| Literature DB >> 31261803 |
Yanjun Cui1,2, Chong Wang3,4, Yue Hao5, Xianhong Gu6, Haifeng Wang7.
Abstract
Heat stress (HS) is a main environmental challenge affecting the animal welfare and production efficiency in pig industry. In recent years, numerous reports have studied the alterations in gene expressions and protein profiles in heat-stressed pigs. However, the use of metabolome to unravel adaptive mechanisms of finishing pig in response to chronic HS have not yet been elucidated. We aimed to investigate the effects of chronic HS on serum metabolome in finishing pigs, and to identify the biomarkers of heat stress. Pigs (n = 8 per treatment) were exposed to either thermal neutral (TN; 22 °C) or heat stress (HS, 30 °C) conditions for three weeks. Serum metabonomics of TN- and HS-treated pigs were compared using the GC-MS approach. Metabonomics analysis revealed that twenty-four metabolites had significantly different levels in TN compared to HS (variable importance in the projection values >1 and p < 0.05). These metabolites are involved in carbohydrate, amino acid, fatty acid, amines metabolism, and gut microbiome-derived metabolism. Three serum monoses (glucose, mannose 2, and galactose) and 6-phosphogluconic acid were decreased, indicating insufficient source of fuel for energy supply, resulting in negative energy balance (NEB) in heat-stressed pigs. Increased levels of non-esterified fatty acid (myristic acid, palmitic acid, and linoleic acid) and short-chain fatty acids (3-hydroxybutanoic acid and maleic acid) suggested fat decomposition compensating for energy shortage, which was an adaptive response to NEB. Increased concentrations of fluorine, lyxose 1, and D-galacturonic acid were significantly correlated with the levels of acute phase proteins (HP, LBP, α2-HSG, and Lysozyme), suggesting acute phase response in HS-stressed pigs. These metabolites are expected to be novel biomarkers of chronic HS in pigs, yet the use of which awaits further validation.Entities:
Keywords: acute-phase proteins; chronic heat stress; finishing pigs; metabolomics
Year: 2019 PMID: 31261803 PMCID: PMC6680871 DOI: 10.3390/ani9070395
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Animals (Basel) ISSN: 2076-2615 Impact factor: 2.752
The effects of three weeks of thermal neutral (TN) or heat stress (HS) conditions on whole blood erythrocyte, hematocrit, hemoglobin, MCV, and MCH in the finishing pigs.
| Parameters | TN | HS |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Erythrocyte (×1012/L) | 7.64 ± 0.093 | 7.583 ± 0.148 * | 0.030 |
| Hematocrit (%) | 48.92 ± 0.85 | 44.37 ± 1.28 ** | 0.006 |
| Hemoglobin (g/L) | 138.92 ± 2.82 | 127.6 ± 3.42 * | 0.010 |
| MCV | 64.06 ± 1.08 | 58.5 ± 1.20 ** | 0.004 |
| MCH | 18.18 ± 0.32 | 16.85 ± 0.36 ** | 0.032 |
MCV: mean corpuscular volume; MCH: mean corpuscular hemoglobin. Data are mean ± SD; n = 8 for each group. * p < 0.05 and ** p < 0.01 before vs. after heat stress.
Figure 1The effects of three weeks of thermal neutral (TN) or heat stress (HS) conditions on activities of SOD, CAT, GSH-PX, and MDA level in the serum of finishing pigs. Data are mean ± SD; n = 8 for each group. * p < 0.05 and ** p < 0.01 before vs. after heat stress.
Figure 2The effects of three weeks of thermal neutral (TN) or heat stress (HS) conditions on activities of (A) HP, (B) α2HGS, (C) LBP, and (D) lysozyme in the serum of finishing pigs. Data are mean ± SD; n = 8 for each group. * p < 0.05 and ** p < 0.01 before vs. after heat stress.
Figure 3Score plot of orthogonal projections to latent structures discriminant analyses (OPLS-DA) derived from the GC-MS profiles of serum samples obtained from the heat stress (HS) group vs. thermal neutral (TN) group (A); Validation plots of the partial least squares discriminant analysis (OPLS-DA) models acquired through 999 permutation tests for the GC-MS data of serum metabolome (B).
Metabolites with significantly different levels in the serum of thermal neutral (TN) or heat stress (HS) finishing pigs.
