| Literature DB >> 36076955 |
Leon-Gordian Koepke1, Edzard Schwedhelm2,3, Wiebke Ibing4, Alexander Oberhuber5, Guenter Daum3,6, Brigitta Vcelar7, Hubert Schelzig4, Florian Simon4.
Abstract
Spinal strokes may be associated with tremendous spinal cord injury. Erythropoietin (EPO) improves the neurological outcome of animals after spinal cord ischemia (SCI) and its effects on ischemia-induced endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress and the unfolded protein response (UPR) are considered possible molecular mechanisms. Furthermore, sphingosin-1-phosphate (S1P) is suggested to correlate with SCI. In this study, the effect of recombinant human EPO (rhEPO) and carbamylated EPO (cEPO-Fc) on the outcome of mice after SCI and a prognostic value of S1P were investigated. SCI was induced in 12-month-old male mice by thoracic aortal cross-clamping after administration of rhEPO, cEPO-Fc, or a control. The locomotory behavior of mice was evaluated by the Basso mouse scale and S1P serum levels were measured by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. The spinal cord was examined histologically and the expressions of key UPR proteins (ATF6, PERK, and IRE1a, caspase-12) were analyzed utilizing immunohistochemistry and real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction. RhEPO and cEPO-Fc significantly improved outcomes after SCI. The expression of caspase-12 significantly increased in the control group within the first 24 h of reperfusion. Animals with better locomotory behavior had significantly higher serum levels of S1P. Our data indicate that rhEPO and cEPO-Fc have protective effects on the clinical outcome and neuronal tissue of mice after SCI and that the ER is involved in the molecular mechanisms. Moreover, serum S1P may predict the severity of impairment after SCI.Entities:
Keywords: biomarker; endoplasmic reticulum; erythropoietin; sphingosine-1-phosphate; spinal cord injury; spinal cord ischemia; stroke; unfolded protein response
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 36076955 PMCID: PMC9455176 DOI: 10.3390/ijms23179558
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Mol Sci ISSN: 1422-0067 Impact factor: 6.208
Evaluation of the neurological status using the Basso-mouse-scale.
| Reperfusion Group (h) | Reperfusion Time (h) | BMS Control | BMS rhEPO | BMS cEPO-Fc |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6 | 6 | 2.8 ± 2.4 | 1.8 ± 1.2 | 0.5 ± 1.1 |
| 24 | 12 | 5.6 ± 4.2 | 8.5 ± 0.6 | 5.4 ± 4.4 |
| 24 | 24 | 5.6 ± 4.2 | 8.6 ± 0.5 | 5.4 ± 4.4 |
| 96 | 12 | 1.3 ± 2.8 | 7.1 ± 3.5 * | 7.1 ± 2.7 § |
| 96 | 24 | 1.1 ± 2.4 | 7.1 ± 3.4 * | 6.9 ± 3.0 § |
| 96 | 36 | 1.2 ± 2.4 | 7.5 ± 3.2 * | 7.2 ± 3.1 § |
| 96 | 48 | 1.3 ± 2.4 | 7.0 ± 3.7 * | 7.3 ± 3.1 § |
| 96 | 60 | 1.2 ± 2.4 | 7.3 ± 3.6 * | 7.2 ± 3.1 § |
| 96 | 72 | 1.3 ± 2.4 | 7.3 ± 3.6 * | 7.2 ± 3.1 § |
| 96 | 84 | 1.2 ± 2.4 | 7.3 ± 3.6 * | 7.3 ± 3.1 § |
| 96 | 96 | 1.3 ± 2.4 | 7.3 ± 3.6 * | 7.4 ± 3.2 § |
Data are listed from left to right according to reperfusion group (6, 24, and 96 h), measurement after reperfusion time (6–96 h) and treatment group (control, rhEPO, cEPO-Fc). The data shown in means and standard deviation. BMS = Basso mouse scale; cEPO-Fc = carbamylated erythropoietin FC fusion protein; h = hours; rhEPO = recombinant human erythropoietin. * rhEPO vs. control—p < 0.05. § cEPO-Fc vs. control—p < 0.05 (Multiple group comparison via Kruskal–Wallis test and post hoc analysis using Dunn’s test).
