| Literature DB >> 36072668 |
Lili Pan1, Zhuoguang Li1, Zhe Su1, Wei Su1, Rongfei Zheng1, Weiyan Chen2, Xuezhi He3, Jianming Song4, Shoulin Li5, Pengqiang Wen6.
Abstract
Background: Desert hedgehog (DHH), as a member of the Hedgehog (HH) family, is mainly involved in testicular development and peripheral nerve sheath formation. A DHH variant has been identified in patients with 46, XY gonadal dysgenesis (46, XY GD) with or without neuropathy, but few reports mention the involvement of other complications. Case presentation: Here, we report a Chinese female patient who was hospitalized at 14.3 years old due to slow breast development for more than 1 year. She had a female genitalia phenotype and breast development started at 13 years old but progressed slowly. She was not yet menarche on admission, and she had intermittent muscle cramps in her hands and feet. Her karyotype analysis was 46, XY and the SRY gene was positive. Surgical exploration revealed no uterus or ovaries, and the pathology of bilateral gonads was dysplastic testis tissue, which was consistent with partial gonadal dysgenesis (PGD). Genetic analysis identified a homozygous pathogenic variant in DHH exon 3 (c.1027T>C, p. Cys343Arg). During the 6-year follow-up, she received estrogen replacement therapy, resulting in breast development progression without gender dysphoria. However, her peripheral neuropathy became more obvious, and a nerve conduction study (NCS) indicated decreased nerve conduction velocity and action potential. In addition, she also suffered complications such as obesity, insulin resistance, fatty liver, and gastric ulcers.Entities:
Keywords: 46, XY gonadal dysgenesis; DHH; Hedgehog signaling pathway; complications; neuropathy
Year: 2022 PMID: 36072668 PMCID: PMC9441908 DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2022.954288
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Genet ISSN: 1664-8021 Impact factor: 4.772
Comparison of NCS results during the follow-up of the present patient.
| Age (years) | Median nerves (left/right) | Tibial nerves (left/right) | Sural nerves (left/right) | F–M latency (ms) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MCV (m/s) | SCV (m/s) | CMAP (mV) | MCV (m/s) | CMAP (mV) | SCV (m/s) | SNAP (mV) | ||
| 15.4 | 49.1/49.3 | 44.4/46.0 | 13.9/17.3 | 39.0/34.7 | 7.2/5.8 | 39.1/39.7 | 7.9/5.2 | 54.7/56.6 |
| 18.4 | 48.6/46.1 | 43.1/42.3 | 15.5/16.0 | 34.9/35.5 | 5.1/5.0 | 38.5/36.2 | 4.2/2.4 | 55.1/- |
| Reference mean value | 62.0 ± 5.3 | 60.6 | 10.5 ± 3.68 | 45.5 ± 3.8 | 14.92 ± 3.37 | 52.1 ± 5.1 | 8.67 ± 2.12 | 47.4 ± 3.3 |
MCV, motor nerve conduction velocity; SCV, sensory never conduction velocity; CMAP, compound motor action potential; SNAP, sensory nerve action potential.
FIGURE 1Pathological results of bilateral gonads. Note: (A) (HE × 50) and (C) (HE × 200): left gonad, spermatogonia could be seen in seminiferous tubules; (B) (HE × 100) and (D) (HE × 200): right gonad, adenoid hyperplasia of testicular hilar cells could be seen.
FIGURE 2Sonogram of neurosonography. Note: Transverse sections (A,C,E): punctate hyperechoic; longitudinal sections (B,D,F): diffuse hyperechoic, less clear texture. A and B: median nerve; C and D: tibial nerve; E and F: peroneal nerve; arrows: the area shown was an abnormal signal on neurosonography.
Clinical features of reported patients with DHH variant caused 46, XY gonadal dysgenesis.
| Author (time) |
| Variation type | Age (years) | Social gender | Chief complaint | Neuropathy | Gonadal pathology | Gonad tumors | Müllerian duct structure |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| c.2T>C | Hom | 27 | Female | Amenorrhea | + | PGD | – | Naive uterus |
|
| c.485T>C | Hom | 16 | Female | NM | NM | CGD | – | Naive uterus |
| c.1086delG | Hom | 19 | Female | NM | NM | CGD | Gonadoblastoma | Naive uterus | |
| c.1086delG | Hom | 26 | Female | NM | NM | CGD | Dysgerminoma | Naive uterus | |
|
| c.57_60dupAGCC | Hom | 17 | Female | Amenorrhea | – | CGD | – | Naive uterus |
| c.271_273delGAG | Hom | 26 | Female | Amenorrhea | – | CGD | – | Naive uterus | |
|
| c.371G>A | Hom | 23 | Female | Amenorrhea | + | PGD | Gonadoblastoma, seminoma | Blind-end vagina, no uterus |
| c.371G>A | Hom | 30 | Female | Amenorrhea | + | PGD | Seminoma | Blind-end vagina, no uterus | |
|
| c.519G>T | Hom | 26 | Female | Amenorrhea | + | NM | NM | – |
| c.519G>T | Hom | 23 | Female | Amenorrhea | – | NM | NM | NM | |
|
| c.304-572_492dup | Hom | 55 | Female | Amenorrhea | + | CGD | – | Naive uterus |
| c.304-572_492dup | Hom | 47 | Female | Amenorrhea | + | CGD | – | Naive uterus | |
|
| c.554C>A | Hom | 54 | Female | Amenorrhea | + | PGD | – | – |
|
| c.491G>C | Hom | 14 | Female | Amenorrhea | – | PGD | – | – |
|
| c.528C>A, | cHet | 21 | Female | Amenorrhea | – | NM | NM | NM |
| c.1011delC | |||||||||
| c.528C>A, | cHet | 2.8 | Male | AEG | – | NM | NM | NM | |
| c.634G>A | |||||||||
|
| c.782C>T, c.680C>T | cHet | NM | Female | AEG | – | PGD | – | Blind-end vagina, no uterus |
| c.746G>A, c.508G>A | cHet | NM | Male | AEG | – | NM | NM | – | |
|
| c.724T>C | Hom | Adult | Female | Amenorrhea | – | CGD | NM | – |
| c.734G>C, c.680C>T | cHet | Adult | Female | AEG | – | PGD | NM | – | |
|
| c.491G>C | Hom | 19 | Female | Amenorrhea | – | CGD | – | – |
|
| c.863G>C | Hom | 22 | Female | DDSSC | – | NM | NM | – |
|
| c.419T>G | Hom | 14 | Female | DDSSC | + | PGD | – | Blind-end vagina, no uterus |
| c.419T>G | Hom | 14 | Female | DDSSC | + | PGD | – | Blind-end vagina, no uterus | |
|
| c.1156insG, | cHet | Adult | Female | Amenorrhea, poorly developed breasts | NM | CGD | NM | NM |
| c.997A>G | |||||||||
| This case | c.1027T>C | Hom | 14.3 | Female | DDSSC | + | PGD | – | Blind-end vagina, no uterus |
+, Positive, existed after evaluation; –: Negative, did not exist after evaluation; NM, not mentioned; Hom, homozygous; cHet, compound heterozygotes; AEG, abnormal external genitalia; DDSSC, delayed development of secondary sexual characteristics; PGD, partial gonadal dysgenesis; CGD, complete gonadal dysgenesis.