| Literature DB >> 36077177 |
Bruce A Watkins1, Allon N Friedman2, Jeffrey Kim3, Kamil Borkowski4, Shaun Kaiser5, Oliver Fiehn6, John W Newman7.
Abstract
Hemodialysis patients (HDPs) have higher blood pressure, higher levels of inflammation, a higher risk of cardiovascular disease, and unusually low plasma n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acid (PUFA) levels compared to healthy subjects. The objective of our investigation was to examine the levels of endocannabinoids (eCBs) and oxylipins (OxLs) in female HDPs compared to healthy matched female controls, with the underlying hypothesis that differences in specific PUFA levels in hemodialysis patients would result in changes in eCBs and OxLs. Plasma phospholipid fatty acids were analyzed by gas chromatography. Plasma was extracted and analyzed using ultra-performance liquid chromatography followed by electrospray ionization and tandem MS for eCBs and OxLs. The global untargeted metabolite profiling of plasma was performed by GCTOF MS. Compared to the controls, HDPs showed lower levels of plasma EPA and the associated OxL metabolites 5- and 12-HEPE, 14,15-DiHETE, as well as DHA derived 19(20)-EpDPE. Meanwhile, no changes in arachidonylethanolamide or 2-arachidonylglycerol in the open circulation were detected. Higher levels of multiple N-acylethanolamides, monoacylglycerols, biomarkers of progressive kidney disease, the nitric oxide metabolism-linked citrulline, and the uremic toxins kynurenine and creatine were observed in HDP. These metabolic differences in cCBs and OxLs help explain the severe inflammatory and cardiovascular disease manifested by HDPs, and they should be explored in future studies.Entities:
Keywords: endocannabinoids; global metabolites; hemodialysis patient; oxylipins; polyunsaturated fatty acids; women
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 36077177 PMCID: PMC9456435 DOI: 10.3390/ijms23179781
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Mol Sci ISSN: 1422-0067 Impact factor: 6.208
Plasma fatty acid percent composition of polar lipids and RBCs in female healthy control subjects and female hemodialysis patients.
| Fatty Acids | Plasma Polar Lipid Fatty Acids | RBC Fatty Acids | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Controls | HDPs | Controls | HDPs | |||
| 14:0 | 1.23 ± 0.76 | 1.28 ± 0.63 | 0.9 | 0.17 ± 0.18 | 0.06 ± 0.13 | 0.14 |
| 15:0 | 0.09 ± 0.07 | ND | - | ND | ND | - |
| 16:0 | 24.15 ± 1.34 | 21.86 ± 1.44 | 0.0022 | 18.71 ± 1.17 | 18.37 ± 1.14 | 0.83 |
| t16:1n-7 | 0.15 ± 0.06 | 0.10 ± 0.09 | 0.2 | 0.03 ± 0.02 | 0.04 ± 0.03 | 0.53 |
| 16:1n-7 | 0.67 ± 0.36 | 0.40 ± 0.26 | 0.08 | 0.03 ± 0.05 | ND | - |
| 17:0 | 0.34 ± 0.05 | 0.33 ± 0.04 | 0.6 | 0.32 ± 0.26 | 0.06 ± 0.12 | 0.014 |
