| Literature DB >> 36061901 |
Melkamu Aderajew Zemene1, Netsanet Worku Mengistu2, Solomon Gedlu Nigatu3.
Abstract
Background: Undernutrition among adolescent girls is still a major public health problem in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Even though the global prevalence of thinness among adolescent girls declined over time, it remains steady in LMICs including Ethiopia. Therefore, this study aimed to assess the trends and factors associated with thinness.Entities:
Keywords: Ethiopia; adolescent girls; multilevel; multivariate decomposition; thinness
Year: 2022 PMID: 36061901 PMCID: PMC9434017 DOI: 10.3389/fnut.2022.933895
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Nutr ISSN: 2296-861X
Percentage distribution of characteristics of adolescent girls in 2000, 2005, 2011, and 2016 Ethiopian demographic and health surveys.
| Variables | Category | Weighted frequency (%) | |||
| EDHS 2000 ( | EDHS 2005 ( | EDHS 2011 ( | EDHS 2016 ( | ||
| Age | 15 | 876 (25.4) | 307 (20.2) | 968 (26) | 663 (21.5) |
| 16 | 763 (22.1) | 318 (21) | 778 (20.9) | 668 (21.6) | |
| 17 | 618 (17.9) | 267 (17.6) | 591 (15.8) | 581 (18.8) | |
| 18 | 733 (21.2) | 403 (26.5) | 874 (23.5) | 790 (25.6) | |
| 19 | 466 (13.4) | 221 (14.7) | 513 (13.8) | 385 (12.5) | |
| Residence | Urban | 771 (22.3) | 327 (21.6) | 997 (26.8) | 730 (23.6) |
| Rural | 2,685 (77.7) | 1,189 (78.4) | 2,727 (73.2) | 2,357 (76.4) | |
| Region | Tigray | 217 (6.3) | 112 (7.4) | 286 (7.7) | 252 (8.1) |
| Afar | 31 (0.9) | 11 (0.7) | 28 (0.7) | 25 (0.8) | |
| Amhara | 789 (22.8) | 351 (23.2) | 1,062 (28.5) | 737 (23.9) | |
| Oromia | 1,465 (42.3) | 549 (36.2) | 1,380 (37.0) | 1,119 (36.2) | |
| Somali | 38 (1.1) | 34 (2.2) | 57 (1.5) | 86 (2.8) | |
| Ben-Gumz | 38 (1.1) | 12 (0.8) | 36 (0.9) | 29 (0.9) | |
| SNNP | 652 (18.9) | 341 (22.5) | 637 (17.1) | 601 (19.5) | |
| Gambela | 7 (0.2) | 3 (0.2) | 16 (0.4) | 8 (0.3) | |
| Harari | 8 (0.2) | 5 (0.3) | 9 (0.3) | 6 (0.2) | |
| Addis Ababa | 193 (5.6) | 90 (6.0) | 196 (5.3) | 206 (6.7) | |
| Dire dawa | 17 (0.5) | 7 (0.5) | 14 (0.4) | 17 (0.5) | |
| Marital status | Not married | 2,827 (81.8) | 1,248 (82.3) | 3,175 (85.3) | 2,660 (86.2) |
| Married | 629 (18.2) | 268 (17.7) | 549 (14.7) | 427 (13.8) | |
| Religion | Orthodox | 1,760 (51.0) | 774 (51.0) | 1,875 (51.2) | 1,337 (43.3) |
| Muslim | 1,011 (29.2) | 406 (27.0) | 972 (26.6) | 948 (30.7) | |
