| Literature DB >> 36059447 |
Jiajin Chen1, Xi Gao2, Sipeng Shen1, Jingyuan Xu3, Zhe Sun1, Ruilang Lin1, Zhixiang Dai1, Li Su4, David C Christiani4, Feng Chen1, Ruyang Zhang1, Yongyue Wei1.
Abstract
Objective: Platelet (PLT) engages in immune and inflammatory responses, all of which are related to the prognosis of critically ill patients. Although thrombocytopenia at ICU admission contributes to in-hospital mortality, PLT is repeatedly measured during ICU hospitalization and the role of longitudinal PLT trajectory remains unclear. We aimed to identify dynamic PLT trajectory patterns and evaluate their relationships with mortality risk and thrombocytopenia.Entities:
Keywords: critical care; immunity; inflammation; longitudinal trajectory; multi-cohort; platelet count; prognosis
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 36059447 PMCID: PMC9437551 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.936662
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Immunol ISSN: 1664-3224 Impact factor: 8.786
Figure 1Trajectory plot and Kaplan–Meier survival curves of patients with three dynamic platelet count trajectory patterns. (A, B) Trajectory plot of platelet count changes within the first four days after ICU admission in eICU-CRD and MIMIC-IV databases. (C, D) Kaplan–Meier curves of 28-day overall survival for patients with three different dynamic platelet count trajectory patterns in the eICU-CRD and MIMIC-IV databases.
Sensitivity analyses for association between platelet count trajectories and 28-day overall survival.
| Model | Cluster | eICU-CRD | MIMIC-IV | Meta | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 95% CI |
|
| 95% CI |
|
| 95% CI |
| ||
| Model1 | Ascending | Reference | Reference | Reference | ||||||
| Stable | 1.44 | (1.30–1.61) | 1.85 × 10−11 | 1.61 | (1.39–1.87) | 2.25 × 10−10 | 1.50 | (1.37–1.63) | 8.89 × 10−20 | |
| Descending | 2.33 | (2.05–2.65) | 4.94 × 10−38 | 2.81 | (2.33–3.38) | 2.01 × 10−27 | 2.48 | (2.23–2.75) | 1.93 × 10−63 | |
| Model2 | Ascending | Reference | Reference | Reference | ||||||
| Stable | 1.29 | (1.15–1.44) | 9.64 × 10−6 | 1.58 | (1.36–1.83) | 1.36 × 10−9 | 1.39 | (1.27–1.52) | 6.68 × 10−13 | |
| Descending | 1.67 | (1.45–1.91) | 2.26 × 10−13 | 2.00 | (1.65–2.42) | 1.12 × 10−12 | 1.78 | (1.59–1.99) | 7.86 × 10−24 | |
| Model3 | Ascending | Reference | Reference | Reference | ||||||
| Stable | 1.28 | (1.14–1.43) | 4.17 × 10−5 | 1.45 | (1.25–1.69) | 1.17 × 10−6 | 1.35 | (1.23–1.48) | 1.22 × 10−10 | |
| Descending | 1.61 | (1.39–1.86) | 8.23 × 10−11 | 1.78 | (1.47–2.17) | 7.59 × 10−9 | 1.67 | (1.49–1.88) | 7.41 × 10−18 | |
| Model4 | Ascending | Reference | Reference | Reference | ||||||
| Stable | 1.28 | (1.13–1.45) | 1.10 × 10−4 | 1.33 | (1.14-1.56) | 3.35 × 10−4 | 1.30 | (1.18–1.43) | 1.47 × 10−7 | |
| Descending | 1.66 | (1.42–1.94) | 1.07 × 10−10 | 1.72 | (1.40–2.12) | 2.20 × 10−7 | 1.68 | (1.48–1.90) | 3.14 × 10−16 | |
| Model5 | Ascending | Reference | Reference | Reference | ||||||
| Stable | 1.24 | (1.10–1.41) | 6.03 × 10−4 | 1.28 | (1.10–1.50) | 2.01 × 10−3 | 1.26 | (1.14–1.38) | 6.15 × 10−6 | |
| Descending | 1.61 | (1.38–1.88) | 1.25 × 10−9 | 1.58 | (1.29–1.94) | 1.35 × 10−5 | 1.60 | (1.41–1.81) | 8.26 × 10−14 | |
| ModelPS | Ascending | Reference | Reference | Reference | ||||||
| Stable | 1.24 | (1.09–1.40) | 8.95 × 10−4 | 1.28 | (1.09–1.50) | 2.01 × 10−3 | 1.26 | (1.14–1.38) | 6.15 × 10−6 | |
| Descending | 1.59 | (1.36–1.84) | 3.36 × 10−9 | 1.57 | (1.28–1.93) | 1.54 × 10−5 | 1.58 | (1.40–1.79) | 1.41 × 10−13 | |
Model1: adjusted for age, gender, ethnicity, baseline platelet count, antiplatelet treatment, platelet transfusion, transfusion amount, malignancies, hematologic diseases, immune therapy, thrombotic diseases, and thromboinflammatory diseases.
Model2: additionally adjusted for first ICU location, ARDS, sepsis, SOFA, APS-III, and supports within 24 h (mechanical ventilation, vasopressor, and dialysis) upon model1.
Model3: additionally adjusted for differential vital signs upon model2.
Model4: additionally adjusted for differential laboratory results upon model3.
Model5: additionally adjusted for differential comorbidities upon model4.
ModelPS: adjusted for all aforementioned covariates using the propensity score (PS) method.
Figure 2Forest plots of stratified associations between platelet count trajectory patterns and 28-day survival of ICU patients. Meta-analysis was conducted to pool the results from the eICU-CRD and MIMIC-IV databases. The effects across strata were tested using heterogeneity test.
Figure 3Causal mediation analysis for platelet count dynamic trajectory, thrombocytopenia, and 28-day survival. (A) Mediation model for the effect of platelet count dynamic trajectory on 28-day survival through thrombocytopenia. (B) Results are described as average causal mediated effect (indirect hazard ratio), 95% confidence interval and the proportion of effect mediated (M%).
Figure 4Mortality-GRID and validation in the MEARDS database. (A) Mortality-GRID. Patients with no change in platelet count per day were set as the reference group, the values in each cell represent hazard ratios of platelet count changes per day derived from restricted cubic spline regression. (B) Consistency between mortality risks estimated by Mortality-GRID and MEARDS database presented by scatter plot. (C) Estimated survival curves for patients in the MEARDS database. The mortality risks of MEARDS patients were independently predicted by Mortality-GRID and categorized into low-, medium-, and high-risk groups using the tertiles.