| Literature DB >> 31323861 |
Weiwei Hu1, Hui Gong1, Lanqi Li1, Shiguo Chen1, Xingqian Ye2.
Abstract
Blueberry pomace is abundant in anthocyanins. This work characterized the anthocyanins in blueberry pomace, discussed the stability of anthocyanins under ultrasound treatment, and compared the extraction conditions for different anthocyanin compositions. Thirteen anthocyanins were identified, and malvidin-3-galactoside (18.56%), which represented the most abundant anthocyanin, was selected as the individual analyte. The general linear model univariate analysis revealed that ultrasound-assisted extraction (UAE) resulted in higher recoveries of both total anthocyanins (TA) and individual anthocyanins (IA) when compared with conventional solvent extraction. The optimized extraction conditions for TA and IA were UAE in pure methanol (12.49 mg/g dry weight) at 25 °C for 30 min and UAE in 70% ethanol (3.57 mg/g dry weight) at 40 °C for 40 min, respectively. Moreover, IA was more vulnerable to degradation compared with TA. Therefore, a specific extraction process of IA is significant for monomer preparation, and harsh conditions should be avoided in UAE.Entities:
Keywords: anthocyanin; comparison; conventional solvent extraction; identification; pomace; ultrasound-assisted extraction
Year: 2019 PMID: 31323861 PMCID: PMC6680923 DOI: 10.3390/molecules24142621
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Figure 1High performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) chromatogram of anthocyanins in blueberry pomace.
Identification of anthocyanins in blueberry pomace using liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC–MS).
| Peak | Retention Time | +ESIMS (m/z) | Formula | Proportion (%) | Tentative Identification |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 12.109 | 429 | - | 15.29 | unknown |
| 2 | 13.327 | 465 | C21H21O12 | 7.00 | delphinidin-3-galactoside |
| 34 | 15.055 | 384 | - | 2.27 | unknown |
| 15.521 | 465 | C21H21O12 | 9.84 | delphinidin-3-glucoside | |
| 5 | 16.618 | 464 | - | 1.29 | unknown |
| 6 | 17.412 | 435 | C20H19O11 | 9.46 | delphinidin-3-arabinoside |
| 7 | 18.848 | 449 | C21H21O11 | 8.01 | cyanidin-3- glucoside |
| 8 | 20.576 | 479 | C22H23O12 | 0.99 | petunidin-3-galactoside |
| 9 | 21.116 | 479 | C22H23O12 | 5.50 | petunidin-3-glucoside |
| 10 | 22.362 | 493 | C23H25O12 | 18.56 | malvidin-3-galactoside |
| 11 | 23.799 | 449 | C21H21O11 | 11.11 | petunidin-3-arabinoside |
| 12 | 24.33 | 493 | C23H25O12 | 9.15 | malvidin-3- glucoside |
| 13 | 26.076 | 463 | C22H23O11 | 0.12 | peonidin-3-galactoside |
Figure 2Effect of time on the stability of individual anthocyanin in blueberry pomace under ultrasound treatment and conventional solvent extraction. Different letters on bars show significant differences (p < 0.05).
Figure 3Effect of temperature on the stability of individual anthocyanin in blueberry pomace under ultrasound treatment and conventional solvent extraction. Different letters on bars show significant differences (p < 0.05).
Figure 4Effect of solvent on the stability of individual anthocyanin in blueberry pomace under ultrasound treatment and conventional solvent extraction. Different letters on bars show significant differences (p < 0.05).
Figure 5Effect of interaction on individual anthocyanins from blueberry pomace during ultrasound extraction course. Letters (a–c) represent interactions of solvent–temperature, temperature–time, and solvent–time.