| 18:0 | 18.59 ± 1.45 | 20.47 ± 1.61 | 0.016 | 12.95 ± 1.27 | 12.91 ± 0.88 | 0.50 |
| 18:1n-9 | 10.82 ± 1.56 | 10.95 ± 2.23 | 0.9 | 16.78 ± 1.79 | 15.69 ± 1.85 | 0.46 |
| 18:1n-7 | 1.42 ± 0.23 | 1.66 ± 0.28 | 0.06 | 1.32 ± 0.17 | 1.47 ± 0.19 | 0.05 |
| 18:2n-6 | 18.16 ± 3.29 | 18.40 ± 2.28 | 0.9 | 11.25 ± 1.48 | 11.31 ± 1.73 | 0.93 |
| 18:3n-6 | 0.15 ± 0.11 | 0.05 ± 0.08 | 0.042 | 0.03 ± 0.06 | ND | - |
| 18:3n-3 | 0.34 ± 0.12 | 0.35 ± 0.10 | 0.8 | 0.04 ± 0.07 | ND | - |
| 20:0 | 0.16 ± 0.02 | 0.18 ± 0.04 | 0.2 | 0.04 ± 0.06 | 0.06 ± 0.13 | 0.71 |
| 20:1n-9 | 0.15 ± 0.06 | 0.19 ± 0.03 | 0.05 | 0.09 ± 0.11 | 0.18 ± 0.28 | 0.36 |
| 20:2n-6 | 0.34 ± 0.07 | 0.32 ± 0.06 | 0.5 | 0.26 ± 0.10 | 0.19 ± 0.19 | 0.34 |
| 20:3n-6 | 3.14 ± 0.82 | 2.15 ± 0.81 | 0.017 | 1.74 ± 0.28 | 1.27 ± 0.45 | 0.013 |
| 20:4n-6 | 11.47 ± 1.71 | 13.61 ± 1.87 | 0.019 | 15.98 ± 1.40 | 15.71 ± 3.49 | 0.83 |
| 20:5n-3 | 0.71 ± 0.28 | 0.38 ± 0.09 | 0.005 | 0.49 ± 0.13 | 0.11 ± 0.17 | 0.001 |
| 22:0 | 0.08 ± 0.06 | 0.04 ± 0.08 | 0.2 | 0.33 ± 0.12 | 0.41 ± 0.33 | 0.47 |
| 22:1n-9 | 0.18 ± 0.10 | 0.31 ± 0.14 | 0.032 | ND | 0.03 ± 0.08 | - |
| 22:4n-6 | 0.55 ± 0.15 | 0.52 ± 0.06 | 0.5 | 3.73 ± 0.71 | 4.04 ± 0.95 | 0.44 |
| 22:5n-6 | 0.43 ± 0.21 | 0.35 ± 0.10 | 0.3 | 0.84 ± 0.23 | 0.68 ± 0.30 | 0.22 |
| 22:5n-3 | 0.88 ± 0.11 | 0.71 ± 0.08 | 0.0013 | 1.98 ± 0.28 | 1.77 ± 0.47 | 0.25 |
| 22:6n-3 | 3.11 ± 1.57 | 2.68 ± 0.78 | 0.5 | 4.06 ± 1.40 | 3.63 ± 1.45 | 0.52 |
| 24:0 | 0.06 ± 0.05 | 0.03 ± 0.07 | 0.4 | 0.95 ± 0.15 | 0.93 ± 0.73 | 0.94 |
| 24:1n-9 | 0.09 ± 0.08 | 0.13 ± 0.08 | 0.3 | 0.91 ± 0.14 | 1.10 ± 0.90 | 0.54 |
| Total SFA | 44.71 ± 1.33 | 44.19 ± 2.13 | 0.5 | 36.11 ± 0.86 | 36.83 ± 3.87 | 0.54 |
| Total MUFA | 13.33 ± 1.77 | 13.65 ± 2.52 | 0.8 | 15.76 ± 1.30 | 16.32 ± 2.05 | 0.38 |
| Total PUFA | 39.29 ± 1.83 | 39.51 ± 1.87 | 0.8 | 40.39 ± 1.45 | 38.90 ± 7.83 | 0.50 |
| Total n-6 PUFA | 34.25 ± 1.88 | 35.40 ± 1.74 | 0.2 | 33.82 ± 1.93 | 33.19 ± 5.43 | 0.75 |
| Total n-3 PUFA | 5.04 ± 1.66 | 4.11 ± 0.91 | 0.15 | 6.56 ± 1.29 | 5.51 ± 1.93 | 0.18 |
| LC n-6 PUFA | 15.94 ± 2.13 | 16.94 ± 1.58 | 0.26 | 22.5 ± 0.93 | 21.88 ± 4.34 | 0.68 |
| LC n-3 PUFA | 4.71 ± 1.67 | 3.77 ± 0.85 | 0.15 | 6.52 ± 1.30 | 5.51 ± 1.93 | 0.19 |
| LC n-6/n-3 Ratio | 3.72 ± 1.29 | 4.65 ± 0.86 | 0.087 | 3.61 ± 0.88 | 4.79 ± 2.73 | 0.24 |
The fatty acid data were measured as fatty acid methyl esters as area % means ± SD of plasma polar lipid fatty acids and RBCs. Authentic external standards were used for peak identification of chromatogram data during integration. The sensitivity of the GC detector is at 10 ng/peak. HDPs = hemodialysis patients; LC n-6 = 20:2n-6 + 20:3n-6 + 20:4n-6 + 22:4n-6 + 22:5n-6; LC n-3 = 20:5n-3 + 22:5n-3 + 22:6n-3. ND = not detected.
