| Literature DB >> 36078542 |
John W Yuen1, Ricky W Wu2, Shirley S Ching1, Chi-Fai Ng3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Conventional and newly emerged intravesical modalities have demonstrated prophylactic effectiveness that may improve quality of life (QoL) in non-muscle invasive bladder cancer. The purpose of this study is to analyze existing QoL evidence in patients receiving any form of intravesical therapy.Entities:
Keywords: Bacillus Calmette–Guérin; bladder cancer; chemotherapy; health-related quality of life; hyperthermia; immunotherapy; intravesical therapy; non-muscle invasive bladder cancer; quality of life; urothelial carcinoma
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 36078542 PMCID: PMC9518426 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph191710825
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 4.614
Figure 1The process of literature screening and selection presented using the PRISMA 2020 flow diagram. * PubMed and the Cochrane library database; ** Studies did not involve NMIBC patients, did not include quality-of-life as outcome measures, and non-English publications.
A summary of the characteristics and main findings of the eligible studies included in this systematic review.
| Author, Year | Study | Cancer Stage, Grade Condition | Intravesical Agents Used | Comparison Groups (n) | QoL Instruments | Time Points of Measurement | Main Findings |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bohle et al., 1996 [ | Prospective cohort | Ta-T1 at grade 1–3 | BCG | Single group (n = 30) | Satisfaction with life; health status | 2 weeks before (Post-TURBT), during (after 6th instillation), and 3-month after treatment | No statistically significant differences observed among the 3 time points for both QoL variables |
| Mack & Frick, 1996 [ | Prospective cohort | Newly diagnosed (T1 or CIS at grade 3 (high-risk); | BCG | Single group (n = 85) | Overall QoL; | During induction cycle (T0), 1-month (T1) and 3-month (T2) during maintenance | 84% and 23% rated bad-to-moderate levels of overall QoL and sexual activity at T0, but progressively improved during the maintenance. With 84% distressed with micturition problems at T0, and slightly improved during maintenance. Activity levels progressively improved as increased from 51% at T0 to 81% at T2. |
| Williams-Cox, 2004 [ | Cross-sectional | Newly diagnosed and undergoing intravesical therapy | Not specified | Maintenance (n = 10) | Satisfaction on general QoL; | During induction | No significant difference between the two groups for QoL satisfaction ranged from ‘satisfied’ to ‘somewhat satisfied’ levels and physical condition at ‘good-to-very good’ levels. Patients rated ‘little or rather affected’ level of daily activity during induction treatment but improved to ‘not at all-to-little’ levels during maintenance. |
| Abbona, et al., 2007 [ | Cross-sectional | Any stages received ≥1 intravesical cycle | Not specified | Single group (n = 63) | Working activity/relations; | Baseline data before entering psychosexual support therapy | Intravesical therapy altered working activity/relations, sexual/couple life, and self-esteem in 43%, 46%, and 38% of patients, respectively. |
| Gilbert et al., 2007 [ | Cross-sectional | Ta-T2 or CIS | Not specified | Intravesical (n = 75) | BCI | Post-treatment | No significant difference between the groups in the urinary domain. Intravesical group exhibited better bowel function scores but lower function and higher bother scores for the sexual domain, despite statistically insignificant. |
| Sighinolfi et al., 2007 [ | Prospective cohort | Ta-T1 or CIS at grade 2–3 | BCG | Single group (n = 30) | IIEF-5; | During treatment, | Erectile dysfunction and urinary symptoms significantly reduced after BCG treatment, in addition to a mean IIEF-5 score increased from 17.6 to 21.7 ( |
| Wittlinger et al., 2009 [ | Single-arm trial | Primary or recurrent | Hyperthermia with cisplatin | Single group (n = 30) | Item no. 8 of IPSS | Post-trial of Quadrimodal treatment | Vast majority of patients rated ≤3 for QoL due to urinary symptoms indicated satisfaction with only 3% of them rated unhappy (score 5). |
