Literature DB >> 36074756

Deletion of CEP164 in mouse photoreceptors post-ciliogenesis interrupts ciliary intraflagellar transport (IFT).

Michelle Reed1, Ken-Ichi Takemaru2, Guoxin Ying1, Jeanne M Frederick1, Wolfgang Baehr1,3,4.   

Abstract

Centrosomal protein of 164 kDa (CEP164) is located at distal appendages of primary cilia and is necessary for basal body (BB) docking to the apical membrane. To investigate the function of photoreceptor CEP164 before and after BB docking, we deleted CEP164 during retina embryonic development (Six3Cre), in postnatal rod photoreceptors (iCre75) and in mature retina using tamoxifen induction (Prom1-ETCre). BBs dock to the cell cortex during postnatal day 6 (P6) to extend a connecting cilium (CC) and an axoneme. P6 retina-specific knockouts (retCep164-/-) are unable to dock BBs, thereby preventing formation of CC or outer segments (OSs). In rod-specific knockouts (rodCep164-/-), Cre expression starts after P7 and CC/OS form. P16 rodCep164-/- rods have nearly normal OS lengths, and maintain OS attachment through P21 despite loss of CEP164. Intraflagellar transport components (IFT88, IFT57 and IFT140) were reduced at P16 rodCep164-/- BBs and CC tips and nearly absent at P21, indicating impaired intraflagellar transport. Nascent OS discs, labeled with a fluorescent dye on P14 and P18 and harvested on P19, showed continued rodCep164-/- disc morphogenesis but absence of P14 discs mid-distally, indicating OS instability. Tamoxifen induction with PROM1ETCre;Cep164F/F (tamCep164-/-) adult mice affected maintenance of both rod and cone OSs. The results suggest that CEP164 is key towards recruitment and stabilization of IFT-B particles at the BB/CC. IFT impairment may be the main driver of ciliary malfunction observed with hypomorphic CEP164 mutations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 36074756      PMCID: PMC9488791          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1010154

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS Genet        ISSN: 1553-7390            Impact factor:   6.020


Introduction

CEP164 (NPHP15) is a ubiquitously expressed centrosomal protein [1] participating in microtubule organization, cell cycle progression and basal body (BB) docking. CEP164 localizes to the BB distal appendages (DAPs) which protrude from the BB distal end as nine-bladed pinwheel-like structures that enable BB docking and ciliogenesis () [2,3]. Additional key DAP proteins are sodium channel and clathrin linker 1 (SCLT1), centrosomal proteins 83 and 89 (CEP83 and CEP89), Fas-binding factor 1 (FBF1) and C2 domain containing 3 centriole elongation regulator (C2CD3) at the distal BB center, proteins containing multiple coiled-coil domains [2,4]. Super-resolution microscopy demonstrated that CEP164 localizes to the outermost of several concentric rings surrounding the BB distal end [5, 6]. CEP164 recruits tau tubulin kinase 2 (TTBK2) to the BB, an interaction based on the CEP164 WW domain with a TTBK2 proline-rich domain [7]. CEP164-TTBK2 interaction facilitates TTBK2-mediated phosphorylation of both CEP83 [8,9] and M-Phase Phosphoprotein 9 (MPP9) at the distal end of the mother centriole [10]. MPP9 and the associated centrosomal protein CP110-CEP97 complex that caps the distal end of mother centrioles are removed subsequently to promote ciliary axoneme growth [10-12] (). Recessive mutations of CEP164 (e.g., Q11P, R93W, Q525X, R576X, R579X) () are associated with nephronophthisis (NPHP), Meckel-Gruber syndrome (MKS) and renal-retinal ciliopathies [13]. Homozygous truncations of CEP164 are associated with severe ciliopathy whereas missense mutations generate milder forms of NPHP [1,13]. Homozygous CEP164(Q11P) and compound R93W with Q525X are associated with NPHP, while homozygous CEP164(R93W) has been identified in a patient with Bardet-Biedl Syndrome (BBS) [13,14]. Both mutations are outside the WW domain located between residues 56 and 89 [12], but structural analysis revealed that Q11P and R93W mutations compromise TTBK2 complex formation [7]. CEP164(X1460WextX57), identified in a child with Leber congenital amaurosis (LCA) [13], causes a read-through of the stop-codon X1460, adding 57 foreign amino acid residues to the CEP164 C-terminus. Biallelic pathogenic variants in CEP164 are causative of oral-facial-digital syndromes (OFDS) [15]. Knockdown of CEP164 in zebrafish resulted in syndromic ciliopathy with ventral body axis curvature, cell death, abnormal heart looping, pronephric tubule cysts, hydrocephalus, and retinal dysplasia [13,16]. Homozygous Cep164 mouse knockouts were embryonically lethal [17]. In a conditional knockout mouse model that lacks CEP164 in multiciliated tissues and testes, a profound loss of airway, ependymal, and oviduct multicilia resulted, and the mutant mouse developed hydrocephalus and male infertility [17]. Using tracheal cell cultures of this mouse model, CEP164 was shown to regulate small vesicle recruitment, ciliary vesicle formation and BB docking [17]. Photoreceptor outer segments (OSs) are considered modified primary cilia, dedicated to light reception and phototransduction [18-21]. As CEP164 forms a complex with multiple ciliary proteins [22], and there is variance in patient phenotype with CEP164 disruption, additional functions may be revealed depending on depletion before or after ciliogenesis. We generated CEP164 conditional knockouts in retina with three different Cre drivers that produce CEP164 truncation during retina embryonic development (retCep164-/-) pre-ciliogenesis, in rod photoreceptors (rodCep164-/-) post-ciliogenesis, and in adult retina using tamoxifen induction (tamCep164-/-) (). retCep164-/- mice were unable to elaborate photoreceptor connecting cilia (CC) and OSs, whereas rodCep164-/- mice do form photoreceptor CC and OS as Cre expression starts post-ciliogenesis. Depletion of CEP164 post-ciliogenesis results in profound loss of intraflagellar transport (IFT) particles, leading to impairment of IFT and OS degeneration. We propose that, in ciliopathies caused by missense mutations (e.g., X1460WextX57 associated with Leber congenital amaurosis (LCA), impairment of IFT provides a mechanism for ciliary dysfunction and disease.

Results

Generation of retina-specific Cep164 knockout mice

The murine Cep164 gene (30 exons, one noncoding exon 1) produces multiple splice variants lacking internal exons. The main variant encodes a protein of 1333 amino acids (150 kDa) carrying an N-terminal WW domain and three coiled-coil domains. To generate a retina-specific knockout mouse at various stages of development (), Cep164F/F mice [17] were bred with transgenic Six3Cre mice (retCep164-/-) [23], iCre75 mice (rodCep164-/-) [24], or Prom1(C-L) (Prom1-ETCre) (tamCep164-/-) mice [25] to produce null alleles (). Six3 (sine oculis-related homeobox 3) is a transcription factor expressed in retina, RPE and brain during embryonic development [23]. Cre in iCre75 is under control of the rhodopsin promoter that expresses in the second postnatal week, allowing CC and OS to develop. Tamoxifen induction allows depletion of CEP164 at any time during development, including in the adult mouse. LoxP sites placed in introns 3 and 4 specify deletion of exon 4 (), truncating CEP164 after exon 3 (after residue Pro 64 inside the WW domain) as exon 5 is out-of-frame. Truncation after exon 3 is predicted to eliminate all splice variants and the WW domain interacting with TTBK2. Genotyping with tail and retina DNA as templates and primers flanking exon 4 verified knockout of the Cep164 gene (). Immunohistochemistry in P21 wildtype (WT) retina with anti-CEP164 antibody showed that CEP164 is a photoreceptor inner segment (IS) protein () and accumulates at the photoreceptor BB, identified by EGFP-CETN2 (