Figure 1Partial least squares-discriminate analysis of control and hemodialysis patient (HDP) endocannabinoids and oxylipins.
Figure 2Selected plasma lipids in controls (n = 10) and hemodialysis patients (HDP; n = 9), measured by UPLC-tandem mass spectrometry. With the exception of 1-OG and AEA, all metabolites showed group discrimination power in a partial least squares-discriminate analysis with variable importance in projection scores > 1 (Figure 1). (A) Endocannabinoid and endocannabinoid-like compounds, including monoacylglycerols and N-acylethanolamides. (B) Oxylipins, including prostanoids, triols, diols, alcohols, epoxides, and hydroperoxides. Hydroperoxide levels were estimated from internal standard corrected-area responses and are expressed as fold-control. Results are expressed as the mean ± SD. The p-values < 0.05 are rounded to 1 significant figure. Group mean differences were assessed on log-transformed data by 2-tailed t-tests, with annotations indicating p-values (** ≤ 0.01; * ≤ 0.050, # ≤ 0. 10).
Plasma endocannabinoid and oxylipin subset levels in healthy controls and hemodialysis patients .
| Compound | Parent | Units | Control | HDP | VIP | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||||
| 2-OG | OA | nM | 38.3 ± 13 | 65.8 ± 38 | 1.3 | 0.1 |
| 1-LG | LA | nM | 6.25 ± 6 | 10.6 ± 5.9 | 1.4 | 0.033 |
| 2-LG | ““ | nM | 30.5 ± 15 | 67 ± 42 | 1.6 | 0.026 |
|
| ||||||
| O-EA | OA | nM | 14.1 ± 5.1 | 24.5 ± 9.7 | 1.8 | 0.0086 |
| L-EA | LA | nM | 5.8 ± 1.5 | 10.4 ± 4.1 | 1.9 | 0.0017 |
| αL-EA | αLEA | nM | 0.082 ± 0.03 | 0.154 ± 0.091 | 1.5 | 0.024 |
| A-EA | AA | nM | 1.59 ± 0.3 | 1.88 ± 0.71 | 1.0 | 0.5 |
| D-EA | AdA | nM | 0.734 ± 0.19 | 1.06 ± 0.32 | 1.6 | 0.023 |
|
| ||||||
| 6-ketoPGF1a | AA | nM | 0.177 ± 0.078 | 0.377 ± 0.34 | 1.1 | 0.1 |
| PGD2 | ““ | 0.0938 ± 0.046 | 0.196 ± 0.2 | 1.1 | 0.2 | |
|
| ||||||
| 9,12,13-TriHOME | LA | nM | 2.51 ± 1.3 | 1.59 ± 0.6 | 1.2 | 0.063 |
| 9,10-13-TriHOME | ““ | nM | 3.9 ± 1.9 | 2.35 ± 0.89 | 1.4 | 0.019 |
|
| ||||||
| 15-HETE | AA | nM | 1.66 ± 0.68 | 1.19 ± 0.51 | 1.1 | 0.1 |
| 12-HETE | ““ | nM | 15.6 ± 10 | 9.68 ± 8.4 | 1.0 | 0.1 |
| 11-HETE | ““ | nM | 0.318 ± 0.13 | 0.221 ± 0.12 | 1.0 | 0.1 |
| 9-HETE | ““ | nM | 0.46 ± 0.15 | 0.316 ± 0.17 | 1.2 | 0.070 |
