preeclampsia (de novo BP ≥ 140/90 mmHg > 20 weeks with proteinuria or signs of end-organ dysfunction), gestational hypertension (de novo BP ≥ 140/90 mmHg > 20 weeks), type of labor, type of delivery, macrosomia (>4 kg), large-for-gestational age (LGA) defined as birth weight > 90 percentile or small-for-gestational age (SGA) defined as birth weight < 10 percentile (according to standardized Flemish birth charts adjusted for sex of the baby and parity) [26], shoulder dystocia, preterm delivery (<37 completed weeks), and admission on the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) [14]. A glycemic value < 2.2 mmol/L was considered as a neonatal hypoglycemia across all centers. The difference in weight between the first prenatal visit and the time of the OGTT was calculated as an early weight gain. Total gestational weight gain (GWG) was calculated as the difference in weight between first prenatal visit and delivery. The excessive total GWG (EGWG) was defined according to the 2009 Institute of Medicine (IOM) guidelines [27].

2.4. Analytical Methods

In line with routine clinical practice in each center, TSH was measured between 6 and 14 weeks of pregnancy. In women with GDM, TSH and fT4 were also measured at the postpartum visit by the local laboratory of each center [electrochemiluminescence immunoassay (ECLIA) method, Roche Cobas e801]. The following fasting samples were analyzed by the laboratory of UZ Leuven: between 6 and 14 weeks: fT4, fT3, and TPO levels; between 26 and 28 weeks: TSH, fT4, and fT3 levels; and in women with GDM, fT3 was also analyzed postpartum. Concentrations of serum TSH (mIU/L), fT3 (pmol/L), fT4 (ng/dL), and TPO antibodies (IU/mL) were measured using the ECLIA method on the Roche Cobas e801 analyzer with Roche reagents (Roche Diagnostics, Indianapolis, IN, USA). The fT3/fT4 ratio was obtained by dividing serum concentrations of fT3 by fT4.

2.5. Statistical Analysis

Descriptive statistics were presented as frequencies and percentages for categorical variables and means with standard deviations or medians with an interquartile range for continuous variables. Categorical variables were analyzed using the chi-square test or the Fisher exact test in the case of low (<5) cell frequencies, whereas continuous variables were analyzed using the Kruskal–Wallis test for data with a non-normal distribution or one-way ANOVA test for data with a normal distribution. To estimate crude and adjusted odds ratios (aORs) of GDM for each thyroid marker accounting for the matched case–control pairs, conditional logistic regression was used. Thyroid markers were both analyzed continuously and in tertiles. The tertiles were based on the thyroid marker distributions among the controls. ORs were calculated separately for the visit early during pregnancy (6–14 weeks) and at the time of the OGTT (26–28 weeks). For the multivariable models, we selected covariates including demographic factors and risk factors for GDM: smoking, education, parity, ethnicity, GWG, first-degree family history of diabetes, and a history of GDM. A correction for confounders (for non-white origin, education, smoking, and a history of impaired glucose intolerance) for the pregnancy outcomes was only applied to caesarian section (CS) and EGWG, as only these outcomes had a sufficient numbers of events. As TPO antibodies may influence both THs as well as glucose homeostasis, we repeated the analysis with exclusion of TPO-antibody-positive cases. A p-value < 0.05 was considered significant. Analyses were performed by statistician A. Laenen using SAS software.

3. Results

Two hundred and thirty-one women with GDM were matched, each to two controls based on age and BMI. Of this group, ninety-six (13.8%) were excluded for multiple reasons (Figure 1). In total, 597 women were included, of which 199 were GDM cases and 398 were matched controls. Compared to the NGT group, women with GDM smoked more before pregnancy, were more likely to have a first-degree family member with diabetes, had a more frequent history of GDM, and had a lower total weight gain (Table A1). TSH levels did not differ significantly between GDM cases and controls (Table 1). Mean fT4 levels were significantly lower among GDM women in the first trimester but not in the third trimester, whereas mean fT3 levels were significantly higher in the third but not in the first trimester (Table 1). Both fT3 and the fT3-to-fT4 ratio were positively associated with GDM in late pregnancy (Table 2). Women in the highest tertile of the fT3 levels had more frequent GDM compared with those in the lowest tertile. This association was no longer significant after adjusting for confounders, such as smoking, education, parity, ethnicity, GWG, first-degree family history of diabetes, and a history of GDM. The positive association between the fT3-to-fT4 ratio and GDM remained significant after adjustment with an aOR of 2.12 (95% CI 1.07; 4.23), comparing the highest with the lowest tertile. TSH levels were not associated with GDM (Table 2).
Figure 1

Flow chart of participants included in the sub-analysis. GDM: gestational diabetes mellitus; OGTT: oral glucose tolerance test; TSH: thyroid-stimulating hormone; IADPSG: International Association of the Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups; BMI: body mass index.

Table A1

Distribution of patient characteristics among women who had GDM and their matched controls.

NGTN = 398 (66.7%)GDMN = 199 (33.3%)p-Value
General
Age (years)31.3 ± 4.331.9 ± 4.70.174
% Ethnic minorities 0.432
Asian3.8 (15)6.1 (12)
Northern African6.0 (24)4.1 (8)
Turkish1.5 (6)1.5 (3)
Black African1.3 (5)2.0 (4)
Middle East1.5 (6)0.5 (1)
Latin American2.0 (8)0.5 (1)
Other2.5 (10)4.1 (8)
% Multiparity49.5 (194)52.8 (105)0.488
% Higher degree diploma82.0 (300)76.0 (136)0.111
% Highest education: 0.220
primary school0.8 (3)3.2 (6)
till 15 years4.9 (19)4.7 (9)
high school18.0 (70)20.5 (39)
bachelor36.0 (140)36.3 (69)
master40.4 (157)35.3 (67)
% Paid job87.4 (346)91.3 (178)0.170
% Smoking before pregnancy26.5 (105)35.5 (70) 0.028
% Smoking during pregnancy2.5 (10)5.6 (11)0.096
% First-degree family history of diabetes11.4 (43)18.6 (34) 0.026
% First-degree family history of GDM4.4 (16)7.6 (14)0.163
% History of GDM *5.1 (10)29.8 (31) <0.001
% History of impaired glucose intolerance2.0 (7)2.7 (5)0.551
6–14 weeks visit
Weeks of gestation first visit with FPG11.9 ± 1.611.9 ± 1.70.571
BMI (kg/m2)25.7 ± 5.426.4 ± 5.30.057
% Overweight45.5 (181)51.0 (101)0.223
% Obesity19.6 (78)22.2 (44)0.453
Weight gain (first visit till OGTT) (kg)6.8 ± 3.26.9 ± 3.70.642
Delivery
Total weight gain (delivery—first visit) (kg)12.5 ± 5.28.7 ± 5.0 <0.001
% Excessive weight gain35.1 (124)15.8 (26) <0.001

GDM: gestational diabetes mellitus; BMI: body mass index; OGTT: oral glucose tolerance test; overweight: BMI ≥ 25–29.9 kg/m2; obesity: BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2. * Data only available for women with GDM. Variables are presented as frequencies % (n); continuous variables are presented as mean ± SD if normally distributed and as median ± IQR if not normally distributed; differences are considered significant at p-value < 0.05. Bold p-values are significant at p < 0.05.