retCep164-/- photoreceptors lack connecting cilia and outer segments

Six3Cre expression begins at embryonic day 9 (E9) and the floxed gene of interest is deleted subsequently. In P6 Cep164;Egfp-Cetn2 controls, BBs docked to the cell cortex as evidenced by presence of CC distal to BBs (). CEP164 appears firmly attached to BBs (, arrows) and short CC are formed (, arrowheads). Few retCep164-/- BBs carry CEP164 and CC formation declines in central retCep164-/- photoreceptors (), presumably because BBs are unable to dock to the IS apical membrane. Similarly, in primary cultures of tracheal multiciliated cells from Cep164F/F;FoxJ1-Cre mice, up to 83% of BBs were undocked [17]. As Six3Cre expression generates a central-to-peripheral gradient of gene product depletion [26], knockout is delayed in peripheral retCep164 retina (), and consequently some photoreceptors develop short CC (about 1/3) (, arrowhead). Mother centrioles with bound CEP164 (, arrow) extend fully developed CC in P16 control photoreceptors (, arrowhead), whereas in central knockout retina, BBs disintegrate and photoreceptors degenerate ( and ). Few BBs with CC survive in the retina periphery ( and arrow in L). Quantitative evaluation reveals that 93.3% control BBs, but only 3.9% knockout BBs, were labeled by antibody directed against CEP164 in P6 central retina (n = 3, ). Labeling increased in the peripheral retina to 36.6%. Absence of 100% labeling in the control is attributed to the imaging plane since CC formation was robust. Thickness of retCep164-/- outer nuclear layer (ONL) appears to be stable at P6 and P10, but declines by P16 (n = 3, ).

Rapid postnatal retCep164-/- photoreceptor degeneration.

A-C, P6 Cep164+/F (A), retCep164 central (B) and peripheral (C) cryosections on Egfp-Cetn2+ background probed with anti-CEP164 antibody (red). In retCep164 cryosections, CEP164-BB association is much reduced, but not in retina periphery where degeneration is delayed. D-F, enlargements of A-C as indicated. CEP164 associates with the BB (arrows) in control sections (D), is absent in the knockout (B’), but detectable at some BB in the retina periphery (F). Arrowheads identify CC. G-I, P16 cryosections probed with anti-CEP164 antibody. Note reduced thickness of mutant ONL. J-L, enlargements as indicated in G-I. At P16, control CC (G, J) are normal length and CEP164 is firmly associated with the BB (arrows in J). In central retCep164 sections (E), ONL is reduced to 1–3 nuclear rows, BBs and CCs have disintegrated. In the peripheral retina (F), few BB structures survive (arrow in L). M, % BBs in P6 control, central and peripheral retCep164photoreceptors. In P6 retCep164 retina cryosections, CEP164 association with BB is much reduced compared to CEP164+/F control (3.9–36.6%) and CC are not formed. Over 100 BB were counted per each animal across three controls and 3 retCep164. N, ONL thickness at P6, P10 and P16 in central retCep164 (n = 3–7). Note significant decrease at P16. * p<0.05, t-test.

retCep164 photoreceptor function at P16 and P25

Antibodies directed against PDE6 and ARL13B were used to assay for OS elaboration in central versus peripheral retina. PDE6 is a key phototransduction enzyme [27] and ARL13B is a small GTPase functioning as a guanine nucleotide exchange factor (GEF) of ARL3 [28]. In cryosections of Cep164+/F;Egfp-Cetn2 control retina, PDE6 (MOE antibody) and ARL13B localize in the photoreceptor OS as expected ( and ). In central retCep164 sections, PDE6 () and ARL13B () mislocalize to the IS as OSs fail to form. In peripheral retina (), PDE6 localizes to rudimentary OSs while ARL13B remains mostly confined to IS (). OS formation in the retina periphery encouraged functional analysis by pan-retina electroetinography (ERG) allowing assessment of photoreceptor function in dark- and light-adapted retina [29]. In response to light, photoreceptors hyperpolarize, causing a change in electric activity that can be detected by ERG, a diagnostic test called employing light flashes of various intensity [29]. Scotopic a-wave (rod function) and photopic b-wave amplitudes (cone and bipolar cell function) were assessed with flashes of 1.4 log cd s·m-2. Scotopic and photopic responses were almost extinguished at P16 and P25 indicating loss of rod and cone function (n = 3–6, and ). High flash intensities under scotopic conditions elicit weak a-wave responses () and under photopic conditions an even stronger response () consistent with minor OS formation and photoreceptor survival at the retina periphery.

Central retCep164-/- photoreceptors do not form OSs.

A-C, P12 central Cep164+/F (A), central retCep164 (B) and peripheral retCep164 retina cryosections(C) probed with MOE (anti-PDE6) (red). PDE6 is an OS protein participating in phototransduction. In central retCep164 sections (B), OSs are not formed and PDE6 mislocalizes to the IS. In retina periphery (C), degeneration is delayed and some OSs are present. D-F, cryosections as in A-C probed with anti-ARL13B, a small GTPase present in the OS. In controls (D), ARL13B correctly localizes to OSs, whereas it mislocalizes to photoreceptor IS of central and peripheral retCep164 retina. G-J, Electroretinography (ERG) at P16, P25. Average scotopic ERG (G) and photopic ERG (H) in control (blue) and retina knockouts (red) at 1.4 log cd s m-2. Scotopic a- wave (I) and photopic b-wave (J) amplitudes (μV) as a function of light intensity (log cd s m-2). Scotopic ERGs show diminished responses by P16 and statistically different responses (^, p < .05) at P25. Photopic ERGs show diminished b-wave responses by P16 and statistically different responses (^, p < .05) at P25. Minimal scotopic a- and b-waves reveal surviving photoreceptors of retina periphery.

Cep164 rod knockout

Previous reports dealt with CEP164’s role in early steps of ciliogenesis, such as preciliary vesicle recruitment and BB docking, but its role in ciliary maintenance is unknown. To determine whether CEP164 is required once CC are established, we examined deficits in a rod-specific knockout of CEP164 driven by iCre75 under control of the rhodopsin promoter (). One advantage of a rod-specific knockout is that Cre expression does not occur before P7, thus permitting ciliogenesis and OS formation. We asked, whether CEP164 is necessary for continued rod viability and, if so, how fast rods would degenerate after CEP164 deletion. Genotyping of rodCep164 control and Cep164F/F;iCre75 (abbreviated rodCep164) retina DNA confirmed that Cep164 exon 3 excision was complete at P16 (, lane 5).

rodCep164 outer segment instability

Depletion of CEP164 after P16 raises the question of BB-membrane attachment and OS stability. Plastic sections of P16 rodCep164 photoreceptors demonstrated that IS/OS length and ONL thickness are comparable to heterozygous control (), but are reduced at P21 (). We again used anti-PDE6 (, rows A and B) and anti-ARL13B antibodies (, rows C and D) to determine OS stability by immunohistochemistry. At P12, control and rodCep164 are comparable and called “predegenerate.” At P16, rodCep164 OSs appear still stable and rodCep164 ONL thickness was not statistically different (n = 4–6, ). However, by P21, OSs became unstable and the ONL thickness was reduced by one-third (n = 5–7, and ). By P30, rodCep164 OSs are undetectable and ONL is reduced to a single row of nuclei. At P16, ARL13B is barely detectable in the rodCep164 OSs and is absent in the mutant OSs at P21 (), suggesting that CEP164 is necessary for ARL13B to reach the OS. While the rodCep164 ONL was not significantly reduced at P12 and P16 relative to control ONLs (n = 3–7, ), the P16 retCep164 ONL thickness was less than half compared to control consistent with distinct earlier onset of Cre-based recombination (n = 3–4, ).

rodCep164-/- OSs degenerate after P16.

