Rongrong Tian1,2, Xiaodong Li3, Hua Zhang1, Lina Ma1, Huimao Zhang3, Zhenxin Wang1,2. 1. State Key Laboratory of Electroanalytical Chemistry, Changchun Institute of Applied Chemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Changchun 130022, P. R. China. 2. University of Science and Technology of China, Jinzhai Road, Baohe District, Hefei, Anhui 230026, P. R. China. 3. Department of Radiology, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin 130021, P. R. China.
Abstract
The efficient and specific capture of circulating tumor cells (CTCs) from patients' peripheral blood is of significant value in precise cancer diagnosis and cancer therapy. As fine targeting molecules, lectins can recognize cancer cells specifically due to the abnormal glycosylation of molecules on the cancer cell membrane and the specific binding of lectin with glycoconjugates. Herein, a Ulex europaeus agglutinin-I (UEA-I)-based magnetic isolation strategy was developed to efficiently and specifically capture α-1,2-fucose overexpression CTCs from colorectal cancer (CRC) patients' peripheral blood. Using UEA-I-modified Fe3O4 magnetic beads (termed MB-UEA-I), up to 94 and 89% of target cells (i.e., SW480 CRC cells) were captured from the cell spiking complete cell culture medium and whole blood, respectively. More than 90% of captured cells show good viability and proliferation ability without detaching from MB-UEA-I. In combination with three-color immunocytochemistry (ICC) identification, MB-UEA-I has been successfully used to capture CTCs from CRC patients' peripheral blood. The experimental results indicate a correlation between CTC characterization and tumor metastasis. Specifically, MB-UEA-I can be applied to screen early CRC by capturing CTCs when served as a liquid biopsy. The presented work offers a new insight into developing cost-effective lectin-functionalized methods for biomedical applications.
The efficient and specific capture of circulating tumor cells (CTCs) from patients' peripheral blood is of significant value in precise cancer diagnosis and cancer therapy. As fine targeting molecules, lectins can recognize cancer cells specifically due to the abnormal glycosylation of molecules on the cancer cell membrane and the specific binding of lectin with glycoconjugates. Herein, a Ulex europaeus agglutinin-I (UEA-I)-based magnetic isolation strategy was developed to efficiently and specifically capture α-1,2-fucose overexpression CTCs from colorectal cancer (CRC) patients' peripheral blood. Using UEA-I-modified Fe3O4 magnetic beads (termed MB-UEA-I), up to 94 and 89% of target cells (i.e., SW480 CRC cells) were captured from the cell spiking complete cell culture medium and whole blood, respectively. More than 90% of captured cells show good viability and proliferation ability without detaching from MB-UEA-I. In combination with three-color immunocytochemistry (ICC) identification, MB-UEA-I has been successfully used to capture CTCs from CRC patients' peripheral blood. The experimental results indicate a correlation between CTC characterization and tumor metastasis. Specifically, MB-UEA-I can be applied to screen early CRC by capturing CTCs when served as a liquid biopsy. The presented work offers a new insight into developing cost-effective lectin-functionalized methods for biomedical applications.
Circulating tumor cells (CTCs) refer to
a general term for various
types of tumor cells shed from the primary site into peripheral blood
with the ability to metastasize to distant organs and form metastatic
tumors.[1−3] Thus, capturing and detecting CTCs may hold great
clinical significance for noninvasive tumor profiling, efficacy monitoring,
prognosis prediction, and early diagnosis of metastasis like a liquid
biopsy.[4−6] Nevertheless, efficient enrichment of high-purity
CTCs is a tremendous challenge because of high heterogeneity and intrinsic
rarity. Generally, there are only a few-to-several hundred CTCs in
106–109 hematologic cells per milliliter
of peripheral blood.[7,8]To date, researchers have
developed numerous methods to highly
efficiently capture and detect CTCs, which are mostly in view of their
physical properties (density, size, deformability, and adhesion preference)[9−13] and/or biological characteristics (antibody–antigen, aptamer,
peptides, and E-selectin).[14−34] For instance, a microfluidic immunoaffinity assay for CTC isolation
from breast cancer patients’ blood was proposed by Park et
al.[18] The related isolation strategy obviously
improves both capture efficiency and recovery of the isolated CTCs,
which is very important for performing sensitive downstream assays.
