| Literature DB >> 36060758 |
Helena Henriques Vieira1,2, Inessa Lacativa Bagatini3, Guilherme Pavan de Moraes2,3, Roberta Mafra Freitas2,4, Hugo Sarmento4, Stefan Bertilsson5, Armando Augusto Henriques Vieira3.
Abstract
The turnover of microbial communities across space is dictated by local and regional factors. Locally, selection shapes community assembly through biological interactions between organisms and the environment, while regional factors influence microbial dispersion patterns. Methods used to disentangle the effects of local and regional factors typically do not aim to identify ecological processes underlying the turnover. In this paper, we identified and quantified these processes for three operational microbial subcommunities (cyanobacteria, particle-attached, and free-living bacteria) from a tropical cascade of freshwater reservoirs with decreasing productivity, over two markedly different dry and rainy seasons. We hypothesized that during the dry season communities would mainly be controlled by selection shaped by the higher environmental heterogeneity that results from low hydrological flow and connectivity between reservoirs. We expected highly similar communities shaped by dispersal and a more homogenized environment during the rainy season, enhanced by increased flow rates. Even if metacommunities were largely controlled by regional events in both periods, the selection had more influence on free-living communities during the dry period, possibly related to elevated dissolved organic carbon concentration, while drift as a purely stochastic factor, had more influence on cyanobacterial communities. Each subcommunity had distinct patterns of turnover along the cascade related to diversity (Cyanobacteria), lifestyle and size (Free-living), and spatial dynamics (particle-attached).Entities:
Keywords: ecological processes; microbial dispersion; microbial turnover; regional factors; tropical reservoirs
Year: 2022 PMID: 36060758 PMCID: PMC9434106 DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.831716
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Microbiol ISSN: 1664-302X Impact factor: 6.064
Figure 1Map of Paraná Basin (topleft), Tietê River (topdown), and location of the four reservoirs sampled (right). Barra Bonita (BB), Promissão (Pr), Nova Avanhandava (NA), and Três Irmãos (TI). Modified from Freitas et al. (2018).
Figure 2Principal component analysis of environmental variables by reservoir. Environmental variables: Residence time (RT), Temperature (Temp), Total phosphorous (TP), Dissolved organic carbon (DOC), and total nitrogen (N). Reservoirs are represented by Barra Bonita (BB), Promissão (Pr), Nova Avanhandava (NA) and Três Irmãos (TI). Black dots represent sampling points from dry period (D1, D2, and D3) and dots represent sampling points from rainy period (R1, R2, and R3).
Figure 3Non-metric multidimensional scaling (NMDS) ordinations with ‘βMNTD weighted’ dissimilarities of microbial communities by reservoir during dry and rainy periods. (A) Cyanobacterial communities (dry period: 83.83% and rainy period: 93.33%). (B) Particle-attached communities (dry period: 53.30% and rainy period non-significant). (C) Free-living communities (dry period: 71.13% and rainy period: 53.21%). PERMANOVA (Pr(>F) > 0.05). Empty dots represent sampling points from dry period (D1, D2, and D3) and filled dots represent sampling points from the rainy period (R1, R2, and R3) Reservoirs are represented by BB (Barra Bonita, connected by dot-dashed lines); Pr (Promissão connected by dashed lines); NA (Nova Avanhandava. connected by solid lines), and TI (Três Irmãos, connected by dotted lines).
Ecological processes governing microbial communities between reservoirs by sampling.
| Dry | Rainy | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| D1 | D2 | D3 | R1 | R2 | R3 | total | ||
| Cyano | BB - Pr | D | D | D | D | D | HD | |
| Pr - NA | D | D | D | D | S | D | ||
| NA - TI | D | D | D | D | S | D | ||
| Stochastic: 100% | Stochastic: 66% | Stochastic: 83% | ||||||
| PA | BB - Pr | DL | D | DL | D | DL | DL | |
| Pr - NA | HD | S | D | S | HD | DL | ||
| NA - TI | DL | DL | D | S | D | DL | ||
| Stochastic: 33% | Stochastic: 22% | Stochastic: 27% | ||||||
| FL | BB - Pr | DL | S | DL | DL | DL | DL | |
| Pr - NA | HD | S | HD | S | S | HD | ||
| NA - TI | HD | S | S | HD | S | DL | ||
| Regional: 56% | Regional: 66% | Regional: 61% | ||||||
Reservoirs: Barra Bonita (BB), Promissão (Pr), Nova Avanhandava (NA), and Três Irmãos (TI). Subcommunities: Cyanobacteria (Cyano), Particle-attached (PA), and Free-living (FL). Sampling names: May-2015 (D1), July-2015 (D2), September-2015 (D3), November-2015 (R1), January-2016 (R2), and March-2016 (R3). Ecological processes driving community’s variation are presented by sampling and between representations of reservoir in the order they are on cascade. Ecological processes: Homogenizing dispersion (HD), Dispersal limitation (DL); Drift (D), and Selection (S). Percentage of ecological processes for both seasons are indicated in “total” column for each subcommunity.