| Literature DB >> 36076827 |
Ting Liu1, Taiwu Zhang1, Yanni Zhang1, Le Yang1, Yan Duan1, Lin Su1, Jianjun Tian1, Lina Sun1, Bohui Wang2, Ye Jin1.
Abstract
Sheep crude tail fat has unique nutritional values and is used as a raw material for high-quality natural oil. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of probiotics on the metabolites and flavor of sheep crude tail fat. In this study, 12 Sunit sheep were randomly divided into an experimental group (LTF, basal feed + Lactiplantibacillusplantarum powder) and a control group (CTF, basal feed). The results of sheep crude tail fat analysis showed that blood lipid parameters were significantly lower and the expression of fatty acid synthase and stearoyl-CoA desaturase genes higher in the LTF group than in the CTF group (p < 0.05). Metabolomic analysis via liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry showed that the contents of metabolites such as eicosapentaenoic acid, 16-hydroxypalmitic acid, and L-citrulline were higher in the LTF group (p < 0.01). Gas chromatography-mass spectrometry detection of volatile flavor compounds in the tail fat showed that nonanal, decanal, and 1-hexanol were more abundant in the LTF group (p < 0.05). Therefore, Lactiplantibacillus plantarum feeding affected blood lipid parameters, expression of lipid metabolism-related genes, tail fat metabolites, and volatile flavor compounds in Sunit sheep. In this study, probiotics feeding was demonstrated to support high-value sheep crude tail fat production.Entities:
Keywords: blood indicators; probiotics; tail fat metabolites; volatile flavor compounds
Year: 2022 PMID: 36076827 PMCID: PMC9455658 DOI: 10.3390/foods11172644
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Foods ISSN: 2304-8158
Figure 1Experimental design diagram. Including animal experiments, RT-PCR experiments of genes related to lipid metabolism, GC-MS experiments of tail fat volatile flavor substances, and LC-MS metabolome experiments of tail fat.
Figure 2Plasma in CTF and LTF. (A) The concentration of TG of Sunit sheep in two feeding methods. (B) The concentration of TC of Sunit sheep in two feeding methods. (C) The concentration of HDL of Sunit sheep in two feeding methods. (D) The concentration of LDL of Sunit sheep in two feeding methods. (E) The value of HDL-to-LDL of Sunit sheep in two feeding methods. (F) The value of HDL-to-TC of Sunit sheep in two feeding methods. “*” indicates a significant difference between the two groups (p < 0.05).
Figure 3The relative expression of seven genes in the cecum. Data are expressed as average ± standard deviation. Note: CTF: control group (basal feed), LTF: experimental group (basal feed + Lactiplantibacillus plantarum). “*” indicates a significant difference between the two groups (p < 0.05).
Figure 4Heatmap of Spearman correlation coefficients between lipid parameters and lipid metabolism-related genes. “*” indicates a significant difference between the two groups (p < 0.05), and “**” indicates an extremely significant difference between the two groups (p < 0.01).
The different tail fat metabolic profiles between the LTF and CTF.
| No | RT | Metabolites | VIP | m/z | Adduct Ion | L/C Group | Pathways |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F1 | 1.241 | Undecanoic acid | 2.954 | 185.154 | (M−H)− | ↓ * | Lipids and lipid-like molecules |
| F2 | 4.624 | Deoxycholic acid | 1.700 | 391.2842 | (M−H)− | ↓ * | |
| F3 | 1.776 | Heptadecanoic acid | 2.496 | 269.2478 | (M−H)− | ↓ * | |
| F4 | 4.349 | Chenodeoxycholate | 2.568 | 391.2839 | (M−H)− | ↓ * | |
| F5 | 1.588 | Pelargonic acid | 1.555 | 157.1229 | (M−H)− | ↑ * | |
| F6 | 1.243 | Eicosapentaenoic acid | 1.855 | 303.2317 | (M+H)+ | ↑ ** | |
| F7 | 1.142 | 16-Hydroxypalmitic acid | 3.835 | 314.2689 | (M+CH3CN+H)+ | ↑ ** | |
| F8 | 5.177 | Hepatic phosphatidylcholine (PC) (16:0/16:0) | 2.661 | 756.553 | (M+Na)+ | ↓ ** | |
| F9 | 5.016 | Stearoylcarnitine | 3.836 | 428.373 | (M+H)+ | ↓ * | |
| F10 | 4.973 | (S)-(-)-Citronellic acid | 2.842 | 212.164 | (M+CH3CN+H)+ | ↑ * | |
| F11 | 7.779 | Guanosine | 2.038 | 282.084 | (M−H)− | ↑ * | Nucleosides, nucleotides, and analogues |
| F12 | 14.752 | Cytidine 5’-diphosphocholine (CDP-choline) | 2.408 | 489.1145 | (M+H)+ | ↑ ** | |
