Literature DB >> 36075929

Germline-somatic JAK2 interactions are associated with clonal expansion in myelofibrosis.

Derek W Brown1,2, Weiyin Zhou3,4, Youjin Wang3, Kristine Jones3,4, Wen Luo3,4, Casey Dagnall3,4, Kedest Teshome3,4, Alyssa Klein3, Tongwu Zhang3, Shu-Hong Lin3, Olivia W Lee3, Sairah Khan3, Jacqueline B Vo3,5, Amy Hutchinson3,4, Jia Liu3,4, Jiahui Wang3,4, Bin Zhu3,4, Belynda Hicks3,4, Andrew St Martin6, Stephen R Spellman7, Tao Wang6,8, H Joachim Deeg9, Vikas Gupta10, Stephanie J Lee6,9, Neal D Freedman3, Meredith Yeager3,4, Stephen J Chanock3, Sharon A Savage3, Wael Saber6, Shahinaz M Gadalla3, Mitchell J Machiela11.   

Abstract

Myelofibrosis is a rare myeloproliferative neoplasm (MPN) with high risk for progression to acute myeloid leukemia. Our integrated genomic analysis of up to 933 myelofibrosis cases identifies 6 germline susceptibility loci, 4 of which overlap with previously identified MPN loci. Virtual karyotyping identifies high frequencies of mosaic chromosomal alterations (mCAs), with enrichment at myelofibrosis GWAS susceptibility loci and recurrently somatically mutated MPN genes (e.g., JAK2). We replicate prior MPN associations showing germline variation at the 9p24.1 risk haplotype confers elevated risk of acquiring JAK2V617F mutations, demonstrating with long-read sequencing that this relationship occurs in cis. We also describe recurrent 9p24.1 large mCAs that selectively retained JAK2V617F mutations. Germline variation associated with longer telomeres is associated with increased myelofibrosis risk. Myelofibrosis cases with high-frequency JAK2 mCAs have marked reductions in measured telomere length - suggesting a relationship between telomere biology and myelofibrosis clonal expansion. Our results advance understanding of the germline-somatic interaction at JAK2 and implicate mCAs involving JAK2 as strong promoters of clonal expansion of those mutated clones.
© 2022. This is a U.S. Government work and not under copyright protection in the US; foreign copyright protection may apply.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 36075929      PMCID: PMC9458655          DOI: 10.1038/s41467-022-32986-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nat Commun        ISSN: 2041-1723            Impact factor:   17.694


Introduction

Myelofibrosis (MF) is a rare myeloproliferative neoplasm (MPN), with an incidence of ~1 per 100,000 per year[1,2], characterized by the development of abnormal hematopoietic stem cell (HSC) clones and altered bone marrow microenvironment, leading to fibrosis[3,4]. Patients with MF typically develop cytopenia due to proliferation of aberrant HSC clones and hepatosplenomegaly due to extramedullary hematopoiesis[4]. Individuals with MF are at a high risk of developing acute myeloid leukemia[5]. MF can present as primary disease (primary MF) or progress from another MPN (secondary MF) such as polycythemia vera or essential thrombocythemia[6]. Recurrent somatic driver mutations have been identified in MF, particularly in JAK2, MPL, and CALR[7-9]; current evidence also indicates a heritable component as well[10,11]. So far, the JAK2 46/1 haplotype and a single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) in the TERT gene region have been established as predisposition alleles for MPNs, including both primary and secondary MF[12-16], which have led to the use of JAK inhibitors and telomerase inhibitors as potential therapeutic agents for MF[17-19]. A genome-wide association study (GWAS) of MPN that included 136 MF patients identified additional MPN-associated loci (e.g., 3q21.3, 3q25.33, 6p21.31, 13q14.11, 18q11.2, 21q22.12)[20]. Current knowledge of MF genetic etiology is inferred from the MPN data. In this work, we undertake an integrated approach to investigate the genetics of MF which includes analysis of germline variation, somatic JAK2 point mutations, somatic mosaic chromosomal alterations (mCAs), and leukocyte telomere length among MF patients who underwent hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) and reported to the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research (CIBMTR), representing a clinically important subset of MF patients. We report here six MF susceptibility loci, four of which replicate prior MPN findings at 9p24.1 (JAK2), 5p15.33 (TERT), 3q25.33 (IFT80), and 4q24 (TET2). We show germline variation at the 9p24.1 risk haplotype confers elevated risk of acquiring cis JAK2 mutations which are selectively retained by recurrent 9p24.1 mCAs. MF is dynamically associated with telomere length in which longer inherited telomere length increases MF risk, and clonal expansion of 9p24.1 mCAs markedly reduces measured telomere length.

Results

CIBMTR MF case characteristics

In total, 937 MF cases met the criteria for inclusion in our study, the majority of which were male (58.06%) and had DNA collected at an average age of 56.9 years (median = 58.4, IQR = 52.3–63.9; Supplemental Table 1). Most cases were primary (68.84%) MF, with intermediate 1 or 2 disease (49.30%) based on the Dynamic International Prognostic Scoring System (DIPSS)[21] score. The average time from diagnosis to transplant in the full cohort was 63.5 months (median = 25.1, IQR = 9.0–88.3). Compared to primary MF cases, secondary MF cases were more likely to be female (54.45% vs. 36.28%) and had longer average time from diagnosis to transplant (122.8 months vs. 36.8 months).

MF susceptibility loci identified with estimated large effect size

We performed a GWAS using 827 MF cases and 4135 ancestry-matched cancer-free controls drawn from the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal, and Ovarian (PLCO) Screening Trial[22] (Methods section). The liability scale heritability of MF was estimated to be 11.4% (s.e.= 5.8%). The genomic inflation (λ) and intercept from linkage disequilibrium score regression (LDSC)[23] showed minimal evidence for systematic inflation (λ = 1.02, LDSC intercept= 1.01, Fig. 1).
Fig. 1

Manhattan plot and quantile-quantile plot from the myelofibrosis genome-wide association study.

The association -log10 P-values are plotted for each tested genetic variant on the y-axis (two-sided, logistic regression) and chromosomal position on the x-axis. The nearest gene for each identified locus is labeled. The red line indicates the genome-wide significance threshold (5 × 10−8). The quantile–quantile plot displays observed versus expected −log10 P-values. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.

Manhattan plot and quantile-quantile plot from the myelofibrosis genome-wide association study.

