Literature DB >> 36076079

Use of hormone-specific antibody probes for differential labeling of contributor cell populations in trace DNA mixtures.

Jennifer M Miller1, Christin Lee1, Sarah Ingram1, Vamsi K Yadavalli2, Susan A Greenspoon3, Christopher J Ehrhardt4.   

Abstract

A significant proportion of casework analyzed by forensic science laboratories is often "touch" or trace forensic DNA evidence, which is deposited through physical contact and is comprised of sloughed epidermal cells. These samples can be challenging to analyze due to low DNA concentrations, frequent degradation, and the presence of cells from multiple individuals in the same sample. To address these challenges, we investigated a new approach for characterizing trace evidence prior to DNA profiling that labels epidermal cells with antibody probes targeting hormone molecules testosterone and dihydrotestosterone (DHT). The goal was to test whether cell populations derived from separate individuals showed different binding efficiencies to hormone probes and, thus, could be used to detect the presence of multiple cell populations. Additionally, we investigated whether antibody probes could be used to isolate contributor cell populations from an epidermal cell mixture and facilitate deconvolution of mixed DNA profiles recovered from touch/trace evidence. Results showed that cell populations from some individuals could differentiated in trace samples based on fluorescence histograms following probe labeling. However, certain pairs of contributors showed largely or completely overlapping histogram profiles and could not be resolved. Preliminary efforts to separate cell populations that could be differentiated with hormone probes with fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) coupled to DNA profiling and probabilistic modeling indicated that it is possible to enrich contributor cell populations from touch/trace samples and produce more probative DNA profiles compared to the original mixture sample. The variability in labeling, differentiation, and physical separation of cell populations may be impacted by similarities in biochemical profiles across some contributors as well as imbalance of contributor DNA quantities in certain mixtures as is typical in casework involving touch/trace evidence. Ultimately, screening and separation of trace DNA samples with this approach may be presumptive and constrained by sample-specific parameters of the original mixture.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cell separation; Flow cytometry; Hormone antibody probes; Mixture interpretation; Probabilistic modeling

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 36076079     DOI: 10.1007/s00414-022-02887-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Legal Med        ISSN: 0937-9827            Impact factor:   2.791


  29 in total

1.  Separation of sperm and epithelial cells in a microfabricated device: potential application to forensic analysis of sexual assault evidence.

Authors:  Katie M Horsman; Susan L R Barker; Jerome P Ferrance; Kymberly A Forrest; Katherine A Koen; James P Landers
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2005-02-01       Impact factor: 6.986

Review 2.  A review of trace "Touch DNA" deposits: Variability factors and an exploration of cellular composition.

Authors:  Julia Burrill; Barbara Daniel; Nunzianda Frascione
Journal:  Forensic Sci Int Genet       Date:  2018-11-27       Impact factor: 4.882

3.  Presence and potential of cell free DNA in different types of forensic samples.

Authors:  Mado Vandewoestyne; David Van Hoofstat; Aimée Franssen; Filip Van Nieuwerburgh; Dieter Deforce
Journal:  Forensic Sci Int Genet       Date:  2013-01-11       Impact factor: 4.882

Review 4.  Blood components.

Authors:  Alistair Farley; Charles Hendry; Ella McLafferty
Journal:  Nurs Stand       Date:  2012 Nov 28-Dec 4

5.  The origin of unknown source DNA from touched objects.

Authors:  Alycia K Buckingham; Michelle L Harvey; Roland A H van Oorschot
Journal:  Forensic Sci Int Genet       Date:  2016-07-28       Impact factor: 4.882

6.  The modified method of two-step differential extraction of sperm and vaginal epithelial cell DNA from vaginal fluid mixed with semen.

Authors:  K Yoshida; K Sekiguchi; N Mizuno; K Kasai; I Sakai; H Sato; S Seta
Journal:  Forensic Sci Int       Date:  1995-03-21       Impact factor: 2.395

7.  Separation of uncompromised whole blood mixtures for single source STR profiling using fluorescently-labeled human leukocyte antigen (HLA) probes and fluorescence activated cell sorting (FACS).

Authors:  Lee Dean; Ye Jin Kwon; M Katherine Philpott; Cristina E Stanciu; Sarah J Seashols-Williams; Tracey Dawson Cruz; Jamie Sturgill; Christopher J Ehrhardt
Journal:  Forensic Sci Int Genet       Date:  2015-03-12       Impact factor: 4.882

Review 8.  Making an epidermis.

Authors:  Maranke I Koster
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 5.691

9.  Forensic trace DNA: a review.

Authors:  Roland Ah van Oorschot; Kaye N Ballantyne; R John Mitchell
Journal:  Investig Genet       Date:  2010-12-01

10.  Evaluation of forensic DNA mixture evidence: protocol for evaluation, interpretation, and statistical calculations using the combined probability of inclusion.

Authors:  Frederick R Bieber; John S Buckleton; Bruce Budowle; John M Butler; Michael D Coble
Journal:  BMC Genet       Date:  2016-08-31       Impact factor: 2.797

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.