| Literature DB >> 36059519 |
Tian Xia1, Huizhu Yang1, Yuyao Guo1, Tiantian Guo1, Lingxiang Xin2, Yanping Jiang1,3, Wen Cui1,3, Han Zhou1,3, Xinyuan Qiao1,3, Xiaona Wang1,3, Jiaxuan Li1,3, Zhifu Shan1,3, Lijie Tang1,3, Li Wang1,3, Yijing Li1,3.
Abstract
Dendritic cells (DCs) play a key role in the natural recognition of pathogens and subsequent activation of adaptive immune responses due to their potent antigen-presenting ability. Dendritic cell-targeting peptide (DCpep) is strongly targeted to DCs, which often express antigens, to enhance the efficacy of vaccines. Our previous study showed that recombinant Lactobacillus expressing human DCpep could significantly induce stronger immune responses than recombinant Lactobacillus without DCpep, but the mechanism remains unclear. In this study, the mechanism by which DCpep enhances the immune response against recombinant Lactobacillus was explored. Fluorescence-labeled human DCpep was synthesized to evaluate the binding ability of human DCpep to porcine monocyte-derived dendritic cells (Mo-DCs) and DCs of the small intestine. The effects of Mo-DC function induced by recombinant Lactobacillus expressing human DCpep fused with the porcine epidemic diarrhea virus (PEDV) core neutralizing epitope (COE) antigen were also investigated. The results showed that human DCpep bind to porcine DCs, but not to porcine small intestinal epithelial cells. Human DCpep can also improve the capture efficiency of recombinant Lactobacillus by Mo-DCs, promote the maturation of dendritic cells, secrete more cytokines, and enhance the ability of porcine DCs to activate T-cell proliferation. Taken together, these results promote advanced understanding of the mechanism by which DCpep enhances immune responses. We found that some DCpeps are conserved between humans and pigs, which provides a theoretical basis for the development of a DC-targeted vaccine.Entities:
Keywords: antigen-presenting; human dendritic cells-targeting peptide; porcine dendritic cells; porcine epidemic diarrhea virus; probiotic bacteria
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 36059519 PMCID: PMC9437479 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.950597
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Immunol ISSN: 1664-3224 Impact factor: 8.786
Details of the specific primer sequences used for qPCR experiments.
| Gene | Primer sequence (5′ -3′) | Accession number |
|---|---|---|
| β-actin | F-GGTGGGTATGGGTCAGAAAG | AF054837 |
| CD40 | F-CGTGCGGGGACTAACAAGA | AF248545 |
| CD80 | F-GAGTCCGAATATACTGGCAAAAGG | AF455811 |
| CD86 | F-GTGTGGGATGGTGTCCTTTGT | NM_214222.1 |
| TLR-2 | F-ACCATTCCCCAGCGTTTCT | NM_213761 |
| TLR-4 | F-ACCAGACTTTCTTGCAGTGGGTCA | NM_001113039 |
| TLR-6 | F-TCCCAGAATAGGATGCAGTGCCTT | NM_213760 |
| TLR-9 | F- ACCAGGGACAACCACCACTT | XM_005669564.3 |
| INF-γ | F-CGAAAAGCTGATTAAAATTCCGGTA | NM_213948.1 |
| IL-12 | F- TGGACCTCAGACCAGAGCAG | U08317 |
| IL-10 | F- GGAAGACGTAATGCCGAAGG | NM_214041 |
| IL-17 | F-CGGCTGGAGAAAGTGATGGT | AB102693 |
Figure 1Typical morphology and molecular phenotype of pig monocyte-derived dendritic cells (Mo-DCs). (A) Images showing the morphology of immature Mo-DCs (imMo-DCs) (Day 5) and mature Mo-DCs (mMo-DCs) (Day 6, imMo-DCs were treated with LPS for 24 h for maturation) using optical microscopy. Scale bars represent 100 μm. (B) ImMo-DCs and mMo-DCs stained with antibodies show the expression of MHC-II (green), CD172a (red), and nuclei stained with DAPI (blue). Scale bars represent 50 μm. (C) Representative images of flow cytometry gating for pig Mo-DCs. Surface marker abundance was expressed by % abundance for CD172a, MHC-II, CD80, and CD86 positive populations. Changes to the brightness, contrast, or color balance were applied to every pixel in the image by microscopy.
Figure 2The ability of FITC-labeled human DCpep to bind to pig Mo-DCs was analyzed using fluorescence microscopy and flow cytometry. Fluorescence (A) and flow cytometry (B) analyses of human DCpep binding to pig Mo-DCs. The human DCpep binding to DCs of the small intestine of healthy piglets was analyzed using fluorescence microscopy (C). The pig DCs expressing CD172a are shown in red. FITC-labeled peptides are shown in green. The nuclei stained with DAPI are shown in blue. Scale bars represent 100 μm. Changes to brightness, contrast, or color balance were applied to every pixel in the image by microscopy.
Figure 3The ability of Mo-DCs to recognize and capture recombinant Lactobacillus was evaluated using scanning electron microscopy and flow cytometry. (A) Scanning electron microscopy images showing the morphology of Mo-DCs capturing recombinant Lactobacillus at 10, 30, 60, 120 min. (B) Mo-DCs capturing recombinant Lactobacillus detected by flow cytometry. Mo-DC surface recombinant Lactobacillus abundance was expressed by % abundance for pPG/L393, pPG-COE/L393, and pPG-COE-DCpep/L393 positive populations.
Figure 4Marker expression of Mo-DCs (106 cells/ mL) stimulated by pPG/L393, pPG-COE/L393, pPG-COE-DCpep/L393, and LPS (2 µg/mL) assessed by relative qRT-PCR, recombinant Lactobacillus-incubated DCs at a ratio of 1:10 (DCs:recombinant Lactobacillus). Different letters (a vs. b, a vs. c, b vs. c) indicate significant differences (p < 0.01) at the same time point.
Figure 5Analysis of toll-like receptor (A) and cytokine (B) mRNA levels in Mo-DCs (106 cells/ mL) in response to pPG/L393, pPG-COE/L393, pPG-COE-DCpep/L393, and LPS (2 µg/mL) stimulation; recombinant Lactobacillus-incubated DCs at a ratio of 1:10 (DCs: recombinant Lactobacillus). Mo-DCs were stimulated by recombinant Lactobacillus and LPS for 6, 12, or 24 h. Unstimulated Mo-DCs were used as a control. Different letters (a vs. b, a vs. c, b vs. c) indicate significant differences (p < 0.01) at the same time point.
Figure 6Analysis of Mo-DCs treated with pPG/L393, pPG-COE/L393, pPG-COE-DCpep/L393, and LPS skew T cells toward different effector T cell profiles. (A) Mo-DCs treated with recombinant Lactobacillus and LPS stimulate the proliferation of T lymphocytes in mixed lymphocyte reaction (MLR). Responder cells were added at ratios of 1:1, 1:10, or 1:100 and co-cultured with the stimulated cells for 72 h. Proliferation is expressed as the Stimulation Index (SI) calculated using the formula: SI = (ODsample − ODstimulator cells only) / (ODresponder cells only − ODblank control). All experiments were performed at minimum in triplicate. Data are presented as mean ± SEM (n = 6 per group). (B) MoDCs were stimulated with recombinant Lactobacillus and LPS for 12 h, and then co-cultured with allogenic T cells at a ratio of 1:10. After 72 h, culture supernatants were collected and analyzed for cytokines by ELISA. Different letters (a vs. b, a vs. c, b vs. c) indicate significant differences (p < 0.01) at the same time point.