| Koga et al., 2010 [ | RCT | Primary or recurrent | BCG | Maintenance (n = 26) | EORTC QLQ-C30 | Post-induction, | The maintenance group reported better QoL after 14 months, in terms of functioning (physical, role, social), global health status, and all symptom scores, except for nausea and vomiting and dyspnea, although statistically insignificant. Such improvements were not observed in the observational group without receiving maintenance. |
| Gontero et al., 2013 [ | RCT | Ta-1 | BCG; | 1/3 dose BCG (n = 47) | EORTC QLQ-C30; | Pre-instillation (T0), after induction cycle (T1), and end of maintenance (T2) | When compared with GEM, BCG exhibited poorer QoL in all functioning scales at significance levels of |
| Wei et al., | Prospective Cohort | Intermediate- or high-risk NMIBC | Pirarubicin | Single group (n = 106) | EORTC QLQ-C30; | Pre- and post-instillation | Global health status and social functioning were worsened significantly ( |
| Hayne et al., 2015 [ | Pilot RCT | Resected, high-risk NMIBC | BCG; | BCG (n = 11) | EORTC QLQ-C30 | Baseline, 3, 6, 9, 12 months | Both groups followed the similar trend of changes in IPSS and cystitis scores throughout the follow-up period, except for an upward trend of cystitis scores exhibited by BCG from 9–12 months which was opposite to that by the BCG + MMC group. BCG + MMC showed slightly better (lower) QoL scores at all times. Results of EORTC questionnaires were not reported. |
| Huang et al., 2015 [ | RCT | Ta-T1 at grade 1–3 | Pirarubicin + HA | Pirarubicin + HA (n = 64) | Pain VAS | Monthly since baseline up to 2 years | Addition of HA improved the pain consistently after 1 month of treatment ( |
| Schmidt et al., 2015 [ | Prospective cohort | Ta-T1 or CIS at grade 1–3 | BCG | TUR | SF-36; | 6 months (T1) and 12 months (T2) post-diagnosis | Only reported change in scores between time points. |
| Yokomizo et al., 2015 [ | RCT | Ta-T1 or CIS at grade 1–3 | BCG | Standard dose (n = 79) | EORTC QLQ-C30 | Baseline and after induction | The half-dose was corresponded with poorer functioning but better symptom QoL. When compared with the baseline, after induction, standard dose resulted in improved global QoL and functioning scores, except emotion function. Half-dose decreased all symptom scores, but standard dose increased diarrhea and constipation scores. |
| Danielsson 2018 [ | Prospective cohort | T1 at grade 2–3 | BCG | Single group (n = 113) | Urinary bladder symptoms and symptom burdens | Baseline (before 1st dose), during instillation (at 3rd, 6th, 12th, and 18th), after treatment (at 24th and 60th month) | Progress improvement by BCG observed over 12 months in prevalence, intensity, and burden caused by several urinary bladder symptoms that have been reported by patients prior to the treatment. General health remained stable over time. |
| Siracusano et al., 2018 [ | Prospective cohort | Intermediate- or high-risk NMIBC | BCG; | Single (n = 108) | EORTC QLQ-C30; | Baseline (T0), 6th or 8th week after 1st instillation (T1), and 3 months after induction (T2) | Global QoL, functioning QoL except cognitive, and cancer-specific symptoms (Pain, dyspnea, insomnia) significantly deteriorated at T1 but improved at T2, as measured by QLQ-C30. |
| Bosschieter et al., 2019 [ | RCT | Ta at grade 1–2 | IL-2 | Complete TURBT (n = 14) | EORTC QLQ-BLS24; | Baseline, 3 months after TURBT | No statistically differences between the two arms when comparing the mean score differences. |
| Tan et al., | RCT | Recurrent, Ta-T1 or CIS at grade 1–3 | BCG; | BCG (n = 56) | EQ-5D | Baseline, at 3rd, 6th, 9th, 12th month of treatment | No statistical difference was observed between BCG and RITA-MMC arms for health status, although higher EQ-5D index scores were shown at 3th, 6th, 9th months. |
| Mostafid et al., 2020 [ | RCT | Ta-T1 or CIS at grade 1–2; EORTC risk of recurrence score ≤ 6 | MMC | MMC (n = 54) | EORTC QLQ-C30; | Baseline, 3rd, 6th, 12th month | For global health status and urinary symptoms, surgery had no impact in the first 6 months but deteriorated at the 12th month. Deteriorations observed in MMC throughout the follow-up period. Both arms did not improve physical function but deteriorated by surgery at the 12th month. |