Rows A, B, Cep164F/+ (A) and Cep164;iCre75 (rodCep164-/-) retina cryosections (B) probed with PDE6 antibody (MOE, red) (A, B) at P12, P16, P21 and P30. All sections are on Egfp-Cetn2 background to mark the position of centrioles and CC. Note disintegrating rodCep164-/- OSs in B at P21 where CC (green) is still congruent with the OS (red). Rows C, D, central Cep164+/F (C) and central rodCep164 (D) retina cryosections probed with anti-ARL13B (red) at P16, P21 and P30. Note ARL13B, known to interact with CEP164, does not reach the OS in the absence of CEP164. E, ONL thickness at P12, P16, P21 and P30 in central retina of rodCep164-/- (n = 3–7). ONL thickness is indistinguishable at P12 and P16, but decreases rapidly after P16. * p<0.05, t-test.

Loss of CEP164 at rodCep164 BB

Immunohistochemistry at P12, P15, P21 and P30 revealed that CEP164 was firmly attached to the BB distal appendages in Cep164+/F;Egfp-Cetn2 cryosections (, rows A and B). At P12, rodCep164 BBs reveal normal appearance with CEP164 firmly attached. At P15 most BBs have lost most CEP164 and at P21, CEP164 was undetectable at BBs (, rows C and D). The P30 knockout ONL revealed one layer of nuclei; a single BB/CC structure is likely that of a surviving cone ( P30), see also P30).

Cep164 rod knockout BB/CC stability.

Row A, Cep164+/F; iCre75 (rodCep164+/F) retina cryosections on Egfp-Cetn2+ background probed with CEP164 antibody (red) at P12, P16, P21 and P30. Row B, enlargements as indicated by dashed squares in row A. Row C, rodCep164-/- cryosections probed with CEP164 antibody. Row D, enlargements as indicated by dashed squares in row C. Note CEP164 is attached to rodCep164-/- BB at P12, but lost at P15 and P21. BB and CC appear perfectly normal at P15 and P21 in the absence of CEP164. At P30, rods are degenerated. Scale bar, 10 μm in rows A and C, 5 μm in rows B and D.

rodCep164-/- scotopic and photopic ERG and fate of cones.

A, control (blue) and rodCep164-/- mice (red) were dark-adapted overnight and exposed under scotopic conditions to flashes of 1.4 log cd s/m2 at P16, P21 and P30 (n = 4–14). Note knockout a- and b- wave amplitudes were diminished at all ages. B, statistical evaluation of amplitudes of control and knockout CEP164 scotopic ERG a-waves at P15, P21 and P30 as measured in A. At P21 and P30 * p<0.05 t-test C, F, scotopic a-wave (C) and photopic b-wave amplitudes (F) at P16, P21 and P30 as a function of light intensity. Knockout scotopic a- and b-waves are diminished, but never extinguished. * p<0.05 at P21 and ^ p<0.05 at P30. D, control (blue) and rodCep164-/- mice (red) were exposed under photopic conditions to flashes of 1.4 log cd s/m2. Note, rodCep164-/- photopic b-waves were absent at P30. E, statistical evaluation of photopic b-wave amplitudes at 1.4 log cd s/m2 as measured in B. G, H, immunohistochemistry with anti-ML-opsin of control (G) and rodCep164-/- central cryosections (H) at P16, P21 and P30. Cones on the rodCep164-/- background are stable until P21 but are degenerated at P30.

rodCep164 photoreceptor function

Scotopic (rod function) and photopic (cone function) pan-retina ERGs were performed at a constant 1.4 log cd s/m2 intensity and the traces averaged (N = 4–14) ( and ). In scotopic ERG with control animals, rod a-waves continue to increase from P15 (120 μV) to P30 (300 μV) while rodCep164-/- rod a-waves hover at 50 μV at P16 and P21 ( and ). At P30, the rodCep164-/- rod a-wave is nearly extinguished, consistent with absence of rods (). The photopic rodCep164 cone b-wave is identical to control at P15, reduced at P21 and extinguished at P30, indicating cone degeneration ( and ). This is consistent with previous findings where deletion of rod-specific genes resulted in secondary loss of cones due to diminished rod-derived cone viability factor (RdCVF) [30]. Scotopic ERG as a function of light intensity showed diminished rod a- and b-wave amplitudes as early as P15 beginning at 1.4 log cd s/m2 ( and ) suggesting rod degeneration has begun, although not statistically significant at that age. Photopic cone b-wave amplitudes of control and rod knockout mice were identical at P15 but those of knockouts were nearly extinguished by P30 ( and ). Assuming that cone bipolar cells are unaffected in rodCep164-/- retinas, the severely attenuated photopic cone b-wave derives from loss of cone function. Cone degeneration in the rod knockout was verified using anti-ML-opsin antibody ( and ). P21 rodCep164-/- cones are relatively stable, but disintegrate by P30.

Loss of IFT88, IFT57 and IFT140 at BB and CC

In primary cilia (RPE1 cells), CEP164 recruits NPHP1 and IFT88 to the mother centriole and, upon deletion of CEP164, the levels of BB-associated IFT88 strongly decrease [31]. In contrast to primary cilia, CEP164 is dispensable for the recruitment of IFT components to multicilia [17]. We explored whether IFT88, IFT57 and IFT140 levels vary in P16 rodCep164-/- retinas () before onset of photoreceptor cell and OS degeneration, and at P21 when OSs disintegrate and ONL thickness is reduced (see ). P16 and P21 control rodCep164+/- photoreceptors reveal the familiar pattern of IFT proteins positioned at the BB and CC distal tips ( upper panels) [32-34]. By contrast, P16 rodCep164-/- photoreceptors reveal reduced levels of IFT proteins at BB and CC, although not statistically significant (n = 3, and lower panels, ), and IFT protein levels are significantly attenuated in P21 knockouts (n = 3, and lower panels, ). IFT88, IFT57 and IFT140 fluorescence signal intensities at distal CC in rodCep164-/- retina are reduced at P16, although not statistically significant (), and to 30% or less by P21 (). SPATA7 (spermatogenesis associated protein 7) [35] and CEP290 [36,37] are unaffected by deletion of CEP164 () suggesting normal CC elaboration. NPHP1 remains unaffected by post-ciliogenesis deletion of CEP164 (). FBF1 remains at the BB in the rodCep164, suggesting intact DAPs (). These results suggest that CEP164 recruits IFT88, IFT140 and IFT57 to photoreceptor BB/CC, as observed in primary cilia [31]. IFT88 and IFT57 protein levels are reduced in the rodCep164-/-, negatively affecting IFT and OS axoneme stability as evidenced by shortening of rodCep164 rod OSs at P16 and P21 () and absence of P14 discs in the dye injection experiment (see below, ).
Fig 7

SPATA7, CEP290, NPHP1 and FBF1 at the rodCep164-/- CC or BB.

A-D, immunohistochemistry of rodCep164+/- (upper panels) and rodCep164-/- (lower panels) cryosections probed with at P21 probed with anti-SPATA7 (A), anti-CEP290 (B), with anti-NPHP1 (E), and anti-FBF1 (D) antibodies. Note no relevant changes for SPATA7, CEP290, NPHP1 and FBF1 localizations. Insets (right) show enlargements of representative BB/CC structures identified by Egfp-CETN2 or individual antibodies (red). F, red channel pixel intensity of NPHP1, CEP290 and SPATA7 signal at CC at P21 using 3 animals each. None are statistically significant. p>0.05, t-test.

Fig 3

rodCep164-/- OSs degenerate after P16.