Figure 1The results of the histopathology. The control group is in dark grey, the rhEPO group is in semi-dark grey, and the cEPO-Fc group is in light grey. Boxes indicate the upper and lower quartile, the line indicates the median, and the upper and lower whiskers indicate 2.5%- and 97.5% quantile. (a): Results of the scoring of the level of necrosis (LON) in the hematoxylin eosin (HE) staining after 6 h (h) of reperfusion time (RT). (b): LON in HE after 24 h RT. (c): LON in HE after 96 h RT. * p < 0.05 (Multiple group comparison via Kruskal–Wallis test and post hoc analysis using Dunn’s test). (d): HE in 10×. Necrotic spinal cord in the control group and healthy spinal cord in the rhEPO group after 96 h RT. (e): Results of the counting of the neurons/area (N/A) in the ventral horn of the spinal cord after 6 h RT. (f): N/A in the ventral horn of the spinal cord after 24 h RT. (g): N/A in the ventral horn of the spinal cord after 96 h RT * p < 0.05 (Multiple group comparison via Brown–Forsythe test and post hoc analysis using Bonferroni test). (h): LFB in 20×. Loss of neurons in the control group healthy spinal cord in rhEPO group after 96 h RT.
Figure 2The results of the immunohistochemistry. The control group is in dark grey, the rhEPO group in semi-dark grey, and the bcEPO-Fc group is in light grey. Boxes indicate the upper and lower quartile, and the line indicates the median, and the upper and lower whisker indicate 2.5%- and 97.5% quantile, and black circles indicate values that are outside 2.5%- and 97.5% quantile. (a): Results of the immunohistochemical (IHC) evaluation of caspase-12 in the control group after 6 h, 24 h, and 96 h RT. * 6 h vs. 24 h p = 0.005 and 6 h vs. 96 h p < 0.001 (Multiple group comparison via Brown–Forsythe test and post hoc analysis using Bonferroni test) (b): IHC of caspase-12 in the rhEPO group after 6 h, 24 h, and 96 h RT. (c): IHC of caspase-12 in the cEPO-Fc group after 6 h, 24 h, and 96 h RT. (d): IHC of caspase-12 in 10×. Caspase-12 is detected in only few neurons after 6 h RT in the control group. Caspase-12 is detected in most neurons after 96 h RT in the control group. (e) IHC of GRP78 in the control group after 6 h, 24 h, and 96 h RT. (f): IHC of GRP78 in the rhEPO group after 6 h, 24 h, and 96 h RT. (g): IHC of GRP78 in the cEPO-Fc group after 6 h, 24 h, and 96 h RT. (h): IHC of GRP78 in 10×. GRP78 is detected in neurons after 6 h and 96 h RT in the control group. (i): IHC of ATF6 in the control group after 6 h, 24 h, and 96 h RT. (j): IHC of ATF6 in the rhEPO group after 6 h, 24 h, and 96 h RT. (k): IHC of ATF6 in the cEPO-Fc group after 6 h, 24 h, and 96 h RT. * 6 h vs. 96 h p = 0.003 (Multiple group comparison via Brown–Forsythe test and post hoc analysis using Bonferroni test). (l): IHC of ATF6 in 10×. GRP78 is detected in neurons after 6 h and 96 h RT in the control group.