The association -log10 P-values are plotted for each tested genetic variant on the y-axis (two-sided, logistic regression) and chromosomal position on the x-axis. The nearest gene for each identified locus is labeled. The red line indicates the genome-wide significance threshold (5 × 10−8). The quantile–quantile plot displays observed versus expected −log10 P-values. Source data are provided as a Source Data file. We analyzed 9,672,066 genotyped and imputed germline variants after filtering on control minor allele frequency (>0.5%) and imputation quality score (>0.7; Methods section) and identified six independent genome-wide significant loci (P < 5 × 10−8) (Supplemental Table 2 and Fig. 1), four of which replicated prior MPN findings at 9p24.1 (JAK2), 5p15.33 (TERT), 3q25.33 (IFT80), and 4q24 (TET2)[20]. We observed rs7851556 in 9p24.1 as the most significant variant (odds ratio (OR) = 2.39, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 2.13–2.68, P = 5.75 × 10−51), which is in strong linkage disequilibrium (LD) with the lead variant reported for MPN, rs1327494 (R2EUR = 0.95, D′EUR = 0.98)[20] and located in an intron of JAK2, a gene which promotes cellular proliferation through the JAK/STAT pathway[8,24]. As chromosomal alterations are common at 9p24.1 (see mCA section below), we performed a sensitivity analysis in individuals with no detectable 9p24.1 mCAs to ensure no miscalling of germline variants resulting from mCAs in the 9p24.1 region; the rs7851556 signal remained significant (OR = 1.65, 95% CI = 1.41–1.92, P = 1.99 × 10−10), although the effect estimate was attenuated due to removal of MF cases that carried the JAK2 risk haplotype (see below section on JAK2–mCA relationship). rs7705526 had the strongest association (OR = 1.65, 95% CI = 1.48–1.84, P = 7.62 × 10−19) in the 5p15.33 locus. Previously identified in MPN[20], this intronic variant is located in TERT, which encodes telomerase, the reverse transcriptase that extends telomeric DNA repeats, and has been associated with CD34+ to CD45+ ratio[25]. The 3q25.33 variant rs201009932 (OR = 5.78, 95% CI = 3.67–9.11, P = 4.06 × 10−14) (Supplemental Table 2) is in moderate LD with the MPN variant rs77249081 (R2EUR = 0.25, D′EUR = 1.00)[20] and resides in an intron variant of IFT80, a part of the IFT complex essential for the assembly and maintenance of cilia as well as differentiation through the Sonic Hedgehog pathway[26,27]. At 4q24, rs1548483, located near TET2, a putative tumor suppressor gene and common somatic driver mutation in clonal hematopoiesis[28,29], was significant (OR = 2.27, 95% CI = 1.71-3.01, P = 1.42 × 10−8); notably, this variant is in high LD with the previously identified MPN variant rs62329718 (R2EUR = 0.94, D′EUR = 1.00)[20]. Conditional analyses controlling for the lead GWAS variant for the 9p24.1 and 5p15.33 loci identified no evidence for additional independent signals (Supplemental Fig. 1). Our GWAS identified two additional MF germline susceptibility loci: 6p21.32 and 17p13.1 (Supplemental Table 2 and Fig. 1). The 6p21.32 variant, rs28442287, (OR = 1.63, 95% CI = 1.38–1.93, P = 9.34 × 10−9) is a downstream variant of HLA-DRB9, within the human leukocyte antigen system[30,31], and has been implicated in bone marrow related diseases[32,33]. The 17p13.1 variant, rs78378222, (OR = 4.47, 95% CI = 2.75–7.27, P = 1.56 × 10−9) is a 3′ UTR variant of the commonly mutated tumor suppressor gene TP53 that increases susceptibility to different types of cancer (e.g., skin basal cell carcinoma, prostate cancer, glioma, and lymphocytic leukemia)[34-37]. Future studies are warranted to validate these two MF germline susceptibility loci. We performed stratified GWAS investigating primary MF (569 cases, 2845 controls) and secondary MF (258 cases, 1290 controls) to investigate possible differences (Supplemental Table 2), and no informative differences in association signals were observed between the two MF types (Supplemental Table 2, Supplemental Fig. 2). We further stratified secondary MF analyses into post-polycythemia vera MF (119 cases, 595 controls) and post-essential thrombocythemia MF (139 cases, 695 controls; Supplemental Table 3). We observed a strong genome-wide significant signal at 9p24.1 (JAK2) only in post-polycythemia vera MF (Supplemental Table 3 and Supplemental Fig. 3), which is consistent with prior reports of higher JAK2 involvement in patients with polycythemia vera[38-40].

MF-associated germline variants near JAK2 increase expression

We performed expression quantitative trait locus (eQTL) analyses using genome-tissue expression (GTEx) whole blood data[41] and identified eQTLs with JAK2 expression (e.g., rs7847141; OR = 1.05, 95% CI = 1.03-1.08, P = 3.69  × 10−5). Germline variants at the lead 9p24.1 locus additionally colocalized with JAK2 expression with rs7851556 having the highest Posterior Probability (PP; PP = 0.59; Supplemental Fig. 4)[42]. MF risk alleles were associated with increased levels of JAK2 expression, explaining 35% of the shared association signal at 9p24.1 (PPSNP = 0.35)[42]. Colocalization was also detected at 6p21.32 with HLA-DRB9 (colocalization PP = 0.36)[43]. In analysis of whole blood GTEx expression data, a transcriptome-wide association study (TWAS)[41,44] identified JAK2 (Z = 9.00, P = 2.18 × 10−19) and RP11-39K24.4 (Z = 10.78, P = 4.26 × 10−27) as significant genes (P < 3.59 × 10−6; Supplemental Figure 5), with positive JAK2 expression associated with increased MF risk. Conditional analyses were performed with predicted RP11-39K24.4 expression, and JAK2 remained an independent expression signal (rs7851556 conditional GWAS P = 9.90 × 10−26; Supplemental Fig. 6).