Table 1

Mean plasma concentrations of thyroid function markers in women with GDM and matched controls.

Total CohortN = 597GDMN = 199 (33.3%)NGTN = 398 (66.7%)p-Value
6–14 weeks
Gestational age at blood collection (weeks)11.9 ± 1.612.0 ± 1.711.9 ± 1.60.571
TSH (mIU/L)1.3 ± 0.91.3 ± 0.91.3 ± 0.90.416
fT4 (pmol/L)14.9 ± 2.414.6 ± 2.115.0 ±2.6 0.039
fT3 (pmol/L)5.0 ± 0.85.0 ± 0.65.0 ± 0.80.288
Anti-TPO ≥ 34 IU/L (%)6.5 (39)6.6 (13)6.5 (26)1.000
fT3/fT4 (upper vs. lower tertile)0.34 ± 0.060.35 ± 0.050.34 ± 0.06 0.020
24–28 weeks
Gestational age at blood collection (weeks)26.9 ± 1.127.1 ± 1.226.9 ± 1.0 0.034
TSH (mIU/L)1.6 ± 0.81.5 ± 0.81.6 ± 0.80.104
fT4 (pmol/L)12.2 ± 1.612.1 ± 1.612.3 ± 1.60.146
fT3 (pmol/L)4.4 ± 0.54.5 ± 0.54.4 ± 0.5 0.013
fT3/fT4 (upper vs. lower tertile)0.36 ± 0.060.37 ± 0.070.36 ± 0.06 0.010
Change from 6–14 weeks to 26–28 weeks
TSH (mIU/L)0.3 ± 0.80.3 ± 0.80.3 ± 0.80.394
fT4 (pmol/L)−2.6 ± 1.9−2.5 ± 1.5−2.7 ± 2.00.396
fT3 (pmol/L)−0.7 ± 0.6−0.6 ± 0.5 −0.7 ± 0.70.075
fT3/fT4 (upper vs. lower tertile)0.02 ± 0.10.02 ± 0.00.02 ± 0.10.336

GDM: gestational diabetes mellitus; NGT: normal glucose tolerant; TSH: thyroid-stimulating hormone; fT3: free triiodothyronine 3; fT4: free thyroxine 4; TPO: thyroid peroxidase. Categorical variables are presented as frequencies % (n); continuous variables are presented as mean ± SD. p-values < 0.05 are considered significant. Bold p-values are significant p < 0.05.

Table 2

Adjusted odds ratio’s for GDM according to tertiles of fT3, fT4, the fT3/fT4 ratio, and TSH.

GDMN = 199 (33.3%)NGTN = 398 (66.7%)Crude ModelMultivariable Model a
6–14 weeks
fT3 (pmol/L)
Tertile 1: 3.3–4.628.6 (57)29.1 (116)11
Tertile 2:4.7–5.130.6 (61)32.7 (130)0.96 (0.61; 1.49)1.36 (0.73; 2.55)
Tertile 3: 5.2–13.840.7 (81)38.2 (152)1.09 (0.71; 1.69)0.75 (0.38; 1.46)
Upper decile: 5.8–13.828.7 (23)25.2 (39)0.76 (0.32; 1.78)0.99 (0.16; 6.28)
p for trend 0.9770.249
Per unit increment 1.00 (0.80; 1.26)0.77 (0.50; 1.18)
fT4 (pmol/L)
Tertile 1: 9.9–13.735.2 (70)29.9 (119)11
Tertile 2: 13.8–15.332.7 (65)32.7 (130)0.84 (0.56; 1.27)0.56 (0.31; 1.01)
Tertile 3: 15.4–47.132.2 (64)37.4 (149)0.72 (0.47; 1.10)0.57 (0.32; 1.02)
Upper decile: 17.2–47.121.3 (19)27.4 (45)0.72 (0.32; 1.61)0.54 (0.17; 1.77)
p for trend 0.0780.111
Per unit increment 0.93 (0.85; 1.01)0.91 (0.81; 1.02)
fT3/fT4 ratio
Tertile 1: 0.20–0.3130.1 (60)34.4 (137)11
Tertile 2: 0.32–0.3531.2 (62)34.2 (136)1.07 (0.70; 1.65)1.29 (0.68; 2.42)
Tertile 3: 0.36–1.0138.7 (77)31.4 (125)1.50 (0.95; 2.36)1.31 (0.69; 2.48)
Upper decile: 0.41–1.0129.4 (25)20.3 (35)1.26 (0.45; 3.52)0.74 (0.14; 3.80)
p for trend 0.0700.467
Per unit increment 20.03 (0.079; 510.43)5.00 (0.06; 383.24)
TSH (mIU/L)
Tertile 1: 0.00–0.8536.7 (73)31.6 (124)11
Tertile 2: 0.86–1.5933.2 (66)37.2 (146)0.79 (0.52; 1.20)1.07 (0.59; 1.98)
Tertile 3: 1.60–8.0030.1 (60)31.1 (122)0.80 (0.52; 1.23)1.15 (0.63; 2.10)
Upper decile: 2.40–8.0018.0 (16)17.3 (26)0.84 (0.34; 2.06)1.79 (0.37; 8.74)
p for trend 0.5760.651
Per unit increment 0.95 (0.78; 1.15)1.06 (0.81; 1.39)
24–28 weeks
fT3 (pmol/L)
Tertile 1: 3.0–4.126.6 (53)34.9 (139)11
Tertile 2: 4.2–4.530.6 (61)32.2 (128)1.29 (0.83; 2.01)1.63 (0.89; 2.98)
Tertile 3: 4.6–7.242.7 (85)32.9 (131) 1.74 (1.13; 2.67) 1.70 (0.91; 3.16)
Upper decile: 5.0–7.239.8 (35)22.3 (40)1.52 (0.71; 3.24)0.82 (0.17; 3.92)
p for trend 0.014 0.174
Per unit increment 1.55 (1.09; 2.21) 1.43 (0.85; 2.38)
fT4 (pmol/L)
Tertile 1: 8.0–11.433.2 (66)30.9 (123)11
Tertile 2: 11.5–12.736.7 (73)32.7 (130)1.06 (0.70; 1.61)0.84 (0.44; 1.57)
Tertile 3: 12.8–24.030.1 (60)36.4 (145)0.78 (0.51; 1.18)0.77 (0.43; 1.39)
Upper decile: 14.3–24.018.5 (15)26.8 (45)0.65 (0.24; 1.80)1.30 (0.28; 6.00)
p for trend 0.1570.467
Per unit increment 0.92 (0.83; 1.03)0.94 (0.80; 1.11)
fT3/fT4 ratio
Tertile 1: 0.21–0.3326.6 (53)36.2 (144)11
Tertile 2: 0.34–0.3733.7 (67)32.7 (130)1.45 (0.94; 2.24)1.82 (0.98; 3.40)
Tertile 3: 0.38–0.6639.7 (79)31.2 (124) 1.85 (1.18; 2.92) 2.12 (1.07; 4.23)
Upper decile: 0.44–0.6637.6 (32)16.8 (29)1.92 (0.67; 5.52)2.12 (0.34; 13.00)
p for trend 0.001 0.042
Per unit increment 190.42 (8.09; 4483.4) 134.84 (1.19; 15302)
TSH (mIU/L)
Tertile 1: 0.04–1.2038.2 (76)30.0 (119)11
Tertile 2: 1.21–1.8429.1 (58)34.5 (137)0.64 (0.41; 0.98)0.54 (0.29; 1.04)
Tertile 3: 1.85–5.9532.7 (65)35.5 (141)0.69 (0.45; 1.06)0.89 (0.49; 1.63)
Upper decile: 2.60–5.9520.0 (19)25.6 (41)0.76 (0.31; 1.87)1.56 (0.38; 6.45)
p for trend 0.1450.713
Per unit increment 0.84 (0.66; 1.06)1.06 (0.77; 1.47)