Rows A, B, Cep164F/+ (A) and Cep164;iCre75 (rodCep164-/-) retina cryosections (B) probed with PDE6 antibody (MOE, red) (A, B) at P12, P16, P21 and P30. All sections are on Egfp-Cetn2 background to mark the position of centrioles and CC. Note disintegrating rodCep164-/- OSs in B at P21 where CC (green) is still congruent with the OS (red). Rows C, D, central Cep164+/F (C) and central rodCep164 (D) retina cryosections probed with anti-ARL13B (red) at P16, P21 and P30. Note ARL13B, known to interact with CEP164, does not reach the OS in the absence of CEP164. E, ONL thickness at P12, P16, P21 and P30 in central retina of rodCep164-/- (n = 3–7). ONL thickness is indistinguishable at P12 and P16, but decreases rapidly after P16. * p<0.05, t-test.

Loss of IFT88, IFT57 and IFT140 in rodCep164-/- photoreceptors.

A, B, immunohistochemistry of rodCep164+/- (upper panels) and rodCep164-/- (lower panels) cryosections at P16 probed with anti-IFT88 (A) and anti-IFT57 (B) antibodies. C-E, immunohistochemistry of P21 rodCep164+/- (upper panels) and rodCep164-/- (lower panels) cryosections probed with anti-IFT88 (C), anti-IFT57 (D) and anti IFT140 (E). Insets to the right of main panels show enlargements of individual representative BB/CC structures as indicated by hatched rectangles (left panels) or antibody alone (red). F, red channel pixel intensity of IFT88, IFT57 and IFT140 signal at CC distal end at P21 using 3 animals each. The IFT57 signal was not significant, likely due to higher variance in the control.

SPATA7, CEP290, NPHP1 and FBF1 at the rodCep164-/- CC or BB.

A-D, immunohistochemistry of rodCep164+/- (upper panels) and rodCep164-/- (lower panels) cryosections probed with at P21 probed with anti-SPATA7 (A), anti-CEP290 (B), with anti-NPHP1 (E), and anti-FBF1 (D) antibodies. Note no relevant changes for SPATA7, CEP290, NPHP1 and FBF1 localizations. Insets (right) show enlargements of representative BB/CC structures identified by Egfp-CETN2 or individual antibodies (red). F, red channel pixel intensity of NPHP1, CEP290 and SPATA7 signal at CC at P21 using 3 animals each. None are statistically significant. p>0.05, t-test.

Intravitreal CF-568 hydrazide dye injection.

Dye was injected at P14 (day1) and P18 (day 4) into rodCep164+/-control versus rodCep164-/- eyes on Egfp-Cetn2+ background and retinas were collected at P19 and dissociated rods were imaged. A, panel of rodCep164+/- control rods. B, single enlarged rodCep164+/- rod with P14 (day 4) and P18 (day 1) disc bands. C, single rodCep164-/- rod with new P18 discs, but no P14 discs. D, statistical evaluation of the distance between CC-tip and center of P18 band in control (blue) and rod KO (red) (n = >100), * p<0.05 t-test. E, % rods with P14 and P18 bands in control versus mutant (n = >100). Distributions of two BB-associated proteins, pericentrin (PCNT) and ninein (NIN), were examined in rodCep164-/- photoreceptors. PCNT interacts with numerous proteins including IFT proteins [38], the γ-tubulin ring complex [39], cytoplasmic dynein [40], PCM1 [41] and CEP215 [42], stabilizing microtubules and/or aiding microtubule nucleation [39]. PCNT localizes to the pericentriolar material (PCM) surrounding the BB of mouse photoreceptors [39,43]. Immunohistochemistry reveals that PCNT trails from the BB presumably along microtubules (), upper panel); PCNT localization of P21 rodCep164 BB is unchanged but slightly reduced ( lower panel). In cultured cells, ninein colocalizes with γ-tubulin and C-Nap1, also known as CEP250 [44], and is important for positioning/anchoring the microtubule minus-ends to BB subdistal appendages [45]. Surprisingly, ninein localizes only weakly to the BB of control photoreceptors ( and upper panels), but labels robustly the centrioles of rodCep164 photoreceptors ( and lower panels), using two distinct antibodies (Abclonal or Sigma Aldrich). One explanation of the differential BB labeling is masking of the ninein epitope by another BB protein the localization of which is altered in the Cep164-/- rod. The significance of labeling of the proximal OSs and the rootletin/microtubule area (arrows in and , upper panels) is unclear, but ninein was previously shown to be released from the centrosome to move along microtubules in epithelial cells providing a potential explanation [46].

Disc formation in rodCep164 photoreceptors

All ~800 discs of the mouse OS are renewed every ten days and roughly 80 discs are synthesized every day, moving towards the retina pigmented epithelium (RPE) to be phagocytosed [47]. To identify mechanisms that cause OS degeneration more precisely, we developed a fluorescent dye assay to monitor the formation of closed discs during disc morphogenesis and their fate. As Cre expression varies in each photoreceptor, to some extent, and dye sequesters into new discs in OS per photoreceptor, dissociated photoreceptors were examined independently. CF-568-hydrazide, a water-soluble, membrane impermeable, aldehyde-fixable red-fluorescent dye [48], was injected intravitreally on P14 (day 1) and P18 (day 4) and eyes were harvested on P19 (day 5). Following retina dissociation, rodCep164+/- control photoreceptors show two bands containing red fluorescent discs along the OS (Figs and ) indicating that CF-568 sequestered into the lumen during enclosure of a nascent disc. The two bands are separated by about 10 μm or ~300 discs. Nascent day 1 discs (P18) are located immediately adjacent to the CC (green, identified by EGFP-CETN2), whereas older day 4 discs (P14) are displaced distally towards the retinal pigment epithelium (RPE), as shown by Richard Young [49,50]. Disc morphogenesis occurs as late as day 4 (P18) in rodCep164-/- OSs, albeit slower than controls as newly formed discs appear closer to the distal CC (n = >100, and ). Relative to control OSs, day 4 rodCep164-/- bands are very faint or absent, i.e., only ~5% of KO rods display P14 bands (n = >100, ).

CEP164 deletion by tamoxifen induction

To explore consequences of CEP164 depletion in cones, we deleted Cep164 in Cep164F/F;Prom1-CreERT2 one-month old mice by tamoxifen induction. PROM1 expression in adult mice occurs in rod/cone photoreceptors along with cells of the brain, pancreas, intestine/colon, kidney, lung and reproductive system (male and female) [25]. Cep164F/+;Prom1-CreERT2 mice (, left column), Cep164+/+;Prom1-CreERT2 mice (, middle column) and Cep164F/F;Prom1-CreERT2 mice (tamCep164-/-) (, right column) were injected with tamoxifen at ages ranging from P28 to P30. Intraperitoneal injection of tamoxifen for five consecutive days induced the nuclear translocation of Cre, and the degeneration rate was assessed in retina cryosections of eyes harvested 2–4 weeks post-tamoxifen induction (2-4wPTI) after the first injection.

Tamoxifen-induced deletion of CEP164 in adult mouse.