JAK2 germline risk haplotype confers elevated risk of cisJAK2 mutations

Targeted PacBio long-read sequencing of the JAK2 region identified 562 (60.82%) individuals with the commonly observed activating JAK2 mutation, a known MPN driver mutation[7,8]. Secondary MF following a prior diagnosis of polycythemia vera or essential thrombocythemia were more likely to have the JAK2 mutation than primary MF cases (67.93% vs. 57.57%, P = 2.85 × 10−3), with post-polycythemia vera MF having the highest frequency of the JAK2 mutation (97.04% vs. 57.57%, P = 5.82 × 10−10). The estimated average mutation allelic fraction on background haplotypes was 62.54% (median = 69.76, IQR = 37.58-92.74), suggesting high clonal expansion of JAK2 mutated clones. MF cases carrying the risk allele (T) of rs7851556 (our lead GWAS SNP) were more likely to acquire a somatic JAK2 mutation (P = 9.41 × 10−14) (Supplemental Table 4). Additionally, individuals with the JAK2 46/1 germline risk haplotype (GGC, from rs3780367, rs10974944, rs12343867, Methods section) were substantially more likely to acquire JAK2 mutations (OR = 2.69, 95% CI = 2.02-3.58, P = 1.16 × 10−11), with 634 (68.61%) individuals carrying the JAK2 46/1 germline risk haplotype, and post-polycythemia vera MF (88.15%) having a higher frequency than both primary MF (65.98%) and post-essential thrombocythemia MF (66.45%). Furthermore, when examining phase information, we observed a strong cis relationship between the germline risk haplotype and JAK2 mutations acquired on the same risk haplotype (binomial P = 1.23 × 10−26; Supplemental Table 5), as previously observed in MPN patients[12-14]. These results were consistently observed when stratified by type of MF: primary MF (binomial P = 1.86 × 10−13), post-polycythemia vera MF (binomial P = 4.88 × 10−10), and post-essential thrombocythemia MF (binomial P = 1.90 × 10−4). Of the 562 individuals carrying a JAK2 mutation, 370 (65.84%) had the mutation in cis with the risk haplotype (binomial P = 7.68 × 10−33). Interestingly, during our JAK2 mutation calling (Methods section), we identified 5 individuals with evidence of the somatic mutation potentially acquired independently on both germline haplotypes (Supplemental Table 6) which were replicated in independent sequencing runs on new libraries. Future studies are needed to further explore the frequency of independent JAK2 mutations on both germline haplotypes in MF cases.

Chromosomal alterations are abundant in MF and preferentially expand JAK2 clones

At least one detectable autosomal mCA was detected in 684 (73.31%) individuals which is in contrast to ~3% in population-based surveys[45,46]. An elevated frequency of mCAs in secondary MF compared to primary MF was also observed (78.35% vs. 71.03%, OR = 1.48, 95% CI = 1.06-2.05, P = 0.0196), with post-polycythemia vera MF having the highest frequency of mCAs (94.12% vs. 71.03%, OR = 6.53, 95% CI = 3.13-13.60, P = 5.54 × 10−7). Recurrent copy neutral loss of heterozygosity (CNLOH) events were detected on chromosome 9p (N = 298; 31.94%), and recurrent loss events were observed on chromosome 13q (N = 89; 9.54%) and 20q (N = 92; 9.86%; Fig. 2). Each GWAS susceptibility locus showed enrichment for mCAs compared to age and sex-matched cancer-free individuals in the UK Biobank[45,46] (binomial P < 1 × 10−8; Supplemental Table 7), suggesting mCAs could clonally expand MF risk conferring alleles at susceptibility loci.
Fig. 2

Mosaic chromosomal alterations by autosomal location.

Green events indicate mosaic copy gains, blue events indicate copy neutral loss of heterozygosity, and red events indicate mosaic losses. The highlighted region on each chromosome band indicates the centromere location. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.

Mosaic chromosomal alterations by autosomal location.

Green events indicate mosaic copy gains, blue events indicate copy neutral loss of heterozygosity, and red events indicate mosaic losses. The highlighted region on each chromosome band indicates the centromere location. Source data are provided as a Source Data file. Since the JAK2 9p24.1 locus was the most notable in our GWAS and contains a hotspot of JAK2 mutations, we closely examined mCAs in this region. In total, 378 (40.51%) individuals had a detectable autosomal mCA across the 9p24.1 region. MF cases carrying the risk allele (T) of rs7851556 (our lead GWAS SNP) were more likely to have mCAs within the 9p24.1 region (P = 2.28 × 10−19), with CNLOH representing over 75% of the observed mCAs (N = 294; Supplemental Table 8). These results replicate previous reports of an association between 9p CNLOH and the JAK2 46/1 risk haplotype[45]. We performed allelic shift analyses in heterozygous individuals to test for a cis relationship between the JAK2 risk haplotype and mCAs spanning 9p24.1[45,46]. Using highly correlated genotyped proxy SNPs to our lead GWAS SNP rs7851556[47], we found that the JAK2 risk haplotype is predominantly amplified by gains (23 of 28, binomial P = 9.12 × 10−4, proxy SNP rs10815167), retained by losses (14 of 16, binomial P = 4.18 × 10−3, proxy SNP rs2230724), and duplicated by CNLOH (51 of 59, binomial P = 9.05 × 10−9, proxy SNP rs10815167), providing strong evidence for preferential clonal expansion of mCAs with the JAK2 MF risk haplotype. Using long-read PacBio sequencing data, we noted substantial allelic imbalance of heterozygous variants in the vicinity of JAK2 in individuals with mCAs spanning the region, providing independent confirmation of mCA calls in the region (Supplemental Fig. 7). Of the 374 individuals with detectable mCAs spanning JAK2 who also had long-read sequencing data, 97.86% had a JAK2 mutation, indicating a strong relationship between mCAs and JAK2 mutations (P = 4.37 × 10−80; Supplemental Table 9). To investigate the clonal evolutionary history of JAK2 mutations, we examined mutated cellular fractions of JAK2 and JAK2 mCAs. We found substantially higher JAK2 allelic fractions on background haplotypes compared to estimated mCA cellular fractions, suggesting the acquisition of a JAK2 mutation occurred prior to acquiring a JAK2 chromosomal alteration for the vast majority of MF cases (binomial P = 3.30 × 10−54; Supplemental Fig. 8). The estimated JAK2 allelic fractions and mCA cellular fractions may be lower than the true somatic fraction in the actual diseased myeloid cells because we used whole blood DNA from most of the patients. However, this would not affect the ratio of JAK2 allelic fraction to mCA cellular fraction. mCAs were also enriched across MPL and CALR gene positions (binomial P < 5 × 10−32; Supplemental Table 10), suggesting mCAs may also clonally expand other MPN driver mutations similar to the JAK2 locus, although this hypothesis needs to be further studied.