Wu et al. designed an efficient and reliable multifunctional nanosphere
system with chip assistance for biomarker phenotyping of single heterogeneous
CTCs based on the size and specific targeting of human epidermal growth
factor receptor 2 (HER2) and the epithelial cell adhesion molecule
(EpCAM).[19] A signal amplification detection
method based on Ag2S fluorescent nanodots combined with
immunomagnetic spheres (IMNs) was proposed by Ding et al., which has
been used for the magnetic capture of CTCs with high efficiency (six
CTCs per milliliter of the mimic whole blood) as well as ultrasensitive
fluorescence labeling.[20] Especially, CTC
enrichment based on antibody (e.g., epidermal growth factor receptor
(EGFR), EpCAM, HER2, etc.)-modified immunomagnetic beads are the most
commonly applied for CTC isolation from the peripheral blood of patients.[25−30] This magnetic isolation method shows several advantages including
simple magnetic operation, specific and effective coupling with target
cells, and easy integration with consecutive identification and analysis
(such as immunocytochemistry (ICC) and Raman imaging). Importantly,
the CellSearch system based on magnetic isolation has been approved
by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), which is used to assess
the diagnostic and prognostic efficacy in patients with metastatic
colorectal cancer, breast cancer, and prostate cancer.[31,32]Despite the fact that antibody functionalization has highly
improved
CTC capture efficiency, the antibody-dependent CTC isolation strategy
remains limited in widespread clinical applications due to its bench-to-bench
stability, reproducibility, mass production, and high cost.[5,35,36] Besides, antibodies (such as
EpCAM) expressed on the surface of CTCs are probably more heterogeneous
than initially expected (that is, the epithelial–mesenchymal
transition (EMT) leads to not only the decreased expression of epithelial
markers (EpCAM) but also increased expression of mesenchymal markers
(EGFR))[5,37] and are even missing in certain tumor classes
(e.g., sarcoma and melanoma).[38] Thus, other
targeting molecules, like DNA aptamers,[39,40] recognition
peptides,[41] or specific binding lectins,[42,43] have also been tested in CTC isolation. Compared to antibodies,
lectins are ubiquitous in a variety of plants including beans and
grains, which are amenable to mass production and play important roles
in identification of glycoprotein and the phase of the disease. They
have been widely used in cytochemistry, histochemistry, and immunochemistry
for the detection and characterization of glycosylated residues and
different glycoconjugates in human or animal cells and tissue surfaces.[44,45] For instance, Xie et al. put forward trifunctional nanospheres modified
with wheat germ agglutinin to identify DU-145 cells with sialic acid
and N-acetylglucosamine expressed on the surface.[42] Therefore, the lectin-modified magnetic isolation
strategy could be a promising technique for CTC isolation. Our previous
work demonstrates that Ulex europaeus agglutinin-I (UEA-I) can conjugate
with α-1,2-fucose on the surface of SW480 cells effectively
and selectively[46,47] and thus shows potential for
the early diagnosis of colorectal cancer (CRC) as well as cancer phenotype
identification as a biomarker.Herein, a cell-sorting strategy
is proposed to efficiently capture
and isolate CTCs, which is based on UEA-I-modified Fe3O4 magnetic beads (termed MB-UEA-I). The resulting MB-UEA-I
can capture SW480 cells spiked in peripheral blood highly efficiently.
In addition, the captured cells show good viability, which satisfies
requirements for downstream mutation detection and cell proliferation.
Furthermore, the practicability of MB-UEA-I is demonstrated by CTC
capture and isolation from unprocessed CRC patients’ blood
samples. This work also identifies that primary CRC and metastatic
CRC have different CTC characterization.
Experimental Section
Preparation of MB-UEA-I
The carboxyl group of MBs was
activated for conjugation with UEA-I through covalent attachment to
obtain MB-UEA-I. The experimental details are illustrated in the Supporting Information (SI).
Capturing SW480 Cells in Cell Spiking Samples
One hundred
SW480 cells were spiked into 1 mL of complete culture medium (L-15
+ 10 v%/v% FBS) and incubated with 0.05 mg of MB-UEA-I at 37 °C
with gentle shaking for 45 min. Subsequently, an external magnet was
used to separate the MB-UEA-I-captured cells, while the uncaptured
cells in supernatants were transferred into a 48-well plate and counted
by an inverted microscope. As control experiments, 0.05 mg of MB-UEA-I
or blank MBs were incubated with 100 HCT116 cells, 100 NCM460 cells,
or 100 SW480 cells spiked in 1 mL of complete culture medium, separately,
and the captured cells were separated and counted as previously described.
