| Literature DB >> 36077553 |
Won-Seob Kim1,2, Jongkyoo Kim3, Hong-Gu Lee1.
Abstract
Heat stress (HS) damages the global beef industry by reducing growth performance causing high economic losses each year. However, understanding the physiological mechanisms of HS in Hanwoo calves remains elusive. The objective of this study was to identify the potential biomarkers and metabolic pathways involving different levels of heat stress in Hanwoo calves. Data were collected from sixteen Hanwoo bull calves (169.6 ± 4.6 days old, BW of 136.9 ± 6.2 kg), which were maintained at four designated ranges of HS according to the temperature-humidity index (THI) including: threshold (22 to 24 °C, 60%; THI = 70 to 73), mild (26 to 28 °C, 60%; THI = 74 to 76), moderate (29 to 31 °C, 80%; THI = 81 to 83), and severe (32 to 34 °C, 80%; THI = 89 to 91) using climate-controlled chambers. Blood was collected once every three days to analyze metabolomics. Metabolic changes in the serum of calves were measured using GC-TOF-MS, and the obtained data were calculated by multivariate statistical analysis. Five metabolic parameters were upregulated and seven metabolic parameters were downregulated in the high THI level compared with the threshold (p < 0.05). Among the parameters, carbohydrates (ribose, myo-inositol, galactose, and lactose), organic compounds (acetic acid, urea, and butenedioic acid), fatty acid (oleic acid), and amino acids (asparagine and lysine) were remarkably influenced by HS. These novel findings support further in-depth research to elucidate the blood-based changes in metabolic pathways in heat-stressed Hanwoo beef calves at different levels of THI. In conclusion, these results indicate that metabolic parameters may act as biomarkers to explain the HS effects in Hanwoo calves.Entities:
Keywords: biomarker; energy metabolism; heat stress; metabolic regulatory pathways; molecular mechanisms
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 36077553 PMCID: PMC9456105 DOI: 10.3390/ijms231710155
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Mol Sci ISSN: 1422-0067 Impact factor: 6.208
Figure 1PCA (principal component analysis) score plot of each group in serum (A). PLS-DA (partial least squares discriminant analysis) score plot and isolate metabolic parameters (VIP > 0.7) of each group in serum (B).
The candidate metabolites altered by heat stress as identified by gas chromatography–time-of-flight mass spectrometry (GC-TOF-MS) analysis.
| Tentative Metabolite a | RT b | VIP | MS | Mass Fragment Pattern c | TMS d | ID e |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||||
| Glycerol | 7.25 | 0.72 | 205 | 45, 73, 103, 147, 205, 218 | 3 | STD/MS |
| Ribitol | 9.37 | 0.80 | 217 | 73, 103, 147, 217, 319 | 5 | MS |
| Arabinose | 10.54 | 0.94 | 307 | 73, 103, 147, 217, 307 | 4 | MS |
| Ribose | 10.75 | 1.91 | 103 | 73, 103, 147, 189, 217, 307 | 4 | STD/MS |
| Arabitol | 11.07 | 1.86 | 217 | 73, 103, 147, 205, 217, 307 | 5 | MS |
| Sorbose | 12.18 | 1.05 | 307 | 73, 103, 147, 217, 307 | 5 | MS |
| Glucose | 12.53 | 1.85 | 160 | 73, 103, 147, 205, 319 | 5 | STD/MS |
| Myo-Inositol | 13.62 | 1.65 | 305 | 73, 147, 191, 217, 305, 367 | 6 | STD/MS |
| Galactose | 13.94 | 1.52 | 319 | 73, 103, 147, 205, 319 | 5 | STD/MS |
| Lactose | 16.97 | 1.58 | 204 | 73, 103, 147, 204, 217, 361 | 8 | STD/MS |
|
| ||||||
| Alanine | 5.52 | 0.78 | 116 | 73, 116, 147, 190, 218 | 2 | STD/MS |
| Valine | 6.69 | 1.46 | 218 | 73, 100, 144, 218, 246 | 2 | STD/MS |
| Leucine | 7.23 | 0.92 | 158 | 73, 147, 158, 218 | 2 | STD/MS |
| Isoleucine | 7.44 | 0.80 | 158 | 45, 73, 100, 158, 218, 260 | 2 | STD/MS |
| Proline | 7.49 | 1.08 | 142 | 73, 142, 216 | 2 | STD/MS |
| Glycine | 7.57 | 1.37 | 174 | 73, 86, 100, 147, 174, 248 | 3 | STD/MS |
| Serine | 8.06 | 1.40 | 218 | 73, 100, 147, 204, 218, 278 | 3 | STD/MS |
| Asparatic acid | 9.44 | 1.19 | 232 | 73, 100, 147, 218, 232 | 3 | STD/MS |
| Methionine | 9.45 | 1.55 | 176 | 61, 73, 128, 147, 176, 293 | 2 | STD/MS |
| 5-Oxoproline | 9.49 | 0.84 | 156 | 73, 147, 156, 230, 258 | 2 | STD/MS |
| Phenylalanine | 10.33 | 1.19 | 218 | 73, 100, 147, 192, 218, 266 | 2 | STD/MS |
