Literature DB >> 36071300

Omniparticle Contrast Agent for Multimodal Imaging: Synthesis and Characterization in an Animal Model.

Neil Robertson1,2,3, Lorenzo Sempere1,2,3, Elizabeth Kenyon1,3, Christiane Mallet2,3,4, Kylie Smith3,4,5, Jeremy Hix2,3,4, Alan Halim1,3, Jinda Fan2,3,4,5, Anna Moore6,7,8.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Individual imaging modalities have certain advantages, but each suffers from drawbacks that other modalities may overcome. The goal of this study was to create a novel contrast agent suitable for various imaging modalities that after a single administration can bridge and strengthen the collaboration between the research fields as well as enrich the information obtained from any one modality. PROCEDURES: The contrast agent platform is based on dextran-coated iron oxide nanoparticles (for MRI and MPI) and synthesized using a modified co-precipitation method, followed by a series of conjugation steps with a fluorophore (for fluorescence and photoacoustic imaging), thyroxine (for CT imaging), and chelators for radioisotope labeling (for PET imaging). The fully conjugated agent was then tested in vitro in cell uptake, viability, and phantom studies and in vivo in a model of intraductal injection and in a tumor model.
RESULTS: The agent was synthesized, characterized, and tested in vitro where it showed the ability to produce a signal on MRI/MPI/FL/PA/CT and PET images. Studies in cells showed the expected concentration-dependent uptake of the agent without noticeable toxicity. In vivo studies demonstrated localization of the agent to the ductal tree in mice after intraductal injection with different degrees of resolution, with CT being the best for this particular application. In a model of injected labeled tumor cells, the agent produced a signal with all modalities and showed persistence in tumor cells confirmed by histology.
CONCLUSIONS: A fully functional omniparticle contrast agent was synthesized and tested in vitro and in vivo in two animal models. Results shown here point to the generation of a potent signal in all modalities tested without detrimental toxicity. Future use of this agent includes its exploration in various models of human disease including image-guided diagnostic and therapeutic applications.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to World Molecular Imaging Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Animal models; Multimodal imaging; Omniparticle contrast agent

Year:  2022        PMID: 36071300     DOI: 10.1007/s11307-022-01770-w

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol        ISSN: 1536-1632            Impact factor:   3.484


  50 in total

Review 1.  Molecular imaging of inflammation/infection: nuclear medicine and optical imaging agents and methods.

Authors:  A Signore; S J Mather; G Piaggio; G Malviya; R A Dierckx
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2010-05-12       Impact factor: 60.622

Review 2.  Nanomaterials for In Vivo Imaging.

Authors:  Bryan Ronain Smith; Sanjiv Sam Gambhir
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2017-01-03       Impact factor: 60.622

3.  Molecular Targeting Nanoprobes with Non-Overlap Emission in the Second Near-Infrared Window for in Vivo Two-Color Colocalization of Immune Cells.

Authors:  Guang-Tao Yu; Meng-Yao Luo; Hao Li; Song Chen; Biao Huang; Zhi-Jun Sun; Ran Cui; Mingxi Zhang
Journal:  ACS Nano       Date:  2019-10-23       Impact factor: 15.881

Review 4.  Quantitative multimodality imaging in cancer research and therapy.

Authors:  Thomas E Yankeelov; Richard G Abramson; C Chad Quarles
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-08-12       Impact factor: 66.675

Review 5.  Integrating molecular nuclear imaging in clinical research to improve anticancer therapy.

Authors:  Elisabeth G E de Vries; Laura Kist de Ruijter; Marjolijn N Lub-de Hooge; Rudi A Dierckx; Sjoerd G Elias; Sjoukje F Oosting
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 66.675

6.  Magnetic Particle Imaging: A Novel in Vivo Imaging Platform for Cancer Detection.

Authors:  Elaine Y Yu; Mindy Bishop; Bo Zheng; R Matthew Ferguson; Amit P Khandhar; Scott J Kemp; Kannan M Krishnan; Patrick W Goodwill; Steven M Conolly
Journal:  Nano Lett       Date:  2017-02-21       Impact factor: 11.189

Review 7.  Pathology, imaging, and treatment of cardiac tumours.

Authors:  Joseph J Maleszewski; Nandan S Anavekar; Timothy J Moynihan; Kyle W Klarich
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2017-04-24       Impact factor: 32.419

8.  Tomographic magnetic particle imaging of cancer targeted nanoparticles.

Authors:  Hamed Arami; Eric Teeman; Alyssa Troksa; Haydin Bradshaw; Katayoun Saatchi; Asahi Tomitaka; Sanjiv Sam Gambhir; Urs O Häfeli; Denny Liggitt; Kannan M Krishnan
Journal:  Nanoscale       Date:  2017-12-07       Impact factor: 7.790

9.  Dual-Modal Imaging-Guided Precise Tracking of Bioorthogonally Labeled Mesenchymal Stem Cells in Mouse Brain Stroke.

Authors:  Seungho Lim; Hong Yeol Yoon; Hee Jeong Jang; Sukyung Song; Woojun Kim; Jooho Park; Kyung Eun Lee; Sangmin Jeon; Sangmin Lee; Dong-Kwon Lim; Byung-Soo Kim; Dong-Eog Kim; Kwangmeyung Kim
Journal:  ACS Nano       Date:  2019-10-11       Impact factor: 15.881

10.  A brain tumor molecular imaging strategy using a new triple-modality MRI-photoacoustic-Raman nanoparticle.

Authors:  Moritz F Kircher; Adam de la Zerda; Jesse V Jokerst; Cristina L Zavaleta; Paul J Kempen; Erik Mittra; Ken Pitter; Ruimin Huang; Carl Campos; Frezghi Habte; Robert Sinclair; Cameron W Brennan; Ingo K Mellinghoff; Eric C Holland; Sanjiv S Gambhir
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2012-04-15       Impact factor: 53.440

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.