Row A, Cep164+/F;Prom1-ETCre (injected) (left panel), Cep164+/+;Prom1-ETCre (uninjected) (middle panel) and Cep164;Prom1-ETCre (tamCep164-/-) (injected) (right panels) on EGFP-CETN2 background probed with anti-CEP164. Note near even distribution BB/CCs with and without CEP164 in the knockout panel. Rows B-E, immunohistochemistry of injected control cryosections (left panels), of uninjected Prom1-ETCre cryosections (middle panels) and of tamCep164-/- (right panels) probed with MOE (anti-PDE6) (A), anti-ARL13B (B), or ML-opsin antibody (C, D). Row A is at 2.5wPTI. Rows B-D are at 3wPTI, and row E at 4wPTI. F, BB of injected controls (no Cre), injected heterozygotes (with Cre), uninjected control and tamCep164-/- retina assayed for presence of CEP164 immunoreactivity. Essentially all control BB displayed CEP164; in tamCep164-/- retina, about 40% of BB did not. tamCEP164-/- is P < 0.05 compared to both controls. Numbers in columns refer to animal numbers (n = 3 each). Labeled by anti-PDE6 antibody (MOE), tamCep164-/- rod OSs degenerated slowly and were approximately half-length at 3wPI (, right panel) relative to control OSs ( left and middle panels). tamCep164-/- rod OSs probed with anti-ARL13B ( right panel) revealed that ARL13B is unable to reach the OS in the absence of CEP164, confirming the interaction of these two proteins [22]. tamCep164-/- cone OSs identified by anti-ML-opsin were shorter at 3wPTI ( right panel) compared to controls ( left and middle panels) and ML-opsin mislocalized in part to the cone IS. At 4wPTI, mutant cone OSs were largely degenerated (, right panel). About 60% of tamCep164-/- rods analyzed by confocal microscopy at 2.5wPTI had BBs associated with CEP164, while the rest were CEP164-free (n = 3, and ) indicating a 40% induced knockout efficiency. Anterograde IFT57 and IFT88 showed normal distributions at control BB and CC tips ( and upper panels) ( and ). As expected, IFT57 and IFT88 were absent at the tamCep164-/- CC tip and reduced at BB ( and lower panels), similar to the CEP164 rod knockout at P16. NPHP1 localization at CC was unaffected ().

Immunohistochemistry with anti-IFT57, anti-IFT88 and anti-NPHP1 in tamCep164-/- mice.

A-C, immunohistochemistry of 2.5wPTI tamCep164+/- (upper panels) and tamCep164-/- (lower panels) photoreceptors probed with anti-IFT57 (red) (A), anti-IFT88 (B) and anti-NPHP1 (C) antibodies. Fluorescent signals of IFT57 and IFT88 immunolabeling are reduced in the knockout, NPHP1 is stably bound to the CC. Insets (right) show enlargements of representative BB/CC structure identified by Egfp-CETN2 (green) or individual antibodies (red). Average tamCep164 scotopic a-wave amplitudes, not significantly reduced at 2wPTI, were diminished by 3wPTI (n = 5–7, ) indicating loss of rod function. Statistical evaluation of scotopic a-waves at 2-4wPTI at 1.4 log cd s/m2 confirmed diminished a-wave amplitudes (50% and 45%, respectively) (n = 3–7, ). A-wave amplitudes did not significantly change at a higher light intensity of 2.4 log cd s/m2 for 2wPTI (n = 3–7, and ). Photopic tamCep164 b-waves persistently diminished from 3wPTI down to 40% of control at 4wPTI ( and ). A- and b-wave amplitudes were not reduced further at 6wPTI and 9wPTI (). Pan-retina ERG as a function of light intensity (-4.5 to 2.4 log cd s/m2) did not reveal significant differences of scotopic/photopic a- and b-wave amplitudes at 2wPTI (). At 3wPTI, scotopic ERG showed diminished a- and b-wave amplitudes beginning at 0.6 log cd s/m2. Photopic b-wave amplitudes of control and tamCep164 mice were statistically identical at 2wPTI, but decreased by 3wPTI ().

Electroretinography of control and tamCep164-/- mice.

A, B, average scotopic (A) and photopic ERG (B) at 1.4 log cd s m-2. 2wPTI is shown in solid traces, and 3wPTI in hatched traces. Control-injected traces (blue), control-uninjected traces (green), tamCep164-/- (red). Traces are averaged with N = 5–7. C, D, statistical evaluation of scotopic a-waves (C) and photopic b-wave amplitudes (D) at 2wPTI, 3wPTI and 4wPTI at 1.4 log cd s/m2. Colors as in A and B, number of animals (N) used is shown at the bottom. * p<0.05, ANOVA.

Discussion

Many cell culture studies address the role of CEP164 during BB docking and early ciliogenesis [2,12,31,42] where disruption of CEP164 blocked primary cilium formation [12,51]. Similar results were obtained in zebrafish [12,13,16] and mouse [1,17,52]. Here, we describe effects of CEP164 deletion at three different stages of retina development by conditional recombination using Cre drivers which express Cre beginning at E9 (Six3Cre) [23], in the second postnatal week (iCre75) [24] or in the adult mouse (tamoxifen injection). Six3Cre-driven deletion of CEP164 has no effect on pre-ciliogenesis photoreceptor differentiation or ONL lamination (), but prevents OS formation ( and ), essentially confirming the well-documented role of CEP164 in cultured cells. Loss of CEP164 early leads to rapid rod and cone degeneration centrally with an LCA-like phenotype (). Because CEP164 disruption results in variable patient phenotypes, we reasoned that CEP164 may have additional functions to be revealed during post-ciliogenesis deletion of CEP164. Two drivers express Cre after ciliogenesis (iCre75 and tamoxifen inducible Prom1-CreERT2) when CEP164 is bound to distal appendages and the BB is docked to the apical membrane. Postnatal depletion of CEP164 in rods with iCre75 allows the BB to dock to the cell cortex. Control photoreceptor CC extend axonemes around P6, and OSs are mature at P21. P16 rodCep164 plastic sections do not reveal major morphological changes compared to controls, but the ONL is reduced at P21 (), confirmed by statistical analysis comparing control and rodCep164 ONL thickness (). At P30, only one nuclear row is present in the knockout (). PDE6 mislocalization in the IS was not obvious in the P21 rodCep164 photoreceptors when OSs are disintegrating (), suggesting continuous delivery of PDE6 by its chaperone PDE6D to OSs as OS discs continue to be formed. By contrast, ARL13B is absent in rodCep164 OSs consistent with the observation that ARL13B interacts with CEP164 () [22]. The results suggest that the BB-CC-axoneme structure at the OS base is relatively stable even as the OS degenerates, in contrast to CEP164’s ciliogenesis role where CEP164 is required for recruitment and physical attachment of small preciliary vesicles to the mother centriole and membrane docking. While P16 control and rodCep164 retina morphologies are comparable (), the scotopic a-wave already is reduced at P15 indicating rod degeneration has already begun (), although not statistically significant at this age. In P15 and P21 rodCep164photoreceptors, most BB have lost CEP164 ( and ) but P16 OSs still possess BB-CC structures (). A major finding is that IFT88, IFT57 and IFT140 are depleted gradually after deletion of CEP164 at P16-P21 ( and ), implicating IFT malfunction as the cause of retina degeneration in rodCep164 mice. Similar results were seen in tamoxifen-induction experiments at 2.5WPTI ( and ). Changes in localization and expression levels of PCNT and ninein () suggest that other PCM and subdistal DAPs may be affected by CEP164 deletion. IFT is integral for assembly, maintenance, and function of motile and primary cilia [53,54], relying on molecular motors and IFT particles to move cargo along microtubules in anterograde (heterotrimeric kinesin-2) or retrograde (dynein-2) direction. IFT88 (Tg737) and IFT57 are required for ciliary and Chlamydomonas flagella assembly [55]. IFT57 stabilizes the IFT-B complex in Chlamydomonas flagella [56] and interacts with IFT20 and the kinesin-2 subunit, KIF3B [57]. Germline deletions of IFT88 are embryonically lethal [58,59]. In mouse photoreceptors, a hypomorphic mutation in the IFT88 gene exhibited abnormal OS development and retinal degeneration demonstrating that IFT88 is important for OS maintenance [32]. In conditional retina IFT88 knockouts (retIft88-/-), BBs failed to extend CC [60]. Loss of IFT88 (Tg737) and IFT57 (Hippi) during CEP164 deletion confirms CEP164’s involvement in recruiting these proteins to the photoreceptor BB, first observed in primary cilia [31]. Another DAP protein involved in recruiting IFT-B proteins (IFT88 and IFT52) is C2CD3 (OFD14) which localizes to the distal ends of both mother and daughter centrioles. C2CD3 was shown to recruit IFT88 and IFT52 to the mother centriole [4]. As C2CD3 is required for the recruitment of DAP proteins including CEP164, the effect of recruiting IFT-B proteins may be indirect. Loss of C2CD3 results in shortened centrioles without appendages and failure of CP110 removal from the ciliary mother centriole, a critical step in initiating ciliogenesis. This provides a potential mechanism for the later onset of retinal degeneration in patients with hypomorphic CEP164 mutations. Instability of the OS distal tip with continued disc morphogenesis proximally was also seen in the CF-568 dye assay that allows monitoring of disc morphogenesis, enclosure and displacement in mouse rods (). Intravitreally-injected CF-568-hydrazide [48] is sealed into the disc lumen during the disc enclosure process. The number of labeled discs, limited by available dye, is fewer than 80, the number of discs generated per day. Although disc morphogenesis continued as late as P18, the rate of disc renewal was impaired (. We propose that instability at the rodCep164-/- OS distal tip may be caused by axonemal disintegration as IFT-B proteins dissociate from BB thereby impairing IFT ( and ). IFT cargo in rods is controversial. Current models suggest that rhodopsin and other integral membrane proteins traffic by anterograde IFT, mediated by kinesin-2, along the CC for deposition into nascent discs [61-64]. In our hands iCre75-based conditional knockout of KIF3A, the kinesin-2 obligatory subunit, did not prevent trafficking of rhodopsin and other proteins to the OS [65]. Conditional knockout of KIF3A with Six3Cre prevented CC and axoneme formation, although BB docked to the cell membrane correctly [60]. Conditional knockout of KIF3A and IFT88 in the adult mouse by tamoxifen injection demonstrated that photoreceptor axonemes disintegrate slowly post-induction, starting distally, but rhodopsin and cone pigments traffic normally for more than 2 weeks, a time interval during which the OS is completely renewed. Thus, visual pigments likely transport to the photoreceptor OS despite KIF3A, IFT88 removals and IFT impairment. Alternatively, kinesin-2-mediated anterograde IFT appears to be responsible for photoreceptor transition zone and axoneme formation [60]. CEP164 forms a complex with PDEδ (a prenylated protein chaperone), INPP5E (a farnesylated inositol polyphosphate 5 phosphatase) and ARL13B (GEF of ARL3) to traffic prenylated INPP5E to primary cilia in cell culture [22]. However, INPP5E of WT mouse photoreceptors localizes to the IS, is excluded from the OS, and is apparently independent of PDEδ [66]. Absence of INPP5E in the OS would seem to nullify experiments to show that ARL13B, PDEδ or CEP164 act as chaperones for INPP5E. Connecting cilia and short rudimentary OSs form in retInpp5e-/- photoreceptors, but without axonemal structure and discs [66]. ARL13B localizes to WT OSs, but in retArl13b-/- [67] and retCep164-/- photoreceptors (), CC and OS fail to form and ARL13B accumulates in the IS. In rodCep164-/- photoreceptors, OSs form but ARL13B is barely detectable at P16 and absent at P21 (), while in tamCep164-/- photoreceptors, ARL13B is depleted in OS (, right panel). These observations are consistent with [22] who show that ARL13B and CEP164 interact to enable ARL13B to reach the cilium, but not with [17] where ARL13B accumulated in CEP164-KO multiciliated cells. Thus, the functional network consisting of ARL13B, INPP5E, PDEδ and CEP164 is an arrangement of primary cilia for INPP5E and ARL13B to traffic to cilia, but is conserved only partially in photoreceptors.