Besides, the Hoechst 33342-prestained SW480 cells, Rhodamine B-prestained
HCT116 cells, and Rhodamine B-prestained NCM460 cells were also incubated
with MB-UEA-I or blank MBs. After separation, the captured and uncaptured
cells were observed via a fluorescence microscope. In addition, MB-UEA-I
or MBs after interactions with cells were also observed through scanning
electron microscopy (SEM) characterization.For investigating
the capture sensitivity of MB-UEA-I toward SW480 cells, various amounts
of SW480 cells were spiked into 1 mL of complete culture medium (L-15
+ 10 v%/v% FBS) and incubated with 0.05 mg of MB-UEA-I at 37 °C
with gentle shaking for 45 min. After separation, the uncaptured cells
in supernatants were transferred into a 48-well plate and counted
by an inverted microscope. Furthermore, the capture sensitivity of
MB-UEA-I toward SW480 cells spiking in the whole blood sample was
also investigated. Various amounts of Hoechst 33342-prestained SW480
cells were spiked into 1 mL of the fresh healthy blood sample. The
capture process was carried out as mentioned above but the MB-UEA-I-captured
cells were characterized via a fluorescence microscope.
Cell Viability and Proliferation Study
Calcein AM and
propidium iodide (PI) were chosen to study the cell viability, while
the proliferation study was conducted by reculturing the MB-UEA-I-captured
SW480 cells (see the SI for experimental
details).
Capture and ICC Identification of SW480 and CTC Cells
The mimic clinical sample was obtained by spiking 10 SW480 cells
into 1 mL of the healthy whole blood. Then, 0.05 mg of MB-UEA-I were
added to the sample, incubated under gentle shaking at 37 °C
for 45 min, and subsequently separated by an external magnet. The
three-color ICC was used to recognize MB-UEA-I-captured cells. For
the clinical practicability test, blood samples collected from 14
CRC patients before surgery and 5 healthy individuals were separately
incubated with 0.05 mg of MB-UEA-I to capture CTCs, which were further
identified by ICC.
Results and Discussion
Preparation and Characterization of MBs and MB-UEA-I
As shown in Scheme , UEA-I was modified on the surface of MBs by carbodiimide chemistry
through covalent attachment. The as-obtained MB-UEA-I can specifically
recognize α-1,2-fucose positive cancer cells, such as SW480
cells and CTCs of primary CRC. The average size of MBs is 1.02 ±
0.06 μm in diameter. After being modified with UEA-I, the MBs
exhibit a negligible change in morphology and dispersibility (as shown
in Figure a,b). To
confirm the combination of MBs with UEA-I, FL-UEA-I was employed to
react with MBs. Under 488 nm excitation, MB-UEA-I-FL emits an obvious
fluorescence at 520 nm (as shown in Figure c,d). Besides, we figured out the calibration
curve of FL-UEA-I and measured the fluorescence spectra of 25 μg
of FL-UEA-I before and after reaction with 0.5 mg of MBs. According
to the change in fluorescence intensity, we found that the coupling
quantity of FL-UEA-I on MBs was about 16 μg mg–1 (as shown in Figure S1).
Scheme 1
Schematic Illustration of CTC Capture and Identification
Based on
MB-UEA-I
Figure 1
SEM micrographs of (a)
MBs and (b) MB-UEA-I, and the fluorescence
images (c) and fluorescence spectra (d) of MBs and MB-UEA-I-FL.
SEM micrographs of (a)
MBs and (b) MB-UEA-I, and the fluorescence
images (c) and fluorescence spectra (d) of MBs and MB-UEA-I-FL.
