Literature DB >> 36070116

Development and Validation of Machine Learning Models to Predict Readmission After Colorectal Surgery.

Kevin A Chen1, Chinmaya U Joisa2, Karyn B Stitzenberg1, Jonathan Stem1, Jose G Guillem1, Shawn M Gomez2, Muneera R Kapadia3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Readmission after colorectal surgery is common and often implies complications for patients and costs for hospitals. Previous works have created predictive models using logistic regression for this outcome but have shown limited accuracy. Machine learning has shown promise in improving predictions by identifying non-linear patterns in data. We sought to create a more accurate predictive model for readmission after colorectal surgery using machine learning.
METHODS: Patients who underwent colorectal surgery were identified in the National Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database including years 2012-2019 and split into training, validation, and test sets. The primary outcome was readmission within 30 days of surgery. Three types of machine learning models were created, including random forest (RF), gradient boosting (XGB), and neural network (NN). A logistic regression (LR) model was also created for comparison. Model performance was evaluated using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC).
RESULTS: The dataset included 213,827 patients after application of exclusion criteria. A total of 23,083 (10.8%) of patients experienced readmission. NN obtained an AUROC of 0.751 (95% CI 0.743-0.759), compared with 0.684 (95% CI 0.676-0.693) for LR. RF and XGB performed similarly with AUROCs of 0.749 (95% CI 0.741-0.757) and 0.745 (95% CI 0.737-0.753) respectively. Ileus, index admission length of stay, organ-space surgical site infection present at time of surgery, and ostomy placement were identified as the most contributory variables.
CONCLUSIONS: Machine learning approaches outperformed traditional statistical methods in the prediction of readmission after colorectal surgery. After external validation, this improved prediction model could be used to target interventions to reduce readmission rate.
© 2022. The Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Artificial intelligence; Colorectal; Machine learning; Readmission

Year:  2022        PMID: 36070116     DOI: 10.1007/s11605-022-05443-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg        ISSN: 1091-255X            Impact factor:   3.267


  20 in total

1.  Readmission Adversely Affects Survival in Surgical Rectal Cancer Patients.

Authors:  Sophia Y Chen; Miloslawa Stem; Susan L Gearhart; Bashar Safar; Sandy H Fang; Nilofer S Azad; Adrian G Murphy; Amol K Narang; Christopher L Wolfgang; Jonathan E Efron
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  Risk factors of unplanned readmission after colorectal surgery: a prospective, multicenter study.

Authors:  D Guinier; G A Mantion; A Alves; F Kwiatkowski; K Slim; Y Panis
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 4.585

Review 3.  Transitional care interventions and hospital readmissions in surgical populations: a systematic review.

Authors:  Caroline E Jones; Robert H Hollis; Tyler S Wahl; Brad S Oriel; Kamal M F Itani; Melanie S Morris; Mary T Hawn
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2016-06-01       Impact factor: 2.565

4.  The use of artificial neural networks to predict delayed discharge and readmission in enhanced recovery following laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery.

Authors:  N K Francis; A Luther; E Salib; L Allanby; D Messenger; A S Allison; N J Smart; J B Ockrim
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2015-06-19       Impact factor: 3.781

5.  Clinical and financial impact of hospital readmissions after colorectal resection: predictors, outcomes, and costs.

Authors:  Rachelle N Damle; Nicole B Cherng; Julie M Flahive; Jennifer S Davids; Justin A Maykel; Paul R Sturrock; W Brian Sweeney; Karim Alavi
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 4.585

Review 6.  Risk factors for 30-d readmission after colorectal surgery: a systematic review.

Authors:  Rachelle N Damle; Karim Alavi
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  2015-06-26       Impact factor: 2.192

7.  Predicting the Risk of Readmission From Dehydration After Ileostomy Formation: The Dehydration Readmission After Ileostomy Prediction Score.

Authors:  Sophia Y Chen; Miloslawa Stem; Marcelo Cerullo; Joseph K Canner; Susan L Gearhart; Bashar Safar; Sandy H Fang; Jonathan E Efron
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 4.585

8.  Transparent Reporting of a multivariable prediction model for Individual Prognosis or Diagnosis (TRIPOD): explanation and elaboration.

Authors:  Karel G M Moons; Douglas G Altman; Johannes B Reitsma; John P A Ioannidis; Petra Macaskill; Ewout W Steyerberg; Andrew J Vickers; David F Ransohoff; Gary S Collins
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2015-01-06       Impact factor: 25.391

9.  Complications after discharge predict readmission after colorectal surgery.

Authors:  Jeremy Albright; Farwa Batool; Robert K Cleary; Andrew J Mullard; Edward Kreske; Jane Ferraro; Scott E Regenbogen
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-08-27       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Using machine learning to predict early readmission following esophagectomy.

Authors:  Siavash Bolourani; Mohammad A Tayebi; Li Diao; Ping Wang; Vihas Patel; Frank Manetta; Paul C Lee
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2020-05-29       Impact factor: 5.209

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.