| Literature DB >> 36075943 |
Gang Huang1,2,3,4, Junbo Xu5,6,7,8, Zhen Zhang9,10,11,12, Lin Cai9,10,11,12, Hanxiong Liu9,10,11,12, Xiuqiong Yu10,11,12.
Abstract
Metabolic syndrome (MetS) is currently a major public health challenge in young, middle aged and elderly population worldwide, but it is still not clear in very elderly population. This study was to investigate the potential association between total cholesterol and high density lipoprotein cholesterol ratio (THR) and MetS in a very elderly population in Chengdu. Totally, 1056 very elderly (aged ≥ 80 years) in Chengdu community were enrolled in this study. Geographic characteristics of participants were collected and laboratory measurement was performed. Metabolic syndrome (MetS) was defined according to the Chinese and the international diabetes federation (IDF) criteria, respectively. Logistic analysis was used to investigate the potential association between the THR and MetS. Receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) analysis was used to evaluate the efficiency of THR in MetS predicting. Finally, 1038 participants were included in statistical analysis. The mean age was 83.6 ± 3.4 years and 52.6% participants were men and 21.6% suffered from MetS. Participants with MetS had relatively higher waist circumference, body weight, blood pressure, fast plasma glucose level, non-high density lipoprotein cholesterol level and THR. The logistic analysis revealed that the THR was associated with MetS according to both the Chinese (odds ratio (OR): 3.053, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.464-3.782, P < 0.001) and the IDF criteria (OR: 2.458, 95% CI 2.016-2.995, P < 0.001). ROC analysis found that the area under curve of the THR was 0.800 (95% CI 0.749-0.852, P < 0.001) and 0.727 (95% CI 0.669-0.786, P < 0.001) for predicting MetS according to the Chinese and the IDF criteria, respectively. The THR is associated with MetS in this community very elderly population in Chengdu.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 36075943 PMCID: PMC9458731 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-19445-5
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.996
Baseline characteristics of very elderly according to MetS (Chinese criteria).
| MetS (n = 224) | No MetS (n = 814) | P value | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | 83.06 ± 2.90 | 83.71 ± 3.49 | 0.044 |
| Male, n (%) | 97 (43.3) | 449 (55.2) | 0.002 |
| Current smoking, n (%) | 27 (12.1) | 88 (10.8) | 0.649 |
| Current drinking, n (%) | 21 (9.4) | 65 (8.0) | 0.565 |
| Hypertension | 138 (61.6) | 408 (50.1) | 0.005 |
| DM | 71 (31.7) | 107 (13.1) | < 0.001 |
| Abdominal obesity, n (%) | 202 (90.2) | 272 (33.4) | < 0.001 |
| Antihypertensive | 126 (56.2) | 344 (42.3) | 0.834 |
| Antidiabetic | 62 (27.6) | 77 (9.4) | 0.027 |
| Lipid lowering | 25 (11.2) | 61 (7.5) | 0.615 |
| WC (cm) | 95.10 ± 7.29 | 85.09 ± 10.30 | < 0.001 |
| Height (cm) | 154.78 ± 10.11 | 155.01 ± 10.11 | 0.512 |
| Body weight (kg) | 60.81 ± 9.80 | 54.05 ± 10.74 | < 0.001 |
| BMI | 25.34 ± 3.35 | 22.42 ± 3.57 | < 0.001 |
| SBP (mmHg) | 152.9 ± 18.8 | 146.1 ± 22.9 | < 0.001 |
| DBP (mmHg) | 75.8 ± 10.6 | 74.1 ± 12.4 | 0.030 |
| FPG (mmol/L) | 7.21 ± 2.85 | 5.28 ± 1.38 | < 0.001 |
| TC (mmol/L) | 5.05 ± 1.02 | 4.84 ± 0.99 | 0.008 |
| TG (mmol/L) | 2.10 ± 1.09 | 1.19 ± 0.61 | < 0.001 |
| LDL-C (mmol/L) | 2.81 ± 0.74 | 2.53 ± 0.74 | < 0.001 |
| HDL-C (mmol/L) | 1.33 ± 0.36 | 1.67 ± 0.43 | < 0.001 |
| THR | 4.00 ± 0.96 | 3.03 ± 0.79 | < 0.001 |
| SUA (µmol/L) | 375.21 ± 88.84 | 350.66 ± 96.01 | < 0.001 |
| Creatinine (μmol/L) | 109.05 ± 41.40 | 102.81 ± 29.72 | 0.231 |
| eGFR (mL/(min∙1.73 m2)) | 55.14 ± 15.08 | 56.40 ± 18.41 | 0.044 |
Data are expressed as mean ± standard deviation for continuous variables or number (percentage) for categorical variables.