Specific Capture of SW480 Cells with MB-UEA-I
The concentration
of MB-UEA-I and incubation time were optimized to obtain the maximum
capture efficiency. Figure S2a shows that
the capture efficiency increases as the concentration of MB-UEA-I
increases. More than 90% of spiked SW480 cells are captured when the
concentration of MB-UEA-I is higher than 0.05 mg mL–1. In addition, as the incubation time of MB-UEA-I with cells increases,
the capture efficiency also increases and more than 90% of SW480 cells
can be captured when the incubation time is longer than 45 min (as
shown in Figure S2b). Considering that
a higher concentration of MB-UEA-I and longer incubation time may
result in more nonspecific capture of untargeted cells, 0.05 mg mL–1 MB-UEA-I and an incubation time of 45 min are chosen
to capture targeted cells in the following experiments.For
testing their specificity, MB-UEA-I were first incubated with two
CRC cell lines (SW480 cells and HCT116 cells) and one normal colorectal
cell line (NCM460 cells) under the optimized conditions. In comparison
with HCT116 and NCM460 cells, SW480 cells express α-1,2-fucose
residues on the cell membrane surface with an aberrantly high level,
which have a high binding affinity with UEA-I through the combination
with α-1,2-fucosylated lactodifucotetraose-derived neoglycolipid.[46−48] As expected, MB-UEA-I can capture more than 94% of spiked SW480
cells in complete culture medium, which is much higher than those
of spiked HCT116 cells (12%) and NCM460 cells (11%) (as shown in Figure ). Moreover, few
SW480 cells were captured by the unmodified MBs. Besides, the fluorescence
imaging studies of MB-UEA-I- or MB-treated cells also verify the specific
binding between MB-UEA-I and SW480 cells (Figure S3). The SEM micrographs in Figure S4 also show the successful attachment of MB-UEA-I on the SW480 cell
surface. The results suggest that MB-UEA-I can be used to efficiently
and specifically capture SW480 cells.
Figure 2
Capture efficiencies of MB-UEA-I to SW480
cells, HCT116 cells,
and NCM460 cells, and the capture efficiency of MBs to SW480 cells.
Error bars mean standard deviations (SD, n = 3).
Capture efficiencies of MB-UEA-I to SW480
cells, HCT116 cells,
and NCM460 cells, and the capture efficiency of MBs to SW480 cells.
Error bars mean standard deviations (SD, n = 3).
Capturing SW480 Cells Spiked in Mimic CTC Samples
Different
amounts (ranging from 3 to 1000) of SW480 cells were added to 1 mL
of complete culture medium or healthy whole blood to investigate the
capture sensitivity of MB-UEA-I. Under the optimal experimental conditions,
the calibration curves were obtained by plotting the linearity of
the captured cell numbers against the spiked cell numbers. As shown
in Figure a, the linear
equations are y1 = 0.94x – 0.92 (R2 = 0.9998) for SW480
cells in complete culture medium and y2 = 0.89x + 0.08 (R2 =
0.9987) for SW480 cells in the whole blood, indicating that capture
sensitivity are 94 and 89% in complete culture medium and whole blood,
respectively. In particular, four SW480 cells were captured from six
SW480 cells spiking 5 mL of whole blood (as shown in Figure S5), demonstrating the high capture sensitivity of
MB-UEA-I. These results reveal that the as-constructed MB-UEA-I can
be directly applied to sort CTCs of primary CRC in clinical samples.
Furthermore, the captured cells from SW480 cells spiking the whole
blood were identified with ICC by the use of Hoechst 33342 (a marker
for nucleus), Alexa Fluor 488-labeled anti-CK19 (a marker for epithelial
cells) monoclonal antibody, and Alexa Fluor 594-labeled anti-CD45
(a marker for white blood cells (WBCs)) monoclonal antibody.[49] Hoechst 33342+/CK19+/CD45– cells are recognized as SW480 cells, while Hoechst
33342+/CK19–/CD45+ are sorted
as WBCs. As shown in Figure b, SW480 cells and WBCs can be effectively separated by MB-UEA-I.
The result confirms that the cell-sorting method based on MB-UEA-I
enables efficient and reliable detection of CTCs.
Figure 3
(a) Capture sensitivities
of MB-UEA-I to SW480 cells. Error bars
mean SD (n = 3). (b) Typical fluorescence images
of the cells identified by ICC ((i) SW480 cells spiking the whole
blood sample, (ii) WBC in the supernatant, and (iii) MB-UEA-I-captured
SW480 cells). Scale bars are 10 μm.
(a) Capture sensitivities
of MB-UEA-I to SW480 cells. Error bars
mean SD (n = 3). (b) Typical fluorescence images
of the cells identified by ICC ((i) SW480 cells spiking the whole
blood sample, (ii) WBC in the supernatant, and (iii) MB-UEA-I-captured
SW480 cells). Scale bars are 10 μm.
