Literature DB >> 20167406

Preferences for long-term care services: willingness to pay estimates derived from a discrete choice experiment.

Anna P Nieboer1, Xander Koolman, Elly A Stolk.   

Abstract

Ageing populations increase pressure on long-term care. Optimal resource allocation requires an optimal mix of care services based on costs and benefits. Contrary to costs, benefits remain largely unknown. This study elicits preferences in the general elderly population for long-term care services for varying types of patients. A discrete choice experiment was conducted in a general population subsample aged 50-65 years (N = 1082) drawn from the Dutch Survey Sampling International panel. To ascertain relative preferences for long-term care and willingness to pay for these, participants were asked to choose the best of two care scenarios for four groups of hypothetical patients: frail and demented elderly, with and without partner. The scenarios described long-term care using ten attributes based on Social Production Function theory: hours of care, organized social activities, transportation, living situation, same person delivering care, room for individual preferences, coordination of services, punctuality, time on waiting list, and co-payments. We found the greatest value was attached to same person delivering care and transportation services. Low value was attached to punctuality and room for individual preferences. Nursing homes were generally considered to be detrimental for well-being except for dementia patients without a partner. Overall, long-term care services were thought to produce greatest well-being for the patients 'without a partner' and those 'with dementia'. Individuals combining these two risk factors would benefit the most from all services except transportation which was considered more important for the frail elderly. The results support the notion that long-term care services represent different value for different types of patients and that the value of a service depends upon the social context. Examination of patient profiles confirmed the notion that physical, mental and social vulnerability affect valuation of the services. Policy-making would profit from allocation models in which budgetary requirements of different services can be balanced against the well-being they produce for individuals. Copyright 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20167406     DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2009.12.027

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Soc Sci Med        ISSN: 0277-9536            Impact factor:   4.634


  19 in total

1.  The relationship of preparation for future care to depression and anxiety in older primary care patients at 2-year follow-up.

Authors:  Silvia Sörensen; Wingyun Mak; Benjamin Chapman; Paul R Duberstein; Jeffrey M Lyness
Journal:  Am J Geriatr Psychiatry       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 4.105

2.  Preferences for home- and community-based long-term care services in Germany: a discrete choice experiment.

Authors:  T Lehnert; O H Günther; A Hajek; S G Riedel-Heller; H H König
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2018-04-06

3.  Including Opt-Out Options in Discrete Choice Experiments: Issues to Consider.

Authors:  Danny Campbell; Seda Erdem
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 3.883

Review 4.  A systematic review of stated preference studies reporting public preferences for healthcare priority setting.

Authors:  Jennifer A Whitty; Emily Lancsar; Kylie Rixon; Xanthe Golenko; Julie Ratcliffe
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 3.883

Review 5.  Discrete choice experiments in health economics: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Michael D Clark; Domino Determann; Stavros Petrou; Domenico Moro; Esther W de Bekker-Grob
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 4.981

6.  Capabilities and quality of life in Dutch psycho-geriatric nursing homes: an exploratory study using a proxy version of the ICECAP-O.

Authors:  Peter Makai; Werner B F Brouwer; Marc A Koopmanschap; Anna P Nieboer
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2011-09-06       Impact factor: 4.147

7.  Validation of the self-management ability scale (SMAS) and development and validation of a shorter scale (SMAS-S) among older patients shortly after hospitalisation.

Authors:  Jane M Cramm; Mathilde M H Strating; Paul L de Vreede; Nardi Steverink; Anna P Nieboer
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2012-01-24       Impact factor: 3.186

Review 8.  Can we do better? Economic analysis of human resource investment to improve home care service for the elderly in Serbia.

Authors:  Marko M Mihic; Marija Lj Todorovic; Vladimir Lj Obradovic; Zorica M Mitrovic
Journal:  Clin Interv Aging       Date:  2016-01-28       Impact factor: 4.458

9.  The relationship between older adults' self-management abilities, well-being and depression.

Authors:  J M Cramm; J M Hartgerink; P L de Vreede; T J Bakker; E W Steyerberg; J P Mackenbach; A P Nieboer
Journal:  Eur J Ageing       Date:  2012-07-04

Review 10.  Developing attributes for discrete choice experiments in health: a systematic literature review and case study of alcohol misuse interventions.

Authors:  Timea Mariann Helter; Christian Ernst Heinrich Boehler
Journal:  J Subst Use       Date:  2016-03-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.