| 12-HEPE | EPA | nM | 1.92 ± 1.4 | 0.76 ± 0.67 | 1.3 | 0.037 |
| 5-HEPE | ““ | nM | 0.295 ± 0.16 | 0.147 ± 0.077 | 1.4 | 0.026 |
|
| ||||||
| 12-HpETE | AA | Fold-C | 1.0 ± 1.3 | 0.35 ± 0.35 | 1.1 | 0.087 |
| 5-HpETE | AA | Fold C | 1.0 ± 1.0 | 0.42 ± 0.33 | 1.1 | 0.1 |
|
| ||||||
| 14(15)-EpETrE | AA | nM | 0.437 ± 0.28 | 0.203 ± 0.11 | 1.5 | 0.014 |
| 11(12)-EpETrE | ““ | nM | 0.551 ± 0.32 | 0.309 ± 0.17 | 1.3 | 0.06 |
| 8(9)-EpETrE | ““ | nM | 0.195 ± 0.13 | 0.0822 ± 0.068 | 1.0 | 0.1 |
| 17(18)-EpETE | EPA | nM | 0.124 ± 0.11 | 0.0478 ± 0.019 | 1.0 | 0.1 |
| 19(20)-EpDPE | DHA | nM | 0.484 ± 0.38 | 0.212 ± 0.09 | 1.4 | 0.019 |
|
| ||||||
| 11,12-DiHETrE | AA | nM | 0.372 ± 0.084 | 0.287 ± 0.089 | 1.3 | 0.031 |
| 17,18-DiHETE | EPA | nM | 2.5 ± 1.1 | 1.79 ± 0.66 | 1.0 | 0.1 |
| 14,15-DiHETE | ““ | nM | 0.378 ± 0.16 | 0.247 ± 0.15 | 1.2 | 0.057 |
a—all values are mean ± SD. Variable importance in projection (VIP) scores are reported from partial least squares-discriminant models of all measured metabolites. The p-values are 2-tailed t-tests comparing group means. b—difference in L-EA between groups that survived false discover rate correction at q = 0.2. Abbreviations: AA = arachidonic acid; AdA = adrenic acid; αLEA = alpha-linoleic acid; DHA = docosahexaenoic acid; EPA = eicosapentaenoic acid; Fold-C = fold-control, i.e., control ÷ HDP; HDP = hemodialysis patient; LA = linoleic acid; OA = oleic acid.
Figure 3Partial least squares-discriminant analysis of untargeted metabolomic data.
Characteristics of female control subjects and female hemodialysis patients.
| Characteristics | Units | Controls | Hemodialysis Patients |
|---|---|---|---|
| Diabetes mellitus | # positive | 2 | 2 |
| NSAID | # positive | 4 | 5 |
| Age | yr | 54.82 ± 4.99 | 59.31 ± 12.81 |
| Medical review | |||
| Time on dialysis | yr | 0 | 10.00 ± 10.52 |
| Age | yr | 54.43 ± 4.90 | 58.02 ± 15.06 |
| Weight | kg | 84.01 ± 11.5 | 82.71 ± 23.68 |
| Height | m | 1.65 ± 0.08 | 1.63 ± 0.06 |
| BMI | kg/m2 | 31.08 ± 5.43 | 31.03 ± 9.26 |
| 3 mo. weight change | kg | No value | 0.84 ± 1.82 |
| 6 mo. weight change | kg | No value | 0.67 ± 1.26 |
| Tobacco | # positive | 0 | 4 |
| ETOH | # positive | 5 | 1 |
| Marijuana | # positive | 0 | 0 |
Values are means ± SD. The # values for diabetes mellitus and NSAID are the number of cases.