Inherited longer telomere length associated with MF risk

In addition to the JAK2 MF susceptibility region, the 5p15.33 locus near TERT implicates telomere length in MF risk. To evaluate the role of telomere length, we used a panel of germline variants associated with measured telomere length to develop a polygenic risk score (PRS) for inherited telomere length[48] and observed a strong positive association between increased genetically-inferred leukocyte telomere length and increased MF risk (OR = 1.33, 95% CI = 1.23-1.44, P = 2.56 × 10−13). Of the 19 telomere-length associated variants imputed, seven (rs4691895, rs7705526, rs2853677, rs228595, rs62053580, rs75691080, and rs34978822) were nominally associated (P < 0.05) with MF risk (binomial P = 2.31 × 10−5). The allele related to longer telomere length was associated with increased risk of MF for five of these seven variants (Fig. 3 and Supplemental Table 11). The telomere length PRS was associated with the presence of JAK2 mutations (OR = 1.20, 95% CI = 1.04–1.37, P = 0.01) as well as mCAs (OR = 1.17, 95% CI = 1.01–1.36, P = 0.04), suggesting longer telomere length may afford cells the ability to clonally expand to detectable clonal fractions, after acquiring somatic mutations.
Fig. 3

The effect of each variant on genetically-inferred telomere length and myelofibrosis risk.

Estimates for the SNP-telomere length (Li et al.) and SNP-myelofibrosis associations are presented in Supplemental Table 11. A linear model estimated trend line and calculated 95% confidence interval around the trend (gray fill) are plotted (two-sided P = 5.48 × 10−4).

The effect of each variant on genetically-inferred telomere length and myelofibrosis risk.

Estimates for the SNP-telomere length (Li et al.) and SNP-myelofibrosis associations are presented in Supplemental Table 11. A linear model estimated trend line and calculated 95% confidence interval around the trend (gray fill) are plotted (two-sided P = 5.48 × 10−4). In a Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis to evaluate a directional relationship between the telomere length-associated variants and MF risk, the intercept from MR-Egger regression was non-significant (P = 0.65, Table 1) after removing five potentially pleiotropic variants (including the lead TERT variant identified in our GWAS) (Supplemental Table 11)[49], suggesting no pleiotropy[50]. Each MR method utilized indicated a strong increasing effect between the telomere length genetic instrument and MF risk (Table 1 and Supplemental Fig. 9).
Table 1

Mendelian randomization results using variants and summary statistics from Li et al.a

MethodOR (95% CI)p-valueb
Maximum-likelihood8.04 (3.41, 18.93)1.88 × 10−6
Simple median6.25 (2.04, 19.10)1.32 × 10−3
Weighted median5.07 (1.75, 14.70)2.76 × 10−3
IVWc7.69 (3.29, 17.97)2.43 × 10−6
MR-Egger13.49 (1.07, 169.93)4.41 × 10−2
Intercept0.97 (0.85, 1.11)0.6475

aFive variants (rs4691895, rs7705526, rs34991172, rs228595, rs34978822) were detected to have evidence of pleiotropy (FDR < 0.2) as detailed in Supplemental Table 11 and removed from the MR analyses.

bAll reported tests are two-sided.

cInverse-variance weighted.

Mendelian randomization results using variants and summary statistics from Li et al.a aFive variants (rs4691895, rs7705526, rs34991172, rs228595, rs34978822) were detected to have evidence of pleiotropy (FDR < 0.2) as detailed in Supplemental Table 11 and removed from the MR analyses. bAll reported tests are two-sided. cInverse-variance weighted. The genetic correlation between leukocyte telomere length and MF using LD score regression[51] was estimated based on summary statistics from a published telomere length GWAS[48] along with summary statistics from our MF GWAS. A marginally significant genome-wide genetic correlation was observed between telomere length and MF (LDSC r = 0.23, s.e.m. = 0.11, P = 0.038), similar in magnitude to what was reported for telomere length and MPN (LDSC r = 0.19, s.e.m. = 0.09, P = 0.037)[20]. Together, our results indicate longer telomere length is associated with increased risk of MF when evaluated by established leukocyte telomere length variants and genome-wide.

Telomere length attrition and mCA-induced clonal expansion

In an analysis of leukocyte relative telomere length (rTL) measured before HCT, on average, telomere length was significantly shorter among older subjects (P = 0.0037), peripheral blood mononuclear cell (PBMC)-derived DNA (P = 0.0031), secondary MF (P = 0.0016), and those with a longer time from diagnosis to HCT transplant (P = 0.0171) (Supplemental Table 12). To further investigate the reported association between telomere length and mCAs in the general population[52], individuals with autosomal mCAs had significantly shorter rTL compared to individuals without autosomal mCAs (P = 7.93 × 10−5; Supplemental Table 13). Multivariable analyses demonstrated negative associations between rTL and the presence of any autosomal mCA (OR = 0.14, 95% CI = 0.04–0.44, P = 7.39 × 10−4; Table 2). These results were consistent when restricted to individuals with whole blood-derived DNA (OR = 0.19, 95% CI = 0.06–0.62, P = 6.05 × 10−3). A close inspection of mCAs in the 9p24.1 region demonstrated stronger attenuation of rTL (OR = 0.04, 95% CI = 0.01–0.19, P = 2.60 × 10−5), indicating individuals with autosomal mCAs, especially those spanning JAK2, exhibit signatures of clonal expansion. Multivariable Poisson regression also demonstrated rTL was negatively associated with a greater number of autosomal mCAs (incidence rate ratio= 0.33, 95% CI = 0.22–0.48, P = 1.98 × 10−8). Associations between measured telomere length and mCAs were consistent when stratified by chromosomal location (e.g., telomeric or interstitial) (Phet = 0.91) and copy number state (e.g., gain, loss, CNLOH, undetermined; Phet = 0.90, Table 2). In sensitivity analyses, adjusting for MF type, DIPSS score, and time to transplant, negative associations with rTL were observed both overall and stratified by chromosomal region and copy number state (overall OR = 0.19, 95% CI = 0.06–0.64, P = 7.44 × 10−3; Table 2).
Table 2

Association between measured telomere length and autosomal mCA status by chromosomal region and copy number change

Univariable modelMultivariable modelaMultivariable modelb
OR (95% CI)Association p-valuecOR (95% CI)Association p-valuecHet p-valuedOR (95% CI)Association p-valuecHet p-valued
Overall0.12 (0.04–0.34)8.31 × 10−50.14 (0.04–0.44)7.39 × 10−40.19 (0.06–0.64)7.44 × 10−3
Chromosomal region0.90570.9241
Telomeric0.08 (0.02–0.25)1.72 × 10−50.11 (0.03–0.39)6.06 × 10−40.16 (0.04–0.59)5.98 × 10−3
Interstitial0.07 (0.02–0.26)3.99 × 10−50.10 (0.03–0.37)4.98 × 10−40.14 (0.04–0.56)5.34 × 10−3
Copy number change0.90320.7922
Gain0.08 (0.02–0.33)4.24 × 10−40.10 (0.02–0.47)3.11 × 10−30.13 (0.03–0.65)0.0132
Loss0.06 (0.02–0.23)2.08 × 10−50.06 (0.02–0.24)5.39 × 10−50.09 (0.02–0.38)1.05 × 10−3
CNLOH0.05 (0.02–0.18)2.83 × 10−60.08 (0.02–0.28)1.29 × 10−40.11 (0.03–0.44)1.91 × 10−3
Undetermined0.04 (0.002–0.62)0.02200.03 (0.001–0.69)0.02790.02 (0.001–0.60)0.0243