GDM: gestational diabetes mellitus; NGT: normal glucose tolerant; TSH: thyroid-stimulating hormone; fT3: free triiodothyronine; fT4: free thyroxine. Upper decile: ≥90th percentile. Boldface indicates statistically significant results. a Adjusted for smoking, education, parity, ethnicity, gestational weight gain, first-degree family history of diabetes, and history of GDM.

Increases in fT3 and the fT3-to-fT4 ratio were associated with a higher BMI, fasting glycaemia, post-load glycaemia, HOMA-IR, and fasting triglycerides and decreasing fasting HDL and ISSI-2 both in early and late pregnancy. Increasing fT3 was associated with decreasing fasting LDL in late pregnancy (Table 3).
Table 3

Bivariate correlations between maternal thyroid function tests at 26–28 weeks of pregnancy and selected parameters in women with GDM and their matched controls.

fT3fT3/fT4 Ratio
r p r p
General
Age (years)−0.0760.0630.0210.610
6–14 weeks
BMI (kg/m2)0.327 <0.001 0.365 <0.001
Waist circumference (cm)0.269 <0.001 0.320 <0.001
Systolic blood pressure (mmHg)0.278 <0.001 0.230 <0.001
Diastolic blood pressure (mmHg)0.225 <0.001 0.195 <0.001
Fasting glycaemia (mmol/L)0.131 0.001 0.162 <0.001
Fasting insulin (pmol/L)0.249 <0.001 0.294 <0.001
HOMA-IR0.257 <0.001 0.305 <0.001
HOMA-B0.0710.0850.143 <0.001
HbA1c (mmol/mol and %)0.0220.5970.0780.057
Fasting Total cholesterol (mmol/L)−0.0450.2760.112 0.006
Fasting HDL (mmol/L)−0.196 <0.001 −0.156 <0.001
Fasting LDL (mmol/L)0.0110.7930.135 0.001
Fasting TG (mmol/L)0.126 0.002 0.252 <0.001
26–28 weeks
BMI (kg/m2)0.345 <0.001 0.400 <0.001
Systolic blood pressure (mmHg)0.300 <0.001 0.318 <0.001
Diastolic blood pressure (mmHg)0.273 <0.001 0.265 <0.001
Glucose non-fasting 0 min on GCT (mmol/L)0.0690.0950.122 0.003
Glucose 60 min on GCT (mmol/L)0.0700.0910.092 0.025
Fasting glycaemia OGTT(mmol/L)0.173 <0.001 0.242 <0.001
30 min glucose OGTT (mmol/L)0.136 0.001 0.105 0.010
1 h glucose OGTT (mmol/L)0.120 0.003 0.171 <0.001
2 h glucose OGTT (mmol/L)0.093 0.023 0.134 0.001
Fasting insulin OGTT (pmol/L)0.285 <0.001 0.379 <0.001
30 min insulin OGTT (pmol/L)0.176 <0.001 0.200 <0.001
1 h insulin OGTT (pmol/L)0.207 <0.001 0.319 <0.001
2 h insulin OGTT (pmol/L)0.205 <0.001 0.297 <0.001
HbA1c (mmol/mol and %)0.142 <0.001 0.260 <0.001
Matsuda insulin sensitivity−0.269 <0.001 −0.349 <0.001
HOMA-IR0.290 <0.001 0.395 <0.001
HOMA-B0.106 0.009 0.124 0.002
ISSI-2−0.194 <0.001 −0.259 <0.001
Insulinogenic index/HOMA-IR−0.179 <0.001 −0.226 <0.001
Fasting total cholesterol (mmol/L)−0.190 <0.001 −0.0380.356
Fasting HDL (mmol/L)−0.213 <0.001 −0.180 <0.001
Fasting LDL (mmol/L)−0.136 0.001 −0.0370.369
Fasting TG (mmol/L)0.0740.0710.206 <0.001
Delivery
Total weight gain (delivery—first visit) (kg)−0.0210.6290.0210.622
Weight baby (g)0.0140.7340.0080.838

GDM: gestational diabetes mellitus; BMI: body mass index; OGTT: oral glucose tolerance test; HOMA-IR: homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance; HOMA-B: homeostasis model assessment for beta cell function; ISSI-2: insulin secretion sensitivity index-2; HDL: high-density lipoprotein; LDL: low-density lipoprotein; TG: triglycerides; overweight: BMI ≥ 25–29.9 kg/m2; obesity: BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2. Differences are considered significant at p-value < 0.05. Bold p-values are significant p < 0.05.

Women in the upper fT3 tertile (52.9%) had a higher BMI, more often hypertension, higher HOMA-IR, lower HDL cholesterol, and higher fasting triglycerides at the first prenatal visit. At the OGTT, women in the upper tertile of fT3 more frequently had a diagnosis of GDM, EGWG, preeclampsia, gestational hypertension, a higher rate of cesarean sections (CS), and NICU admissions (Table 4). After adjusting for the previously mentioned confounders, only the rate of CS remained significantly higher in the upper tertile fT3 group [aOR 1.937, 95% CI (1.12; 3.36), p = 0.0187]. Women with GDM in the upper tertile fT3 group (61.6%) had a worse metabolic profile at the postpartum OGTT compared to women with GDM with lower fT3 (38.4%), but the rate of glucose intolerance was similar in both groups (Table A2).
Table 4

Distribution of selected patient characteristics according to lower and upper tertiles of fT3.

