Literature DB >> 36071921

HEARTS in the Americas appraisal checklist and clinical pathway for comprehensive hypertension management in primary care.

Andres Rosende1, Donald DiPette2, Jeffrey Brettler3, Gonzalo Rodríguez4, Eric Zuniga5, Kenneth Connell6, Pedro Ordunez1.   

Abstract

Cardiovascular diseases are the leading cause of mortality and morbidity in the Region of the Americas, and hypertension represents its main risk factor. However, population hypertension control rates in the Region are poor. Global Hearts is the World Health Organization's flagship initiative to reduce the burden of cardiovascular diseases. HEARTS in the Americas Initiative is its regional adaptation that seeks to be the cardiovascular disease risk management model, including hypertension and diabetes, in primary health care throughout the Americas by 2025. HEARTS in the Americas is being implemented in 22 countries and over 2 095 primary care centers. All implementing countries have defined their treatment protocols, and HEARTS in the Americas has supported continuous improvement. Because WHO recently released the 2021 Guideline for the Pharmacological Treatment of Hypertension in Adults and HEARTS in the Americas introduced the key drivers for hypertension control, the initiative generated a methodology to help countries update and strengthen their treatment protocols. This article describes the process of developing the treatment protocol appraisal checklist and defines the resulting clinical pathway. This tool can help countries and primary care centers to improve their protocols by identifying the improvement points and upgrading clinical pathways.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Americas; Cardiovascular diseases; clinical protocols; critical pathways; hypertension; practice guideline; public health

Year:  2022        PMID: 36071921      PMCID: PMC9440731          DOI: 10.26633/RPSP.2022.125

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rev Panam Salud Publica        ISSN: 1020-4989


Cardiovascular diseases (CVD) are the leading cause of premature mortality and morbidity in the Americas, accounting for 2 million deaths annually and a substantial negative socioeconomic impact (1). In terms of their risk factors high blood pressure is the most relevant one (2). In Latin America and the Caribbean, more than one-third of adults live with hypertension. However, even though the treatment of hypertension is very cost-effective, relatively easy, and safe, only 23% of men and 35% of women are controlled (blood pressure < 140/90 mmHg) (3). The Global HEARTS Initiative is a broad strategy launched in 2016 by the World Health Organization (WHO) to reduce premature CVD morbidity and mortality through the implementation of health policies at the population level and strengthening CVD management in primary health care settings (4). The Pan American Health Organization (PAHO), the regional office of the WHO, initiated HEARTS in the Americas, a comprehensive CVD risk reduction program, which is poised to become the Americas' CVD care management model by 2025 (5). It is currently being implemented and expanded in 22 countries and more than 2 095 primary health care (PHC) facilities. Its fundamental goals are improved coverage and control of hypertension and CVD risk reduction in the population served. HEARTS in the Americas is based on six technical pillars; one of the most relevant includes standardized treatment protocols and medications (5). Accordingly, the initiative created a pragmatic methodology to advance standardized and effective hypertension treatment protocols (6) based on a defined shortlist of ideal antihypertensive medications (7). As a result, most HEARTS countries are progressively moving from their current (immediately implementable) protocols—based on the best available pharmacologic options for each country— to acceptable protocols emphasizing the use of two-drug combination medications in the initial management of the newly diagnosed individual with hypertension, and are taking steps to develop and implement preferred protocols, stressing the inclusion of fixed-dose combination medications in a single pill which includes molecules with ideal characteristics (8). At the end of 2021, WHO launched the Guideline for the Pharmacological Treatment of Hypertension in Adults (9). In parallel, HEARTS in the Americas Innovation Group (IG) agreed on the key drivers to improve hypertension control, a set of evidence-based recommendations to make specific clinical and managerial process improvements at the PHC setting (10). Based on these two developments (9,10) supported by extensive systematic reviews, HEARTS in the Americas developed a methodology to help countries update and strengthen their treatment protocols. As a result, an appraisal checklist was created to identify potential points of improvement in the current treatment protocols. This checklist directly led to the development of the HEARTS Clinical Pathway for Hypertension and CVD Risk Management. The clinical pathway concept comprises a multifactorial intervention for the mutual decision-making and organization of care processes for a well-defined group of patients during a well-defined period (11). The HEARTS clinical pathway meets these requirements, and its core remains a practical and effective treatment protocol. This article aims to describe the process of developing the treatment protocol appraisal checklist and define the resulting clinical pathway. These tools can help countries and PHC centers enhance their protocols by identifying the improvement points and developing clinical pathways.

