BACKGROUND: All-cause readmission rates in patients undergoing ileostomy formation are as high as 20% to 30%. Dehydration is a leading cause. No predictive model for dehydration readmission has been described. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to develop and validate the Dehydration Readmission After Ileostomy Prediction scoring system to predict the risk of readmission for dehydration after ileostomy formation. DESIGN: Patients who underwent ileostomy formation were identified using the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program data set (2012-2015). Predictors for dehydration were identified using multivariable logistic regression analysis and translated into a point scoring system based on corresponding β-coefficients using 2012-2014 data (derivation). Model discrimination was assessed with receiver operating characteristic curves using 2015 data (validation). SETTINGS: This study used the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. PATIENTS: A total of 8064 (derivation) and 3467 patients (validation) were included from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Dehydration readmission within 30 days of operation was measured. RESULTS: A total of 8064 patients were in the derivation sample, with 2.9% (20.1% overall) readmitted for dehydration. Twenty-five variables were queried, and 7 predictors were identified with points assigned: ASA class III (4 points), female sex (5 points), IPAA (4 points), age ≥65 years (5 points), shortened length of stay (5 points), ASA class I to II with IBD (7 points), and hypertension (9 points). A 39-point, 5-tier risk category scoring system was developed. The model performed well in derivation (area under curve = 0.71) and validation samples (area under curve = 0.74) and passed the Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test. LIMITATIONS: Limitations of this study pertained to those of the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program, including a lack of generalizability, lack of ileostomy-specific variables, and inability to capture multiple readmission International Classification of Diseases, 9/10 edition, codes. CONCLUSIONS: The Dehydration Readmission After Ileostomy Prediction score is a validated scoring system that identifies patients at risk for dehydration readmission after ileostomy formation. It is a specific approach to optimize patient factors, implement interventions, and prevent readmissions. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/A746.
BACKGROUND: All-cause readmission rates in patients undergoing ileostomy formation are as high as 20% to 30%. Dehydration is a leading cause. No predictive model for dehydration readmission has been described. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to develop and validate the Dehydration Readmission After Ileostomy Prediction scoring system to predict the risk of readmission for dehydration after ileostomy formation. DESIGN:Patients who underwent ileostomy formation were identified using the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program data set (2012-2015). Predictors for dehydration were identified using multivariable logistic regression analysis and translated into a point scoring system based on corresponding β-coefficients using 2012-2014 data (derivation). Model discrimination was assessed with receiver operating characteristic curves using 2015 data (validation). SETTINGS: This study used the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. PATIENTS: A total of 8064 (derivation) and 3467 patients (validation) were included from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Dehydration readmission within 30 days of operation was measured. RESULTS: A total of 8064 patients were in the derivation sample, with 2.9% (20.1% overall) readmitted for dehydration. Twenty-five variables were queried, and 7 predictors were identified with points assigned: ASA class III (4 points), female sex (5 points), IPAA (4 points), age ≥65 years (5 points), shortened length of stay (5 points), ASA class I to II with IBD (7 points), and hypertension (9 points). A 39-point, 5-tier risk category scoring system was developed. The model performed well in derivation (area under curve = 0.71) and validation samples (area under curve = 0.74) and passed the Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test. LIMITATIONS: Limitations of this study pertained to those of the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program, including a lack of generalizability, lack of ileostomy-specific variables, and inability to capture multiple readmission International Classification of Diseases, 9/10 edition, codes. CONCLUSIONS: The Dehydration Readmission After Ileostomy Prediction score is a validated scoring system that identifies patients at risk for dehydration readmission after ileostomy formation. It is a specific approach to optimize patient factors, implement interventions, and prevent readmissions. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/A746.
Authors: Eric B Schneider; Omar Hyder; Benjamin S Brooke; Jonathan Efron; John L Cameron; Barish H Edil; Richard D Schulick; Michael A Choti; Christopher L Wolfgang; Timothy M Pawlik Journal: J Am Coll Surg Date: 2012-01-29 Impact factor: 6.113
Authors: Donald J Lucas; Elliott R Haut; Elizabeth M Hechenbleikner; Elizabeth C Wick; Timothy M Pawlik Journal: JAMA Surg Date: 2014-08 Impact factor: 14.766
Authors: Ian M Paquette; Patrick Solan; Janice F Rafferty; Martha A Ferguson; Bradley R Davis Journal: Dis Colon Rectum Date: 2013-08 Impact factor: 4.585
Authors: Evangelos Messaris; Rishabh Sehgal; Susan Deiling; Walter A Koltun; David Stewart; Kevin McKenna; Lisa S Poritz Journal: Dis Colon Rectum Date: 2012-02 Impact factor: 4.585
Authors: Puja M Shah; Lily Johnston; Bethany Sarosiek; Amy Harrigan; Charles M Friel; Robert H Thiele; Traci L Hedrick Journal: Dis Colon Rectum Date: 2017-02 Impact factor: 4.585
Authors: Caroline J Rieser; Jurgis Alvikas; Heather Phelos; Lauren B Hall; Amer H Zureikat; Andrew Lee; Melanie Ongchin; Matthew P Holtzman; James F Pingpank; David L Bartlett; M Haroon A Choudry Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2022-01-06 Impact factor: 5.344
Authors: Kevin A Chen; Chinmaya U Joisa; Karyn B Stitzenberg; Jonathan Stem; Jose G Guillem; Shawn M Gomez; Muneera R Kapadia Journal: J Gastrointest Surg Date: 2022-09-07 Impact factor: 3.267
Authors: Taryn E Hassinger; Elizabeth D Krebs; Florence E Turrentine; Robert H Thiele; Bethany M Sarosiek; Sook C Hoang; Charles M Friel; Traci L Hedrick Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2020-05-11 Impact factor: 4.584
Authors: Caroline J Rieser; Lauren B Hall; Eliza Kang; Amer H Zureikat; Matthew P Holtzman; James F Pingpank; David L Bartlett; M Haroon A Choudry Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2021-01-23 Impact factor: 5.344
Authors: Elizabeth J Austin; Jen Neukirch; Thuan D Ong; Louise Simpson; Gabrielle N Berger; Carolyn Sy Keller; David R Flum; Elaine Giusti; Jennifer Azen; Giana H Davidson Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2020-08-31 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Alberto A Uribe; Tristan E Weaver; Marco Echeverria-Villalobos; Luis Periel; Haixia Shi; Juan Fiorda-Diaz; Alicia Gonzalez-Zacarias; Mahmoud Abdel-Rasoul; Lin Li Journal: Front Surg Date: 2021-12-08