| Protestant | 512 (14.8) | 287 (18.9) | 739 (20.2) | 760 (24.6) | |
| Others | 173 (5.0) | 48 (3.1) | 72 (1.9) | 42 (1.4) | |
| Educational status | No education | 2,072 (60) | 596 (39.3) | 604 (16.2) | 415 (13.4) |
| 10 | 943 (27.2) | 665 (43.9) | 2,643 (71.0) | 1,963 (63.6) | |
| 20 and above | 442 (12.8) | 255 (16.8) | 477 (12.8) | 709 (23.0) | |
| Wealth index | Poorest | – | 230 (15.2) | 613 (16.5) | 423 (13.7) |
| Poorer | – | 265 (17.4) | 645 (17.3) | 501 (16.2) | |
| Middle | – | 284 (18.7) | 634 (17.0) | 579 (18.8) | |
| Richer | – | 271 (18.0) | 831 (22.3) | 670 (21.7) | |
| Richest | – | 466 (30.7) | 1,001 (26.9) | 913 (29.6) | |
| Occupation status | Not working | 1,535 (44.4) | 1,073 (70.8) | 1,882 (50.5) | 1,807 (58.5) |
| Working | 1,921 (55.6) | 443 (29.2) | 1,842 (49.5) | 1,280 (41.5) | |
| Family size | <6 | 1,914 (55.4) | 859 (56.6) | 2,137 (57.4) | 1,878 (60.8) |
| =6 | 1,542 (44.6) | 658 (43.4) | 1,587 (42.6) | 1,209 (39.2) | |
| HH head | Male | 2,660 (77.0) | 1,150 (75.9) | 2,691 (73.3) | 2,293 (74.3) |
| Female | 796 (23.0) | 366 (24.1) | 1,033 (27.7) | 794 (25.7) | |
| Age of HH head | <46 | 1,770 (51.2) | 699 (46.1) | 1,867 (50.1) | 1,423 (46.1) |
| =46 | 1,686 (48.8) | 817 (53.9) | 1,857 (49.9) | 1,664 (53.9) | |
| Toilet type | Unimproved | 2,624 (76) | 1,321 (87.1) | 3,027 (81.3) | 2,578 (83.5) |
| Improved | 832 (24) | 195 (12.9) | 697 (18.7) | 509 (16.5) | |
| Drinking water source | Unimproved | 2,526 (73) | 1,084 (71.5) | 2,521 (67.7) | 1,465 (47.5) |
| Improved | 930 (27) | 432 (28.5) | 1,203 (32.3) | 1,622 (52.5) | |
| Ever drink alcohol | No | – | – | 2,193 (58.9) | 2,111 (68.4) |
| Yes | – | – | 1,531 (41.1) | 976 (31.6) | |
| Ever chew chat | No | – | – | 3,528 (94.7) | 2,865 (92.8) |
| Yes | – | – | 196 (5.3) | 222 (7.2) | |
| Media exposure | No | 1,980 (57) | 623 (41.1) | 839 (22.5) | 1,461 (47.3) |
| Yes | 1,476 (43) | 893 (58.9) | 2,885 (77.5) | 1,626 (52.7) | |
| Anemia status | Anemic | – | 333 (21.9) | 475 (12.9) | 590 (19.5) |
| Normal | – | 1,183 (78.1) | 3,183 (87.1) | 2,438 (80.5) | |
*Catholic/traditional/other. HH, household.
FIGURE 1Trends of thinness among late adolescent girls in Ethiopia from EDHS 2000 to 2016.
Trends in thinness among late adolescent girls in Ethiopia by the selected characteristics of 2000, 2005, 2011, and 2016 Ethiopian demographic and health surveys in percent (%).