| F13 | 15.236 | β-Nicotinamide D-ribonucleotide | 1.441 | 335.0636 | M+ | ↑ ** | |
| F14 | 12.195 | Succinate | 1.527 | 117.019 | (M−H)− | ↑ * | Organic acids and derivatives |
| F15 | 1.190 | Ketoisocaproic acid | 3.890 | 129.055 | (M−H)− | ↑ * | |
| F16 | 12.863 | L-Citrulline | 1.620 | 176.1026 | (M+H)+ | ↑ ** | |
| F17 | 10.823 | Ergothioneine | 1.271 | 230.096 | (M+H)+ | ↑ * | |
| F18 | 9.374 | L-Methionine | 1.097 | 150.058 | (M+H)+ | ↑ * | |
| F19 | 15.423 | Phosphorylcholine | 7.547 | 184.073 | (M+H)+ | ↑ ** | Organic nitrogen compounds |
| F20 | 9.199 | Choline | 2.583 | 104.106 | M+ | ↓ * | |
| F21 | 1.044 | 4-Pyridoxic acid | 2.435 | 182.045 | (M−H)− | ↑ * | Organoheterocyclic compounds |
| F22 | 6.880 | Cytosine | 1.274 | 112.050 | (M+H)+ | ↑ ** | |
| F23 | 70.79 | All cis-(6,9,12)-Linolenic acid | 9.573 | 277.217 | (M−H)− | ↓ ** | |
| F24 | 11.593 | D-gluconate | 1.517 | 195.051 | (M−H)− | ↑ * | Organic oxygen compounds |
Note: RT(min) represents the retention time of the component. VIP represents the variable projection importance; the larger the value, the more important. m/z represents the mass-to-charge ratio. Adduct Ion represents the adduct ion information of the compound. Comparison of the number of corresponding flavor substances between the two groups. “↑” indicates that the amount in LTF is higher than in CTF, and “↓” indicates that LTF is lower than CTF. “*” indicates a significant difference between the two groups, and “**” indicates an extremely significant difference between the two groups.
Figure 5Chord diagram and network diagram for positive ion mode and negative ion mode. (A) Positive ion mode chord diagram. (B) Negative ion mode chord diagram. The starting point of the link in the inner circle in the Figure represents each significantly different metabolite, and the arc on the outer circle represents the classification of the significantly different metabolite. Colored lines indicate correlations within the various metabolites, and the lines are the same color as the subclasses. Dark grey lines indicate correlations between different classes of metabolites. (C) Positive ion mode network diagram. (D) Negative ion mode network diagram. The dots in the Figure represent significantly different metabolites. The size of the dots is related to the degree of connectivity. The greater the degree, the larger the dot. The colors of the lines represent correlations, red for positive correlations and blue for negative correlations. The thickness of the line represents the absolute value of the correlation coefficient. The thicker the line, the greater the correlation.
Volatile compounds of Sunit sheep crude tail fat (μg/kg).
| Compound | CTF | LTF | Significance | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aldehydes | Hexanal | 25.23 ± 5.86 | 32.87 ± 14.97 | NS |
| Octanal | 46.91 ± 8.95 | 68.71 ± 11.69 | NS | |
| Nonanal | 151.72 ± 12.74 b | 241.19 ± 23.98 a | ** | |
| Decanal | 28.27 ± 2.55 b | 38.92 ± 3.70 a | * | |
| 2-Nonenal, (E)- | 19.33 ± 0.89 | 21.90 ± 1.67 | NS | |
| Alcohols | 1-Hexanol | 19.11 ± 2.06 b | 32.03 ± 4.43 a | * |
| 1-Octen-3-ol | 32.87 ± 5.57 | 40.27 ± 0.37 | NS | |
| 2-Octen-1-ol,(E)- | 22.92 ± 3.47 | 11.44 ± 4.79 | NS | |
| 1-Octanol | 18.42 ± 1.51 b | 31.89 ± 2.91 a | ** | |
| Acids | Octanoic acid | 25.62 ± 5.55 b | 51.93 ± 9.83 a | * |
| Nonanoic acid | 51.23 ± 17.48 | 98.15 ± 20.59 | NS | |
| Undecanoic acid | 32.41 ± 5.47 | 158.36 ± 64.89 | NS | |
| Esters | Allyl 2-ethyl butyrate | 41.37 ± 2.99 | 39.10 ± 2.26 | NS |
| Acetic acid, nonyl ester | 13.86 ± 0.78 | 15.50 ± 0.59 | NS | |
| Nonanoic acid, ethyl ester | 17.52 ± 1.12b | 26.00 ± 2.13a | * | |
| Octanoic acid, ethyl ester | 17.78 ± 4.86 | 21.88 ± 7.94 | NS | |
| Hexanoic acid, ethyl ester | 11.20 ± 1.55 | 14.30 ± 0.49 | NS | |
| Amines | Ethanolamine | 36.67 ± 5.67 | 23.71 ± 6.63 | NS |
| Aromatic hydrocarbons | Ethylbenzene | 197.68 ± 8.78 | 178.35 ± 5.06 | NS |
| Hydrocarbons | Styrene | 21.79 ± 7.62 | 20.79 ± 4.43 | NS |
| Longifolene | 14.98 ± 3.29 | 31.96 ± 6.73 | NS | |
| Limonene | 62.62 ± 5.46 b | 157.43 ± 18.55 a | ** |
Note: Values are expressed as mean and standard deviation (n = 6). NS, nonsignificant. a,b Significant differences between feeding regimens (p < 0.05). * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01.