| Literature DB >> 36057610 |
Xiao-Li Wang1, Jin-Jie Zhou1, Sheng Liu1, Ya-Qin Sun1, Zhi-Long Xiu2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Climate change caused by greenhouse gas emission has become a global hot topic. Although biotechnology is considered as an environmentally friendly method to produce chemicals, almost all biochemicals face carbon dioxide emission from inevitable respiration and energy metabolism of most microorganisms. To cater for the broad prospect of biochemicals, bioprocess optimization of diverse valuable products is becoming increasingly important for environmental sustainability and cleaner production. Based on Ca(OH)2 as a CO2 capture agent and pH regulator, a bioprocess was proposed for co-production of 1,3-propanediol (1,3-PDO), biohydrogen and micro-nano CaCO3 by Clostridium butyricum DL07.Entities:
Keywords: 1,3-Propanediol; CO2 capture; Green hydrogen; Micro-nano-CaCO3; Waste glycerol
Year: 2022 PMID: 36057610 PMCID: PMC9440576 DOI: 10.1186/s13068-022-02190-2
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biotechnol Biofuels Bioprod ISSN: 2731-3654
Production of some industrial biochemicals by microbial fermentation in major relevant countries and induced CO2 production in the fermentation
| Biochemicals | Production capacity (tons/a year) | Major production Country | induced CO2 production (tons/a year) | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bioethanol | 88 million | USA, Brazil &China | 84.2 million | [ |
| 1,3-Propanediol | 63,000 | USA | 118,030 | [ |
| 1,4-Butanediol | 105,000 | USA, Germany & Italy | 13,310 | [ |
| Butanol | 21,460 | China | 25,480 | [ |
Fig. 1Profit of products using NaOH (a, b) or/and Ca(OH)2 (c, d) as the CO2 capture agent and pH regulator. 5 M NaOH was employed in a and b, where a was flushed with nitrogen gas for 1 h before and after inoculation and b with continuous nitrogen gas flushing throughout the fermentation; 5 M Ca(OH)2 suspension was used in under similar nitrogen gas flushing conditions with a; 5 M NaOH and 5 M Ca(OH)2 suspension were used in d under similar nitrogen gas flushing conditions with a
Fed-batch fermentation using different CO2 capture agent and pH regulator
| pH regulator | Fermentation | 1,3-PDO (g/L) | Butyrate (g/L) | Acetate (g/L) | Lactate (g/L) | Q1,3-PDO (g/L/h) | Yield (g 1,3-PDO/g gly) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5M NaOHa | 30 | 85.1 ± 1.2 | 14.5 ± 0.2 | 9.63 ± 0.1 | 1.32 ± 0.0 | 2.84 | 0.504 |
| 5M Ca(OH)2a | 16 | 88.6 ± 0.3 | 15.7 ± 0.1 | 9.42 ± 0.1 | 2.91 ± 0.1 | 5.52 | 0.486 |
| 2.5M Ca(OH)2a | 16 | 81.1 ± 1.1 | 15.0 ± 0.4 | 8.63 ± 0.1 | 2.55 ± 0.1 | 5.14 | 0.481 |
| 1.5M Ca(OH)2a | 19 | 76.3 ± 1.3 | 14.2 ± 0.4 | 8.15 ± 0.0 | 2.21 ± 0.0 | 4.09 | 0.483 |
| 5M Ca(OH)2b | 16 | 88.3 ± 0.5 | 15.8 ± 0.5 | 9.34 ± 0.2 | 3.03 ± 0.1 | 5.51 | 0.485 |
| 5M Ca(OH)2c | 16 | 84.5 ± 0.9 | 15.2 ± 0.4 | 9.01 ± 0.3 | 2.82 ± 0.0 | 5.28 | 0.483 |
| NaOH & Ca(OH)2a | 17 | 84.4 ± 0.6 | 14.2 ± 0.3 | 9.81 ± 0.1 | 1.17 ± 0.0 | 4.96 | 0.506 |
Stirring speed: a250 rpm; b350 rpm; c150 rpm
1,3-PDO production by natural 1,3-PDO producers from glycerol in fed-batch fermentation
| Microorganism | Titer (g/L) | Yield (g/g) | Overall productivity (g/L/h) | pH regulator | Refs. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 80.1 | 0.44 | 2.22 | NaOH | [ | |
| 71.4 | 0.49 | 2.24 | NaOH | [ | |
| 65.3 | 0.46 | 1.36 | KOH | [ | |
| 67.9 | 0.55 | 0.78 | NaOH | [ | |
| 50.5 | 0.47 | 1.80 | NaOH | [ | |
| 59.2 | 0.53 | 2.11 | NaOH | [ | |
| 66.2 | 0.51 | 1.38 | NaOH | [ | |
| 81.2 | 0.49 | 4.27 | Ammonia | [ | |
| 68.1 | 0.40 | 0.79 | NaOH | [ | |
| 47.2 | 0.38 | 0.73 | NaOH | [ | |
| a | 52.3 | 0.51 | 1.09 | Ammonia | [ |
| Mixed culture | 70.0 | 0.56 | 2.60 | NaOH | [ |
| Microbial consortium C2-2 M | 82.7 | 0.54 | 3.06 | NaOH | [ |
| Microbial consortium CJD-S | 41.5 | 0.34 | 1.15 | NaOH | [ |
| 85.1 | 0.50 | 2.84 | NaOH | This study | |
| 88.6 | 0.49 | 5.54 | Ca(OH)2 | ||
| 84.4 | 0.51 | 4.96 | NaOH & Ca(OH)2 |
aGlycerol and xylose as co-substrate
Fig. 2SEM images of precipitations produced during fermentation at different Ca(OH)2 concentrations and stirring speeds
Fig. 3EDS and SEM images of pure CaCO3 and precipitations collected in the fermentation
Fig. 4Ratio of H2 to CO2 and H2 production in the fermentation with different concentrations of CO2 capture agent
Fig. 5Conductivities of fermentation broths under different CO2 capture scenarios. NaOH represents 5 M NaOH solution; Ca(OH)2 represents 5 M Ca(OH)2 suspension; In the ammonium hydroxide group, ammonium hydroxide acted as an inorganic nitrogen source and, otherwise, (NH4)2SO4 acted as an inorganic nitrogen source
Ions concentration of fermentation broth using different CO2 capture agents and pH regulators
| Ions (mg/L) | A | B | C | D |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cl− | 221.65 | 169.50 | 190.40 | 171.42 |
| SO42− | 3268.58 | 539.96 | 14.28 | 3.57 |
| PO43− | 423.68 | 0.00 | 403.42 | 0.00 |
| Na+ | 13,043.60 | 38.61 | 10,865.96 | 47.55 |
| K+ | 453.91 | 446.88 | 454.60 | 451.85 |
| NH4+ | 0.00 | 0.00 | 3.62 | 5.91 |
| Ca2+ | 64.74 | 6308.75 | 90.00 | 5658.55 |
A and C represent 5 M NaOH as the CO2 capture agent and pH regulator; B and D represent 5 M Ca(OH)2 as the CO2 capture agent and pH regulator; (NH4)2 SO4 was supplemented into the medium of A and C; Ammonium hydroxide was added in B and D group during the fermentation