CNLOH  copy neutral loss of heterozygosity; mCA mosaic chromosomal alteration.

aMultivariable models control for sex, age, age-squared, genetic ancestry, and DNA source.

bMultivariable models additionally control for myelofibrosis type, DIPSS score, and time to transplant.

cTwo-sided logistic regression.

dDenotes test of heterogeneity of effect within subgroups analyzed.

Association between measured telomere length and autosomal mCA status by chromosomal region and copy number change CNLOH  copy neutral loss of heterozygosity; mCA mosaic chromosomal alteration. aMultivariable models control for sex, age, age-squared, genetic ancestry, and DNA source. bMultivariable models additionally control for myelofibrosis type, DIPSS score, and time to transplant. cTwo-sided logistic regression. dDenotes test of heterogeneity of effect within subgroups analyzed. Analyses of the rTL and mCA clonal fractions indicated a strong relationship in which increasing mCA cellular fraction was associated with a substantial decrease in measured rTL (β = −0.57, 95% CI = -0.74 to −0.39, P = 4.76 × 10−10), especially for mCAs spanning JAK2 (β = −1.17, 95% CI = -1.44 to −0.91, P = 1.39 × 10−16). Interestingly, we did not observe an association between measured rTL and JAK2 mutation presence (OR = 0.84, 95% CI = 0.29-2.42, P = 0.74), but we did observe an association with JAK2 clonal fraction (β = −1.11, 95% CI = −1.31 to −0.91, P = 2.26 × 10−25). After removing individuals with mCAs, rTL was no longer associated with JAK2 clonal fraction (β = −0.27, 95% CI = -0.71–0.16, P = 0.22), suggesting JAK2 alone may not be a strong driver of rapid clonal expansion in MF (Supplemental Table 14). These findings indicate mCAs, many of which selectively retain or duplicate JAK2 mutations, promote rapid clonal expansion of mutated clones resulting in significant reductions in telomere length.

Discussion

We conducted an integrated genomic characterization of MF by investigating both germline susceptibility alleles and somatic events, particularly mosaic chromosomal events. Our study supports a key role of JAK2 events as a critical driver of MF and underscores important interactions of germline susceptibility with JAK2 mutations and mCAs[12-14,45]. We observed that 68% of MF cases carry at least one germline JAK2 risk allele, whereas somatic events are also critical to MF development - in our study 61% of MF cases carried a somatic JAK2 mutation, and 41% with an mCA spanning JAK2. Overall, we observed that ~85% of cases involve JAK2. Using independent sequencing runs, we identified five individuals with evidence of acquiring independent JAK2 mutations on both germline haplotypes. The frequency and consequences of independent JAK2 mutations on both germline haplotypes should be further studied. In a GWAS, we identified six MF susceptibility loci (one including JAK2 on 9p24.1) with two independent signals unique to MF[20]. The estimated MF heritability is 11.4% (s.e. = 5.8%), and all MF susceptibility loci had high effect sizes (OR > 1.6) relative to those typically found by GWAS, suggesting a strong germline component at multiple genomic loci for MF risk. Global assessment of mCAs demonstrated a high frequency in MF cases and demonstrated enrichment at each GWAS locus and across other MPN driver mutations, providing potential evidence for genome-wide germline-somatic interactions beyond that observed for JAK2. Our integrated study demonstrates a complex germline-somatic interaction in MF patients at the 9p24.1 susceptibility locus, which confirmed prior findings and revealed insights into MF etiology. The observed effect of telomere length on disease risk in concert with 9p24.1 indicates that the presence of a germline susceptibility locus involving JAK2 directly influences the probability of developing a somatic event in the same region, presumably on the same haplotype (Fig. 4). We observed that individuals with the germline JAK2 risk haplotype tagged by rs7851556 were predisposed to acquiring a somatic JAK2 mutation in cis, as previously reported[12-14]. The cis relationship could not be checked directly due to the distance between our lead GWAS variant (rs7851556) and the JAK2 mutation, but this relationship is supported by the high LD between rs7851556 and variants (rs3780367, rs10974944, rs12343867) in the 46/1 risk haplotype (R2 > 0.93). We also observed mCAs lead to preferential over-representation of this risk haplotype containing the JAK2 mutation[45]. Prior studies demonstrate JAK2 is a strong activator of cellular growth and proliferation[8,24], promotes cell surface localization[53], is activated in response to a variety of cytokines[54-56], and induces bone marrow fibrosis[57]. Altered JAK2 activity conferred by the germline JAK2 risk haplotype, JAK2 activating mutation, and 9p24.1 mCAs could lead to a cellular phenotype characterized by increased clonal expansion. While we were able to connect germline susceptibility and somatic mutations in cross-sectional data from MF patients, future longitudinal assessment will be key in follow-up of our study. Likewise future studies characterizing germline functional variation are needed to better understand how the germline JAK2 MF susceptibility locus leads to altered JAK2 expression and acquisition of JAK2 mutations.
Fig. 4

A proposed conceptual framework of myelofibrosis genetic etiology.

Both longer inherited telomere length and the germline JAK2 risk haplotype tagged by rs7851556 are associated with increased risk of myelofibrosis. The germline JAK2 risk haplotype further predisposes to somatically acquire the JAK2 mutation in cis, and mosaic chromosomal alterations in the 9p24.1 region lead to over-representation of the germline risk haplotype and JAK2 somatic mutation. We hypothesize that increasing JAK2 activity underlies each of these processes which leads to increased clonal expansion and proliferation, and accelerated telomere length shortening in myelofibrosis patients.

A proposed conceptual framework of myelofibrosis genetic etiology.