Cell Viability Analysis and Proliferation Study
The
viability of MB-UEA-I-captured SW480 cells was analyzed through Calcein
AM and PI costaining. Most captured cells exhibit green fluorescence
emission, and the viability rate is calculated to be 93%, which is
similar to the viability rate (95%) of the control cells (Figure S6). Besides, the proliferation ability
of MB-UEA-I-captured cells was further explored. The captured cells
with MB-UEA-I on the surface can well adhere to the culture plates
and exhibit strong proliferation ability (as shown in Figure ). In particular, the proliferation
rate of MB-UEA-I-captured SW480 cells is as rapid as that of normal
cultured SW480 cells (Figure S7). The results
distinctly illustrated that the captured cells retained both the cell
viability and proliferative ability, enabling trusty downstream studies,
for example, gene expression, mutation, sequencing, etc.
Figure 4
Fluorescence
images of MB-UEA-I-captured SW480 cells after re-cultured.
From left to right: adhered to the plate, proliferated, just reached
confluence, reached confluence after one passage and five passages,
respectively. The scale bars are 50 μm.
Fluorescence
images of MB-UEA-I-captured SW480 cells after re-cultured.
From left to right: adhered to the plate, proliferated, just reached
confluence, reached confluence after one passage and five passages,
respectively. The scale bars are 50 μm.
CTC Capture and Identification from Clinical CRC Patients’
Peripheral Blood
The clinical practicability of MB-UEA-I
was demonstrated by directly profiling CTCs in peripheral blood samples,
which were collected from 14 CRC patients before surgery and 5 healthy
individuals. The Hoechst 33342+/CK19+/CD45– cells characterized by ICC were classified as CTCs.
As illustrated in Figure a and Table S1, the CTC numbers
ranged from 3 to 20 cells mL–1 blood from CRC patients,
while there are no CTCs in the blood samples of healthy donors. As
a typical sample, the fluorescence images of 16 CTCs captured from
the blood sample of the No. 5 patient are shown in Figure b. In addition, the numbers
of CTCs (mean values of 13 ± 4 CTCs mL–1) in
blood samples from primary CRC patients (nos. 1–7) are higher
than that in blood samples (mean values of 5 ± 2 CTCs mL–1) from metastatic CRC patients (nos. 8–14).
The phenomenon is caused by decreasing the fucosylation level of the
CRC cell membrane with tumor progression, i.e., the cell membrane
is highly fucosylated at an early stage of CRC and gradually defucosylated
through genetic mutation in the metastasis stage of CRC.[50] The result indicates the characterization of
CTCs associated with disease progression and demonstrates that the
MB-UEA-I-based magnetic isolation strategy is a promising tool for
the early diagnosis of CRC. But it still needs to be combined with
other diagnostic techniques to determine the CRC stage accurately.
Figure 5
(a) Quantitative
detection of CTCs from 14 CRC patients (nos. 1–14)
and 5 healthy individuals (nos. 15–19) blood samples. (b) Fluorescence
images of the MB-UEA-I-captured CTCs from patient no. 5 by three-color
ICC identification. Scale bars are 5 μm.
(a) Quantitative
detection of CTCs from 14 CRC patients (nos. 1–14)
and 5 healthy individuals (nos. 15–19) blood samples. (b) Fluorescence
images of the MB-UEA-I-captured CTCs from patient no. 5 by three-color
ICC identification. Scale bars are 5 μm.
Conclusions
In summary, a convenient and rapid lectin-based
magnetic isolation
strategy is developed to highly efficiently and specifically capture
CTCs of CRC through strong binding affinity between UEA-I and α-1,2-fucose.
The captured cells are completely suitable for downstream studies
such as CTC culture, gene expression, and mutation detection because
the as-proposed MB-UEA-I magnetic isolation platform exhibits a negligible
effect on cell viability and proliferation ability. Heterogeneous
populations/features of CTCs at different disease progression stages
have been demonstrated by profiling CTCs in whole blood samples from
14 CRC patients, which may offer helpful information for clinical
decisions. Therefore, the lectin-based magnetic isolation strategy
demonstrates the practical use of lectin-based isolation of rare cells
and has a great promise to be translated to the clinic as a cost-effective
liquid biopsy method.
Authors: Massimo Cristofanilli; G Thomas Budd; Matthew J Ellis; Alison Stopeck; Jeri Matera; M Craig Miller; James M Reuben; Gerald V Doyle; W Jeffrey Allard; Leon W M M Terstappen; Daniel F Hayes Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2004-08-19 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Walid A Osta; Yian Chen; Kaidi Mikhitarian; Michael Mitas; Mohamed Salem; Yusuf A Hannun; David J Cole; William E Gillanders Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2004-08-15 Impact factor: 12.701