| Variables | 2000 | 2005 | 2011 | 2016 | Point difference in thinness rate | |||
| 2005–2000 | 2011–2005 | 2016–2011 | 2016–2000 | |||||
|
| ||||||||
| Urban | 20.6 | 19.5 | 24.4 | 18.9 | −1.1 | 4.9 | −5.5 | −1.7 |
| Rural | 38.4 | 31.5 | 34.9 | 26.8 | −6.9 | 3.4 | −8.1 | −11.6 |
|
| ||||||||
| Not married | 35.7 | 29.7 | 32.2 | 24.4 | −6 | 2.5 | −7.8 | −11.3 |
| Married | 28.6 | 25.4 | 31.3 | 28.5 | −3.2 | 5.9 | −2.8 | −0.1 |
|
| ||||||||
| Orthodox | 34.2 | 29.6 | 37.2 | 28.7 | −4.6 | 7.6 | −8.5 | −5.5 |
| Muslim | 36.5 | 29.9 | 29.1 | 26.4 | −6.6 | −0.8 | −2.7 | −10.1 |
| Protestant | 29.3 | 26.2 | 23.8 | 17.0 | −3.1 | −2.4 | −6.8 | −12.3 |
| Others | 39.3 | 24.4 | 20.3 | 15.7 | −14.9 | −4.1 | −4.6 | −23.6 |
|
| ||||||||
| No education | 35.9 | 28.0 | 25.3 | 26.6 | −7.9 | −2.7 | 1.3 | −9.3 |
| 10 | 36.7 | 31.6 | 35.2 | 25.8 | −5.1 | 3.6 | −9.4 | −10.9 |
| 20 and above | 22.4 | 24.0 | 23.2 | 21.6 | 1.6 | −0.8 | −1.6 | −0.8 |
|
| ||||||||
| Poorest | – | 36.0 | 39.1 | 32.1 | – | 3.1 | −7 | – |
| Poorer | – | 28.1 | 39.5 | 21.6 | – | 11.4 | −17.9 | – |
| Middle | – | 36.6 | 30.9 | 32.7 | – | −5.7 | 1.8 | – |
| Richer | – | 32.5 | 32.6 | 22.7 | – | 0.1 | −9.9 | – |
| Richest | – | 19.1 | 23.3 | 20.1 | – | 4.2 | −3.2 | – |
|
| ||||||||
| Not working | 36.9 | 29.9 | 32.4 | 26.1 | −7 | 2.5 | −6.3 | −10.8 |
| Working | 32.4 | 26.6 | 31.8 | 23.3 | −5.8 | 5.2 | −8.5 | −9.1 |
|
| ||||||||
| <6 | 32.9 | 26.6 | 29.5 | 23.8 | −6.3 | 2.9 | −5.7 | −9.1 |
| =6 | 36.2 | 32.0 | 35.6 | 26.7 | −4.2 | 3.6 | −8.9 | −9.5 |
|
| ||||||||
| Male | 35.7 | 29.1 | 33.8 | 26.3 | −6.6 | 4.7 | −7.5 | −9.4 |
| Female | 30.2 | 28.1 | 27.7 | 21.0 | −2.1 | −0.4 | −6.7 | −9.2 |
|
| ||||||||
| Unimproved | 37.8 | 30.5 | 32.9 | 26.5 | −7.3 | 2.4 | −6.4 | −11.3 |
| Improved | 23.7 | 18.4 | 28.5 | 17.2 | −5.3 | 10.1 | −11.3 | −6.5 |
|
| ||||||||
| Unimproved | 37.4 | 32.6 | 37.3 | 26.1 | −4.8 | 4.7 | −11.2 | −11.3 |
| Improved | 33.3 | 27.4 | 29.6 | 23.6 | −5.9 | 2.2 | −6 | −9.7 |
|
| ||||||||
| No | 38.1 | 34.7 | 34.7 | 27.7 | −3.4 | 0 | −7 | −10.4 |
| Yes | 29.5 | 24.8 | 31.3 | 22.5 | −4.7 | 6.5 | −8.8 | −7 |
|
| ||||||||
| Anemic | – | 29.5 | 34.4 | 24.9 | – | 4.9 | −9.5 | – |
| Normal | – | 28.7 | 31.8 | 25.1 | – | 3.1 | −6.7 | – |
| Overall | 34.4 | 28.9 | 32.1 | 24.9 | −5.5 | 3.2 | −7.2 | −9.5 |
*Catholic/traditional/other. HH, household.
FIGURE 2Trends of thinness among late adolescent girls over time across regions of Ethiopia from 2000 to 2016.