| Asparagine | 10.65 | 1.95 | 116 | 73, 116, 132, 231 | 3 | STD/MS |
| Ornithine | 11.72 | 0.71 | 174 | 73, 142, 174, 200, 420 | 4 | MS |
| Lysine | 12.45 | 2.26 | 317 | 73, 92, 128, 174, 230, 317 | 4 | STD/MS |
| Tyrosine | 12.58 | 1.34 | 218 | 73, 100, 147, 179, 218, 280 | 3 | STD/MS |
| Tryptophan | 14.35 | 0.93 | 73 | 45, 73, 202, 291 | 3 | STD/MS |
|
| ||||||
| Oleic acid | 14.18 | 1.64 | 339 | 73, 117, 129, 145, 339 | 1 | STD/MS |
| Oleamide | 15.32 | 0.87 | 75 | 75, 116, 128, 131, 144, 338 | 1 | STD/MS |
|
| ||||||
| Acetic acid | 5.24 | 1.37 | 147 | 45, 66, 73, 147, 177, 205 | 2 | MS |
| Urea | 6.77 | 1.66 | 147 | 45, 73, 147, 171, 189, 204 | 2 | MS |
| Butenedioic acid | 7.87 | 1.84 | 245 | 45, 73, 147, 245 | 2 | MS |
| Threonic acid | 9.81 | 0.83 | 292 | 73, 117, 147, 205, 220, 292 | 4 | STD/MS |
| Glyoxylic acid | 14.90 | 1.01 | 203 | 75, 113, 147, 203 | 2 | MS |
|
| ||||||
| Pyrimidine | 7.86 | 1.93 | 241 | 45, 73, 99, 147, 241, 256 | 2 | MS |
|
| ||||||
| Pentanedioic acid | 9.89 | 1.52 | 198 | 73, 147, 198, 304 | 2 | MS |
| Propanedioic acid | 11.12 | 2.25 | 305 | 73, 147, 221, 305 | 3 | MS |
| Phosphoric acid | 11.35 | 0.79 | 299 | 73, 103, 147, 357, 399, 445 | 4 | MS |
| 9, 12-Octadecadienoic acid | 14.16 | 1.32 | 338 | 75, 81, 95, 117, 129, 337 | 1 | MS |
a Identified metabolites based on variable importance projection (VIP) analysis with cutoff value at 0.7; b Retention time; c Mass fragmentation is the fragmentation of the tentative compound; d Trimethylsilyl; e Identification: MS, mass spectrum was consistent with those of NIST and in-house libraries; STD, mass spectrum was consistent with that of standard compound.
Figure 2Metabolomics parameters (n = 4) in serum (Control, T1, T2, T3; VIP > 0.7, p < 0.05 (★), p < 0.1 (★). a,b Means with different superscripts differ significantly in each group (p < 0.05) based on Tukey’s test.
Figure 3The metabolic pathway map related to metabolic profiling in serum, according to the effects of heat stress in each group. The x-axis represents the pathway impact values computed from pathway topological analysis, and the y-axis represents the −log of p-value obtained from pathway enrichment analysis. The pathways that were most significantly changed are characterized by both a high −log(p) value and high impact value (top right region). The color and size of each dot were associated with the −log(p) value and pathway impact value, respectively, where a small p value and high pathway impact value indicate the pathway is greatly influenced by heat stress.
List of potential metabolic pathways that change in serum according to heat stress.
| Metabolite Pathway | Impact | Metabolites | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Phenylalanine, tyrosine, and tryptophan biosynthesis | 0.042 | 0.5 | Lysine |
| Aminoacyl-tRNA biosynthesis | 0.001 | 0.17 | Asparagine, Lysine |
| Galactose metabolism | 0.002 | 0.16 | Lactose, Galactose, Myo-Inositiol |
| Glyoxylate and dicarboxylate metabolism | 0.043 | 0.04 | Acetic acid |
| Glycolysis/Gluconeogenesis | 0.029 | 0.03 | Acetic acid |
| Inositol phosphate metabolism | 0.317 | 0.13 | Myo-Inositol |
| Pyruvate metabolism | 0.210 | 0.06 | Acetic acid |
| Phosphatidylinositiol signaling system | 0.260 | 0.04 | Myo-Inositol |
| Cystein and methionine metabolism | 0.299 | 0.02 | Asparagine, Lysine |
| Glycine, serine and threonine metabolism | 0.306 | 0.21 | Serine, Lysine |
| Tyrosine metabolism | 0.364 | 0.14 | Tyrosine |
Figure 4Schematic representation of climate chamber experiments according to heat stress (HS) treatments (thermoneutral, mild, moderate, and severe). Sixteen Hanwoo calves were randomly divided into four homogenized groups. The animals were subjected to ambient temperatures (22 °C) for 7 days in the adaption period one week before the experiment began. Following the adaptation periods, animals were kept in the treatment chambers for 21 days. After the completion of two treatments (thermoneutral and mild HS), we conducted the other two treatments (moderate and severe HS), using the same approach with different calves. THI = temperature–humidity index.