Hailong He1,2, Hao Song1,2, Xiaodie Meng1,2, Kai Cao1, Yi-Xin Liu1,2, Jinda Wang1,2, Xiuhua Wan1,2, Zi-Bing Jin3,4. 1. Beijing Institute of Ophthalmology, Beijing Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100005, China. 2. Beijing Tongren Eye Center, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100005, China. 3. Beijing Institute of Ophthalmology, Beijing Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100005, China. jinzibing@foxmail.com. 4. Beijing Tongren Eye Center, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100005, China. jinzibing@foxmail.com.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Cataract extraction could improve visual acuity (VA) for patients with retinitis pigmentosa (RP), while the surgery may increase photoreceptor degeneration through light damage. In this study, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate the effectiveness and prediction of VA after cataract surgery in patients with RP. METHODS: We comprehensively extracted data from literature of available studies with quality control processing. Improvement of VA before and after cataract surgery of different durations of follow-up and different structural integrity of the preoperative macular ellipsoid zone (EZ) in patients with RP were compared. VA was measured by the logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR). RESULTS: Sixteen studies were subjected to analysis. Postoperative VA was significantly improved versus preoperative, with a mean difference (MD) of 0.57 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.45, 0.69], and a fixed-effect model was applied during follow-up durations of 1 day to 1 month (I2 = 0%). Similarly, for follow-up durations of 1-3 months, 3-6 months, and 6-12 months, postoperative VAs were all better than preoperative values, with MDs of 0.36 (95% CI 0.31, 0.41), 0.35 (95% CI 0.23, 0.46), and 0.22 (95% CI 0.14, 0.30) (I2 < 50%). For follow-up duration of 1-5 years, the random-effect model was applied for higher heterogeneity (I2 = 81%), with an MD of 0.26 (95% CI 0.09, 0.43). There was no significant difference in the improvement of the EZ-invisible group, with an MD of 0.27 (95% CI - 0.17, 0.70) (I2 = 82%). There were significant differences between EZ-abnormal and EZ-normal groups in preoperative and postoperative VA, with MDs of 0.56 (95% CI 0.27, 0.85) and 0.46 (95% CI 0.27, 0.65) (I2 > 50%). CONCLUSIONS: Cataract surgery could improve VA for patients with RP during long-term follow-up, and the surgery is not recommended for patients with invisible preoperative macular EZ. However, further studies are required to address the problem of excessive light exposure to the degenerated retina in patients with RP with the cataract removed. The study protocol was registered on the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) (CRD42022340165).
INTRODUCTION: Cataract extraction could improve visual acuity (VA) for patients with retinitis pigmentosa (RP), while the surgery may increase photoreceptor degeneration through light damage. In this study, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate the effectiveness and prediction of VA after cataract surgery in patients with RP. METHODS: We comprehensively extracted data from literature of available studies with quality control processing. Improvement of VA before and after cataract surgery of different durations of follow-up and different structural integrity of the preoperative macular ellipsoid zone (EZ) in patients with RP were compared. VA was measured by the logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR). RESULTS: Sixteen studies were subjected to analysis. Postoperative VA was significantly improved versus preoperative, with a mean difference (MD) of 0.57 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.45, 0.69], and a fixed-effect model was applied during follow-up durations of 1 day to 1 month (I2 = 0%). Similarly, for follow-up durations of 1-3 months, 3-6 months, and 6-12 months, postoperative VAs were all better than preoperative values, with MDs of 0.36 (95% CI 0.31, 0.41), 0.35 (95% CI 0.23, 0.46), and 0.22 (95% CI 0.14, 0.30) (I2 < 50%). For follow-up duration of 1-5 years, the random-effect model was applied for higher heterogeneity (I2 = 81%), with an MD of 0.26 (95% CI 0.09, 0.43). There was no significant difference in the improvement of the EZ-invisible group, with an MD of 0.27 (95% CI - 0.17, 0.70) (I2 = 82%). There were significant differences between EZ-abnormal and EZ-normal groups in preoperative and postoperative VA, with MDs of 0.56 (95% CI 0.27, 0.85) and 0.46 (95% CI 0.27, 0.65) (I2 > 50%). CONCLUSIONS: Cataract surgery could improve VA for patients with RP during long-term follow-up, and the surgery is not recommended for patients with invisible preoperative macular EZ. However, further studies are required to address the problem of excessive light exposure to the degenerated retina in patients with RP with the cataract removed. The study protocol was registered on the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) (CRD42022340165).
Authors: Sanne K Verbakel; Ramon A C van Huet; Camiel J F Boon; Anneke I den Hollander; Rob W J Collin; Caroline C W Klaver; Carel B Hoyng; Ronald Roepman; B Jeroen Klevering Journal: Prog Retin Eye Res Date: 2018-03-27 Impact factor: 21.198
Authors: Artur V Cideciyan; Samuel G Jacobson; Tomas S Aleman; Danian Gu; Susan E Pearce-Kelling; Alexander Sumaroka; Gregory M Acland; Gustavo D Aguirre Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2005-03-22 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Inmaculada Martin-Merida; Almudena Avila-Fernandez; Marta Del Pozo-Valero; Fiona Blanco-Kelly; Olga Zurita; Raquel Perez-Carro; Domingo Aguilera-Garcia; Rosa Riveiro-Alvarez; Ana Arteche; Maria Jose Trujillo-Tiebas; Saoud Tahsin-Swafiri; Elvira Rodriguez-Pinilla; Isabel Lorda-Sanchez; Blanca Garcia-Sandoval; Marta Corton; Carmen Ayuso Journal: Ophthalmology Date: 2019-03-20 Impact factor: 12.079
Authors: Gerald Liew; Stacey Strong; Patrick Bradley; Philip Severn; Anthony T Moore; Andrew R Webster; Paul Mitchell; Annette Kifley; Michel Michaelides Journal: Br J Ophthalmol Date: 2018-10-05 Impact factor: 4.638
Authors: Matthew J Page; Joanne E McKenzie; Patrick M Bossuyt; Isabelle Boutron; Tammy C Hoffmann; Cynthia D Mulrow; Larissa Shamseer; Jennifer M Tetzlaff; Elie A Akl; Sue E Brennan; Roger Chou; Julie Glanville; Jeremy M Grimshaw; Asbjørn Hróbjartsson; Manoj M Lalu; Tianjing Li; Elizabeth W Loder; Evan Mayo-Wilson; Steve McDonald; Luke A McGuinness; Lesley A Stewart; James Thomas; Andrea C Tricco; Vivian A Welch; Penny Whiting; David Moher Journal: BMJ Date: 2021-03-29