| NO. | Metabolites | RT | Quant Mass | VIP |
| Fold Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gut Microbiome-Derived Metabolites | ||||||
| 1 | fluorene | 9.41 | 204 | 2.60 | 0.009 | 1.51 |
| 2 | lyxose 1 | 9.46 | 103 | 1.87 | 0.039 | 1.62 |
| 3 | 10.97 | 333 | 2.14 | <0.001 | 1.76 | |
| Fatty Acid Metabolism | ||||||
| 4 | 3-Hexenedioic acid | 8.65 | 170 | 1.91 | 0.049 | 2.10 |
| 5 | myristic Acid | 10.57 | 285 | 1.81 | 0.026 | 1.55 |
| 6 | palmitic acid | 11.56 | 117 | 1.96 | 0.043 | 1.55 |
| 7 | arachidonic acid | 13.02 | 80 | 1.16 | 0.034 | 0.76 |
| 8 | 3-Aminoisobutyric acid 1 | 8.29 | 174 | 1.36 | 0.020 | 1.23 |
| 9 | 3-hydroxybutanoic acid | 5.91 | 131 | 2.10 | 0.037 | 1.87 |
| 10 | maleic acid | 7.18 | 341 | 1.70 | 0.017 | 1.84 |
| 11 | tartaric acid | 9.31 | 355 | 1.91 | 0.027 | 1.46 |
| Carbohydrate Metabolism | ||||||
| 12 | glucose 2 | 10.90 | 103 | 1.58 | <0.001 | 0.52 |
| 13 | mannose 2 | 10.82 | 160 | 2.23 | <0.001 | 0.65 |
| 14 | lactose 1 | 14.21 | 73 | 1.58 | 0.027 | 0.30 |
| 15 | 3,6-Anhydro-D-galactose | 10.00 | 231 | 1.45 | 0.015 | 0.58 |
| 16 | 6-phosphogluconic acid | 13.16 | 318 | 2.17 | 0.006 | 0.73 |
| 17 | ribonic acid, gamma-lactone | 9.70 | 68 | 2.31 | 0.024 | 1.53 |
| 18 | Glucoheptonic acid | 12.61 | 232 | 2.14 | 0.023 | 1.72 |
| Amino Acid Metabolism | ||||||
| 19 | lysine | 10.95 | 174 | 1.39 | 0.015 | 1.71 |
| 20 | N-Methyl-DL-alanine | 6.25 | 130 | 1.88 | 0.050 | 2.19 |
| Amines Metabolism | ||||||
| 21 | hydroxylamine | 5.88 | 245 | 1.62 | 0.031 | 1.56 |
| 22 | N-Acetyl-5-hydroxytryptamine 2 | 13.57 | 55 | 1.95 | 0.049 | 0.15 |
| 23 | 3-methylcatechol | 7.90 | 180 | 2.34 | 0.012 | 0.53 |
| 24 | indole-3-acetamide | 12.58 | 105 | 1.76 | 0.016 | 0.52 |
RT, retention time; VIP, variable importance in the projection; Fold Change, ratio of mean peak area of the HS group to the mean peak area of the TN group.
Figure 4Hierarchical cluster analysis of twenty-four metabolites with significantly different levels in serum of finishing pigs. Red indicates high relative abundance, and blue indicates low relative abundance.
Partial Pearson’s correlation between APRs and metabolites with correction of the treatment groups (HS and TN).
| Metabolites | HP | LBP | lysozyme | α2HSG |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fluorene | 0.97 *** | NS | NS | NS |
| N-Acetyl-5-Hydroxytryptamine 2 | NS | NS | 0.96 *** | NS |
| Mannose 2 | −0.51 * | −0.68 ** | −0.52 * | −0.56 * |
| Indole-3-acetamide 4 | NS | NS | 0.92 *** | NS |
| Glucose 2 | NS | −0.62 * | NS | −0.52 * |
| 6 phosphogluconic acid | 0.92 *** | NS | NS | NS |
| Arachidonic acid | 0.91 *** | NS | NS | NS |
| 3-Aminoisobutyric acid 1 | NS | −0.62 ** | −0.60 * | −0.55 * |
| Tartaric acid | NS | 0.65 ** | 0.84 *** | NS |
| Hydroxylamine | NS | NS | 0.93 *** | NS |
| Lysine | NS | −0.52 * | NS | NS |
| Maleic acid | NS | −0.58 * | NS | −0.51 * |
| Ribonic acid, gamma-lactone | NS | 0.95 *** | NS | 0.97 *** |
| Lyxose 1 | 0.53 * | 0.83 *** | NS | 0.86 *** |
| D-galacturonic acid 1 | 0.58 * | 0.77 *** | NS | 0.79 ** |
| Glucoheptonic acid 1 | NS | NS | 0.65 ** | NS |
| N-Methyl-DL-alanine | 0.91 ** | NS | NS | NS |
| 3-Hexenedioic acid | NS | NS | NS | NS |
| 3-hydroxybutanoic acid | NS | 0.95 *** | 0.97 *** | |
| Myristic Acid | NS | NS | 0.91 *** | NS |
| Palmitic acid | NS | 0.92 *** | NS | 0.95 *** |
| Lactose 1 | NS | NS | NS | NS |
| 3,6-Anhydro-D-Galactose 3 | 0.94 *** | NS | NS | NS |
| 3-methylcatechol | NS | NS | NS | 0.51 * |
HP, haptoglobin; α2HSG, alpha-2-HS-Glycoprotein; LBP, LPS-blinding protein * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, and *** p < 0.001. NS, no significant correlations (p > 0.05).
Figure 5Schematic overview of some important metabolites and major metabolic pathways related to fat acid, amino acid, and energy metabolism in heat-stressed pigs. Red up-arrow: heat stress (HS) group vs. thermal neutral (TN) group up-regulation. Blue down-arrow: HS group vs. TN group down-regulation.