Literature DB >> 27497642

The origin of unknown source DNA from touched objects.

Alycia K Buckingham1, Michelle L Harvey2, Roland A H van Oorschot3.   

Abstract

The presence of DNA in a criminal investigation often requires scrutiny in relation to how it came to be where it was found. There is a paucity of data with respect to the extent to which one can assume that the last person handling an object, which has previously been touched by others, will contribute to the DNA profile generated from it. There are limited data in detailing the extent to which any foreign DNA is picked-up from a previously touched object and transferred to subsequently touched objects. This study focuses on DNA transfer and persistence on a knife handle after multiple handlings with the knife by different individuals soon after each other, as well as handprints left on flat DNA-free surfaces immediately after touching a knife handle with a known history of prior handling. The profiles of later handlers of a knife are more prominent than earlier handlers; however, the last handler is not always the major contributor to the profile. Proportional contributions to the profiles retrieved from knife handles vary depending on the individuals touching the knife handle. They can also vary when knife handles have been handled in the same manner by the same individuals in the same sequence on different occasions. Hands readily pickup DNA left on objects by others and transfer it to subsequently touched objects. The quantity of foreign DNA picked up by a hand and deposited on subsequently touched objects diminishes as more DNA-free objects are handled soon after each other. Caution is advised when considering how DNA from different individuals may have been transferred to the object from which it was collected.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  DNA transfer; Knife handle; Non-self DNA; Touch DNA; Trace DNA

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27497642     DOI: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2016.07.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Forensic Sci Int Genet        ISSN: 1872-4973            Impact factor:   4.882


  5 in total

1.  Persistence of touch DNA on burglary-related tools.

Authors:  Céline M Pfeifer; Peter Wiegand
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2017-02-06       Impact factor: 2.686

2.  Use of hormone-specific antibody probes for differential labeling of contributor cell populations in trace DNA mixtures.

Authors:  Jennifer M Miller; Christin Lee; Sarah Ingram; Vamsi K Yadavalli; Susan A Greenspoon; Christopher J Ehrhardt
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2022-09-09       Impact factor: 2.791

3.  Touch DNA: impact of handling time on touch deposit and evaluation of different recovery techniques: An experimental study.

Authors:  Francesco Sessa; Monica Salerno; Giuseppe Bertozzi; Giovanni Messina; Pietrantonio Ricci; Caterina Ledda; Venerando Rapisarda; Santina Cantatore; Emanuela Turillazzi; Cristoforo Pomara
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-07-02       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 4.  Interpol review of forensic biology and forensic DNA typing 2016-2019.

Authors:  John M Butler; Sheila Willis
Journal:  Forensic Sci Int       Date:  2020-02-20       Impact factor: 2.395

5.  Touch DNA in forensic science: The use of laboratory-created eccrine fingerprints to quantify DNA loss.

Authors:  Jessica Tang; Jennifer Ostrander; Ray Wickenheiser; Ashley Hall
Journal:  Forensic Sci Int       Date:  2019-10-23       Impact factor: 2.395

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.