Summary

Deletion of CEP164 in photoreceptors before ciliogenesis prevented BB docking as shown in primary cilia, leading to rapid rod/cone degeneration resembling LCA. Deletion of CEP164 after ciliogenesis and BB docking reveals that BB/CC/OS structure lacking CEP164 is initially stable. Post-ciliogenesis deletion of CEP164 causes loss of IFT proteins and impairment of IFT, an essential transport mechanism for OS assembly and maintenance. Impairment of IFT is demonstrated by a fluorescent dye assay that labels newly generated discs. In rodCep164-/- rods, discs that travel to the mid-distal OS degenerate, while disc morphogenesis continues proximally at a slower rate, consistent with axoneme damage and IFT impairment. We favor a model in which the rodCep164-/- axoneme is ill-maintained as IFT-B proteins dissociate from the BB, causing OS degeneration as IFT trains fail. Loss of IFT88 and IFT57 during CEP164 deletion suggests that CEP164 recruits anterograde IFT proteins to the BB as proposed by [31], and identifies CEP164 and DAP structure as integral for initiating IFT.

Materials and methods

Ethics statement

All mice were handled in accordance with NIH guidelines, and all protocols were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) of the University of Utah (Protocol 18–11005).

Animals

Prom1tm1(cre/ERT2)Gilb (Stock No: 017743) and Egfp-Cetn2 mice Stock No. 008234—CB6-Tg(CAG-EGFP/CETN2)3-4Jgg/J) were obtained from The Jackson Laboratory. iCre75 mice were generated in Utah [24]. Cep164F/F mice were described previously [17].

Generation of retina- and rod-knockout mice

Cep164F/F mice were crossed with Six3Cre [23] or iCre75 transgenic mice [24] kept on Egfp-Cetn2 background to generate Cep164 F/+;Six3Cre;Egfp-Cetn2 (retCep164+/-) or Cep164 F/+;iCre75;Egfp-Cetn2 (rodCep164+/-) mice. Mice were then backcrossed to Cep164F/F to generate experimental animals.

Generation of knockouts by tamoxifen induction

Cep164F/F mice were bred to Prom1-CreERT2 mice [25] to generate Cep164F/+;Prom1-CreERT2 mice. Expression of CreERT2 is driven by the prominin 1 (Prom1) promoter/enhancer. Cep164F/+;Prom1-CreERT2 mice were bred to Cep164F/F mice to generate mice for tamoxifen injection. Tamoxifen was administered via intraperitoneal injection in adult mice (P28-P30 at time of first injection). Tamoxifen was dissolved in corn oil to a stock solution of 20mg/ml. Mice were dosed with 150 mg/kg body weight for 5 consecutive days according to their weight on the first day of injection (i.e., 7.5 μL of 20mg/ml tamoxifen solution per gram weight). ERG and eye collection for confocal immunolocalization were performed 2–9 weeks after the first injection.

Genotyping

Genomic DNA was extracted from fresh tissue by dissolving tail clips or retina DNA from P8-12 day old mice in 150 μL tail lysis buffer at 50–60°C for 1–2 hour. Digests were centrifuged at 15000 rpm for 5 minutes. Supernatant was added to an equal volume of isopropanol and centrifuged at 15000 rpm for 5 minutes. The DNA pellet was rehydrated in 75 μL H2O. Genotyping was achieved by polymerase chain reaction with EconoTaq DNA polymerase (Lucigen). Primers for genotyping of CEP164 mice: 5’-CCATCTGTCCAGTACCATTAAAAA and 5’-CCCAGAATACAACATGGGAGA (WT allele, 215 bp; floxed allele, 415 bp). The CEP164 exon 4 excision assay used CEP164 floxed allele F1 primer, 5’-CCATCTGTCCAGTACCATTAAAAA and R2 primer 5’-GACAAGTTCCATCTACCACAATC (WT allele 1525 bp; Floxed allele 1696 bp; Exon 4 excision allele 719 bp).