WHO HYPERTENSION GUIDELINE AND HEARTS IN THE AMERICAS KEY DRIVERS FOR HYPERTENSION CONTROL

The new WHO hypertension guideline (9) has a remarkable implementation profile. For instance, it emphasizes a lower blood pressure threshold for initiating pharmacological treatment, increased use of CVD risk assessment in treatment decisions such as lower blood pressure treatment targets in high CVD-risk patients, the importance of using standardized and simple treatment algorithms/protocols, more substantial consideration for the use of two medications (two-pills or, preferably, a single-pill, fixed-dose combination) in the initial treatment, and the relevance of timely patient follow-up and implementation of team-based care, among others (12). Furthermore, based on the study of the most successful and innovative hypertension programs globally, the HEARTS in the Americas IG defined eight evidence-based hypertension control key drivers categorized into five domains: Diagnosis (blood pressure measurement accuracy and CVD risk evaluation) Treatment (standardized treatment protocol and treatment intensification) Continuity of care and follow-up Delivery system (team-based care, medication refill) System for performance evaluation Implementing the key drivers for hypertension control will allow PHC facilities to guide their program implementation, enhance their culture of quality improvement and ultimately improve hypertension control while serving as a model for other non-communicable diseases management at the PHC level in diverse settings (10).

HEARTS IN THE AMERICAS, TREATMENT PROTOCOL APPRAISAL CHECKLIST

HEARTS in the Americas established a core advisory group of physicians and university professors from high and middle-income countries with proven clinical experience in hypertension management (internal medicine, cardiology, nephrology, and public health experts) and in-depth knowledge of the HEARTS model (5). The first goal was to design a standardized methodology to upgrade current treatment protocols by identifying specific improvement points. To this end, the advisory group defined the attributes and components of a preferred treatment protocol and then created an appraisal checklist. The preferred protocol was based on the recommendations derived from the treatment protocol model recommended by the WHO HEARTS technical package (13), the HEARTS in the Americas specific recommendations to improve treatment protocols (8), the 2021 WHO hypertension guideline (9), and the HEARTS in the Americas key drivers for hypertension control (10). As a result, the advisory group developed a treatment protocol evaluation checklist proposal. This proposal underwent a broad consultative process involving the treatment protocol groups from each HEARTS implementing country. After several rounds of iterations, the tool was agreed upon by a broad consensus. The resulting appraisal checklist comprises 34 questions in three domains: 1) requirements to optimize protocol implementation, 2) hypertension treatment, and 3) CVD risk management. (Table 1) Each of the questions selected was accompanied by operational definitions, the evidence´s certainty, recommendation type, and background source.
TABLE 1.

Treatment protocol appraisal checklist. HEARTS in the Americas (summary version)

Domains

Specific questions about the current treatment protocol[*]

Requirements to optimize protocol implementation

1. Does the protocol establish a clear course of action?

2. Does the protocol have a linear (non-branching) structure?

3. Is the protocol PHC based?

4. How many treatment steps are in the protocol? (Considering 4 optimal to 6 acceptable)

5. Does the protocol include a hypertension screening strategy for all adults?

6. Does the protocol promote a strategy that allows BP measurement by certified non-physician health workers?

7. Does the protocol explicitly establish repeat BP measurement if the first BP reading is elevated?

8. Does the protocol indicate an assessment of treatment adherence?

9. Does the protocol establish a follow-up visit every 2-4 weeks until BP control is achieved?

10. Does the protocol establish a follow-up visit every 3-6 months for low- and moderate-risk patients once the BP is under control?