fT3 Lower Tertile (3.0–4.1)26–28 WeeksN = 192 (47.1%)fT3 Upper Tertile (4.6–7.2) 26–28 WeeksN = 216 (52.9%)p-Value
General
Age (years)32.1 ± 4.031.2 ± 4.7 0.047
6–14 weeks visit
BMI (kg/m2)23.9 ± 4.427.7 ± 6.0 <0.001
% Overweight30.2 (58)61.6 (133) <0.001
% Obesity8.3 (16)32.9 (71) <0.001
Waist circumference (cm)84.1 ± 11.091.9 ± 13.6 <0.001
% Waist 80–88 cm44.9 (84)26.5 (56) <0.001
% Waist ≥ 88 cm22.5 (42)53.5 (113)
Weight gain (first visit till OGTT) (kg)6.7 ± 3.36.7 ± 3.40.525
Systolic blood pressure (mmHg)112.3 ± 8.7119.4 ± 12.1 <0.001
Diastolic blood pressure (mmHg) 69.2 ± 7.173.5 ± 8.9 <0.001
% Hypertension (≥140/90 mmHg) 0.5 (1)6.9 (15) <0.001
Fasting glycaemia (mmol/L)2.15 (2.02–2.22)2.17 (2.07–2.27) 0.004
Fasting insulin (pmol/L)41.1 (31.0–53.8)60.1 (43.0–86.8) <0.001
HOMA-IR 8.2 (6.3–11.3)12.2 (8.6–18.5) <0.001
HOMA-B760.7 (582.1–1052.9)1015.4 (735.8–1519.6) <0.001
HbA1c (mmol/mol and %)31.1 (30.1–33.3)5.0 (4.9–5.2)31.1 (30.1–33.3)5.0 (4.9–5.2)0.779
Fasting total cholesterol (mmol/L)2.2 (2.0–2.4)2.1 (1.9–2.4)0.400
Fasting HDL (mmol/L)0.85 (0.75–0.96)0.77 (0.68–0.88) <0.001
Fasting LDL (mmol/L)1.15 (0.91–1.32)1.38 (0.94–1.33)0.655
Fasting TG (mmol/L)0.96 (0.79–1.20)1.04 (0.86–1.45) 0.002
fT4 (pmol/L)14.7 (13.4–16.1)14.8 (13.5–16.0)0.477
TSH (mIU/L)1.2 (0.8–1.8)1.1 (0.6–1.8)0.136
% Anti-TPO-positive (≥34 IU/L)6.8 (13)6.0 (13)0.840
Total score lifestyle
Physical activity1.0 (0–2.0)1.0 (0–2.0)0.073
Diet3.0 (0–5.0)2.0 (0–4.0) 0.009
24–28 weeks visit
BMI (kg/m2)26.3 ± 4.430.2 ± 5.7 <0.001
% Overweight51.6 (95)78.4 (167) <0.001
% Obesity16.3 (30)47.9 (102) <0.001
Systolic blood pressure (mmHg)109.5 ± 8.7116.0 ± 11.4 <0.001
Diastolic blood pressure (mmHg) 64.9 ± 6.569.6 ± 8.4 <0.001
% Hypertension (≥140/90 mmHg) 0.5 (1)4.6 (10) 0.012
Weeks of gestation at OGTT26.9 ± 1.127.0 ± 1.10.685
Fasting glycaemia OGTT (mmol/L)4.38 (4.16–4.66)4.50 (4.30–4.82) <0.001
30 min glucose OGTT (mmol/L)7.21 (6.49–8.10)7.55 (6.72–8.49) 0.003
1 h glucose OGTT (mmol/L)7.52 (6.19–9.02)8.27 (6.94–9.43) 0.007
2 h glucose OGTT (mmol/L)6.60 (5.44–7.85)7.16 (5.88–8.27) 0.008
% GDM diagnosis 27.6 (53)39.3 (85) 0.016
Fasting insulin OGTT (pmol/L)56.4 (41.2–78.2)79.9 (61.3–113.7) <0.001
30 min insulin OGTT (pmol/L)442.4 (336.4–677.50)583.1 (407.7–872.1) <0.001
1 h insulin OGTT (pmol/L)542.8 (382.3–828.8)693.7 (478.8–1014.0) <0.001
2 h insulin OGTT (pmol/L)513.9 (344.3–786.0)692.0 (452.8–1005.0) <0.001
HbA1c (mmol/mol and %)30.1 (29.0–32.2)4.9 (4.8–5.1)31.1 (30.1–33.3)5.0 (4.9–5.2) 0.002
Matsuda insulin sensitivity0.6 (0.4–0.8)0.4 (0.3–0.5) <0.001
HOMA-IR11.0 (7.9–15.9)16.1 (11.7–23.5) <0.001
HOMA-B1281.4 (913.4–1759.6)1635.1 (1147.3–2292.2) <0.001
ISSI-2 0.1 (0.1–0.3)0.1 (0–0.2) <0.001
Insulinogenic index/HOMA-IR 0.3 (0.2–0.5)0.3 (0.2–0.3) <0.001
Fasting total cholesterol (mmol/L)6.47 (5.74–7.15)5.97 (5.46–6.70) <0.001
Fasting HDL (mmol/L)2.03 (1.75–2.31)1.82 (1.59–2.08) <0.001
Fasting LDL (mmol/L)3.59 (2.93–4.29)3.21 (2.75–3.90) 0.004
Fasting TG (mmol/L)1.84 (1.46–2.25)1.95 (1.63–2.48) 0.015
GDM treatment *
GDM27.6 (53)39.3 (85) 0.016
% Need for treatment with insulin 3.7 (7)4.6 (10)1.000
Gestational age at start insulin30.7 ± 3.029.6 ± 2.00.551
Delivery
% Excessive weight gain21.3 (38)36.2 (64) 0.002
Gestational age (weeks)39.3 ± 1.638.9 ± 1.9 0.036
% Preeclampsia1.0 (2)4.6 (10) 0.040
% Gestational hypertension3.1 (6)8.3 (18) 0.034
% Cesarean sections (total)16.1 (31)29.4 (63) 0.002
% Planned CS4.7 (9)16.8 (36) <0.001
% Emergency CS (during labor)11.5 (2)12.6 (27)0.762
% Macrosomia (>4 kg)6.2 (12)8.4 (18)0.451
% LGA8.8 (17)13.9 (30)0.122
% SGA5.7 (11)4.6 (10)0.659
% Neonatal hypoglycaemia <2.22 mmol/L5.8 (10)9.8 (18)0.172
% NICU admission6.8 (13)14.9 (32) 0.011

GDM: gestational diabetes mellitus; BMI: body mass index; OGTT: oral glucose tolerance test; HOMA-IR: homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance; HOMA-B: homeostasis model assessment for beta cell function; HDL: high-density lipoprotein; LDL: low-density lipoprotein; TG: triglycerides; LGA: large-for-gestational age infant; SGA: small-for-gestational age infant; NICU: neonatal intensive care unit; overweight: BMI ≥ 25–29.9 kg/m2; obesity: BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2. * Data only available for women with GDM. Categorical variables are presented as frequencies %(n); continuous variables are presented as mean ± SD if normally distributed and as median ± IQR if not normally distributed; differences are considered significant at p-value < 0.05. Bold p-values are significant p < 0.05.