Detail decomposition of the change in thinness among late adolescent girls in Ethiopia, 2000–2016.
| Variables | Differences due to characteristics (E) | Difference due to coefficients (C) | ||
| Coeff (95% CI) | Pct (%) | Coeff (95% CI) | Pct (%) | |
| Age (years) | ||||
| 15 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| 16 | 0.00029 (−0.000044, 0.00006) | −0.33134 | 0.00415 (−0.01637, 0.02469) | −4.4428 |
| 17 | −0.00087 (−0.00159, −0.00014) | 0.92801 | 0.00956 (−0.00883, 0.02796) | −10.223 |
| 18 | −0.00492 (−0.0084, −0.00145) | 5.2616 | 0.00694 (−0.01353, 0.02742) | −7.4171 |
| 19 | 0.00121 (0.00023, 0.0022) | −1.288 | 0.00964 (−0.00661, 0.02588) | −10.294 |
| Residence | ||||
| Urban | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| Rural | −0.00029 (−0.00130, 0.00070) | 0.31809 | −0.09425 (−0.18726, −0.00125) | 100.68 |
| Marital status | ||||
| Married | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| Not married | −0.00221 (−0.00557, 0.00115) | 2.3633 | −0.10228 (−0.18102, −0.02354) | 109.26 |
| HH head | ||||
| Male | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| Female | −0.00117 (−0.00265, 0.00030) | 1.2574 | −0.00082 (−0.01917, 0.01753) | 0.8769 |
| Family size | ||||
| <6 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| =6 | −0.00097 (−0.00362, 0.00168) | 1.0374 | 0.00897 (−0.02201, 0.03996) | −9.5887 |
| Religion | ||||
| Orthodox | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| Muslim | −0.00068 (−0.00152, 0.00016) | 0.7292 | −0.01584 (−0.03746, 0.00577) | 16.924 |
| Protestant | −0.01504 (−0.0221, −0.0079) | 16.075 | −0.01303 (−0.02697, 0.00090) | 13.922 |
| Others | 0.00664 (−0.00709, 0.02037) | −7.0947 | −0.01048 (−0.02787, 0.00690) | 11.197 |
| Toilet type | ||||
| Unimproved | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| Improved | 0.00669 (0.00043, 0.01296) | −7.1554 | −0.01117 (−0.03584, 0.01349) | 11.939 |
| Media exposure | ||||
| No | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| Yes | −0.00369 (−0.01073, 0.00333) | 3.9515 | −0.00549 (−0.03322, 0.02222) | 5.8747 |
| Constants | 0.13558 (−0.02601, 0.29718) | −144.83 | ||
| Overall | −0.015092 (−0.02869, −0.0015) | 16.121 | −0.07852 (−0.11172, −0.0453) | 83.879 |
$Catholic/traditional/other. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001. HH, household; 1, reference; CI, confidence interval. The bold values represent the overall values.
Random effect and model fit statistics for thinness among late adolescent girls in Ethiopia by multilevel logistic regression analysis, EDHS 2016.
| Parameters | Model I (Null) | Model II | Model III | Model IV |
| Coefficient variance | 0.62 | 0.57 | 0.41 | 0.46 |
| ICC (%) | 16% | 14.8% | 11% | 12% |
| MOR (CI) | 2.12 (1.87, 2.46) | 2.05 (1.78, 2.4) | 1.84 (1.6, 2.1) | 1.89 (1.68,2.2) |
| PCV (%) | Reff. | 8% | 34% | 25.8% |
|
| ||||
| DIC (−2LL) | 3,373 | 3,255 | 3,285 | 3,201 |
| AIC | 3,377 | 3,289 | 3,315 | 3,258 |
| BIC | 3,389 | 3,392 | 3,406 | 3,427 |
ICC, intra-class correlation coefficient; MOR, median odds ratio; PCV, proportional change in variance; DIC, deviance information criteria; AIC, Akaike’s information criterion; BIC, Bayesian information criterion; Model I is the null model, a baseline model without any independent variable. Model II is adjusted for individual-level factors. Model III is adjusted for community-level factors. Model IV is the full model adjusted for both individual and community-level factors.
