| Literature DB >> 36078829 |
Haixia Jiang1, Suhua Xiao1, Hongwei Hu2, Haotian He2.
Abstract
Caregiving services are currently the weakest part of China's social security system for the elderly. It is well needed to investigate the fac-tors affecting the unmet care needs of the elderly with disabilities. Based on the Behavioral Model of Health Services Use (BMHSU), this paper explores the needs and influencing factors of care services for the disabled elderly in urban and rural areas using data from the 2018 Project of Social Policy Support System for Disadvantaged Families in China. The demand for care services of the disabled elderly in central and western areas is significantly higher than that in eastern, along with that in rural areas significantly higher than that in urban areas. The demands for care services of the disabled elderly in urban and rural areas are significantly affected by tendency factors, resource factors, and need factors. Urban and rural attributes, worried pension and LCI are the common influencing factors for the care service demand of the disabled elderly from economically disadvantaged families and ordinary families. The demands for care services of the disabled elderly were associated with tendencies, resources, and needs, increased chronic disease prevention and mental health services benefit caregivers.Entities:
Keywords: MIMIC structural equation model; care service demand; disadvantaged families; population aging; urban and rural disability elderly
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 36078829 PMCID: PMC9518346 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph191711112
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 4.614
Figure 1The theoretical analysis framework of the factors affecting the demand for care services for the disabled elderly in urban and rural areas.
Figure 2Confirmatory Factor Analysis Model (CFA) for Measuring Care Service Needs.
Figure 3MIMIC model of influencing factors of care service demand.
Exploratory Factor Analysis Results (n = 2916).
| Factor | PCFA | PFA | IPFA | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Eigenvalue | Factor Loadings | Eigenvalue | Factor Loadings | Eigenvalue | Factor Loadings | |
| Factor 1 | 2.69 | 0.62 | 1.96 | 0.51 | 2.14 | 0.52 |
| Factor 2 | 0.82 | 0.66 | 0.06 | 0.55 | 0.25 | 0.56 |
| Factor 3 | 0.71 | 0.65 | −0.07 | 0.55 | 0.13 | 0.59 |
| Factor 4 | 0.67 | 0.72 | −0.07 | 0.63 | 0.04 | 0.67 |
| Factor 5 | 0.60 | 0.73 | −0.12 | 0.64 | 0.01 | 0.69 |
| Factor 6 | 0.51 | 0.64 | −0.20 | 0.53 | −0.0002 | 0.53 |
Note: Factor loadings is the factor loadings of six index variables in factor 1, Cronhach’s α = 0.746.
Figure 4Confirmatory factor analysis of care service needs. Note: the estimation method is resampling method (bootstrap 1000 times), report the standardization coefficient, **** represents the significant level of 0.1%.
Calculation of urban and rural care service demand in eastern, central, and western regions.
| Weighted Average | Eastern Region | Central Region | Western Region | Variance Analysis |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Urban and Rural Weighted Average | 1.09 | 1.24 | 1.39 | F = 17.25 |
| Urban Weighted Average | 0.88 | 1.09 | 1.20 | F = 14.70 |
| Rural Weighted Average | 1.39 | 1.45 | 1.61 | F = 4.16 |
Figure 5Results of MIMIC model of influencing factors of care service demand. Note: The estimation method is ML, report the standardized coefficient is, ****, **, * are significant at the levels of 0.1%, 5% and 10% respectively.
Results of model regression of factors influencing the demand for care services for the disabled.
| Model | Estimation Methods | (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ml | ml + robust | mlmv + robust | bootstrap | gsem | jackknife | ||
| A. | Gender | 0.06 **** | 0.06 **** | 0.05 **** | 0.06 **** | 0.35 **** | 0.06 **** |
| (5.21) | (5.21) | (5.11) | (5.23) | (5.07) | (5.19) | ||
| Age | 0.00 ** | 0.00 * | 0.00 | 0.00 * | 0.01 | 0.00 * | |
| (1.99) | (1.94) | (0.76) | (1.92) | (1.46) | (1.93) | ||
| Education | −0.02 **** | −0.02 **** | −0.02 *** | −0.02 **** | −0.10 *** | −0.02 **** | |
| (−3.43) | (−3.51) | (−3.24) | (−3.67) | (−2.65) | (−3.49) | ||
| Attributes | −0.09 **** | −0.09 **** | −0.10 **** | −0.09 **** | −0.54 **** | −0.09 **** | |