Figure 3Serum level of S1P and immunohistochemistry for caspase-12 of animals with a BMS > 7 and < 3. Basso mouse scale (BMS) > 7 in dark grey and BMS < 3 in light grey. Boxes indicate the upper and lower quartile, the line indicates the median, the upper and lower whisker indicate 2.5%- and 97.5% quantile, and black circles indicate values that are outside 2.5%- and 97.5% quantile. (a): Serum levels of S1P of after 24 h RT. * BMS > 7 (n = 11) vs. <3 (n = 4) p < 0.001 (t-test). (b): Serum levels of S1P after 96 h. (c): Results of the immunohistochemical (IHC) evaluation of caspase-12 after 24 h. (d): IHC of caspase-12 after 96 h. * BMS > 7 (n = 18) vs. <3 (n = 16) p = 0.009 (t-test).
RT-qPCR measurements of ATF6, IRE1α, and PERK in the spinal cord of the animals of the control, recombinant human erythropoietin (rhEPO), and carbamylated erythropoietin FC fusion protein (cEPO-Fc) group after 6 and 24 h of reperfusion.
| Detected Gene | Reperfusion Time (h) | Control | rhEPO | cEPO-Fc |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ATF6 | 6 | 1.16 ± 0.75 | 1.11 ± 0.32 | 1.29 ± 0.99 |
| 24 | 1.20 ± 0.61 | 2.20 ± 1.77 | 1.48 ± 1.16 | |
| IRE1α | 6 | 1.06 ± 0.45 | 0.95 ± 0.21 | 0.93 ± 0.29 * |
| 24 | 1.10 ± 0.47 | 0.80 ± 0.21 | 2.35 ± 1.31 & | |
| PERK | 6 | 1.13 ± 0.64 | 1.08 ± 0.28 | 1.04 ± 0.61 * |
| 24 | 1.05 ± 0.36 | 0.80 ± 0.08 | 2.40 ± 1.17 § |
Data are shown in means and standard deviation (Fold change). cEPO-Fc = carbamylated erythropoietin FC fusion protein; h = hours; rhEPO = recombinant human erythropoietin. * Within one group 6 h vs. 24 h—p < 0.05 (two-tailed t-test). & cEPO-Fc vs. rhEPO at 24 h—p = 0.033 (Multiple group comparison via Brown–Forsythe test and post hoc analysis using Tukey test). § cEPO-Fc vs. rhEPO and control at 24 h—p = 0.012 (cEPO-Fc vs. rhEPO and p = 0.032 (cEPO-Fc vs. control) (Multiple group comparison via Brown–Forsythe test and post-hoc analysis using Tukey test).
Study groups and the number of animals.
| Reperfusion Time (h) | Study Group | Number of Animals ( |
|---|---|---|
| 6 | control | 5 |
| 6 | rhEPO | 5 |
| 6 | cEPO-Fc | 6 |
| 24 | control | 5 |
| 24 | rhEPO | 5 |
| 24 | cEPO-Fc | 5 |
| 96 | control | 13 |
| 96 | rhEPO | 10 |
| 96 | cEPO-Fc | 11 |
h = hours; n = number of animals; cEPO-Fc = carbamylated erythropoietin FC fusion protein; rhEPO = recombinant human erythropoietin.
Figure 4Workflow of the hematoxylin eosin necrosis score. This figure shows the workflow for evaluating the extent of necrosis in murine spinal cord based on hematoxylin eosin staining using a semiquantitative scoring system. There were four main criteria that were defined for the evaluation of necrosis. The arrows indicate the respective region or structure of interest for the evaluation of the main criterion. Each of these criteria was evaluated semi-quantitatively, according to sub-criteria, with 0–3 points (pts.). This results in a possible total score of 0–12 pts. This total score is translated into levels of necrosis (LON) from I–V as shown in the figure.
Primer purchasing detail.
| Gene of Interest | Order Number at Qiagen N.V. |
|---|---|
| ATF6 | PPM33057A |
| IRE1α (Em1) | PPM36937A |
| PERK (Eif2ak3) | PPM26428B |
| 18SrRNA | PPM57735E |
ATF6 = activating transcription factor 6, IRE1α = inositol-requiring enzyme 1α, PERK = protein kinase RNA-like endoplasmic reticulum kinase, 18S ribosomal RNA.