Both longer inherited telomere length and the germline JAK2 risk haplotype tagged by rs7851556 are associated with increased risk of myelofibrosis. The germline JAK2 risk haplotype further predisposes to somatically acquire the JAK2 mutation in cis, and mosaic chromosomal alterations in the 9p24.1 region lead to over-representation of the germline risk haplotype and JAK2 somatic mutation. We hypothesize that increasing JAK2 activity underlies each of these processes which leads to increased clonal expansion and proliferation, and accelerated telomere length shortening in myelofibrosis patients. The MF susceptibility signal near TERT together with our PRS, MR, and genetic correlation analyses, suggest that polygenetic effects of genetic variants associated with telomere length are important contributors to MF predisposition, especially in light that telomere length is required for hematopoietic stem cell self-renewal[58]. A prior study on a smaller number of variants suggested longer genetically determined telomere length, as derived by telomere length associated variants, increases MPN risk[59]. Our observations further suggest inherited genome-wide variation promoting longer telomeres could fuel MF clonal expansion, especially JAK2-mCA mediated expansion. A downstream consequence of this increased cellular proliferation is shorter telomeres as observed in the reduced rTL in patients with mCAs. As previously demonstrated in MPN patients, and replicated in our MF study, measured rTL was not associated with JAK2 mutation presence, but was inversely associated with JAK2 clonal fraction[60]. Our results indicate that mCAs are driving this observed association between measured rTL and JAK2 clonal fraction, suggesting mCAs, particularly mCAs spanning JAK2, promote clonal expansion in MF. A recent trial identified that telomerase inhibitor therapy may be an effective treatment for MF; although the mechanism is poorly understood[19]. It is possible that patients with MF and JAK2 mCAs who have expanded clones may benefit from telomerase inhibition through senescence or apoptosis of these MF clones, potentially leading to better clinical outcomes[61]. Future functional and clinical investigations, using the flow-FISH assay to measure leukocyte cell-type specific telomere length, are required to test this hypothesis. Furthermore, our study included MF patients who received HCT between 2000 and 2016, and may represent a specialized clinical subset, which may not generalize to all MF patients. The large number of cases for this rare disease allowed for investigation of potential differences between primary and secondary MF, and secondary subtype. We noted no major differences in germline susceptibility by type of MF, and observed a significant signal at 9p24.1 (JAK2) in post-polycythemia vera MF. We did observe differences in their somatic profiles, with both JAK2 mutations and mCA acquisition more commonly observed in secondary MF compared to primary MF. This observation underscores a higher somatic load of mutations in secondary MF, which could be due to prior MPN diagnosis and longer disease duration, and is in agreement with prior reports[38-40]. This higher frequency of somatic mutations could have implications for MF treatment approaches, with JAK2 inhibitors potentially inducing a greater response in individuals with higher mutation allele burden[62]. In conclusion, our integrated genomic investigation of MF highlights a strong inherited genetic component of MF, which, in turn, influences the somatic profile of abundant mCAs in MF. These findings underscore the critical role of JAK2 and telomere biology in MF susceptibility, which could inform avenues for improved clinical management of MF.

Methods

Study population

This study utilized blood samples and clinical information from the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research (CIBMTR) database and repository (https://www.cibmtr.org). The study was approved by the National Marrow Donor Program institutional review board. All patients provided written informed consent for the research use of their samples and clinical data. Patients eligible for inclusion were those who underwent hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) for primary idiopathic or secondary MF between 2000 and 2016 and have a pre-HCT blood sample available for genomic analysis. Blood samples, from either whole blood or peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs), were collected within 30 days before administering HCT conditioning regimen. In total, 937 MF patients met the criteria for inclusion in our study, of which 863 (92.1%) contributed whole blood and 74 (7.9%) PBMCs (Supplemental Table 1).

SNP genotyping and quality control assessment

We used Qiagen QIAsymphony for DNA extraction. All genomic laboratory work included in this study was conducted by the NCI Cancer Genomics Research Laboratory. Genotyping on MF cases was completed using the Illumina Infinium Global Screening Array-24v1-0. Genotypes were called using standard Illumina microarray data analysis workflows. Controls were selected from 62,880 previously genotyped cancer-free individuals within the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal, and Ovarian (PLCO) Screening Trial[22], who were genotyped on the same array as the cases. To minimize technical artifacts, genotyping quality control steps were performed on the joint set of MF cases and PLCO controls. Standard quality control checks were performed to ensure high completion rates (≥95%), no sample contamination, sex concordance, no unexpected duplicates or replicates, normal rates of heterozygosity, and no instances of high relatedness (IBD < 0.2). Genetic ancestry was inferred using SNPWEIGHTS[63], which estimates the percentage of European, West African, and East Asian ancestry for each subject. After filtering based on quality control steps and European ancestry (>80%), 833 MF cases and 56,929 cancer-free controls were eligible for the GWAS analysis.

Genome-wide association study

We genetically matched the MF cases and PLCO controls using PCAmatchR to minimize the effects of confounding due to potential population stratification bias[64]. For the combined set of cases and controls, we extracted linkage disequilibrium filtered variants (R2 < 0.1) from the array manifest file (GSA-24v2-0_A1) and performed principal component (PC) analyses using PLINK[65]. The first 20 PCs and eigenvalues were used to 1:5 match MF cases and PLCO controls based on eigenvalue weights (Supplemental Figure 10). After matching, six MF cases did not have well matching controls and were removed from the analysis (Supplemental Figure 10), resulting in a total of 827 cases and 4135 genetically matched controls. Imputation was carried out using the Michigan Imputation Server with the TOPMed reference panel (https://imputationserver.sph.umich.edu). Following imputation, association analyses were conducted under an additive model using SNPTEST (https://mathgen.stats.ox.ac.uk/genetics_software/snptest/snptest.html). Any PCs that remained significant after matching were additionally adjusted for in the GWAS association tests. For the main GWAS, germline variants were filtered based on control minor allele frequency (>0.5%) and imputation quality score (>0.7). In GWAS stratified by MF type (Supplemental Table 1), variants were filtered based on a more stringent control minor allele frequency (>5%) to remove potential spurious associations arising due to small sample size. Manhattan plots for results visualization were generated using the “qqman” and “hudson” R packages[66,67].

Linkage disequilibrium score regression

Linkage disequilibrium score regression (LDSC) was used to estimate the narrow-sense heritability estimate of MF risk as well as compute genetic correlations[51]. We computed LD scores from European individuals within 1000 Genomes Project data[68]. Variants were filtered by minor allele frequency (>1%); 5,956,602 variants were retained for all calculations[51]. Heritability calculations were based on a MF sample prevalence of 0.1667 in our GWAS and a population prevalence of 5.69 × 10−5[1].