| (−7.91) | (−7.60) | (−8.85) | (−7.45) | (−7.40) | (−7.57) | ||
| Worried Pension | 0.11 **** | 0.11 **** | 0.06 **** | 0.11 **** | 0.72 **** | 0.11 **** | |
| (9.64) | (9.51) | (6.27) | (9.27) | (9.04) | (9.47) | ||
| Econmy | −0.01 ** | −0.01 ** | −0.02 ** | −0.01 ** | −0.08 * | −0.01 ** | |
| (−2.23) | (−2.24) | (−2.49) | (−2.23) | (−1.92) | (−2.23) | ||
| Family Help | 0.01 ** | 0.01 ** | 0.01 * | 0.01 ** | 0.05 ** | 0.01 ** | |
| (2.00) | (2.00) | (1.70) | (2.04) | (2.54) | (1.99) | ||
| LCI | 0.09 **** | 0.09 **** | 0.10 **** | 0.09 **** | 0.59 **** | 0.09 **** | |
| (8.07) | (8.33) | (8.57) | (8.08) | (7.94) | (8.30) | ||
| Health | −0.01 ** | −0.01 ** | −0.02 *** | −0.01 ** | −0.06 | −0.01 ** | |
| (−2.24) | (−2.23) | (−2.84) | (−2.24) | (−1.55) | (−2.22) | ||
| Chronic Disease | 0.01 * | 0.01 * | 0.01 ** | 0.01 * | 0.05 ** | 0.01 * | |
| (1.79) | (1.77) | (2.47) | (1.67) | (2.39) | (1.76) | ||
| Disability Degree | 0.05 **** | 0.05 **** | 0.07 **** | 0.05 **** | 0.26 **** | 0.05 **** | |
| (6.48) | (5.87) | (8.87) | (5.95) | (5.47) | (5.84) | ||
| B. | Daily Care | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| _cons | 0.07 | 0.07 | 0.16 *** | 0.07 | — | 0.07 | |
| (1.09) | (1.08) | (2.74) | (1.06) | — | (1.08) | ||
| Medical Treatment | 1.42 **** | 1.42 **** | 1.32 **** | 1.42 **** | 1.32 **** | 1.42 **** | |
| (17.17) | (17.31) | (19.93) | (17.75) | (11.29) | (17.32) | ||
| _cons | 0.19 ** | 0.19 ** | 0.32 **** | 0.19 ** | — | 0.19 ** | |
| (2.32) | (2.31) | (4.21) | (2.26) | — | (2.30) | ||
| Health Education | 0.93 **** | 0.93 **** | 0.87 **** | 0.93 **** | 1.09 **** | 0.93 **** | |
| (13.67) | (12.88) | (14.66) | (12.41) | (11.14) | (12.89) | ||
| _cons | 0.18 *** | 0.18 *** | 0.25 **** | 0.18 *** | — | 0.18 *** | |
| (3.27) | (3.24) | (4.83) | (3.18) | — | (3.23) | ||
| Rehabilitation | 1.08 **** | 1.08 **** | 1.08 **** | 1.08 **** | 1.67 **** | 1.08 **** | |
| (17.69) | (16.73) | (20.18) | (16.70) | (10.98) | (16.76) | ||
| _cons | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.10 | 0.01 | — | 0.01 | |
| (0.10) | (0.10) | (1.58) | (0.10) | — | (0.10) | ||
| Psychological | 1.29 **** | 1.29 **** | 1.21 **** | 1.29 **** | 1.59 **** | 1.29 **** | |
| (16.69) | (16.17) | (18.49) | (16.29) | (10.97) | (16.18) | ||
| _cons | 0.16 ** | 0.16 ** | 0.25 **** | 0.16 ** | — | 0.16 ** | |
| (2.05) | (2.03) | (3.61) | (1.99) | — | (2.02) | ||
| Social Support | 1.01 **** | 1.01 **** | 0.94 **** | 1.01 **** | 1.33 **** | 1.01 **** | |
| (16.10) | (15.32) | (16.78) | (15.42) | (11.16) | (15.35) | ||
| _cons | −0.01 | −0.01 | 0.06 | −0.01 | — | −0.01 | |
| (−0.18) | (−0.18) | (1.13) | (−0.17) | — | (−0.18) | ||
| C. |
| 2362 | 2362 | 2917 | 2362 | 2365 | 2362 |
| R2 (CD) | 0.242 | 0.242 | 0.228 | 0.242 | — | 0.242 | |
| CFI | 0.941 | — | — | 0.941 | — | 0.941 | |
| RMSEA | 0.037 | — | — | 0.037 | — | 0.037 | |
| SRMR | 0.024 | 0.024 | — | 0.024 | — | 0.024 |
Note: report denormalization factor, (3) is the result of bootstrap 1000 times, ****, ***, **, * are significant at the levels of 0.1%, 1%, 5% and 10% respectively, “—” means the value is blank.
Comparison of the results of factors influencing the needs of elderly care services in difficult families and ordinary families.
| Model | (1) | (2) | (3) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Difficult Families | Ordinary Families | Overall Families | |
| Gender | 0.256 **** | 0.015 | 0.216 **** |
| (5.53) | (0.16) | (5.23) | |
| Age | 0.005 * | 0.001 | 0.005 * |
| (1.67) | (0.10) | (1.69) | |
| Education | −0.076 *** | −0.015 | −0.068 *** |
| (−2.98) | (−0.34) | (−3.09) | |
| Attributes | −0.357 **** | −0.284 *** | −0.332 **** |
| (−7.58) | (−3.03) | (−7.93) | |
| Worried Pension | 0.442 **** | 0.497 **** | 0.452 **** |
| (9.66) | (5.68) | (11.14) | |
| Family Help | 0.031 ** | 0.027 | 0.027 ** |
| (2.06) | (0.96) | (2.09) | |
| LCI | 0.352 **** | 0.394 **** | 0.363 **** |
| (7.73) | (4.40) | (8.95) | |
| Health | −0.045 * | −0.081 | −0.052 ** |
| (−1.71) | (−1.54) | (−2.23) | |
| Chronic Disease | 0.027 ** | 0.016 | 0.026 ** |
| (2.02) | (0.56) | (2.13) | |
| Disability Degree | 0.200 **** | 0.065 | 0.185 **** |
| (6.54) | (0.90) | (6.62) | |
| _cons | 0.167 | 0.648 | 0.213 |
| (0.66) | (1.19) | (0.93) | |
|
| 1935 | 427 | 2362 |
Note: ****, ***, **, * are significant at the levels of 0.1%, 1%, 5% and 10% respectively.