11. Does the protocol establish a follow-up visit every 3 months or less for patients with established CVD, calculated high CVD risk, diabetes, or chronic kidney disease once the BP is under control?

12. Does the protocol promote medication titration by non-physician personnel under monitoring and by protocol?

13. Does the protocol include the healthy lifestyle recommendations?

14. Does the protocol fit into a strategy that ensures a 3-month supply of medications for the patient?

15. Can the protocol be applied to manage most cases of hypertension?

Hypertension treatment

16. Does the protocol establish pharmacological therapy immediately after confirming a SBP ≥ 140 mmHg or a DBP ≥ 90 mmHg?

17. Does the protocol intensify medication titration whenever an elevated BP is confirmed?

18. Does the protocol establish a target < 140/90 mmHg among the general adult population?

19. Does the protocol contain only first-line medications recommended in current guidelines? (Long-acting: ACEi/ARB/CCB/TZ-TZL)

20. Does the protocol define specific medications?

21. Does the protocol define specific medication dosages?

22. Does the protocol explicitly establish that medication is taken at a single daily time?

23. Does the protocol recommend two medications combination treatment for all patients in the initial pharmacological treatment step once hypertension has been diagnosed?

24. Does the protocol recommend fixed-dose combination antihypertensive medications?

25. Is the antihypertensive pharmacological treatment prescribed by the protocol independent of complementary patient evaluations?

Cardiovascular risk management

26. Does the protocol recommend assessing CVD risk in all patients with hypertension?

27. Is antihypertensive treatment initiated immediately regardless of CVD risk assessment?

28. Is antihypertensive treatment initiated after confirming a SBP ≥ 130 mmHg in patients with established CVD?

29. Does the protocol establish a treatment target of a SBP < 130 mmHg in patients with established CVD?

30. Among patients without previous CVD, is antihypertensive treatment initiated after confirming a SBP ≥ 130 mmHg in patients with calculated high CVD risk, diabetes or chronic kidney disease?

31. Among patients without previous CVD, does the protocol establish a treatment target of a SBP < 130 mmHg in patients with calculated high CVD risk, diabetes or chronic kidney disease?

32. Does the protocol recommend adding high-intensity statin therapy in patients with established CVD?

33. Among patients without previous CVD, does the protocol recommend adding moderate- to high intensity statin therapy in patients with calculated high CVD risk, diabetes or chronic kidney disease?

34. Does the protocol recommend adding low-dose aspirin in patients with established CVD?

Each question in the appraisal checklist has a closed option list that includes the following: Yes; No; Partially; Not available.