Table A2

Postpartum characteristics in women with GDM according to lower and upper tertiles of fT3.

fT3 Lower Tertile (3.0–4.1)26–28 WeeksN = 53 (38.4%)fT3 Upper Tertile (4.6–7.2) 26–28 WeeksN = 85 (61.6%)p-Value
Postpartum
Glucose intolerance at postpartum OGTT 1.000
% IFG4.2 (2)5.6 (4)
% IGT12.5 (6)11.1 (8)
% Both IFG and IGT0 (0)1.4 (1)
BMI (kg/m2) *23.6 ± 4.028.8 ± 5.6 <0.001
% Overweight *27.1 (13)73.9 (51) <0.001
% Obesity *6.2 (3)34.8 (24) <0.001
Systolic blood pressure (mmHg) *112.3 ± 10.1120.0 ± 12.4 0.002
Diastolic blood pressure (mmHg) *70.5 ± 9.175.6 ± 8.9 0.006
% Hypertension (≥140/90 mmHg)2.1 (1)8.7 (6)0.237
Fasting glycaemia (mmol/L) *4.72 (4.47–4.91)4.94 (4.69–5.16) 0.003
30 min glucose OGTT (mmol/L) *7.80 (6.94–8.74)7.66 (6.77–8.60)0.637
1 h glucose OGTT (mmol/L) *7.30 (5.99–8.63)7.08 (5.80–8.21)0.488
2 h glucose OGTT (mmol/L) *5.50 (4.94–6.66)6.10 (5.00–6.91)0.423
Fasting insulin (pmol/L) *38.5 (23.6–58.8)54.3 (39.5–84.2) 0.001
30 min insulin OGTT (pmol/L) *332.2 (228.0–418.0)388.2 (258.0–571.5)0.104
1 h insulin OGTT (pmol/L) *364.5 (273.3–501.4)451.7 (269.2–694.8)0.081
2 h insulin OGTT (pmol/L) *249.0 (164.4–424.7)338.4 (228.6–546.2) 0.028
HbA1c (%) *5.3 (5.1–5.5)5.2 (5.1–5.5)0.820
Matsuda insulin sensitivity *0.9 (0.5–1.4)0.7 (0.4–0.9) 0.006
Stumvoll index *−135.6 (−346.9–220.9)95.2 (−164.6–534.1) 0.017
Oral disposition index *−90.0 (−338.5–159.0)69.0 (−136.3–212.3) 0.020
HOMA-IR *8.1 (4.6–12.6)11.2 (8.9–19.2) <0.001
HOMA-B *642.9 (447.7–826.5)784.0 (582.4–1210.8) 0.033
ISSI-2 *0.3 (0.2–0.7)0.2 (0.1–0.4)0.013
Insulinogenic index/Homa-IR *0.3 (0.2–0.4)0.2 (0.2–0.3) 0.043
Fasting total cholesterol (mmol/L) *4.80 (4.13–5.21)4.60 (4.11–5.08)0.421
Fasting HDL (mmol/L) *1.67 (1.44–1.95)4.41 (1.26–1.67) 0.003
Fasting LDL (mmol/L) *2.64 (2.16–3.13)2.67 (2.13–3.13)0.967
Fasting TG (mmol/L) *0.75 (0.62–0.96)0.89 (0.69–1.25) 0.008

GDM: gestational diabetes mellitus; BMI: body mass index; OGTT: oral glucose tolerance test; HOMA-IR: homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance; HOMA-B: homeostasis model assessment for beta cell function; ISSI-2: insulin secretion-sensitivity index-2; HDL: high-density lipoprotein; LDL: low-density lipoprotein; TG: triglycerides; LGA: large-for-gestational age infant; SGA: small-for-gestational age infant; NICU: neonatal intensive care unit; IFG: impaired fasting glycaemia; IGT: impaired glucose tolerance; overweight: BMI ≥ 25–29.9 kg/m2; obesity: BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2. * Data only available for women with GDM. Categorical variables are presented as frequencies % (n); continuous variables are presented as mean ± SD if normally distributed and as median ± IQR if not normally distributed; differences are considered significant at p-value < 0.05. Bold p-values are significant at p < 0.05.

Compared to women in the lower fT3-to-fT4 tertile [49.2%] group, women in the upper fT3-to-fT4 tertile [50.7%] group had a higher BMI, a higher waist circumference, and a worse lipid profile in early pregnancy, and were more insulin-resistant (Table 5). These metabolic parameters remained worse at the time of the OGTT, and GDM was significantly more often diagnosed in the upper fT3-to-fT4 tertile group [38.9% (79) vs. 26.9% (53), p = 0.011] compared to the lower fT3-to-fT4 tertile group. EGWG, preeclampsia, gestational hypertension, CS, and LGA occurred more often in the upper fT3-to-fT4 tertile group compared to the lower fT3-to-fT4 tertile group (Table 5). After adjusting for confounders, the risk of developing CS and EGWG was no longer significantly higher. There were no significant differences in the rate of glucose intolerance postpartum between both groups (Table A3).
Table 5

Distribution of patient characteristics according to lower and upper tertiles of the fT3-to-fT4 ratio.