BMI body mass index, DBP diastolic blood pressure, DM diabetes mellitus, eGFR estimated glomerular filtration rate, FPG fast plasma glucose, HDL high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, LDL low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, SUA serum uric acid, SBP systolic blood pressure, TC total cholesterol, TG triglyceride, THR total and high density lipoprotein cholesterol ratio, WC Waist circumference.
Estimated prevalence of metabolic syndrome and its components.
| Tertile categories of THR | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chinese criteria | IDF criteria | |||||||
| T1 (n = 346) | T2 (n = 346) | T3 (n = 346) | P for trends | T1 (n = 346) | T2 (n = 346) | T3 (n = 346) | P for trends | |
| MetS, n (%) | 22 (6.4) | 47 (13.6) | 155 (44.8) | < 0.001 | 40 (11.6) | 63 (18.2) | 157 (45.4) | < 0.001 |
| Abdominal Obesity, n (%) | 148 (42.8) | 170 (49.1) | 232 (67.1) | < 0.001 | 176 (50.9) | 196 (56.6) | 246 (71.1) | < 0.001 |
| High blood pressure, n (%) | 271 (78.3) | 266 (76.9) | 293 (84.7) | 0.024 | 271 (78.3) | 266 (76.9) | 293 (84.7) | 0.024 |
| Hypertirglyceridemia,n (%) | 15 (4.3) | 45 (13.0) | 173 (50.0) | < 0.001 | 15 (4.3) | 45 (13.0) | 173 (50.0) | < 0.001 |
| Low HDL cholesterol, n (%) | 2 (0.6) | 4 (1.2) | 65 (18.8) | < 0.001 | 6 (1.7) | 19 (5.5) | 129 (37.3) | < 0.001 |
| Hyperglycemia, n (%) | 54 (15.6) | 75 (21.7) | 115 (33.2) | < 0.001 | 96 (27.7) | 103 (29.8) | 146 (42.2) | < 0.001 |
Data are expressed as number (percentage).
HDL high-density lipoprotein, IDF international diabetes federation, MetS metabolic syndrome, THR total and high density lipoprotein cholesterol ratio. The cut-off values of THR are 2.72 and 3.50.
Figure 1Logistic regression results of laboratory parameters for MetS predicting. (A) MetS according to the Chinese criteria. (B) MetS according to the IDF criteria. FPG fast plasma glucose, HDL-C high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, IDF international diabetes federation, MetS metabolic syndrome, TC total cholesterol, TG triglyceride, THR total cholesterol and high density lipoprotein cholesterol ratio.
Association between the THR and MetS according to models with different risk factors.
| MetS (Chinese criteria) | MetS (IDF criteria) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OR (95% CI) | P value | OR (95% CI) | P value | |
| Model 1 | 3.211 (2.349–4.388) | < 0.001 | 2.281 (1.742–2.989) | < 0.001 |
| Model 2 | 3.107 (2.507–3.849) | < 0.001 | 2.418 (1.981–2.951) | < 0.001 |
| Model 3 | 3.053 (2.464–3.782) | < 0.001 | 2.458 (2.016–2.995) | < 0.001 |
Model 1: not adjusted.
Model 2: adjusted for sex. BMI, hyperurecemia and eGFR.
Model 3: adjusted for sex, age, BMI, hyperurecemia and eGFR, current smoking, current drinking and physical activity.
BMI body mass index, CI conference interval, eGFR estimated glomerular filtration rate, IDF international diabetes federation, MetS metabolic syndrome, OR odds ratio, THR total and high density lipoprotein cholesterol ratio.
Figure 2ROC curves of different parameters for MetS predicting. (A) ROC analysis of the THR for MetS predicting according to the Chinese criteria. The AUC of THR was 0.800 (95% CI 0.749–0.852). (B) ROC analysis of the THR for MetS predicting according to the IDF criteria. The AUC of the THR was 0.727 (95% CI 0.669–0.786). AUC area under the ROC curve, FPG fast plasma glucose, HDL-C high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, IDF international diabetes federation, MetS metabolic syndrome, ROC Receiver operating characteristic, TC total cholesterol, TG triglyceride, THR total cholesterol and high density lipoprotein cholesterol ratio.