HEARTS IN THE AMERICAS, A COMPREHENSIVE CLINICAL PATHWAY

A standardized, simple, directive, and algorithmic protocol represents a significant step forward in improving hypertension's clinical management (14). However, a recurring concern from HEARTS implementing countries is that HEARTS treatment protocol seems too top-down and is focused primarily on hypertension. Indeed, implementing countries called for a more comprehensive and inclusive clinical and management tool. In this context, the new WHO hypertension guideline and the HEARTS in the Americas key drivers for hypertension control represented timely incentives to move towards a comprehensive standardized clinical pathway. Domains Specific questions about the current treatment protocol[*] Requirements to optimize protocol implementation 1. Does the protocol establish a clear course of action? 2. Does the protocol have a linear (non-branching) structure? 3. Is the protocol PHC based? 4. How many treatment steps are in the protocol? (Considering 4 optimal to 6 acceptable) 5. Does the protocol include a hypertension screening strategy for all adults? 6. Does the protocol promote a strategy that allows BP measurement by certified non-physician health workers? 7. Does the protocol explicitly establish repeat BP measurement if the first BP reading is elevated? 8. Does the protocol indicate an assessment of treatment adherence? 9. Does the protocol establish a follow-up visit every 2-4 weeks until BP control is achieved? 10. Does the protocol establish a follow-up visit every 3-6 months for low- and moderate-risk patients once the BP is under control? 11. Does the protocol establish a follow-up visit every 3 months or less for patients with established CVD, calculated high CVD risk, diabetes, or chronic kidney disease once the BP is under control? 12. Does the protocol promote medication titration by non-physician personnel under monitoring and by protocol? 13. Does the protocol include the healthy lifestyle recommendations? 14. Does the protocol fit into a strategy that ensures a 3-month supply of medications for the patient? 15. Can the protocol be applied to manage most cases of hypertension? Hypertension treatment 16. Does the protocol establish pharmacological therapy immediately after confirming a SBP ≥ 140 mmHg or a DBP ≥ 90 mmHg? 17. Does the protocol intensify medication titration whenever an elevated BP is confirmed? 18. Does the protocol establish a target < 140/90 mmHg among the general adult population? 19. Does the protocol contain only first-line medications recommended in current guidelines? (Long-acting: ACEi/ARB/CCB/TZ-TZL) 20. Does the protocol define specific medications? 21. Does the protocol define specific medication dosages? 22. Does the protocol explicitly establish that medication is taken at a single daily time? 23. Does the protocol recommend two medications combination treatment for all patients in the initial pharmacological treatment step once hypertension has been diagnosed? 24. Does the protocol recommend fixed-dose combination antihypertensive medications? 25. Is the antihypertensive pharmacological treatment prescribed by the protocol independent of complementary patient evaluations? Cardiovascular risk management 26. Does the protocol recommend assessing CVD risk in all patients with hypertension? 27. Is antihypertensive treatment initiated immediately regardless of CVD risk assessment? 28. Is antihypertensive treatment initiated after confirming a SBP ≥ 130 mmHg in patients with established CVD? 29. Does the protocol establish a treatment target of a SBP < 130 mmHg in patients with established CVD? 30. Among patients without previous CVD, is antihypertensive treatment initiated after confirming a SBP ≥ 130 mmHg in patients with calculated high CVD risk, diabetes or chronic kidney disease? 31. Among patients without previous CVD, does the protocol establish a treatment target of a SBP < 130 mmHg in patients with calculated high CVD risk, diabetes or chronic kidney disease? 32. Does the protocol recommend adding high-intensity statin therapy in patients with established CVD? 33. Among patients without previous CVD, does the protocol recommend adding moderate- to high intensity statin therapy in patients with calculated high CVD risk, diabetes or chronic kidney disease? 34. Does the protocol recommend adding low-dose aspirin in patients with established CVD? Each question in the appraisal checklist has a closed option list that includes the following: Yes; No; Partially; Not available. Thus, although the clinical pathway maintained the HEARTS' standardized hypertension treatment protocol as its core, it expanded its scope to innovatively incorporate and harmonize other relevant elements to improve hypertension and the CVD secondary prevention management, the main goals of HEARTS in the Americas. (Figure 1)
FIGURE 1.

HEARTS in the Americas Hypertension Clinical Pathway

The resulting standardized clinical pathway reflects “the ABCs” of CVD prevention and treatment. Indeed, it has been designed to cover most of the population, be team-driven rather than physician-centered, and actively involve patients and caregivers, all essential tenets of the chronic care model (15). Step A advises a standardized technique for blood pressure measurement, includes a broad screening strategy, and recommends using automated and clinically validated blood pressure measuring devices for accurate blood pressure measurement (16,17). Step B encourages the healthcare team to use the HEARTS app to estimate CVD risk in all patients, but not delay the initiation of treatment if needed, and stratify them according to their CVD risk level to select the best clinical approach (18). Finally, step C is the heart of the clinical pathway. This outlines a standardized treatment protocol, including pharmacological and non-pharmacological recommendations for hypertension and a comprehensive and pragmatic approach to CVD secondary prevention in PHC. Furthermore, the HEARTS clinical pathway highlights the approach to patients with established CVD, diabetes, and chronic kidney disease. CVD risk stratification sets different blood pressure thresholds to initiate antihypertensive pharmacologic treatment, control goals, and specific recommendations for aspirin and statins. This pharmacological treatment protocol uses only four steps for medication titration at maximum, systematically repeats blood pressure measurement in each visit among patients over the target, establishes a monthly interval visit until blood pressure control is achieved, and indicates minimum follow-up intervals according to CVD risk level. Finally, it includes recommendations for COVID, influenza, and pneumococcus immunizations. The overall goal of the clinical pathway is to enhance the quality of care, reduce the unjustified clinical performance variability, improve risk-adjusted patient outcomes, promote patient safety, increase patient participation and satisfaction, and optimize the use of resources.

PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS

PHC teams must support their clinical and management activities on evidence-based best practices to improve hypertension and CVD risk management. In addition, recommendations must be clear, directive, and operationalized through a standardized implementation tool to be effective. Therefore, the treatment protocol appraisal checklist and the clinical pathway adopted by HEARTS in the Americas meet all these requirements, keeping the simplicity and pragmatism necessary to facilitate its implementation. The treatment protocol appraisal checklist allows each HEARTS implementing country to initiate a process to identify areas for improvement and then plan the changes needed to enable new treatment protocols. Moreover, adopting a standardized clinical pathway allows the more comprehensive operationalization of the WHO hypertension guideline (9) and the implementation of HEARTS in the Americas key drivers for hypertension control in PHC (10). In addition, this clinical pathway is aligned with the HEARTS System for Monitoring Evaluation indicators, a tool designed by HEARTS in the Americas (19) to guide and catalyze health system changes. This process is expected to lead to changes in care management organization and positively impact the selection and upgrade of medication formularies and the education and training of care teams. This work is expected to be completed by the end of 2022, resulting in more effective and practical treatment protocols and a robust and comprehensive clinical pathway. In conclusion, the ultimate goal of the HEARTS clinical pathway is to facilitate the successful implementation of a new model of care, increase hypertension control, improve CVD risk management, and optimize the use of resources through more active and informed engagement of health teams and patients.

Disclaimer.

PO, AR, DD, JB, GR, EZ and KC are staff members or consultants of the Pan American Health Organization. Authors hold sole responsibility for the views expressed in this manuscript, which may not necessarily reflect the opinion or policy of the Revista Panamericana de Salud Pública/Pan American Journal of Public Health and/or those of the Pan American Health Organization.
  13 in total

Review 1.  WHO HEARTS: A Global Program to Reduce Cardiovascular Disease Burden: Experience Implementing in the Americas and Opportunities in Canada.

Authors:  Norm R C Campbell; Pedro Ordunez; Gloria Giraldo; Yenny A Rodriguez Morales; Cintia Lombardi; Taskeen Khan; Raj Padwal; Ross T Tsuyuki; Cherian Varghese
Journal:  Can J Cardiol       Date:  2020-12-10       Impact factor: 5.223

2.  Drivers and scorecards to improve hypertension control in primary care practice: Recommendations from the HEARTS in the Americas Innovation Group.

Authors:  Jeffrey W Brettler; Gloria P Giraldo Arcila; Teresa Aumala; Allana Best; Norm Rc Campbell; Shana Cyr; Angelo Gamarra; Marc G Jaffe; Mirna Jimenez De la Rosa; Javier Maldonado; Carolina Neira Ojeda; Modesta Haughton; Taraleen Malcolm; Vivian Perez; Gonzalo Rodriguez; Andres Rosende; Yamilé Valdés González; Peter W Wood; Eric Zúñiga; Pedro Ordunez
Journal:  Lancet Reg Health Am       Date:  2022-05

3.  São Paulo call to action for the prevention and control of high blood pressure: 2020.

Authors:  Norm R C Campbell; Aletta E Schutte; Cherian V Varghese; Pedro Ordunez; Xin-Hua Zhang; Taskeen Khan; James E Sharman; Paul K Whelton; Gianfranco Parati; Michael A Weber; Marcelo Orías; Marc G Jaffe; Andrew E Moran; Frida Liane Plavnik; Venkata S Ram; Michael Brainin; Mayowa O Owolabi; Augstin J Ramirez; Eduardo Barbosa; Luiz Aparecido Bortolotto; Daniel T Lackland
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2019-11-25       Impact factor: 3.738

4.  Recommended treatment protocols to improve management of hypertension globally: A statement by Resolve to Save Lives and the World Hypertension League (WHL).