Dye injection

CF-568-hydrazide is a water soluble, membrane impermeable, aldehyde-fixable red-fluorescent dye [48]. Heterozygous control (rodCep164F/+;Egfp-Cetn2) and knockout (rodCep164F/F;Egfp-Cetn2) eyes were injected intravitreally with 1.5 μL of 0.5% CF-568-hydrazide [48] in 1x PBS on P14 and P18, and retinas were harvested on P19, at which time about half OS-length has been replaced. Treated retinas were dissociated mechanically and images acquired using a Zeiss LSM 800 microscope.

Immunohistochemistry

Eyes were embedded without fixation, or fixed 10 minutes or 1 hour in 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA) in 0.1M phosphate buffer (pH 7.4) and embedded in OCT (Fisher). Sections were allowed to adhere to slides for 30 minutes at 37°C. Eyes embedded without initial fixation had the OCT compound dissolved by adding a small volume of 1X PBS, holding stationary for 5 minutes at room temperature, and then adding 1:1 methanol-acetone for 10 minutes at 4°C. Slides were rehydrated by washing either 10 minutes (X3) or 5 minutes (X4) in 1X PBS. All sections used were from the central retina near the optic nerve, except when labeled as peripheral. Sections were blocked in 5% normal goat serum (NGS); 0.1% Triton in 1X PBS (for 1 hour 4% PFA fixation) or 5% NGS in 1X PBS (for 10 minutes 4% PFA or 10 minutes methanol-acetone fixation) for 1 hour. Antibodies, fixation, dilutions and sources: PDE6 (1 hour 4% PFA, 1:1000; MOE Cytosignal) [64]; OPN1MW/OPN1LW (1 hour 4% PFA, 1:500, Millipore Sigma AB5405) [65]; CEP164 (10 m minutes in 4% PFA, 1:350, Sigma-Aldrich); ARL13B (1 hour 4% PFA,1:350, ProteinTech); IFT57 (10 minutes 4% PFA, 1:200, Pazour lab); IFT88 (10 minutes 4% PFA, 1:200, Pazour lab); IFT120 (10 minutes 4% PFA, 1:150, Pazour lab); SPATA7 (10 minutes 4% PFA, 1:100, Chen lab, purified as described [35]); CEP290 (10 minutes 4% PFA, 1:300, Swaroop laboratory); PCNT (10 minutes 4% PFA, 1:250, Covance); Ninein (10 minutes 4% PFA, 1:100, Abclonal and Sigma-Aldrich); NPHP1 (10 minutes 4% PFA, 1:100, [68]); FBF1 (10 minutes methanol-acetone fix, 1:200, Proteintech). Primary antibodies were diluted in blocking buffer and applied to sections; sections were then incubated overnight at 4°C. Slides were washed for 10 minutes (X3) or 5 minutes (X4) in 1X PBS. Secondary antibodies were diluted in blocking buffer (goat anti-rabbit Alexa Fluor 555, 1:1000 (Invitrogen 32732); goat anti-mouse Alexa Fluor 555, 1:1000 (Invitrogen 32737); DAPI, 1:3000), applied to the sections and incubated with rotation, in the dark, for 1 hour at room temperature. Slides were washed for 10 minutes (X3) or 5 minutes (X4) in 1X PBS. Slides were dipped briefly in deionized H2O, and coverslipped using Fluoromount-G Mounting Medium (Southern Biotech). Images were acquired using a Zeiss LSM 800 confocal microscope with 63X objective and post-processed with Airyscan. All genotypes of a given age and antibody were imaged at a single z-plane using identical settings for laser intensity and master gain. Digital gain was 1 for all images. Pinhole size was set for 1AU on the red channel (39 μm for the 40X objective). Post-processing of non-saturated images consisted of equal adjustments to brightness/contrast of control and knockout images using Adobe Photoshop but without affecting the conclusions. Red channel separation was obtained by isolating the R-channel in the “blender options” of Adobe Photoshop.

Intensity measurements

We used the average pixel intensity of a drawn region of interest (ROI) function in Zen Blue. For IFT markers, a circle ROI was drawn around the distal tip of the CC, as determined by the Cetn2-EGFP signal. Over 30 cells were counted across 3 different confocal images and averaged per mouse. For CC markers, a rectangular ROI was drawn around the CC and average intensity measured. We performed a two-tailed Student’s t-Test to compare controls to knockouts. Microsoft Excel function "T.TEST assuming equal variances, two-tailed" was used to calculate the p-value, with statistical significance determined using an alpha value of p < 0.05.

Electroretinography

Scotopic and photopic ERG measurements were performed using P16 and P25 for Six3Cre experiments and P16, P21, or P30 mice for the iCre75 experiments and at 2, 3, 4, 6 or 9 weeks post-tamoxifen induction for the Prom1-CreERT2 experiments. Prior to ERG the mice were dark-adapted overnight and anesthetized with intraperitoneal injection of 1% ketamine/0.1% xylazine at 10 μl/g body weight. The mice were kept warm during ERG by using a temperature-controlled stage. Scotopic and photopic responses were recorded as described [66] using a UTAS BigShot Ganzfeld system (LKC Technologies, Gaithersburg, MD). Scotopic single-flash responses were recorded at stimulus intensities of -4.5 log cd s·m-2 [log candela seconds per square meter] to 2.4 log cd s·m-2). Mice were light-adapted under a background light of 1.48 log cd s·m-2 for 5 minutes prior to measuring photopic responses. Photopic single-flash responses of control and knockout were recorded at stimulus intensities of -0.1 log cd s·m-2 to 1.9 log cd s·m-2.

Statistical analysis

We performed an unbalanced two-factor ANOVA to compare mutant and control mice for their quantified a- and b-wave ERG response across multiple ages or weeks post-tamoxifen induction. Post-hoc multiple comparison was performed using Tukey’s honestly significant difference criterion. Statistical significance was determined using an alpha value of p < 0.05. ERG statistics were computed using MATLAB’s statistical toolbox "anovan" and "multcompare" functions. We performed a two-tailed Student’s t-Test assuming equal variances to compare ONL thickness for retCep164+/-, retCep164-/-, rodCep164+/- and rodCep164-/-. Retina measurements used for these calculations were determined based on an average of three measurements per retina. Microsoft Excel function "T.TEST assuming equal variances, two-tailed" was used to calculate the p-value, with statistical significance determined using an alpha value of p < 0.05.

CEP164 localizes to BB docked at the inner segment membrane.

A, immunolocalization of CEP164 (red) in P21 Cep164+/+;Egfp-Cetn2 (green) photoreceptors. CEP164 is an inner segment protein associating with basal bodies (BBs). B, BB enlargement with connecting cilium (CC) and daughter centriole (DC). Expression of transgenic Egfp-CETN2 identifies the CC, BB (= mother centriole, MC) and DC. C, BB docking pathway, ciliogenesis and IFT. a, centrosome consisting of MC and DC; MC and DC distal ends are capped by CP110/CEP97 (green). b, MC acquires distal appendage proteins (DAPs, light blue) and CEP164 (red). c, TTBK2 (tau tubulin kinase 2) phosphorylates DAPs which removes the terminal cap and allows docking. MC matures to BB. d, BB cap removal permits extension of A- and B-tubules to form an axoneme and transition zone (TZ). e, BB/TZ acquire IFT proteins and kinesin-2 to assist IFT. f, IFT delivers subunits to extend the axoneme and initiate disc morphogenesis. g, deletion of CEP164 post-ciliogenesis leads to loss of IFT protein and cell death. (TIF) Click here for additional data file.

Generation of CEP164 conditional knockout mice.