Colocalization of MF GWAS and QTLs

Colocalization analyses of the MF GWAS signals were performed using expression quantitative trait locus (eQTL) whole blood genome-tissue expression (GTEx) (version 8) data[41] with eCAVIAR and Hyprcoloc[42,43]. We extracted GWAS and QTL summary statistics 100 kb upstream and downstream of the lead GWAS SNP as input for colocalization analyses, with the exception of chromosome 6, which was limited to 10 kb, due to the number of variants in the region. For each MF GWAS locus, eCAVIAR colocalization posterior probability (colocalization PP > 0.01)[43] or Hyprcoloc posterior probability (PP > 0.50)[42] was used to identify colocalization.

Transcriptome-wide association study

We performed a transcriptome-wide association study (TWAS) on the MF GWAS summary statistics using FUSION (http://gusevlab.org/projects/fusion/)[44]. TWAS was performed using GTEx whole blood gene expression data (version 7)[41] by imputing the gene expression phenotypes for GWAS data overlapping the LD reference panel (1000 Genomes European)[51]. FUSION was used to test associations using pre-computed expression reference weights. A Bonferroni corrected level of significance of 3.59 × 10−6 (0.05/13,909 GTEx available features) was used to assess statistical significance.

Targeted PacBio sequencing and mutation calling

Targeted PacBio Single Molecule Real-Time (SMRT) sequencing was performed on MF cases to detect JAK2 mutations. We followed the SMRT sequencing process protocols as described in the PacBio sequencing manual (https://www.pacb.com/wp-content/uploads/Procedure-checklist-Preparing-SMRTbell-libraries-using-PacBio-barcoded-M13-primers-for-multiplex-SMRT-sequencing.pdf). Briefly, a 2-step PCR, using 10 ng of DNA as input, was conducted. In step 1, template-specific primers amplified the region of chr9:5067166-5074380 in GRCh38. Next, in step 2, unique barcode sequences were incorporated onto each sample, using universal tags, for multiplexing. Products were purified and quantified with an additional normalization step to ensure equal concentration of each sample prior to pooling, and hairpin adapters were ligated to the ends of each amplicon pool (up to 384 samples) during the SMRT bell library preparation. Each pooled library had primer annealing and polymerase binding performed according to the protocol and sequenced on 1 Sequel II SMRT Cell 8 M. After sequencing, Circular Consensus Sequencing (CCS) read generation was performed with set criteria, including a minimum of 3 passes and accuracy of 99%. CCS reads were used as input to lima (https://github.com/PacificBiosciences/barcoding) to demultiplex the pooled samples, and then aligned to GRCh38 using pbmm (https://github.com/PacificBiosciences/pbmm2). Haplotypes were then generated based on aligned CCS reads, including 3 SNPs within the JAK2 46/1 haplotype (rs3780367, rs10974944, rs12343867) and the JAK2 mutation (chr9:5073770). For each MF case, any haplotype with frequency  < 1% was removed. Additionally, cases were removed if they did not have sufficient DNA quantity (N = 1), total number of CCS reads  <  1000 (N = 1), more than two germline haplotypes (based on rs3780367, rs10974944, rs12343867; N = 4), or JAK2 mutations called on more than one germline haplotype (N = 49). We repeated sequencing of 53 individuals that failed QC; 1 individual did not have sufficient DNA for resequencing. We also resequenced an additional 43 MF cases who passed the above QC steps to further validate our PacBio sequencing and QC procedure. We followed the same protocol as detailed above for the resequenicng effort, with new aliquots of the genomic DNA taken and reamplified to generate a new library. Again, haplotypes were generated based on aligned CCS reads, including the 3 SNPS within the JAK2 46/1 haplotype and the JAK2 mutation, and any haplotype with frequency  < 1% was removed. We observed a high degree of concordance (>93%) between the first and second sequencing efforts for the subjects who originally passed our QC procedure (N = 43). Of those individuals that originally failed our sequencing QC (N = 53), we removed cases that were again identified with more than two germline haplotypes (N = 2) or JAK2 mutations called on more than one germline haplotype (N = 5). Overall, 924 MF cases were retained for downstream analyses with average read depth of 8,623.2 (median = 6872, min = 3155, max = 27,402).

Mosaic chromosomal alterations QC and calling

Using genotype data, MF cases were called for mCAs. Before mCA calling, the same GWAS quality control measures were performed, with completion rates relaxed to ≥90%. MoChA software (https://github.com/freeseek/mocha) was used to detect somatic copy number aberrations, a similar approach has been previously implemented[45,46]. Briefly, MoChA utilizes hidden Markov models (HMM) to integrate B allele frequency (BAF) and log2 R ratio (LRR), and leverage haplotype information to detect subtle imbalances between maternal and paternal allelic fractions in a cell population. The BAF was calculated as the ratio of signal intensity between two alleles at each genotyped variant in relation to estimated genotype clusters and was used to detect allelic imbalances as well as calculate the proportion of cells with a deletion, duplication, and copy neutral loss of heterozygosity (CNLOH)[69]. Contiguous genomic stretches of BAF values for heterozygous SNPs that deviate from 0.5 are indicative of mosaic chromosomal alterations. LRR calculates the log base 2 of the ratio of observed total signal intensities to expected signal intensities for a genotyped variant[69]. Contiguous genomic stretches with LRR > 0 indicate copy gain,  <0 indicate loss and around 0 indicate CNLOH. Furthermore, phase data was used to detect subtle over or under representation of haplotypes indicating the presence of a mCA. Eagle2, a software utilizing a population-based approach to infer phase (1000 Genomes reference panel), was used to infer haplotypes[70,71]. Chromosome 9 had a high frequency of CNLOH events with high cell fractions. These events are poorly detected by phase-based methods, due to lack of heterozygous sites in the event region. Although MoChA applies a non-phased-based model to detect high-level mosaic events, this approach only detects mosaic gains or losses, not CNLOH. Therefore, we additionally applied a custom software pipeline that utilized the BAFSegmentation software (http://baseplugins.thep.lu.se/wiki/se.lu.onk.BAFsegmentation) to recover additional events not detected in MoChA[72]. Chromosome 9 was segmented for mosaic events using circular binary segmentation on BAF values. All potential events from both detection methods were plotted and visualized, and false positive calls were excluded from the analysis based on manual review of each plot. Samples with called mCAs on the merged set from MoChA and BAFSegmentation were classified by copy number state (gain, loss, CNLOH, or undetermined events), cellular fraction (the percentage of sampled leukocytes carrying the detected mCA), and chromosomal region (e.g., telomeric, interstitial, or whole chromosome event). Events that only occurred around telomeric ends (±1 Mb from chromosome ends) were defined as telomeric, events that spanned an entire chromosome were defined as whole chromosome events, and all other events were defined as interstitial.