Factors associated with thinness among late adolescent girls in Ethiopia by multilevel logistic regression analysis, EDHS 2016.
| Variables | Model II AOR (95% CI) | Model III AOR (95% CI) | Model IV AOR (95% CI) |
| Individual-level factors | |||
| Age of adolescents | 0.84 (0.78, 0.90) | – | 0.83 (0.77, 0.90) |
| Household head sex | |||
| Male | 1 | – | 1 |
| Female | 0.80 (0.63, 1.02) | – | 0.77 (0.61, 0.98) |
| Ever drink alcohol | |||
| No | 1 | – | 1 |
| Yes | 1.06 (0.79, 1.42) | – | 0.95 (0.70, 1.28) |
| Occupation status | |||
| Not working | 1 | – | 1 |
| Working | 0.91 (0.69, 1.18) | – | 0.87 (0.67, 1.15) |
| Family size | |||
| Below 6 | 1 | – | 1 |
| Six and above | 1.19 (0.96, 1.46) | – | 1.15 (0.93, 1.43) |
| Marital status | |||
| Married | 1 | – | 1 |
| Not married | 0.80 (0.59, 1.09) | – | 0.82 (0.60, 1.11) |
| Religion | |||
| Orthodox | 1 | – | 1 |
| Muslim | 0.82 (0.59, 1.13) | – | 0.87 (0.60, 1.28) |
| Protestant | 0.43 (0.30, 0.62) | – | 0.71 (0.47, 1.06) |
| Others | 0.34 (0.11, 1.05) | – | 055 (0.18, 1.71) |
| Media exposure | |||
| No | 1 | – | 1 |
| Yes | 0.84 (0.68, 1.03) | – | 0.82 (0.65, 1.03) |
| Age of household head | 0.97 (0.96, 0.99) | – | 0.96 (0.95, 1.07) |
| Toilet facility | |||
| Unimproved | 1 | – | 1 |
| Improved | 0.52 (0.38, 0.72) | – | 0.45 (0.31, 0.65) |
| Wealth index | |||
| Poor | 0.97 (0.75, 1.26) | – | 0.84 (0.62, 1.13) |
| Middle | 1.46 (1.12, 1.89) | – | 1.45 (1.10,1.90) |
| Rich | 1 | – | 1 |
| Community-level factors | |||
| Residence | – | ||
| Urban | – | 1 | 1 |
| Rural | – | 1.76 (1.20, 2.57) | 1.18 (0.77, 1.80) |
| Region | |||
| Addis Ababa | – | 1 | 1 |
| Tigray | – | 2.08 (1.16, 3,72) | 1.61 (0.86, 2.98) |
| Afar | – | 2.31 (0.86, 6.21) | 1.83 (0.64, 519) |
| Amhara | – | 1.39 (0.80, 2.41) | 0.92 (0.51, 1.67) |
| Oromia | – | 0.81 (0.47, 1.41) | 0.60 (0.33, 1.08) |
| Somali | – | 2.33 (1.14, 4.73) | 2.14 (1.0, 4.10) |
| Benishangul-Gumz | – | 0.53 (0.17, 1.68) | 0.36 (0.11, 1.18) |
| SNNP | – | 0.44 (0.25, 0.80) | 0.35 (0.18, 0.68) |
| Gambelia | – | 1.87 (0.39, 8.90) | 1.36 (0.27, 6.85) |
| Harari | – | 1.22 (0.17, 8.41) | 0.92 (0.12, 6.70) |
| Dire Da’wa | – | 1.36 (0.39, 4.68) | 1.33 (0.37, 4.81) |
| Community media exposure | |||
| Low | – | 1 | 1 |
| High | – | 0.99 (073, 1.33) | 1.11 (0.80, 1.55) |
| Community poverty | |||
| Low | – | 1 | 1 |
| High | – | 1.02 (0.75, 1.35) | 1.02 (0.73, 1.42) |
#Catholic/traditional/other; *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001 1 = reference; CI, confidence interval. Model I is an empty model. Model II is adjusted for individual-level factors. Model III is adjusted for community-level factors. Model Iv is the full model adjusted for both individual and community-level factors.