A, stages of rod photoreceptor ciliogenesis. E9 depicts a progenitor cell in which Six3Cre is expressed. At P0-P1, the centrosome consisting of mother (MC) and daughter (DC) centrioles acquires a ciliary vesicle (CV) distally. From P3-P4, the mother centriole docks to the cortex of the inner segment (IS). During P5-P6, an axoneme emanates from the MC and MC becomes a basal body (green). A- and B-tubules (black) extend at P7-P8, and the transition zone (TZ) becomes established. As plasma membrane evaginates and discs assemble, the rod outer segment (OS) is considered mature at three weeks of age (P21). Adapted from [21], with permission from Elsevier. B, gene structures of human centrosomal protein 164 kDa (CEP164; upper) and mouse Cep164 (lower) consisting of a single WW (yellow) and three coiled-coiled (CC) domains. Positions of mutations associated with human nephronophthisis (NPHP) and retina degeneration are indicated. Asterisk above mouse CEP164 indicates the truncation point of our conditional knockout. C, schematic of Cep164 exons 1–7 and conditional Cep164 allele with loxP recombination sites flanking exon 4. The FRT site originates from flippase removing the gene trap. D, Cre-induced recombination (driven by Six3Cre, iCre75 or Prom1-ETCre) excises exon 4 and generates a null allele. (TIF) Click here for additional data file.

Genotyping.

A-E, PCR amplification for the presence of WT and floxed Cep164 alleles (A), as well as Six3Cre (B), iCre75 (C), EGFP-CETN2 (D), and Prom1-ETCre (E) transgenes from tail DNA. F, verification of exon 4 excision using primers, F1 and R2, and P6 retCep164-/- retina DNA as template. G, rod knockout verification of exon 4 excision using primers, F1 and R2, and P16 rodCep164-/- retina DNA as template. Lane 1, size markers; lane 2, +/F DNA; lane 3, F/F DNA; lane 4, +/F DNA with iCre75; lane 5, F/F DNA and iCre75; lane 6, water control. Note knockout (-/-) is complete in lane 5. H, genotyping of tamoxifen-induced CEP164 deletion at 2.5 weeks post-tamoxifen injection (2.5wPTI). Lane 1, +/F uninjected without Prom1EtCre. Lane 2, +/+ injected without Prom1ETCre. Lane 3, F/F injected with Prom1-ETCre (KO). Lane 4, water control. Note floxed exon 4 is still present and knockout is incomplete. (TIF) Click here for additional data file.

Cep164 rod knockout histology.

A, B, retina morphology at P16 (A) and P21 (B). Note mutant OSs are still full-length at P16, but reduced by P21. (TIF) Click here for additional data file.

Red channel pixel intensity at P16.

Pixel intensities of IFT88, IFT57 and IFT140 at rodCep164-/- CC distal end were not significant, p>0.05. Three animals each were used. (TIF) Click here for additional data file.

Immunohistochemistry with anti-PCNT and anti-ninein.

A-C, immunohistochemistry of P21 rodCep164+/- (upper panels) and rodCep164-/- cryosections (lower panels) probed with antibodies (red) directed against PCNT (A), ninein with Abclonal antibody (B) and Sigma-Aldrich antibody (C). Pericentrin locates to the pericentriolar material surrounding the BB (yellow); PCNT levels appear slightly reduced in rodCep164-/-. Ninein is a subdistal appendage protein associated with centrioles in tissue culture; in rods ninein is very weak at the BB but present in the proximal axoneme of control rods (B, upper panels) or rootlet/microtubule area (C, upper panels) (arrows in B and C enlargements). Panels to the right, enlargements of representative BB/CCs identified by EGFP-CETN2 (green) or individual antibodies (red). (TIF) Click here for additional data file.

Evaluation of scotopic a-wave and photopic b-wave amplitudes of tamoxifen-induced knockouts versus controls.

A-D, statistical evaluation of scotopic a-wave (A, B) and photopic b-wave (C, D) amplitudes measured at light intensities of 1.4 log cd s/m2 (A, C) and 2.4 log cd s/m2 (B, D) at 2–9 wPTI. That OSs do not completely degenerate may be due to insufficient tamoxifen, or the PROM1 promoter unable to express higher levels of ETCre. (TIF) Click here for additional data file.

ERG measurements post-tamoxifen induction.

A-C, amplitudes (μV) of scotopic a-wave (A), scotopic b-wave (B) and photopic b-wave (C) as a function of light intensity (log cd s m-2). Scotopic and photopic ERGs show statistically distinct responses at 3wPTI (^, p < .05, ANOVA at 2wPTI; *, p<0.05 ANOVA at 3wPTI). (TIF) Click here for additional data file.

Model of photoreceptor CEP164-mediated intraflagellar transport.

A, during anterograde (directed toward the microtubule plus-end) IFT, kinesin-2 (KIF3A, KIF3B and KAP subunits) moves cargo along the proximal axoneme (microtubule doublet). Cargo likely consists of IFT-A and -B particles, retrograde dynein-2 motors, and axoneme building blocks and stabilizing factors. Mechanisms concerning axoneme maintenance is currently unclear. B, loss of IFT-A and -B particles, caused by CEP164 depletion, terminates IFT and photoreceptor OSs degenerate. (TIF) Click here for additional data file.
  67 in total

1.  Retina- and ventral forebrain-specific Cre recombinase activity in transgenic mice.

Authors:  Y Furuta; O Lagutin; B L Hogan; G C Oliver
Journal:  Genesis       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 2.487

2.  Cep164 triggers ciliogenesis by recruiting Tau tubulin kinase 2 to the mother centriole.

Authors:  Lukáš Čajánek; Erich A Nigg
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-06-30       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Roscovitine blocks collecting duct cyst growth in Cep164-deficient kidneys.

Authors:  Rannar Airik; Merlin Airik; Markus Schueler; Carlton M Bates; Friedhelm Hildebrandt
Journal:  Kidney Int       Date:  2019-05-08       Impact factor: 10.612

Review 4.  Molecular basis for photoreceptor outer segment architecture.

Authors:  Andrew F X Goldberg; Orson L Moritz; David S Williams
Journal:  Prog Retin Eye Res       Date:  2016-06-01       Impact factor: 21.198

5.  Small molecular fluorescence dyes for immuno cell analysis.

Authors:  Janine Jiang; Xue Li; Fei Mao; Xingyong Wu; Yong Chen
Journal:  Anal Biochem       Date:  2020-12-09       Impact factor: 3.365

6.  Molecular mechanisms underlying the role of the centriolar CEP164-TTBK2 complex in ciliopathies.

Authors:  Ivan Rosa E Silva; Lucia Binó; Christopher M Johnson; Trevor J Rutherford; David Neuhaus; Antonina Andreeva; Lukáš Čajánek; Mark van Breugel
Journal:  Structure       Date:  2021-09-08       Impact factor: 5.006

7.  Ninein is released from the centrosome and moves bi-directionally along microtubules.

Authors:  David K Moss; Gemma Bellett; Jane M Carter; Mirjana Liovic; Jennifer Keynton; Alan R Prescott; E Birgitte Lane; Mette M Mogensen
Journal:  J Cell Sci       Date:  2007-08-14       Impact factor: 5.285

8.  Cep164 mediates vesicular docking to the mother centriole during early steps of ciliogenesis.

Authors:  Kerstin N Schmidt; Stefanie Kuhns; Annett Neuner; Birgit Hub; Hanswalter Zentgraf; Gislene Pereira
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  2012-12-17       Impact factor: 10.539

9.  Prominin 1 marks intestinal stem cells that are susceptible to neoplastic transformation.

Authors:  Liqin Zhu; Paul Gibson; D Spencer Currle; Yiai Tong; Robert J Richardson; Ildar T Bayazitov; Helen Poppleton; Stanislav Zakharenko; David W Ellison; Richard J Gilbertson
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2008-12-17       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  The renewal of photoreceptor cell outer segments.

Authors:  R W Young
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  1967-04       Impact factor: 10.539

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.