Authors:  Marc G Jaffe; Thomas R Frieden; Norman R C Campbell; Kunihiro Matsushita; Lawrence J Appel; Daniel T Lackland; Xin Hua Zhang; Arumugam Muruganathan; Paul K Whelton
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2018-04-27       Impact factor: 3.738

5.  Hypertension Pharmacological Treatment in Adults: A World Health Organization Guideline Executive Summary.

Authors:  Akram Al-Makki; Donald DiPette; Paul K Whelton; M Hassan Murad; Reem A Mustafa; Shrish Acharya; Hind Mamoun Beheiry; Beatriz Champagne; Kenneth Connell; Marie Therese Cooney; Nnenna Ezeigwe; Thomas Andrew Gaziano; Agaba Gidio; Patricio Lopez-Jaramillo; Unab I Khan; Vindya Kumarapeli; Andrew E Moran; Margaret Mswema Silwimba; Brian Rayner; Apichard Sukonthasan; Jing Yu; Nizal Saraffzadegan; K Srinath Reddy; Taskeen Khan
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2021-11-15       Impact factor: 10.190

6.  Worldwide trends in hypertension prevalence and progress in treatment and control from 1990 to 2019: a pooled analysis of 1201 population-representative studies with 104 million participants.

Authors: 
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2021-08-24       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  The HEARTS app: a clinical tool for cardiovascular risk and hypertension management in primary health care.

Authors:  Pedro Ordunez; Carlos Tajer; Thomas Gaziano; Yenny A Rodriguez; Andres Rosende; Marc G Jaffe
Journal:  Rev Panam Salud Publica       Date:  2022-03-28

8.  Standardized treatment to improve hypertension control in primary health care: The HEARTS in the Americas Initiative.

Authors:  Donald J DiPette; Kenneth Goughnour; Eric Zuniga; Jamario Skeete; Emily Ridley; Sonia Angell; Jeffrey Brettler; Norm R C Campbell; Antionio Coca; Kenneth Connell; Rohit Doon; Marc Jaffe; Patricio Lopez-Jaramillo; Andrew Moran; Marcelo Orias; Daniel J Pineiro; Andres Rosende; Yamilé Valdés González; Pedro Ordunez
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2020-10-12       Impact factor: 3.738

9.  Brief online certification course for measuring blood pressure with an automated blood pressure device. A free new resource to support World Hypertension Day Oct 17, 2020.

Authors:  Norm R C Campbell; Tej Khalsa; Pedro Ordunez; Yenny A Rodriguez Morales; Xin-Hua Zhang; Gianfranco Parati; Raj Padwal; Ross T Tsuyuki; Lyne Cloutier; James E Sharman
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2020-09-03       Impact factor: 3.738

10.  Lancet Commission on Hypertension group position statement on the global improvement of accuracy standards for devices that measure blood pressure.

Authors:  James E Sharman; Eoin O'Brien; Bruce Alpert; Aletta E Schutte; Christian Delles; Michael Hecht Olsen; Roland Asmar; Neil Atkins; Eduardo Barbosa; David Calhoun; Norm R C Campbell; John Chalmers; Ivor Benjamin; Garry Jennings; Stéphane Laurent; Pierre Boutouyrie; Patricio Lopez-Jaramillo; Richard J McManus; Anastasia S Mihailidou; Pedro Ordunez; Raj Padwal; Paolo Palatini; Gianfranco Parati; Neil Poulter; Michael K Rakotz; Clive Rosendorff; Francesca Saladini; Angelo Scuteri; Weimar Sebba Barroso; Myeong-Chan Cho; Ki-Chul Sung; Raymond R Townsend; Ji-Guang Wang; Tine Willum Hansen; Gregory Wozniak; George Stergiou
Journal:  J Hypertens       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 4.776

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.