| Catto et al., 2021 [ | Cross-sectional | Ta-T1 or CIS | Not specified | TURBT + BCG/MMC (n = 562) | EQ-5D; | 1–10 years after treatment | Intravesical therapy following TURBT caused higher percentage of pain/discomfort but lower percentage of anxiety/depression than TURBT alone as measured by ED-5D. |
| Catto et al., 2021 [ | RCT | High-grade Ta-1 or CIS | BCG | BCG (n = 25) | EQ-5D; | Baseline; 3, 6, and 12 months follow-up | No differences were observed between BCG and RC in the trends of EQ5D QoL and QLQ-C30 functioning QoL scores, except RC showed reductions on global health status, physical and role functioning score at 3 months, and social functioning score at 6 months. |
| Gonzalez-Padilla et al., 2021 [ | Prospective cohort | Intermediate-risk and high-risk of Ta-1 and CIS | BCG; | BCG | FACT-BI; | Baseline, at 4th and 6th week, and 1 week after induction | All 3 study groups followed similar trends in improving the symptom scores measured by FACT-BI and IPSS. CHT-MMC showed superior effects over BCG but that was comparable to MMC alone. Statistical significance ( |
| Miyake et al., 2022 [ | Prospective cohort | Intermediate or high-risk NMIBC; EORTC performance status 0–1 | BCG | Single group (n = 10) | IPSS; | Baseline; 4th and 8th induction doses; 1 month after induction treatment | Significant deteriorated changes observed in cognitive functioning, insomnia, during and at 1 month after induction. The sleep quality also significantly deteriorated (in terms of decreased sleep efficacy, increased mobile time, increased immobile bouts ≤ 1 min, and increased fragmentation index with 60–70% rated poor sleep quality) during induction period, but restored to the baseline levels after 1 month. Stable emotional functioning and symptom (pain, dyspnea) scores observed during induction, but rebound to pre-TURBT levels after 1 month. Constipation scores increased at post-TURBT and remained stable during and at 1 month after induction. Appetite loss reduced at post-TURBT, but increased during induction and rebound to pre-TURBT level after 1 month. |
| Rentsh et al., 2022 [ | Single-arm trial | Recurrent NMIBC at intermediate or high-risk for progression (EORTC score 7–23); post BCG | BCG | Single group (n = 40) | EORTC QLQ-C30; | Before induction (T0), before maintenance (T1), and end of treatment (T2) | Induction therapy exhibited mild effects on QLQ-C30 domains, but 49% of patients reported improvement in emotional functioning while one-third of them reported deterioration in global health status (33%), physical functioning (30%), and fatigue (30%). For QLQ-NMIBC24 measures, induction therapy deteriorated urinary symptoms, future worries, and sexual function especially for males while it improved intravesical treatment issues. |
BCI = Bladder Cancer Index; CHT-MMC = Chemohyperthermia with MMC; CLSS = Core Lower Urinary Tract Symptom Score; EORTC QLQ-C30 = European Organization of Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire; EORTC QLQ-BLS24/NMIBC24 = Non-muscle invasive bladder cancer module of the EORTC-QLQ; EQ-5D: EuroQoL-5 dimensions; FACT-BI = Bladder cancer-specific symptoms; GEM = Gemcitabine; HA = Hyaluronic acid; ICSI = Interstitial Cystitis Symptom Index; IIEF-5 = The International Index of Erectile function; IPSS: International Prostate Symptom Score; MMC = Mitomycin C; RITA = Radiofrequency-induced thermos-chemotherapy; SF-36 = Short Form Health Survey Questionnaire; SF-8 = 8 items version of SF-36.
Figure 2Summary of risk of bias results evaluated by using the CONSORT 2010 checklist for interventional studies: (a) The risk of bias levels of key RCT components rated in every included study; (b) the percentage of each risk of bias level of the key components [36,42,43,44,48,51,52,53,55,58].
Figure 3Summary of risk of bias results evaluated by using the STROBE Statement checklist for interventional studies: (a) The risk of bias levels of items rated in every included study; (b) the percentage of each risk of bias level of the items [36,42,43,44,48,51,52,53,54,58].