Leukocyte telomere length polygenetic risk score and Mendelian randomization

We generated a telomere length polygenic risk score (PRS) by aggregating variants previously found to be associated with measured telomere length in GWAS into a weighted genetic instrument (Supplemental Table 11)[48]. The inherited telomere length PRS was standardized to have mean 0 and standard deviation 1. PRS analyses were adjusted for ancestry principal components within MF risk analyses, and sex, age, age-squared, genetic ancestry, and DNA source within JAK2 mutation and mCA analyses. Mendelian randomization (MR) analyses were performed using the telomere length associated variants[48] within the “Mendelian Randomization” R package[50]. We utilized the “GLIDE” R package to investigate any potential evidence of pleiotropy among the included variants[49]. Any variant found to have heterogeneous effects between measured telomere length and MF (false discovery rate  <0.2) was removed from the analysis[49].

Telomere length measurement

We utilized a modified qPCR assay to measure leukocyte relative telomere length (rTL) in pre-HCT extracted DNA[73]. The qPCR assay calculates the ratio between telomeric repeat copy number (T) and that of a single reference gene (beta-globin gene; 36B4) (S). Relative T/S was calculated in relation to a reference curve and final measurements were exponentiated to assure normality. All telomeric and 36B4 reactions were measured in triplicate, and the mean was used for final calculations. A total of 927 patients had DNA available for telomere length measurement. The overall completion rate was high (98.9%), resulting in 916 patients with available measured telomere length. An internal control, which is used to standardize results within the project, had an overall coefficient of variation (CV) of 2.96% and the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and its 95% confidence interval for study technical replicates was 0.982 (0.975, 0.986). All telomere length analyses adjusted for sex, age, age-squared, genetic ancestry, and DNA source, unless otherwise noted.
  70 in total

1.  A common JAK2 haplotype confers susceptibility to myeloproliferative neoplasms.

Authors:  Damla Olcaydu; Ashot Harutyunyan; Roland Jäger; Tiina Berg; Bettina Gisslinger; Ingrid Pabinger; Heinz Gisslinger; Robert Kralovics
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2009-03-15       Impact factor: 38.330

2.  Genome-wide Association Study Identifies HLA-DPB1 as a Significant Risk Factor for Severe Aplastic Anemia.

Authors:  Sharon A Savage; Mathias Viard; Colm O'hUigin; Weiyin Zhou; Meredith Yeager; Shengchao Alfred Li; Tao Wang; Veron Ramsuran; Nicolas Vince; Aurelie Vogt; Belynda Hicks; Laurie Burdett; Charles Chung; Michael Dean; Kelvin C de Andrade; Neal D Freedman; Sonja I Berndt; Nathaniel Rothman; Qing Lan; James R Cerhan; Susan L Slager; Yawei Zhang; Lauren R Teras; Michael Haagenson; Stephen J Chanock; Stephen R Spellman; Youjin Wang; Amanda Willis; Medhat Askar; Stephanie J Lee; Mary Carrington; Shahinaz M Gadalla
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2020-01-30       Impact factor: 11.025

Review 3.  Janus kinases in immune cell signaling.

Authors:  Kamran Ghoreschi; Arian Laurence; John J O'Shea
Journal:  Immunol Rev       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 12.988

4.  Increased risks of polycythemia vera, essential thrombocythemia, and myelofibrosis among 24,577 first-degree relatives of 11,039 patients with myeloproliferative neoplasms in Sweden.

Authors:  Ola Landgren; Lynn R Goldin; Sigurdur Y Kristinsson; Elin A Helgadottir; Jan Samuelsson; Magnus Björkholm
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2008-05-01       Impact factor: 22.113

5.  Leukemic transformation in myelofibrosis with myeloid metaplasia: a single-institution experience with 91 cases.

Authors:  Ruben A Mesa; Chin-Yang Li; Rhett P Ketterling; Georgene S Schroeder; Ryan A Knudson; Ayalew Tefferi
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2004-09-23       Impact factor: 22.113

6.  Epidemiology of myeloproliferative neoplasms in the United States.

Authors:  Jyotsna Mehta; Hongwei Wang; Sheikh Usman Iqbal; Ruben Mesa
Journal:  Leuk Lymphoma       Date:  2013-07-29

7.  A global reference for human genetic variation.

Authors:  Adam Auton; Lisa D Brooks; Richard M Durbin; Erik P Garrison; Hyun Min Kang; Jan O Korbel; Jonathan L Marchini; Shane McCarthy; Gil A McVean; Gonçalo R Abecasis
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2015-10-01       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Low penetrance susceptibility to glioma is caused by the TP53 variant rs78378222.

Authors:  V Enciso-Mora; F J Hosking; A L Di Stefano; D Zelenika; S Shete; P Broderick; A Idbaih; J-Y Delattre; K Hoang-Xuan; Y Marie; M Labussière; A Alentorn; P Ciccarino; M Rossetto; G Armstrong; Y Liu; K Gousias; J Schramm; C Lau; S J Hepworth; M Schoemaker; K Strauch; M Müller-Nurasyid; S Schreiber; A Franke; S Moebus; L Eisele; A Swerdlow; M Simon; M Bondy; M Lathrop; M Sanson; R S Houlston
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2013-04-09       Impact factor: 7.640

9.  Effect of pre-analytic variables on the reproducibility of qPCR relative telomere length measurement.

Authors:  Casey L Dagnall; Belynda Hicks; Kedest Teshome; Amy A Hutchinson; Shahinaz M Gadalla; Payal P Khincha; Meredith Yeager; Sharon A Savage
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-09-08       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Genetic polymorphisms associated with telomere length and risk of developing myeloproliferative neoplasms.

Authors:  Matteo Giaccherini; Angelica Macauda; Nicola Sgherza; Juan Sainz; Federica Gemignani; Josè Manuel Sanchez Maldonado; Manuel Jurado; Francesca Tavano; Grzegorz Mazur; Andrés Jerez; Joanna Góra-Tybor; Aleksandra Gołos; Francisca Hernández Mohedo; Joaquin Martinez Lopez; Judit Várkonyi; Raffaele Spadano; Aleksandra Butrym; Federico Canzian; Daniele Campa
Journal:  Blood Cancer J       Date:  2020-09-01       Impact factor: 11.037

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.