fT3-to-fT4 RatioLower Tertile (0.21 to 0.33) 26–28 WeeksN = 197 (49.2%)fT3-to-fT4 RatioUpper Tertile (0.38 to 0.66)26–28 WeeksN = 203 (50.7%)p-Value
General
Age (years)31.6 ± 4.131.8 ± 4.60.752
% History of impaired glucose intolerance0.6 (1)4.9 (9) 0.020
6–14 weeks visit
Weeks of gestation first visit with FPG12.0 ± 1.611.9 ± 1.70.669
BMI (kg/m2)23.3 ± 3.928.0 ± 5.6 <0.001
% Overweight27.4 (54)66.0 (134) <0.001
% Obesity6.1 (12)32.5 (66)
Waist circumference (cm)83.4 ± 10.092.6 ± 12.5 <0.001
% Waist 80–88 cm42.0 (81)30.6 (61) <0.001
% Waist ≥ 88 cm22.3 (43)55.8 (111)
Weight gain (first visit till OGTT) (kg)6.4 ± 3.37.2 ± 3.0 0.007
Systolic blood pressure (mmHg)112.4 ± 9.0118.2 ± 11.5 <0.001
Diastolic blood pressure (mmHg) 69.3 ± 7.372.7 ± 9.0 <0.001
% Hypertension (≥140/90 mmHg) 0.5 (1)6.9 (14) <0.001
Fasting glycaemia (mmol/L)4.61 (4.33–4.77)4.66 (4.50–4.88) 0.002
Fasting insulin (pmol/L)39.4 (30.6–53.6)62.5 (43.9–89.1) <0.001
HOMA-IR 8.0 (6.1–11.2)12.9 (9.0–18.7) <0.001
HOMA-B742.9 (582.6–1052.5)1048.9 (774.0–1470.9) <0.001
HbA1c (mmol/mol and %)31.1 (30.1–33.3)5.0 (4.9–5.2)31.1 (30.1–33.3)5.0 (4.9–5.2)0.053
Fasting total cholesterol (mmol/L)4.54 (3.98–5.11)4.75 (4.31–5.26) 0.006
Fasting HDL (mmol/L)1.82 (1.57–2.03)1.67 (1.44–1.90) <0.001
Fasting LDL (mmol/L)2.31 (1.85–2.70)2.49 (2.11–2.93) <0.001
Fasting TG (mmol/L)0.91 (0.77–1.13)1.10 (0.86–1.57) <0.001
fT4 (pmol/L)15.7 (14.4–16.9)13.8 (12.8–14.9) <0.001
TSH (mIU/L)1.1 (0.60; 1.75)1.2 (0.8–1.9) 0.039
% Anti-TPO-positive (≥34 IU/L)6.6 (13)7.9 (16)0.702
24–28 weeks visit
BMI (kg/m2)25.6 ± 3.930.7 ± 5.3 <0.001
% Overweight44.8 (7)86.4 (171) <0.001
% Obesity12.9 (25)50.0 (99) <0.001
Systolic blood pressure (mmHg)109.7 ± 9.0116.6 ± 11.2 <0.001
Diastolic blood pressure (mmHg) 65.2 ± 6.969.7 ± 8.2 <0.001
% Hypertension (≥140/90 mmHg) 0 (0)4.5 (9) 0.004
Fasting glycaemia OGTT(mmol/L)4.38 (4.16–4.61)4.55 (4.33–4.88) <0.001
30 min glucose OGTT (mmol/L)7.21 (6.44–7.99)7.46 (6.83–8.38) 0.006
1 h glucose OGTT (mmol/L)7.49 (6.05–8.82)8.32 (6.99–9.49) <0.001
2 h glucose OGTT (mmol/L)6.60 (5.38–7.88)7.16 (5.94–8.27) 0.004
Fasting insulin OGTT (pmol/L)53.7 (39.8–76.7)84.8 (64.3–124.9) <0.001
30 min insulin OGTT (pmol/L)466.9 (325.5–661.2)591.9 (418.9–867.9) <0.001
1 h insulin OGTT (pmol/L)518.9 (357.2–741.0)752.4 (563.2–1038.0) <0.001
2 h insulin OGTT (pmol/L)497.8 (334.7–737.6)757.0 (499.2–1046.5) <0.001
% GDM diagnosis 26.9 (53)38.9 (79) 0.011
HbA1c (mmol/mol and %)30.1 (29.0–32.2)4.9 (4.8–5.1)31.1 (30.1–33.3)5.0 (4.9–5.2) <0.001
Matsuda insulin sensitivity0.6 (0.4–0.8)0.4 (0.3–0.5) <0.001
HOMA-IR10.7 (7.7–15.4)17.5 (12.5–25.8) <0.001
HOMA-B1254.5 (889.6–1699.7)1668.0 (1146.0–2311.7) <0.001
ISSI-2 0.2 (0.1–0.3)0.1 (0.0–0.1) <0.001
Insulinogenic index/HOMA-IR 0.3 (0.2–0.5)0.2 (0.2–0.3) <0.001
Fasting total cholesterol (mmol/L)6.09 (5.60–6.60)6.14 (5.62–6.91)0.937
Fasting HDL (mmol/L)1.98 (1.72–2.29)1.77 (1.51–2.11) <0.001
Fasting LDL (mmol/L)3.36 (2.80–3.93)3.31 (2.80–3.98)0.961
Fasting TG (mmol/L)1.73 (1.39–2.16)2.04 (1.69–2.56) <0.001
Increase (difference) in TG between the first and second visit (mmol/L)0.76 (0.50–1.08)0.87 (0.59–1.24) 0.033
fT4 (pmol/L)13.3 (12.5–14.3)11.1 (10.4–11.8) <0.001
TSH (mIU/L)1.4 (1.0–2.0)1.7 (1.1–2.1) 0.005
Total score lifestyle:
Physical activity1.0 (0–2.0)1.0 (0–2.0)0.216
Diet3.0 (1.0–5.0)2.0 (0–4.0) 0.004
GDM treatment *
GDM26.9 (53)38.9 (79) 0.011
% Need for treatment with insulin 3.0 (6)5.9 (12)0.540
Gestational age at start insulin29.8 ± 1.230.2 ± 1.60.666
Delivery
Total weight gain (delivery—first visit) (kg)10.7 ± 4.911.6 ± 5.7 0.038
% Excessive weight gain15.3 (27)39.5 (70) <0.001
Gestational age (weeks)39.3 ± 1.539.1 ± 1.80.094
% Preeclampsia0.5 (1)4.4 (9) 0.020
% Gestational hypertension2.0 (4)8.9 (18) 0.003
% Preterm delivery6.1 (12)7.4 (15)0.692
% Induction labor27.9 (55)37.1 (75)0.055
% Cesarean sections (total)12.7 (25)32.2 (65) <0.001
% Planned CS6.1 (12)17.3 (35) <0.001
% Emergency CS (during labor)6.6 (13)14.8 (30) 0.009
% Macrosomia (>4 kg)6.1 (12)9.9 (20)0.197
% LGA8.1 (16)17.8 (36) 0.005
% SGA4.1 (8)3.0 (6)0.597
% Neonatal hypoglycaemia <2.22 mmol/L5.6 (10)8.7 (15)0.304
% NICU admission6.1 (12)16.8 (34) <0.001

GDM: gestational diabetes mellitus; BMI: body mass index; OGTT: oral glucose tolerance test; HOMA-B: homeostasis model assessment for beta cell function; HDL: high-density lipoprotein; LDL: low-density lipoprotein; TG: triglycerides; fT4: free T4; TSH: thyroid-stimulating hormone; LGA: large-for-gestational age infant; SGA: small-for-gestational age infant; NICU: neonatal intensive care unit; IFG: impaired fasting glycaemia; IGT: impaired glucose tolerance; overweight: BMI ≥ 25–29.9 kg/m2; obesity: BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2. * Data only available for women with GDM. Categorical variables are presented as frequencies % (n); continuous variables are presented as mean ±SD if normally distributed and as median ± IQR if not normally distributed; odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals are presented for significant differences; differences are considered significant at p-value < 0.05. Bold p-values are significant p < 0.05.

Table A3

Postpartum characteristics in GDM according to lower and upper tertiles of the fT3-to-fT4 ratio.

