Literature DB >> 36060014

U(VI) binding onto electrospun polymers functionalized with phosphonate surfactants.

Nabil Shaikh1, Jiajie Qian2, Sewoon Kim2, Hoa Phan3, Juan S Lezama-Pacheco4, Abdul-Mehdi S Ali5, David M Cwiertny2, Tori Z Forbes3, Amanda J Haes3, José M Cerrato1.   

Abstract

We previously observed that phosphonate functionalized electrospun nanofibers can uptake U(VI), making them promising materials for sensing and water treatment applications. Here, we investigate the optimal fabrication of these materials and their mechanism of U(VI) binding under the influence of environmentally relevant ions (e.g., Ca2+ and CO 3 2 - ). We found that U(VI) uptake was greatest on polyacrylonitrile (PAN) functionalized with longer-chain phosphonate surfactants (e.g., hexa- and octadecyl phosphonate; HDPA and ODPA, respectively), which were better retained in the nanofiber after surface segregation. Subsequent uptake experiments to better understand specific solid-liquid interfacial interactions were carried out using 5 mg of HDPA-functionalized PAN mats with 10 μM U at pH 6.8 in four systems with different combinations of solutions containing 5 mM calcium (Ca2+) and 5 mM bicarbonate ( HCO 3 - ). U uptake was similar in control solutions containing no Ca2+ and HCO 3 - (resulting in 19 ± 3% U uptake), and in those containing only 5 mM Ca2+ (resulting in 20 ± 3% U uptake). A decrease in U uptake (10 ± 4% U uptake) was observed in experiments with HCO 3 - , indicating that UO2-CO3 complexes may increase uranium solubility. Results from shell-by-shell EXAFS fitting, aqueous extractions, and surface-enhanced Raman scattering (SERS) indicate that U is bound to phosphonate as a monodentate inner sphere surface complex to one of the hydroxyls in the phosphonate functional groups. New knowledge derived from this study on material fabrication and solid-liquid interfacial interactions will help to advance technologies for use in the in-situ detection and treatment of U in water.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Electrospun polymer; Phosphonate; Sensing; Spectroscopy; Uranium

Year:  2022        PMID: 36060014      PMCID: PMC9435318          DOI: 10.1016/j.jece.2022.108448

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Environ Chem Eng        ISSN: 2213-2929


  30 in total

1.  Elevated Concentrations of U and Co-occurring Metals in Abandoned Mine Wastes in a Northeastern Arizona Native American Community.

Authors:  Johanna M Blake; Sumant Avasarala; Kateryna Artyushkova; Abdul-Mehdi S Ali; Adrian J Brearley; Christopher Shuey; Wm Paul Robinson; Christopher Nez; Sadie Bill; Johnnye Lewis; Chris Hirani; Juan S Lezama Pacheco; José M Cerrato
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2015-07-09       Impact factor: 9.028

2.  A procedure for quantitation of total oxidized uranium for bioremediation studies.

Authors:  Dwayne A Elias; John M Senko; Lee R Krumholz
Journal:  J Microbiol Methods       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 2.363

3.  Extraction of oxidized and reduced forms of uranium from contaminated soils: effects of carbonate concentration and pH.

Authors:  Ping Zhou; Baohua Gu
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2005-06-15       Impact factor: 9.028

4.  Silica with immobilized phosphinic acid-derivative for uranium extraction.

Authors:  Tetyana M Budnyak; Alexander V Strizhak; Agnieszka Gładysz-Płaska; Dariusz Sternik; Igor V Komarov; Dorota Kołodyńska; Marek Majdan; Valentin А Tertykh
Journal:  J Hazard Mater       Date:  2016-04-22       Impact factor: 10.588

5.  Phosphate-Induced Immobilization of Uranium in Hanford Sediments.

Authors:  Zezhen Pan; Daniel E Giammar; Vrajesh Mehta; Lyndsay D Troyer; Jeffrey G Catalano; Zheming Wang
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2016-11-29       Impact factor: 9.028

6.  Functionalized polymer-iron oxide hybrid nanofibers: Electrospun filtration devices for metal oxyanion removal.

Authors:  Katherine T Peter; Adam J Johns; Nosang V Myung; David M Cwiertny
Journal:  Water Res       Date:  2017-04-04       Impact factor: 11.236

7.  Reactivity of As and U co-occurring in Mine Wastes in northeastern Arizona.

Authors:  Johanna M Blake; Sumant Avasarala; Abdul-Mehdi S Ali; Michael Spilde; Juan S Lezama-Pacheco; Drew Latta; Kateryna Artyushkova; Anastasia G Ilgen; Christopher Shuey; Christopher Nez; José M Cerrato
Journal:  Chem Geol       Date:  2019-05-20       Impact factor: 4.015

8.  Surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy for uranium detection and analysis in environmental samples.

Authors:  Chuanmin Ruan; Wensui Luo; Wei Wang; Baohua Gu
Journal:  Anal Chim Acta       Date:  2007-10-22       Impact factor: 6.558

9.  Uranium(VI) sorption complexes on silica in the presence of calcium and carbonate.

Authors:  Alaaeldine Sh Saleh; Jun-Yeop Lee; Yongheum Jo; Jong-Il Yun
Journal:  J Environ Radioact       Date:  2017-11-29       Impact factor: 2.674

10.  Use of spectroscopic techniques for uranium(VI)/montmorillonite interaction modeling.

Authors:  A Kowal-Fouchard; R Drot; E Simoni; J J Ehrhardt
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2004-03-01       Impact factor: 9.028

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.