| Literature DB >> 36061889 |
Tamara Popović1, Bojana Šarić2, Jasmina Debeljak Martačić1, Aleksandra Arsić1, Pavle Jovanov2, Edita Stokić3, Aleksandra Mišan2, Anamarija Mandić2.
Abstract
The fruit juice industry generates pomace as a valuable by-product especially rich in polyphenols, dietary fibers, vitamins, minerals, and unsaturated fatty acids. In the cookies used in this study, 30% of the gluten-free flour was replaced with dried and ground blueberry and raspberry pomace, rich source of polyphenols, dietary fibers, linoleic and alpha-linolenic acid. In order to examine whether the addition of blueberry and raspberry pomace in cookie formulation can have beneficial effects on certain blood parameters and anthropometric measurements, the designed cookies were tested in 20 healthy, normally fed female subjects, aged 30-50 years (41.35 ± 8.58 years) over four-week dietetic intervention study. Significant changes in the composition of fatty acids serum phospholipids, decrease in LDL-cholesterol level (20.16%), increase in adiponectin level (25.52%) and decrease in ALT and AST values were observed, thus indicating that inclusion of cookies containing blueberry and raspberry dried and ground pomace to usual diet might have positive effects on certain cardiovascular risk factors and liver function indicators.Entities:
Keywords: berry pomace; dietetic intervention study; lipid status; metabolic disorder; plasma fatty acids
Year: 2022 PMID: 36061889 PMCID: PMC9428553 DOI: 10.3389/fnut.2022.969996
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Nutr ISSN: 2296-861X
Anthropometric characteristics and biochemical parameters of the study participants at baseline and after 4 week intervention.
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Body mass (kg) | 65.54 ± 10.26 | 65.59 ± 10.36 | 0.9676 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 23.10 ± 3.58 | 23.12 ± 3.59 | 0.9246 |
| Fasting glucose (mmol/L) | 4.65 ± 0.35 | 4.65 ± 0.38 | 0.9031 |
| Postprandial glucose (mmol/L) | 4.57 ± 0.43 | 4.58 ± 0.45 | 0.9892 |
| Triglycerides (mmol/L) | 1.07 ± 0.55 | 0.96 ±0.41 | 0.519 |
| TC (mmol/L) | 5.99 ± 1.05 | 5.65 ± 0.94 | 0.2976 |
| HDL-C (mmol/L) | 1.91 ± 0.48 | 1.87 ±0.45 | 0.8283 |
| LDL-C (mmol/L) | 3.72 ± 0.99 | 2.97 ± 0.64 | 0.0080** |
| Creatinine (mmol/L) | 60.72 ± 6.24 | 60.61 ± 6.42 | 0.7553 |
| Urea (mmol/L) | 4.01 ± 1.19 | 3.64 ± 1.22 | 0.2914 |
| Uric acid (nmol/L) | 232.49 ± 38.19 | 234.47 ± 37.21 | 0.9138 |
| AST (IU/L) | 13.89 ± 3.32 | 11.67 ± 3.13 | 0.0424* |
| ALT (IU/L) | 19.78 ± 3.97 | 17.37 ± 4.09 | 0.0133** |
| Adiponectin (mg/mL) | 11,99 ± 3,29 | 15,05 ± 5,47 | 0,0439* |
Values are given as mean ± SD; Significantly different values at the end of study compared to baseline were marked as follows: *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001.
Fatty acid profile in plasma phospholipids of study participants at baseline and after 4 week intervention.
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| 16:0 | 32.31 ± 2.27 | 30.41 ± 2.29 | 0.00096*** |
| 16:1 | 0.61 ±0.11 | 0.49 ± 0.13 | 0.000685*** |
| 18:0 | 17.38 ± 2.26 | 17.17 ± 2.00 | |
| 18:1 n9 | 8.03 ± 0.94 | 8.14 ± 1.01 | |
| 18:1 n7 | 1.61 ± 0.28 | 2.28 ± 2.83 | |
| 18:2 | 23.61 ± 2.44 | 24.40 ± 3.17 | |
| 18:3 n3 | 0.21 ± 0.08 | 0.21 ± 0.09 | |
| 20:3 | 2.52 ± 0.73 | 2.72 ± 0.70 | |
| 20:4 | 10.59 ± 2.05 | 10.74 ± 2.65 | |
| 20:5 | 0.31 ± 0.17 | 0.31 ± 0.15 | |
| 22:4 | 0.40 ± 0.09 | 0.39 ± 0.10 | |
| 22:5 | 0.41 ± 0.10 | 0.46 ± 0.10 | 0.062385* |
| 22:6 | 2.01 ± 0.64 | 2.29 ± 0.63 | 0.019312** |
| SFA | 49.69 ± 2.41 | 47.58 ± 3.39 | 0.019643** |
| MUFA | 10.25 ± 1.18 | 10.91 ± 3.21 | |
| PUFA | 40.06 ± 2.72 | 41.52 ± 2.94 | |
| n6 | 37.12 ± 2.57 | 38.25 ± 2.70 | |
| n3 | 2.94 ± 0.78 | 3.27 ± 0.76* | 0.013905* |
| n6/n3 | 13.38 ± 3.27 | 12.26 ± 2.72* | 0.033049* |
Values are given as mean ± SD; Significantly different values at the end of study compared to baseline were marked as follows: *p < p < 0.05, **p < p < 0.01, ***p < p < 0.001.