GDM and fT3-to-fT4 RatioLower Tertile (0.21 to 0.33)26–28 WeeksN = 53 (40.1%)GDM and fT3-to-fT4 RatioUpper Tertile (0.38 to 0.66)26–28 WeeksN = 79 (59.8%)p-Value
Postpartum
Glucose intolerance at postpartum OGTT17.8 (8)19.1 (13)0.721
% IFG6.7 (3)2.9 (2)
% IGT8.9 (4)13.2 (9)
% Both IFG and IGT2.2 (1)2.9 (2)
BMI (kg/m2) *23.1 ± 3.828.4 ± 5.6 <0.001
% Overweight *22.2 (10)68.7 (46) <0.001
% Obesity *6.7 (3)31.3 (21) 0.002
Systolic blood pressure (mmHg) *111.1 ± 14.0120.6 ± 13.6 <0.001
Diastolic blood pressure (mmHg) *70.6 ± 9.075.5 ± 8.5 0.004
% Hypertension (≥140/90 mmHg) 6.7 (3)7.5 (5)1.000
Fasting glycaemia (mmol/L) *4.72 (4.50–4.94)4.94 (4.74–5.19)0.011
30 min glucose OGTT (mmol/L) *7.66 (6.55–8.94)7.83 (6.83–8.60)0.887
1 h glucose OGTT (mmol/L) *6.94 (6.10–8.60)7.35 (5.72–8.38)0.808
2 h glucose OGTT (mmol/L) *5.55 (4.99–6.27)5.91 (4.99–7.13)0.480
Fasting insulin (pmol/L) *38.8 (26.3–56.1)55.4 (38.1–101.0) <0.001
30 min insulin OGTT (pmol/L) *332.2 (230.7–454.7)418.5 (289.3–565.5)0.055
1 h insulin OGTT (pmol/L) *364.6 (229.2–554.1)487.1 (324.5–790.0) 0.036
2 h insulin OGTT (pmol/L) *280.4 (189.9–453.6)342.8 (233.9–653.5) 0.034
HbA1c (%) *5.2 (5.1–5.5)5.3 (5.0–5.5)0.590
Matsuda insulin sensitivity *0.8 (0.5–1.3)0.6 (0.4–0.9) 0.002
Stumvoll index *−55.1 (−328.2–311.1)185.8 (−30.8–660.7) 0.016
Oral disposition index *−81.9 (−349.3–190.3)97.6 (−35.8–254.9) 0.018
HOMA-IR *8.3 (5.8–12.2)12.1 (8.4–22.6) <0.001
HOMA-B *675.0 (445.9–1074.5)787.7 (563.7–1287.3) 0.050
ISSI-2 *0.3 (0.2–0.7)0.2 (0.1–0.4) 0.004
Insulinogenic index/Homa-IR *0.3 (0.2–0.4)0.2 (0.1–0.3) 0.047
Fasting total cholesterol (mmol/L) *4.87 (4.13–5.2)4.74 (4.34–5.16)0.869
Fasting HDL (mmol/L) *1.63 (1.30–1.95)1.39 (1.18–1.77) 0.009
Fasting LDL (mmol/L) *2.66 (2.12–3.20)2.81 (2.31–3.13)0.516
Fasting TG (mmol/L) *0.80 (0.64–0.97)0.94 (0.64–1.43)0.062
fT4 (pmol/L)16.2 (14.7–17.9)15.5 (14.1–16.6) 0.040
TSH (mIU/L)1.5 (0.9–1.9)1.5 (1.1–2.1)0.733
Lifestyle score: physical activity *1.0 (0–2.0)1.0 (0–2.0)0.879
Lifestyle score: diet *3.0 (0–6.0)2.0 (0–4.0)0.293
% breastfeeding *81.4 (35)80.6 (54)1.000
METs category at time of the OGTT * 0.161
% Low19.5 (8)12.3 (8)
% Moderate53.6 (22)43.1 (28)
% High26.8 (11)44.6 (29)
% MET category low *19.5 (8)12.3 (8)0.405

GDM: gestational diabetes mellitus; BMI: body mass index; OGTT: oral glucose tolerance test; HOMA-B: homeostasis model assessment for beta cell function; ISSI-2: insulin secretion-sensitivity index-2; HDL: high-density lipoprotein; LDL: low-density lipoprotein; TG: triglycerides; fT4: free T4; TSH: thyroid-stimulating hormone; MET: metabolic equivalent of task; LGA: large-for-gestational age infant; SGA: small-for-gestational age infant; NICU: neonatal intensive care unit; IFG: impaired fasting glycaemia; IGT: impaired glucose tolerance; overweight: BMI ≥ 25–29.9 kg/m2; obesity: BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2. * Data only available for women with GDM. Categorical variables are presented as frequencies % (n); continuous variables are presented as mean ± SD if normally distributed and as median ± IQR if not normally distributed; odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals are presented for significant differences; differences are considered significant at p-value < 0.05. Bold p-values are significant at p < 0.05.

4. Discussion

Existing data are conflicting on the association between GDM and THs during pregnancy. We found that both fT3 and the fT3-to-fT4 ratio in late pregnancy were significantly and positively associated with GDM. After adjusting for confounders such as smoking, education, parity, ethnicity, GWG, and a (first-degree family) history of diabetes or GDM, the association between the highest tertile of fT3 with GDM was no longer significant. In contrast, the fT3-to-fT4 ratio remained significantly associated with GDM after adjusting for confounders. FT4 early into pregnancy was negatively correlated with GDM after adjusting for confounders. There is evidence that THs play an important role in glucose metabolism by regulating hepatic gluconeogenesis, in the intestinal absorption of glucose, and in the uptake of glucose in peripheral tissues. It is suggested that thyroid dysfunction may have a role in the emergence of GDM [4,5]. However, data are sparse on the association between different thyroid function markers and GDM based on the 2013 WHO criteria [12,13]. Data are also limited on the impact of thyroid function within the normal range on pregnancy outcomes and the risk of developing glucose intolerance in early postpartum. Our results do not support previous studies in which TSH, even within the normal range in the first trimester, was positively associated with GDM [10,11]. This discrepant finding could be explained by differences in the study population (e.g., Caucasian vs. Chinese women), the study design, diagnostic criteria for GDM, and the sample size. However, our results are in line with earlier findings which show a negative correlation between fT4 concentration in early pregnancy and GDM [12,28,29,30]. Maternal fT4 is important for fetal development in the first trimester of pregnancy. In normal pregnancy, human chorionic gonadotrophin (HCG) stimulates the thyroid gland, which leads to a small and transient increase in maternal fT4. Mothers with thyroid insufficiency might be more prone to pregnancy complications (e.g., GDM) compared to euthyroid women [28,31]. A study of Rawal et al. showed that higher fT3 levels may be an indicator of GDM risk starting early into pregnancy [5]. A recent Chinese study showed that both peripheral and central thyroid resistance indices during the first half of pregnancy significantly affected the subsequent risk of GDM [13]. This study showed that higher levels of fT3 and a higher fT3-to-fT4 ratio were associated with increased GDM risk, even among euthyroid women [13]. However, this study investigates a Chinese population, though we also present the first data on the impact of TH markers on the risk of developing GDM in a Caucasian population using the 2013 WHO criteria. Our study also provides information on the association between thyroid markers, insulin resistance, and beta-cell function during pregnancy and postpartum. In contrast to other studies [5,12,13], in our sub-analysis, the association between higher tertile fT3 was no longer significant after adjusting for confounders. Discrepancies between the results in our study and the Rawal study may be related to differences in the study population as a multiracial pregnancy cohort from the US was evaluated using the Carpenter and Coustan diagnostic criteria in the Rawal study, potentially resulting in the diagnosis of more severe degrees of hyperglycaemia compared to our study using the 2013 WHO criteria, identifying milder forms of GDM. Our study also had a substantially larger sample size. FT3 is the primary biologically active hormone involved in glucose homeostasis. The increase in the fT3 hormone during pregnancy is responsible for stimulating endogenous glucose production. Of all circulating fT3, 80% is formed by peripheral deiodinase (DIO) activity, which is indicated by an increase in the fT3-to-fT4 ratio both in a normal pregnancy as well as in GDM pregnancies [5,32]. Furthermore, studies on euthyroid patients without diabetes showed a positive relation between FPG and fT3 as well as between FPG and the fT3-to-fT4 ratio, indicating that THs may play an important role in the different pathophysiological mechanisms of IFG and IGT [33,34]. It could also be hypothesized that changes in placental DIO activity could contribute to an increase in the fT3-to-fT4 ratio, e.g., when there is a decrease in DIO3 as a result of (mal)adaptation of the placenta or an accelerated placental maturation in women with GDM [31]. In addition, an Italian study found a single-nucleotide polymorphism Thr921a in the coding region of DIO2 gene to be associated with insulin resistance, lower glucose disposal, and increased BMI [35,36]. However, there is still controversy on the exact role of polymorphisms on the DOI2 gene and its association with glucose tolerance [37,38]. Our observational study cannot demonstrate any causal relationship between THs and GDM, but rather suggests that THs may play a role in the pathophysiology of GDM, and its related adverse pregnancy outcomes and the risk of developing adverse metabolic profile postpartum. Women in the upper fT3 tertile and in the upper fT3-to-fT4 ratio group had a worse metabolic profile compared to women in the lower tertiles, both in early and later stages of pregnancy and for women with GDM also in early postpartum. Studies in NGT pregnant women without a history of thyroid dysfunction showed that a higher fT3-to-fT4 ratio was associated with a less favorable metabolic phenotype with a positive association between the fT3-to-fT4 ratio and BMI, triglycerides, and HOMA-IR, as also shown in our population [32,39]. Our results are also in line with findings in euthyroid middle-aged subjects, in which a higher fT3 and a higher fT3-to-fT4 ratio were associated with an unfavorable metabolic profile [34]. Additionally, our study demonstrated that women with a higher fT3 and higher fT3-to-fT4 ratio had more adverse pregnancy outcomes with higher rates of EGWG, preeclampsia, gestational hypertension, CS, LGA, and NICU admissions. After adjusting for confounders, the association between the upper tertile of the fT3-to-fT4 ratio and the risk of developing CS and EGWG and the association between the upper tertile fT3 and EGWG were no longer significant. Recent studies have shown a relationship between preeclampsia, gestational hypertension, CS, LGA, and NICU admissions in pregnant women with subclinical hypothyroidism [40,41,42,43,44]. Our study provides novel data showing that adverse pregnancy outcomes might also be related to THs within the normal range of fT3 and the fT3-to-fT4 ratio. At the postpartum OGTT, women with GDM in the upper tertile fT3 and the upper fT3-to-fT4 ratio group had a persistently worse metabolic profile. However, the rate of glucose intolerance was similar between the lower and highest tertiles groups. To our knowledge, we present the first data on the metabolic profiles and the risk of developing glucose intolerance in early postpartum, according to different degrees of fT3 and the fT3-to-fT4 ratio during pregnancy. A study from China showed an association between thyroid antibodies (TPO-antibody and thyroglobulin antibody) and glucose metabolism postpartum, but no data on thyroid function postpartum were available [12]. A major strength of our study is the large multicentric prospective cohort with a large detailed dataset containing broad demographic, clinical, and obstetrical outcomes. We provide the first data on the association between thyroid markers and GDM diagnosed with the 2013 WHO criteria in euthyroid women in a Caucasian population. Additionally, GDM cases were matched for age and BMI with NGT controls. Data on the risk of developing GDM and adverse pregnancy outcomes were adjusted for important confounders. Women with hypothyroidism were excluded. Most TH markers were centrally analyzed by the same laboratory of UZ Leuven. A limitation of the study is that our cohort was mainly Caucasian, with a relatively low background risk of developing GDM. In addition, we had no data on β-HCG levels, iodine status, and neonatal thyroid function parameters.

5. Conclusions

In conclusion, we found that a higher fT3-to-fT4 ratio late during pregnancy is associated with GDM, adverse pregnancy outcomes, and a persistent worse metabolic profile in early postpartum.
  42 in total

1.  Clinically useful estimates of insulin sensitivity during pregnancy: validation studies in women with normal glucose tolerance and gestational diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  J P Kirwan; L Huston-Presley; S C Kalhan; P M Catalano
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 19.112

Review 2.  Interpretation of thyroid function tests during pregnancy.

Authors:  W Edward Visser; Robin P Peeters
Journal:  Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2020-06-18       Impact factor: 4.690

3.  Higher thyroid-stimulating hormone levels in the first trimester are associated with gestational diabetes in a Chinese population.

Authors:  J Leng; W Li; L Wang; S Zhang; H Liu; W Li; S Wang; P Shao; L Pan; S Wang; E Liu
Journal:  Diabet Med       Date:  2019-08-21       Impact factor: 4.359

4.  A Prospective Study of Early-pregnancy Thyroid Markers, Lipid Species, and Risk of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus.

Authors:  Yi Wang; Fengjiang Sun; Ping Wu; Yichao Huang; Yi Ye; Xue Yang; Jiaying Yuan; Yan Liu; Huayan Zeng; Ying Wen; Xiaorong Qi; Chun-Xia Yang; Yixin Wang; Gang Liu; Da Chen; Liangzhong Li; Xiong-Fei Pan; An Pan
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2022-01-18       Impact factor: 5.958

Review 5.  2. Classification and Diagnosis of Diabetes: Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes-2020.

Authors: 
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 19.112

6.  Association between a novel variant of the human type 2 deiodinase gene Thr92Ala and insulin resistance: evidence of interaction with the Trp64Arg variant of the beta-3-adrenergic receptor.

Authors:  Daniela Mentuccia; Laura Proietti-Pannunzi; Keith Tanner; Vincenzo Bacci; Toni I Pollin; Eric T Poehlman; Alan R Shuldiner; Francesco S Celi
Journal:  Diabetes       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 9.461

7.  Maternal low thyroxin levels are associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes in a Chinese population.

Authors:  Yong Zhang; Xiaobei Dai; Shuai Yang; Chen Zhang; Mi Han; He-Feng Huang; Jianxia Fan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-05-23       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Increased Central and Peripheral Thyroid Resistance Indices During the First Half of Gestation Were Associated With Lowered Risk of Gestational Diabetes-Analyses Based on Huizhou Birth Cohort in South China.

Authors:  Zhao-Min Liu; Guoyi Li; Yi Wu; Di Zhang; Sujuan Zhang; Yuan-Tao Hao; Weiqing Chen; Qi Huang; Shuyi Li; Yaojie Xie; Mingtong Ye; Chun He; Ping Chen; Wenjing Pan
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-03-08       Impact factor: 5.555

9.  The Belgian Diabetes in Pregnancy Study (BEDIP-N), a multi-centric prospective cohort study on screening for diabetes in pregnancy and gestational diabetes: methodology and design.

Authors:  Katrien Benhalima; Paul Van Crombrugge; Johan Verhaeghe; Sofie Vandeginste; Hilde Verlaenen; Chris Vercammen; Els Dufraimont; Christophe De Block; Yves Jacquemyn; Farah Mekahli; Katrien De Clippel; Roland Devlieger; Chantal Mathieu
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2014-07-11       Impact factor: 3.007

10.  Incidence and Risk Factors of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus: A Prospective Cohort Study in Qingdao, China.

Authors:  Guoju Li; Tao Wei; Wei Ni; Ai Zhang; Jun Zhang; Yuhan Xing; Quansheng Xing
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2020-09-11       Impact factor: 5.555

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.